Advertisement

Diagnosis and Therapy of Interregional Feedback Effects

  • Takeo Ihara
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Economists have long been interested in measuring the total impact on employment, income, and output resulting from a given change in investment. One of the more useful analytical techniques developed by J. M. Keynes, based on the earlier work of R. S. Kahn, was that of the multiplier. In the The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Keynes (1936) wrote as follows:

in a given circumstances a definite ratio, to be called the Multiplier, can be established between income and investment and, subject to certain simplifications, between the total employment and the employment directly employed on investment (which we shall call the primary employment).

Keywords

Final Demand Indirect Route Input Coefficient Matrix Multiplier Regional Science Association 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bourque, P. J. and M. Cox. 1970. “An inventory of regional input-output studies in the United States,” Mimeo, University of Washington, Graduate School of Business Administration, Seattle.Google Scholar
  2. Chenery, H. B. 1954. “Interregional and international input-output analysis.” In T. Barna ed. The Structure Interdependence of the Economy: Proceedings of an International Conference on Input-Output Analysis, Giuffre, Milano.Google Scholar
  3. Giarrantani, F., J. D. Maddy and C. F. Socher. 1976. Regional and Interregional Input-Output Analysis: An Annotated Bibliography. Morgantown, West Virginia University Library.Google Scholar
  4. Hewings, G.J.D. and R.C. Jensen. 1986. “Regional, interregional and multiregional input-output analysis.” In P. Nijkamp and E.S. Mills (eds.) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, Vol. 1. Amsterdam, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  5. Hirsch, W.Z. 1959. “Interindustry relations of a metropolitan area.” Review of Economics and Statistics 41, 360–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ihara, T. 1993. “Some extensions of interregional input-output analysis.” In H. Kohno and P. Nijkamp eds. Potentials and Bottlenecks in Spatial Development. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  7. Isard, W. 1951. “Interregional input-output analysis: a model of a space economy.” Review of Economics and Statistics 33, 318–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Isard, W. and R.E. Kuenne. 1953. “The impact of steel upon the Greater New York-Philadelphia industrial region.” Review of Economics and Statistics 35, 289–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Isard, W. 1960. Methods of Regional Analysis: An Introduction to Regional Science. Cambridge, MIT and Wiley.Google Scholar
  10. Keynes, J. M. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money. London, Macmillan.Google Scholar
  11. Leontief, W. 1936. “Quantitative input-output relations in the economic system of the United States.” Review of Economics and Statistics 18, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leontief, W. 1941. The Structure of American Economy: 1919–1929. Oxford, University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Miernyk, W.H. 1965. The Elements of Input-Output Analysis. New York, Random House.Google Scholar
  14. Miller, R.E. 1957. “The impact of the aluminum industry on the Pacific North-west: a regional input-output analysis.” Review of Economics and Statistics 39, 200–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Miller, R.E. and P.D. Blair. 1985. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Englewood Hills, NJ., Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  16. Miyazawa, Ken’ichi. 1976. Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, Volume 116. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  17. Moore, F.J. and J.W. Petersen. 1955. “Regional analysis: an interindustry model of Utah.” Review of Economics and Statistics 37, 368–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Moses, L.M. 1955. “The stability of interregional trading patterns and input-output analysis,” American Economic Review 45, 803–832.Google Scholar
  19. Richardson, H.W. 1979. Regional Economics. Urbana, University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  20. Yamada, H. and T. lhara. 1969. “Input-output analysis of interregional repercussion.” Papers and Proceedings of the Third Far East Conference of the Regional Science Association 3, 3–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Takeo Ihara
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of EconomicsKagawa UniversityTakamatsu, Kagawa 760Japan

Personalised recommendations