Decentralization and Income Distribution in the Inter-Regional Indonesian Economy

  • Budy P. Resosudarmo
  • Luky Eko Wuryanto
  • Geoffrey J. Hewings
  • Lindsay Saunders
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


There is an extensive literature that is focused on analytical issues related to income distribution and economic development in developing economies. Two of the more popular approaches have based analysis on the use of social accounting systems and computable general equilibrium models, with the latter models essentially embracing social accounting systems but within a more extensive, economy-wide formulation. The major attraction for these approaches is the essential synergism between the structure of production and the structure of income distribution. In this chapter, this synergism is extended to include the additional dimension of space. Miyazawa’s (1966) notions of internal and external multipliers can be extended to a broader analytical scheme in which more extensive feedback mechanisms are explored, in this case through an elaboration of the interregional social accounting system into an interregional computable general equilibrium model.


Gross Domestic Product Income Distribution Computable General Equilibrium Policy Scenario Computable General Equilibrium Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Carter, A.P. 1970. Structural Change in the American Economy. Cambridge, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Defourny, J. and E. Thorbecke. 1984. “Structural path analysis and multiplier decomposition within a social accounting framework.” Economic Journal 94, 111–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feldman, S.J., D. McClain, and K. Palmer. 1987. “Sources of structural change in the United States 1963–1978: an input-output perspective.” Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 503–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hewings, G.J.D. 1982. “Regional and interregional interdependencies alternative accounting systems.” Environment and Planning 4, 1587–1600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hewings, G.J.D. 1983. “Design of appropriate accounting systems for regional development in developing countries.” Papers of the Regional Science Association 51, 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hewings, G.J.D. 1996. “A review, evaluation, and strategy for regional and interregional modeling in Indonesia.” Discussion Paper 96-P-2, Regional Economics Applications Laboratory, University of Illinois, Urbana.Google Scholar
  7. Hewings, G.J.D., P.R. Israilevich, M. Sonis and G. Schindler. 1998. “The hollowing out process in the Chicago economy, 1975–2011.” Geographical Analysis 30, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hidayat, T. 1991a. The Construction of Two-Region Social Accounting Matrix for Indonesia and Its Application to Some Equity Issues. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  9. Hidayat, T. 1991b. “An interregional social accounting matrix for Indonesia: theoretical background and construction.” Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia 39, 335–357.Google Scholar
  10. Hirschman, A. 1958. The Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hulu, E. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1993. “The development and use of interregional input-output models for Indonesia under conditions of limited information.” Review of Regional Development Studies 5, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan, H.A. and E. Thorbecke. 1988. Macroeconomic Effects and Diffusion of Alternative Technologies within a Social Accounting Matrix Framework. Aldershot, Gower.Google Scholar
  13. Kim, T.J., Knaap, G., Azis, I.J. Eds. 1992. Spatial Development in Indonesia: Review and Prospects. London, Avebury.Google Scholar
  14. Miyazawa, K. 1966. “Internal and external matrix multipliers in the input-output model.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 7, 38–55.Google Scholar
  15. Miyazawa, K. 1976. Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Pyatt and J.I. Round. 1979. “Accounting and fixed price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework.” Economic Journal 89, 850–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Rasmussen, P. 1956. Studies in Inter-Sectoral Relations. Copenhagen, Einar Harks.Google Scholar
  18. Round, J.I. 1985. “Decomposing multipliers for economic systems involving regional and world trade.” Economic Journal 95, 383–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Round, J.I. 1988. “Incorporating the, international, regional and spatial dimension into a SAM: some methods and applications.” In F.J. Harrigan and P.G. McGregor eds. Recent Advances in Regional Economic Modeling. London, Pion.Google Scholar
  20. Sonis, M. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1988. “Superposition and decomposition principles in hierarchical social accounting and input-output analysis.” In F.J. Harrigan and P.G. McGregor eds. Recent Advances in Regional Economic Modelling. London, Pion, pp. 46–65.Google Scholar
  21. Sonis, M. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1990. “The `Matrioshka Principle’ in the hierarchical decomposition of multiregional social accounting systems.” In L. Anselin and M. Madden eds. New Directions in Regional Analysis: Integrated and Multiregional Approaches. London, Pinter.Google Scholar
  22. Sonis, M., and G.J.D. Hewings. 1992. “Coefficient change in input-output models: theory and applications.” Economic Systems Research 4, 143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sonis, M. and G.J.D. Hewings. 1993. “Hierarchies of regional sub-structures and their multipliers within input-output systems: Miyazawa revisited.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 34, 33–44.Google Scholar
  24. Sonis, M., G.J.D. Hewings, J. Guo. 1996. “Sources of structural change in input-output systems: a field of influence approach.” Economic Systems Research 8, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sonis, M, G.J.D. Hewings, J. Guo, E. Hulu. 1997a. “Interpreting spatial economic structure: feedback loops in the Indonesian economy, 1980, 1985.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 27, 325–342 Google Scholar
  26. Sonis, M., G.J.D. Hewings and S. Sulistyowati. 1997b. “Block structural path analysis: applications to structural changes in the Indonesian economy.” Economic Systems Research 9, 265–280. Google Scholar
  27. Sundrum, R.M. 1986. “Indonesia’s rapid economic growth, 1968–81.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 22, 40–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sundrum, R.M. 1988. “Indonesia’s slow economic growth, 1981–1986.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 24, 37–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Temenggung, Y.A. 1995. An Inter-Regional Computable General Equilibrium Model for Indonesia: Measuring the Regional Economic Consequences of National Tax Policy. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University. Google Scholar
  30. Thorbecke, E. 1992. Adjustment and Equity in Indonesia. Paris: OECD Publication. Wuryanto, L.E. 1996. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Performance in Indonesia:An Inter-regional Computable General Equilibrium Approach. Unpublished Ph.D.dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Budy P. Resosudarmo
    • 1
  • Luky Eko Wuryanto
    • 2
  • Geoffrey J. Hewings
    • 3
  • Lindsay Saunders
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyUniversity of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  2. 2.BappenasJakartaIndonesia
  3. 3.Regional Economics Applications LaboratoryUniversity of IllinoisUrbanaUSA
  4. 4.SW Development LtdChristchurchNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations