Spatial and Sectoral Income Distribution Effects in an Interindustry-Econometric Framework: The Case of Queensland

  • Guy R. West
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)


Queensland is a very diversified and decentralized state, ranging from a very arid and sparsely populated inland to densely populated temperate zones in the south-east to tropical rainforest areas in the north. Renowned as “The Sunshine State”, with its images of mild climate and pristine beaches stretching for miles, it is often the envy of residents in the “rust-belt” areas of southern New South Wales and Victoria. Unfortunately, its economic performance has not always lived up to the same reputation. High levels of unemployment Australia-wide have seen increased migration from retirees (often forced) and the “structurally” unemployed into Queensland from the southern States. If one has to live on the dole, one might as well do it in comfort.


Income Distribution Total Household Income Wage Income Central Coast Gross Regional Product 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Armstrong, H. and J. Taylor. 1993. Regional Economics and Policy. New York, Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  2. Denison, E.F. 1954 “Income types and the size distribution.” American Economic Review 44, 254–269.Google Scholar
  3. Dewhurst, J.H.L. and G.R.West. 1989. “Closing interregional input-output models with econometrically determined relationships.” Paper presented to the Regional Science Association 29th European Congress, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  4. Golladay, F. and R. Haveman. 1976. “Regional and distributional effects of a negative income tax.” American Economic Review 66, 629–641.Google Scholar
  5. Miernyk, W.H., E.R. Bonner, J.H. Chapman, Jr., and K. Shellhamer. 1967. Impact of the Space Program on a Local Economy: An Input-Output Analysis. Morgantown, West Virginia University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Miyazawa, K. 1968 “Input-output analysis and interrelational income multipliers as a matrix.” Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics 18, 39–58.Google Scholar
  7. Miyazawa, K. 1976 Input-Output Analysis and the Structure of Income Distribution. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Rose, A.Z., B.H. Stevens, and G.E. Davis. 1988. Natural Resource Policy and Income Distribution. Baltimore, John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  9. West, G.R. 1991 “A Queensland input-output econometric model: an overview.” Australian Economic Papers 30, 221–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. West, G.R. 1994. “The Queensland impact and projection model: the household sector.” Economic Systems Research 6, 363–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. West, G.R. and R.C. Jensen. 1989. “An economic planning model for the state and regions of Queensland.” Paper presented to the 11th Pacific Regional Science Conference Organisation, Singapore.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guy R. West
    • 1
  1. 1.Regional and Urban Economics Research Unit, Department of EconomicsUniversity of QueenslandBrisbaneAustralia

Personalised recommendations