Advertisement

Comparing Western and Japanese Industrial Purchasing Linkages

  • Philip McCann
Chapter
  • 107 Downloads
Part of the Advances in Spatial Science book series (ADVSPATIAL)

Abstract

Western industrial purchasing management techniques all originated in the mass-production system, and herein lies the basic fundamental difference between the Western and Japanese philosophies. The Western purchasing philosophy is historically based purely on the question of the minimisation of the delivered price of a product. For a particular input, businesses will buy inputs from whichever is perceived to be the cheapest source, wherever they happen to be located in the world, as long as the input product meets the minimum quality requirements. The relationship between a customer and a supplier is necessarily purely a short-term monetary one, and for this reason, firms will traditionally have multiple potential suppliers, who will then compete for business on a continuous-tendering basis. The issue of the location of a supplier is only important in as much as the source price of a product must fall by a sufficient amount as the delivery distance between a firm and its supplier increases, in order to ensure that the delivered price of the product is lower than for other suppliers at other locations.

Keywords

Linkage Length Linkage Pattern Kanban System Japanese Industry Purchasing Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asanuma B.(1985 a) “The Organization of Parts Purchases in the Japanese Automotive Industry.” Japanese Economic Studies. Vol.13 No.4 pp32–53.Google Scholar
  2. Asanuma B. (1985 b) “The Contractual’ Framework for Parts Supply in the Japanese Automotive Industry.” Japanese Economic Studies. Vol.13 No.4 pp54–77.Google Scholar
  3. Baster J. (1980) “Stability of Trade Patterns in Regional Input-Output Tables.” Urban Studies Vol. 17 pp. 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bloomfield G.T. (1981) “The Changing Spatial Organisation of Multinational Corporations in the World Automotive Industry.” In F.E.I. Hamilton and G.J.R. Linge (eds.) Spatial Analysis, Industry and Industrial Environment Vol.!! International Industrial Systems. John Wiley and Sons. Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  5. Clark R. (1979) The Japanese Company. Yale University Press. New Haven.Google Scholar
  6. Glasmier A. (1988) “Factors Governing the Development of High Tech Agglomerations: A Tale of Three Cities.” Regional Studies Vol.22.4 pp.287–301.Google Scholar
  7. Hague D.C. and Dunning J.H. (1952) Costs in Alternative Locations. NIERS National Institute of Economic and Social Research, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  8. Hoare A.G. “Linkage flows, locational evaluation and industrial geography.” Environment and Planning A 1975 Vol.7 pp.241–58.Google Scholar
  9. Horsley W. and Buckley R. (1990) Nippon New Superpower. Japan since 1945. BBC Books London.Google Scholar
  10. Ikeda M. (1979) “The Subcontracting System in the Japanese Electronics Industry.” Engineering Industries of Japan No. 19 pp. 43–71.Google Scholar
  11. ILAG (1973) Inquiry into Location Attitudes Group. Report in Minutes of Evidence to the Trade and Industry Subcommittee on Regional Development Incentives Select Committee on Expenditure. H.C.327. Session 1972–1973.Google Scholar
  12. Isard W. and Dacey M. (1962) “On the projection of individual behaviour in regional analysis.” Journal of Regional Science Vo.4 No.1 p.12.Google Scholar
  13. Itoh Y. (1978) “The Upbringing of Toyota’s Suppliers”. Papers from the International Conference of Quality Control. Joseph Juran (ed.) Tokyo.Google Scholar
  14. James B.G.S. (1964) “The incompatibility of industrial and trading cultures.” Journal of Industrial Economics Vol. 13 pp. 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Knibb B. (1989) “Toyota Comes to Derby…Are We Ready?” Enterprise. June pp.10–14. Kobayashi Y. (1983) “Quality Control in Japan: The Case of Fuji Xerox.” Japanese Economic Studies Spring Vol. XI No. 3 pp. 75–104.Google Scholar
  16. Latham W.R. (1976) Locational behaviour in Manufacturing Industries. Martinus Nijhoff Social Sciences, Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lever W.F. (1972) “Industrial movement, spatial association and functional linkages.” Regional Studies Vol. 6 pp. 371–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lever W.F. (1974) “Manufacturing Linkages and the Search for Suppliers.” In F.E.I. Hamilton (ed.) Spatial Perspectives on Industrial Organization and Decision-Making. John Wiley and Sons Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  19. Luttrell W.F. (1962) Factory Location and Industrial Movement. NIESR National Institute of Economic and Social Research, London.Google Scholar
  20. Marshall J.N. (1987) “Industrial change, linkages and regional development.” In W.F. Lever (ed.) Industrial Change in the United Kingdom. Longman: Harlow.Google Scholar
  21. Mondon Y. (1981) “What makes the Toyota production system really tick?” Industrial Engineering pp.37–44, January.Google Scholar
  22. Moseley M.J. and Townroe P.M. (1973) Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie. Vol. 64 No. 3. pp. 137–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ohno T. (1982) “How the Toyota Production System was Created.” Japanese Economic Studies Vol.10 pp.83–101, Summer.Google Scholar
  24. Ohno T. The Toyota Production System. 1978 Diamond Publishing Co. Tokyo.Google Scholar
  25. Okamura H. (1982) “Interfirm Relations in an Enterprise Group: The case of Mitsubishi.” Japanese Economic Studies Vol.10 No.4 pp.53–82, Summer.Google Scholar
  26. Richter C.E. (1969) “The impact of industrial linkages on geographical association.” Journal of Regional Science Vol. 9 pp. 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Richter C.E. (1970) “Systematic relationships between industrial linkages and the agglomeration of manufacturing industries.” Review of Regional Studies Vol. 1 pp. 37–8.Google Scholar
  28. Sayer A. (1986) “New developments in manufacturing; the just-in-time system.” Capital and Class No.30. Winter.Google Scholar
  29. Sheard P. (1983) “Auto-production systems in Japan: organisational and locational features.” Australian Geographical Studies. Vol. 21. No. 1. pp. 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shimokawa K. (1982) ‘Japan’s Keiretsu System: The Case of the Automobile Industry.“ Japanese Economic Studies Vol.13 No.4 pp.3–31, Summer.Google Scholar
  31. Streit M.E. (1969) “Spatial association and economic linkages between industries.” Journal of Regional Science Vol. 9 pp. 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor M.J. and Thrift N.J. (1982) “Industrial linkage and the segmented economy 1; some theoretical proposals.” Environment. and Planning A Vol.14 pp.1615–1632.Google Scholar
  33. Townroe P.M. “Branch plants and regional development.” 1975 Town Planning Review Vol.46 pp.47–62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip McCann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Economics, Faculty of Urban and Regional StudiesUniversity of ReadingReadingEngland

Personalised recommendations