Advertisement

Nartheciaceae

  • M. N. Tamura
Chapter
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 3)

Abstract

Perennial herbs, very rarely without chlorophyll and saprophytic (Petrosavia). Underground stem usually a rhizome, thick to thin, short to long, creeping to ascendant or erect, sometimes with scaly leaves, sometimes stoloniferous, rarely a corm (one sp. of Aletris). Roots fibrous. Foliage leaves mostly basal, often distichous, equitant, unifacial, sometimes spiral, tufted, bifacial, linear, ensiform, lanceolate or broadly oblanceolate, rarely absent. Peduncle erect, usually with small foliage leaves or scaly leaves, rarely leafless. Inflorescence a raceme or more rarely a spike, cyme or corymb, 1-flowered in Harperocallis. Flowers trimerous, bisexual, actinomorphic, often hypogynous, sometimes half-epigynous, often funnel-shaped, cup-shaped or opening flat, sometimes campanulate, urceolate, or tepals reflexed (Aletris spp.). Bracts present, rarely spathelike. Bracteoles usually present, 3-fid to 3-sected, calycular, or linear to lanceolate, rarely absent. Tepals 3 + 3 with generally similar whorls, petaloid, often free, sometimes connate in lower part, linear to ovate, obovate, spathulate or deltoid, 1–17mm long, white, greenish, pale yellow, brown, pinkish, reddish to purple, rarely bright yellow (Narthecium), without spotted patterns, without perigonal nectaries and spurs. Stamens usually 3 + 3, rarely 9 or 10 (Pleea); filaments linear to subulate, sometimes dilated basally, usually glabrous, rarely pubescent (Narthecium); anthers linear-lanceolate to rounded, dorsifixed or basifixed, dehiscent longitudinally, introrse or latrorse. Ovary 3-carpellate, sessile or stipitate, superior to half- (rarely fully) inferior; ovules anatropous or campylotropous, bitegmic or more rarely unitegmic, usually numerous, rarely 4 in each locule (Japonolirion); the carpels connate only at the base or for most or all of their length, ending in recurved styluli or a single style; septal nectaries usually present, rarely absent. Capsules 2–15 mm long, septicidal or loculicidal; seeds linear to broadly elliptical, 0.3–11 mm long, brown, dark red, pale yellow, or whitish, sometimes with appendages at both ends, sometimes only at one end, sometimes with a wing, and sometimes with neither appendage nor wing.

Keywords

Nectar Secretion Foliage Leave Ventral Bundle Dorsal Bundle Stigma Capitate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Ambrose, J.D. 1980. A re-evaluation of the Melanthioideae (Liliaceae) using numerical analyses. In: Brickell, C.D., Cutler, D.F., Gregory, M. (eds.) Petaloid monocotyledons, pp. 65–81. London: Academic Press. (Linnean Society Symposium Series Vol. 8 )Google Scholar
  2. Baumann-bodenheim, M.G. 1954. Prinzipien eines Fruchtsystems der Angiospermen. Ber. Schweiz. Bot. Ges. 64: 94–112.Google Scholar
  3. Beccari, O. 1871. Petrosavia: nuovo genere di piante parasite della famiglia delle Melanthaceae. Nuovo Giorn. Bot. Ital. 3: 7–11.Google Scholar
  4. Cave, M. 1964. Cytological observations on some genera of the Agavaceae. Madrono 17: 163–169.Google Scholar
  5. Chase, M.W. et al. 1993, 1995. See general references. Cheadle, V.I., Kosakai, H. 1971. Vessels in Liliaceae. Phytomorphology 21: 320–333.Google Scholar
  6. Dahlgren, R.M.T. et al. 1985. See general references. Davis, G.L. 1966. See general references.Google Scholar
  7. Deyl, M. 1955. The evolution of the plants and the taxonomy of the monocotyledons. Acta Mus. Nat. Pragae, Bot. no. 3,11B: 1–143.Google Scholar
  8. Frölich, D., Barthlott, W. 1988. See general references.Google Scholar
  9. Goldblatt, P. 1995. The status of R. Dahlgren’s orders Liliales and Melanthiales. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.), Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, pp. 181–200. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  10. Hara, H. 1967. The status of the genus Metanarthecium Maxim. J Jpn. Bot. 42: 312–316.Google Scholar
  11. Heel, W.A. van 1988. On the development of some gynoecia with septal nectaries. Blumea 33: 477–504.Google Scholar
  12. Hegnauer, R. 1963, 1986. See general references.Google Scholar
  13. Huber, H. 1969. See general references.Google Scholar
  14. Hutchinson, J. 1934. The families of flowering plants, Vol. 2. Monocotyledons. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Ikuse, M. 1956. Pollen grains of Japan. Tokyo: Hirokawa.Google Scholar
  16. Kitagawa, M. 1983. Aletris luteoviridis (Maxim.) Franch. In: Ohwi, J., Kitagawa, M. (eds.) New flora of Japan: 436. Tokyo: Shibundo (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  17. Kitamura, S. 1964. Liliaceae. In: Kitamura, S., Murata, G., Koyama, T. (eds.), Coloured illustrations of herbaceous plants of Japan, Vol. 3, pp. 90–157. Osaka: Hoikusha (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  18. Kurosawa, S. 1980. Cytotaxonomic study on the spermatophytes in the Ose region. In: Hara, H. (ed.) Comprehensive research study of Osegahara and its allied area, pp. 46–48. Tokyo: Monbusho Scientific Research Program (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  19. Levan, A., Fredga, K., Sandberg, A.A. 1964. Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 20 1220.Google Scholar
  20. Loew, E., Kirchner, O. 1911. Melanthioideae, pp. 229–291. In: Kirchner, O., Loew, E., Schröter, C. (eds.) Lebensgeschichte der Blütenpflanzen Mitteleuropas, Vol. I, Abt. 3. Stuttgart: E. Ulmer.Google Scholar
  21. McDaniel, S. 1968. Harperocallis. A new genus of the Liliaceae from Florida. J. Arnold Arbor. 49: 35–40.Google Scholar
  22. Nakai, T. 1930. Plantae Japonicae and Koreanae. Bot. Mag. ( Tokyo ) 44: 22–23.Google Scholar
  23. Sato, D. 1942. Karyotype alteration and phylogeny in Liliaceae and allied families. Jpn. J. Bot. 12: 57–161.Google Scholar
  24. Shimizu, T. 1983. The new alpine flora of Japan in color. Osaka: Hoikusha (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  25. Sokolowska-Kulczycka, A. 1980. Embryological studies of Tofieldia calyculata (L.) Whlb. Acta Biol. Cracov. Ser. Bot. 22: 113–128.Google Scholar
  26. Stant, M.Y. 1970. Anatomy of Petrosavia stellaris Becc., a saprophytic monocotyledon. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 63 (Suppl. 1): 147–161.Google Scholar
  27. Sterling, C. 1978. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Liliaceae: Hewardieae, Petrosavieae, and Tricyrteae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 95–106.Google Scholar
  28. Sterling, C. 1979. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Liliaceae: Tofieldieae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 79: 321–332.Google Scholar
  29. Sterling, C. 1980. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Liliaceae: Helonieae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80: 341–356.Google Scholar
  30. Takahashi, Hr., Nishio, E., Hayashi, H. 1993. Pollination biology of the saprophytic species Petrosavia sakuraii (Makino) van Steenis in central Japan. J. Plant Res. 106: 213–217.Google Scholar
  31. Takahashi, M., Kawano, S. 1989. Pollen morphology of the Melanthiaceae and its systematic implications. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 76: 863–876.Google Scholar
  32. Takhtajan, A.L. 1997. See general references.Google Scholar
  33. Tamura, M.N. 1995. See general references.Google Scholar
  34. Tamura, M.N. 1996. A recent history of classifications of Liliaceae with special reference to the influences of cladistics and molecular phylogeny. Shuseibutsugaku-kenkyu 20: 27–31 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  35. Tamura, M.N., Takahashi, Hr. 1998. Karyotype analysis of the saprophyte Petrosavia sakuraii (Makino) J.J. Smith ex van Steenis and its systematic implications. Acta Phytotaxon. Geobot. 49 (in press).Google Scholar
  36. Tanaka, R. 1977. Recent karyotype studies. In: Ogawa, K., Kurozumi, K., Koike, J., Sato, S. (eds.), Plant cytology. 293326. Tokyo: Asakura (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  37. Thorne, R.T. 1992. See general references.Google Scholar
  38. Tillich, H.-J. 1995. Seedlings and systematics in monocotyledons. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution, pp. 303–352. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.Google Scholar
  39. Utech, F.H. 1978a. Floral vascular anatomy of Pleea tenuifolia Michx. (Liliaceae-Tofieldieae) and its reassignment to Tofieldia. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 47: 423–453.Google Scholar
  40. Utech, F.H. 1978b. Floral vascular anatomy of the monotypic Japanese Metanarthecium luteoviride Maxim. (LiliaceaeMelanthioideae). Ann. Carnegie Mus. 47: 455–477.Google Scholar
  41. Utech, F.H. 1979. Karyotype analysis, palynology, and external seed morphology of Tofieldia tenuifolia (Michx.) Utech (Liliaceae-Tofieldieae). Ann. Carnegie Mus. 48: 171–184.Google Scholar
  42. Utech, F.H. 1984. Floral vascular anatomy of Japonolirion osense Nakai (Liliaceae) and its tribal relationship. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 53: 447–461.Google Scholar
  43. Walker, J.W. 1986. Classification and evolution of the monocotyledons. Am. J. Bot. 73 (6): 746 (Abstract).Google Scholar
  44. Williams, C.A. 1975. Biosystematics of the Monocotyledoneae-flavonoid patterns in leaves of the Liliaceae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 3: 229–244.Google Scholar
  45. Zhukova, P.G. 1967. Chromosome numbers in some species of plants of the northeastern part of the USSR II. Bot. Zh. 52: 983–987 (in Russian).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. N. Tamura

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations