• M. N. Tamura
Part of the The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants book series (FAMILIES GENERA, volume 3)


Rhizomatous or bulbiferous perennials. Stem often leafy, sometimes scapiform, usually aerial, rarely subterranean, usually erect, rarely descending, simple or branching. Foliage leaves alternate, sometimes with much reduced internodes, linear to elliptical, apically obtuse to long caudate-acuminate, subsessile or sessile to amplexicaul, rarely perfoliate, often parallel-veined, sometimes reticulate-veined, sometimes dark-spotted. Inflorescence terminal or axillary, often 1-flowered, or umbelliform, sometimes a thyrse or a thyrsoid, rarely a raceme. Flowers bisexual, hypogynous, actinomorphic, erect or nodding, often showy. Perianth often campanulate to subrotate, sometimes tubular-campanulate, infundibular or cupular, sometimes recurved. Tepals 3 + 3, free, the whorls similar or highly different, white, green, yellow, red, lavender or purple, often purple-spotted, purple-striped, or patterned with specks of contrasting color, usually nectariferous. Stamens usually 3 + 3, rarely 3 + 0 (Scoliopus), free, inserted at tepal base. Filaments often subulate or flattened, dilated at base, sometimes filiform. Anthers often oblong, sometimes sagittate, lanceolate or linear, dorsifixed versatile or basifixed, extrorse or latrorse. Carpels 3; ovary often 3(−1)-locular; ovules 2-many in each locule; style long to very short, apically subentire to 3-parted. Fruit a septicidal or irregularly rupturing capsule or a berry; seeds globose, oblong, irregular or flattened, sometimes with elaiosome.


Arctic Zone Floral Biology Fungal Gnat Outer Tepal Nucellus Epidermis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  1. Alden, I. 1912. A contribution to the life history of Uvularia sessilifolia. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 39: 439–446.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, J.G. 1875, 1879. See general references.Google Scholar
  3. Beal, J.M., Ownbey, M. 1943. Cytological studies in relation to the classification of the genus Calochortus. III. Bot. Gaz. 104: 553–562.Google Scholar
  4. Bentham, G., Hooker, J.D. 1883. Genera Plantarum, Vol. 3. London: Reeve; Williams und Norgate.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, R.Y. 1959. Seed dispersal, morphology, and taxonomic position of Scoliopus, Liliaceae, Skr. Nor Vidensk. Akad. Oslo I. Mat.-Naturvidensk. Kl. 4: 1–56.Google Scholar
  6. Berg, R.Y. 1960. Ovary, ovule, and endosperm of Calochortus amabilis with remarks on the taxonomic position of Calochortus. Nytt Mag. Bot. 8: 189–206.Google Scholar
  7. Berg, R.Y. 1962. Contribution to the comparative embryology of the Liliaceae: Scoliopus, Trillium, Paris, and Medeola. Skr. Nor. Vidensk.-Akad. Oslo I. Mat.-Naturvidensk. Kl. Ny Ser. 4: 1–64.Google Scholar
  8. Björnstad, I.N. 1970. Comparative embryology of Asparagoideae-Polygonateae, Liliaceae. Nytt Mag. Bot. 17: 169–207.Google Scholar
  9. Buxbaum, F. 1937. Die Entwicklungslinien der Lilioideae. Bot. Arch. 38: 218–293, 305–398.Google Scholar
  10. Cave, M.S. 1941. Megasporogenesis and embryo sac development in Calochortus. Am. J. Bot. 28: 390–394.Google Scholar
  11. Cave, M.S. 1953. Cytology and embryology in the delimitation of genera. Chron. Bot. 14: 140–153.Google Scholar
  12. Cave, M.S. 1970. Chromosomes of the California Liliaceae. Univ. Calif. Publ. Bot. 57: 1–58.Google Scholar
  13. Chase, M.W. et al. 1993, 1995. See general references. Cheadle, V.I., Kosakai, H. 1971. Vessels in Liliaceae. Phytomorphology 21: 320–333.Google Scholar
  14. Conover, M.V. 1991. Epidermal patterns of the reticulate-veined Liliiflorae and their parallel-veined allies. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 107: 295–312.Google Scholar
  15. Cronquist, A., Holmgren, A.H., Holmgren, N.H., Reveal, J.L., Holmgren, P.K. 1977. Intermountain flora. Vascular plants of the intermountain west, USA, Vol. 6. New York: Columbia Univ. Press.Google Scholar
  16. Dahlgren, R.M.T. et al. 1985. See general references.Google Scholar
  17. Fassett, N.C. 1935. Notes from the herbarium of the University of Wisconsin-XII. A study of Streptopus. Rhodora 37: 88–113.Google Scholar
  18. Fukuhara, T., Shinwari, Z.K. 1994. Seed-coat anatomy in Uvulariaceae (Liliales) of the northern hemisphere: systematic implications. Acta Phytotaxon. Geobot. 45: 1–14.Google Scholar
  19. Goebel, K. 1931. Blütenbildung und Sprossgestaltung ( 2. Ergänzungsband zur Organographie der Pflanzen). Jena: G. Fischer.Google Scholar
  20. Grassmann, P. 1884. Die Septaldrüsen. Ihre Verbreitung, Entstehung und Verrichtung. Flora 67: 113–136.Google Scholar
  21. Hara, H. 1988. A revision of the Asiatic species of the genus Disporum (Liliaceae). Univ. Mus., Univ. Tokyo, Bull. 31: 163–209.Google Scholar
  22. Heslop-Harrison, Y., Shivanna, K.R. 1977. See general references.Google Scholar
  23. Huber, H. 1969. See general references.Google Scholar
  24. Hutchinson, J. 1934. The families of flowering plants, Vol. 2. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Ishikawa, M. 1916. A list of the number of chromosomes. Bot. Mag. ( Tokyo ) 30: 404–448.Google Scholar
  26. Johansen, D.A. 1932. The chromosomes of the Californian Liliaceae. I. Am. J. Bot. 19: 779–783.Google Scholar
  27. Koidzumi, G. 1938. Florae in the eastern Kii Mountains. Acta Phytotaxon. Geobot. 7: 120–123 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  28. Krause, K. 1930. See general references.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, N.S., Yeau, S.H. 1990. A palynological study on Streptopus ovalis (Ohwi) Wang et Y.C. Tang and the relative species (tribe Polygonateae, Liliaceae). Korean J. Plant Taxon. 20: 81–94 (in Korean with English abstract).Google Scholar
  30. Maheshwari, P. 1946. The Fritillaria type of embryo sac. A critical review. J. Indian Bot. Soc., Iyengar Comm. Vol. pp. 101–119.Google Scholar
  31. McAllister, F. 1914. The development of the embryo sac in the Convallariaceae. Bot. Gaz. 58: 137–153.Google Scholar
  32. Mesler, M.R., Ackerman, J.D., Lu, K.L. 1980. The effectiveness of fungal gnats as pollinators. Am. J. Bot. 67: 564–567.Google Scholar
  33. Nakamura, J. 1980. Diagnostic characters of pollen grains of Japan, parts I, I I. Osaka: Osaka Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  34. Nawa, N. 1928. Some cytological observations in Tricyrtis, Sagittaria and Lilium. Bot. Mag. ( Tokyo ) 42: 33–36.Google Scholar
  35. Ogihara, R. 1971. Interspecific differentiation of basic chromosome number from x = 13 to x = 12 in natural populations of Tricyrtis hirta. Rep. Fac. Technol. Kanagawa Univ. 9: 26–30 (in Japanese with English summary).Google Scholar
  36. Ogura, H. 1964. On the embryo sac of two species of Tricyrtis. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Ser. IV (Biol.) 30: 219–222.Google Scholar
  37. Ownbey, M. 1940. A monograph of the genus Calochortus. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 27: 371–560.Google Scholar
  38. Rudall, P.J. et al. 1997. See general references.Google Scholar
  39. Schnarf, K. 1949. Der Umfang der Lilioideae im natürlichen System. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 95: 257–269.Google Scholar
  40. Shimakura, M. 1973. Palynomorphs of Japanese plants. Osaka: Osaka Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  41. Shinwari, Z.K., Kato, H., Terauchi, R., Kawano, S. 1994a. Phylogenetic relationships among genera in the LiliaceaeAsparagoideae-Polygonatae s. 1. inferred from rbcL gene sequence data. Plant Syst. Evol. 192: 263–277.Google Scholar
  42. Shinwari, Z.K., Terauchi, R., Utech F.H., Kawano, S. 1994b. Recognition of the New World Disporum section Prosartes as Prosartes ( Liliaceae) based on the sequence data of the rbcL gene. Taxon 43: 353–366.Google Scholar
  43. Sterling, C. 1978. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Liliaceae: Hewardieae, Petrosavieae, and Tricyrteae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 95–106.Google Scholar
  44. Sulbha 1954. The embryology of Iphigenia indica Kunth. Phytomorphology 4: 180–191.Google Scholar
  45. Takahashi, Hr. 1980. A taxonomic study on the genus Tricyrtis. Sci. Rep. Fac. Educ., Gifu Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 6: 583–635.Google Scholar
  46. Takahashi, Hr. 1984. The floral biology of Tricyrtis latifolia Maxim. (Liliaceae). Bot. Mag. ( Tokyo ) 97: 207–217.Google Scholar
  47. Takahashi, Hr. 1987. A comparative floral and pollination biology of Tricyrtis flava Maxim, T. nana Yatabe and T. ohsumiensis Masamune (Liliaceae). Bot. Mag. ( Tokyo ) 100: 185–203.Google Scholar
  48. Takahashi, Hr. 1991. Karyotype variations of Tricyrtis hirta Hook. (Liliaceae). Acta Phytotaxon. Geobot. 42: 113–124.Google Scholar
  49. Takahashi, Hr. 1993. Floral biology of Tricyrtis macranthopsis Masamune and T. ishiiana (Kitagawa et T. Koyama) Ohwi et Okuyama var. surugensis Yamazaki (Liliaceae). Acta Phytotaxon. Geobot. 44: 141–150.Google Scholar
  50. Takahashi, Hr. 1994. Floral biology of Tricyrtis macropoda Miq. (Liliaceae). Acta Phytotaxon. Geobot. 45: 33–40.Google Scholar
  51. Tamura, M.N. 1995. A karyological review of the orders Asparagales and Liliales ( Monocotyledonae ). Feddes Repert. 106: 83–111.Google Scholar
  52. Tamura, M.N., Utech, F.H., Kawano, S. 1992. Biosystematic studies in Disporum (Liliaceae-Polygonateae) IV. Karyotype analysis of some Asiatic and North American taxa with special reference to their systematic status. Plant Species Biol. 7: 103–120.Google Scholar
  53. Therman, E. 1956. Cytotaxonomy of the tribe Polygonatae. Am. J. Bot. 43: 134–142.Google Scholar
  54. Thorne, R.T. 1992. See general references.Google Scholar
  55. Torrey, J. 1857. Report on the botany of the expedition. Pac. Railroad Rep. 4: 1–195.Google Scholar
  56. Utech, F.H. 1979. Floral vascular anatomy of Scoliopus bigelovii Torrey (Liliaceae-Parideae = Trilliaceae) and tribal note. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 48: 43–71.Google Scholar
  57. Utech, F.H. 1992. Biology of Scoliopus (Liliaceae) I. Phytogeography and systematics. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 79: 126142.Google Scholar
  58. Watson, S. 1879. XV. Contributions to American botany. I. Revision of the North American Liliaceae. II. Descriptions of some new species of North American plants. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 14 (N. S. 6): 213–303.Google Scholar
  59. Williams, C.A. 1975. Biosystematics of the Monocotyledoneae-flavonoid patterns in leaves of the Liliaceae. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 3: 229–244.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. N. Tamura

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations