Skip to main content

Part of the book series: The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants ((FAMILIES GENERA,volume 3))

Abstract

Perennial, terrestrial herbs from short rhizomes, rarely with a woody stem (Chlorophytum suffruticosum); roots fibrous or thickened and fleshy, sometimes with distant tubers. Leaves spirally to distinchously arranged, basal, numerous, more or less sheathing, often surrounded by scarious leaf remnants; leaf blades dorsiventral, linear to oblong-lanceolate, parallel-veined. Inflorescence erect, mostly scapose, racemes or panicles, or with slender pedicels arising directly and umbel-like from a subterranean axis (Leucocrinum and Anthericum angustifolium). Flowers bisexual, hypogynous, pedicellate, actinomorphic or zygomorphic (Diora, rarely Chlorophytum), relatively small, white to greenish or yellow, sometimes reddish streaked or tinged, never blue or violet, solitary or several per node, with 1 to several bracts; tepals 3 + 3; both whorls more or less equal, persistent; perianth spreading to reflexed, or perigone narrowly campanulate (Diamena), or rarely fused basally into a long tube (Leucocrinum, Diora), articulated on the pedicels with pericladium or not. Stamens 6, free or shortly united basally (Echeandia); anthers dorsifixed and sometimes inserted into a rimmed pit or basifixed, introrse, dehiscing by longitudinal slits; thecae 2, oblong to elongate; attached to the tepal bases (Anthericum and Chlorophytum) or apex of the perigone tube (Leucocrinum). Gynoecium tricarpellary, syncarpous, sessile or rarely stipitate (Chlorophytum); ovary trilocular with 2–many anatropous or campylotropous ovules in 2 rows on axile placentas; septal nectaries present; style filiform, stigma minutely capitate; fruit a dry dehiscent loculicidal capsule; seeds numerous to 2 in each locule, black, rounded, angular, folded or flattened; testa thick, phytomelanencrusted, endosperm fleshy; embryo cylindric, curved inwards; rarely with a basal tuft of hairs (Comospermum).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Selected Bibliography

  • Abrams, L. 1940. Illustrated Flora of the Pacific States, vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, A., Köhler, E. 1987. Morfologfa del polen de las Agavaceae y algunos géneros afines. Grana 26: 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez de Zayas, A. 1990. El compleja estomâtico en la famffia Agavaceae: 2. Epidermis adultsa. Feddes Repert. 101: 113–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, P., Montalvo, E.A. 1977. The reproductive phenology of Echeandia macrocarpa Greenm. (Liliaceae) with a reexamination of the floral morphology. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 104: 320–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, L. 1932. Monocotyledonous seedlings. Trans. Proc. Edinb. Bot. Soc. 31: 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M.S. 1948. Sporogenesis and embryo sac development of Hesperocallis and Leucocrinum in relation to their systematic position. Am. J. Bot. 35: 343–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, M.W. 1995. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chung, M.G., Jones, S.B.J. 1987. Pollen morphology of Hosta Tratt. (Funkiaceae) and related genera. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 116: 31–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden, R.W. 1987. Hagenbachia, a misplaced genus of New World Liliaceae. Nord. J. Bot. 7: 255–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruden, R.W. 1994. 3. Echeandia Ortega. In: Davidse, G., Sousa, M.S., Carter, A.O. (eds.) Flora Mesoamericana, Alismataceae à Cyperaceae, vol. 6. México: Universidad Nacional Autônoma de México, Instituto de Biologia pp. 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, R.M.T., Clifford, H.T. 1982. See general references. Dahlgren, R.M.T. 1985. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G. 1966. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz Lifante, Z., Dfez, M.J., Fernandez, I. 1990. Morfologfa polinica de las subfamilias Melanthioideae y Asphodeloideae ( Liliaceae) en la Peninsula Ibérica y su importantcfa taxonônomica. Lagascalia 16: 211–225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Fulvio, T.E., Cave, M.S. 1964. Embryology of Blandfordia nobilis Smith ( Liliaceae) with special reference to its taxonomic position. Phytomorphology 14: 487–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fay, M.F., Chase, M.W. 1996. Resurrection of Themidaceae for the Brodiaea alliance, and recircumscription of Alliaceae, Amaryllidaceae and Agapanthoideae. Taxon 45: 441–452.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frölich, D., Barthlott, W. 1988. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttenberg, H.V. 1968. Der primäre Bau der Angiospermenwurzel. Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegi, G., Dunziger, G. 1909. Illustrierte Flora von Mittel-Europa, vol. 2. München: J.F. Lehmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegnauer, R. 1963. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R.F. 1987. 38. Chlorophytum. In: George, A.S. (ed.) Flora of Australia, vol. 45. Canberra: Australian Government Printing Service, pp. 349–350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez, L.S. 1995. Taxonomic study of the Mexican genus Hemiphylacus (Hyacinthaceae). Syst. Bot. 20: 546–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heslop-Harrison, Y., Shivanna, K.R. 1977. The receptive surface of the angiosperm stigma. Ann. Bot. 41: 1233–1258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, H. 1969. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, J. 1979. Liliaceae I. Flora Malesiana 19: 189–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kativu, S. 1994. Anthericaceae in Zimbabwe: a study on cytology and reproduction. In: Seyani, J.H., Chikuni, A.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth Plenary Meeting AETFAT. Malawi, pp. 524–534.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kativu, S., Nordal, I. 1993. New combinations of African species in the genus Chlorophytum (Anthericaceae). Nord. J. Bot. 13: 59–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel, G. 1984. Plants for human consumption. Koenigstein: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H. 1995. The phylogenetic place and origination of the genus Diuranthera. Acta Bot. Yunnan. 17: 268–276 (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marais, W., Reilly, J. 1978. Chlorophytum and its related genera (Liliaceae). Kew Bull. 32: 653–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, V.A. 1986. 36. Leucocrinum. In: Walter, S.M., Brady, A., Brickell, C.D., Cullen, J., Green, P.S., Lewis, J., Matthews, V.A., Webb, D.A., Yeo, P.F., Alexander, J.C.M. (eds.) The European garden flora, vol. 1 Pteridophyta, Gymnospermae, Angiospermae - monocotyledons (Part I ). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, H.E., Jr. 1951. Petronymphe, a new genus of Amaryllidaceae. Gentes Herb. 8: 258–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordal, I., Thulin, M. 1993. Synopsis of Anthericum and Chlorophytum (Anthericaceae) in the Horn of Africa, including the description of nine new species. Nord. J. Bot. 13: 257–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordal, I., Eriksen, T.E., Fosing, M. 1990. Studies in the generic delimitation of Anthericaceae. Mitt. Staatsinst. Allg. Bot. Hamb. 23b: 535–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oganezova, G.G. 1987. Characteristics of seed and fruit anatomical structure in some representatives of subfamily Asphodeloideae (Liliaceae) in connection with their systematics and phylogeny. (in Russian) Bot. Zh. 72: 436–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palomino, G., Martinez, J. 1994. Cytotypes and meiotic behaviour in Mexican populations of three species of Echeandia ( Liliaceae ). Cytologia 59: 295–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenna, P. 1987. Diamena and Diora, two new genera of Anthericaceae from Peru. Opera Bot. 92: 185–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenna, P. 1988. Six new species of Anthericum (Anthericaceae) from Bolivia and Peru. Onira Bot. Leafl. 1: 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudall, P., Chase, M. 1996. Systematics of the Xanthorrhoeaceae sensu lato: evidence for polyphyly. Telopea 6: 185–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudall, P., Chase, M.W., Conran, J.G. 1997. New circumscriptions and new family of asparagoid lilies: genera formerly included in Anthericaceae. Kew Bull. 51: 667–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudall, P.J., Cutler, D.F. 1995. Asparagales: a reappraisal. In: Rudall, P.J., Cribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlittler, J. 1943. Die Blütenabgliederung und die Perikladien bei den Vertretern des Anthericumtypus sowie ihre Bedeutung für die Systematik. Mitt. Bot. Mus. Univ. Zürich 164: 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlittler, J. 1945. Untersuchungen über den Bau der Blütenstände im Bereich des Anthericumtypus (AsphodelinaeAnthericinae-Dianellinae). Mitt. Bot. Mus. Univ. Zürich 174: 200–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnarf, K. 1931. Vergleichende Embryologie der Angiospermen. Berlin: Borntraeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, W. 1982. Beiträge zur Taxonomie der Liliifloren IX. Anthericaceae. Wiss. Z. Friedrich Schiller Univ. Jena 31: 291–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stedje, B., Nordal, I. 1994. A contribution to the discussion of the family delimitation of Anthericaceae versus Asphodelaceae. In: Seyani, J.H., Chikuni, A.C. (eds.) Proceedings of the XIIIth Plenary Meeting AETFAT. Malawi, pp. 513–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A.L. 1982. See general references.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamura, M.N. 1995. A karyological review of the orders Asparagales and Liliales ( Monocotyledonae ). Feddes Repert. 106: 83–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka, T. 1976. Tanaka’s cyclopedia of edible plants of the world. Tokyo: Keigaku Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tillich, H.-J. 1995. Seedlings and systematics in monocotyledons. In: Rudall, P.J., Gribb, P.J., Cutler, D.F., Humphries, C.J. (eds.) Monocotyledons: systematics and evolution. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, W.M. 1977. Vessel types of monocotyledons: a survey. Bot. Not. 130: 383–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D.A. 1980. Liliiflorae. 183. Liliaceae. 7. Anthericum. In: Tutin, T.G., Heywood, V.H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walter, S.M., Webb, D.A. (eds.) Flora Europaea, vol. 5: Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conran, J.G. (1998). Anthericaceae. In: Kubitzki, K. (eds) Flowering Plants · Monocotyledons. The Families and Genera of Vascular Plants, vol 3. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03533-7_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08377-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03533-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics