Abstract
Large-scale cultivation of plants expressing viral genes raises several ecological questions, including: where are sexually compatible cultivar, weed, and wild plant populations of the virus-influenced plant? where is the virus (naturally) present and how long has the virus been there? which populations might the virus invade in the future? how much is the virus (or the potential recombinant and heterologous encapsidated virus relative) able to decrease the fitness of susceptible plants? what is the potential velocity of gene flow to and gene introgression into weed and wild plant populations? For example, beet (Beta vulgaris) is a crop of particular concern regarding invasiveness because it commonly hybridises with annual forms of wild beet. There is still a significant lack of knowledge about the potential ecological impact of transgenic plants expressing viral sequences. Several disadvantages, but also some advantages, of the spreading of virus resistance genes to non-target plant populations are possible. Virus resistance would be most likely to cause “ecological release” in wild populations if the disease is widespread and has significant effects on plant fitness. In the future, plant breeding activities will develop improved transgenic high-performance cultivars. An ecological inventory and monitoring of wild plant habitats would help to assess the risks of transgenic gene introgression.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abe H, Tamada T (1986) Association of beet necrotic yellow vein virus with isolates of Polymyxa betae Keskin. Ann Phytopathol Soc Japan 52:235–247
Asher MJC (1993) Rhizomania. in: DA Cooke and RK Scott (ed) The sugar beet crop: science into practice. Chapmann and Hall, London, pp 311–346
Bartsch D, Pohl-Orf M (1996) Ecological aspects of transgenic sugar beet: Transfer and expression of herbicide resistance in hybrids with wild beets. Euphytica 91:55–58
Bartsch D, Schmidt M (1997) Influence of sugar beet breeding on populations of Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima in Italy. J Veget Sci 8:81–84
Bartsch D, Schmidt M, Pohl-Orf M, Haag C, Schuphan I (1996) Competitiveness of transgenic sugar beet resistant to beet necrotic yellow vein virus and potential impact on wild beet populations. Mol Ecol 5:199–205
Boudry P, Mörchen M, Saumitou-Laprade P, Vernet P, Van Dijk H (1993) The origin and evolution of weed beets: consequences for the breeding and release of herbicide-resistant transgenic sugar-beets. Theor Appl Genet 87:471–478
Cooper JI, Asher MJC (1988) Viruses with fungal vectors. Association of Applied Biologists, Wellesbourne. 355 pp.
Crawley MJ, Hails RS, Rees M, Kohn D, Buxton J (1993) Ecology of transgenic oilseed rape in natural habitats. Nature 363:620–623
Dale PJ (1993) The release of transgenic plants into agriculture. J Agric Sci 120:1–5
Faccioli G, Giunchedi L (1974) On the viruses involved on rhizomania diseases of sugar beet in Italy. Phytopathol mediterr 13:28–35
Frese L (1991) Sammlung, Erhaltung und Nutzbarmachung der genetischen Ressourcen von Beta-Rüben (B. vulgaris L.) und Wurzelzicborien (Cichorium intybus L.) Landbauforschung Völkenrode 41:65–73
George AS (ed) (1980) Flora of Australia, new ed. 4: p277
Giunchedi L, Biaggi M, Poggi Pollini C (1987) Correlation between tolerance and beet necrotic yellow vein virus in sugar beet genotypes. Phytopathol mediterr 26:23–28
König R, Lesemann DE, Maiss E (1995) Attempts to detect heteroencapsidations or other non-intended side effects in transgenic sugarbeet expressing the coat protein gene of beet necrotic yellow vein virus (BNYW). In: Landsmann J, Casper R (ed) Key Biosafety Aspects of Genetically Modified Organisms — Workshop 10.–11. April 1995 in Braunschweig, Germany, Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft 309,71–7
Mannerlöf M, Lennerfors B-L, Tenning P (1996) Reduced titer of BNYW in transgenic sugar beets expressing the BNYW coat protein. Euphytica 90:293–299
Parker IM, Bartsch D (1996) Recent advances in ecological biosafety research on the risks of transgenic plants: a trans-continental perspective In: Tomiuk J, Sentker A, Wöhrmann K (ed) Transgenic Organisms — Biological and Social Implications. Birkhäuser-Verlag Basel, 147–161
Santoni S, Berville A (1992) Evidence for gene exchange between sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and wild beets: consequences for transgenic sugar beets. Plant Mol Biol 20:578–580
Tamada T (1975) Beet necrotic yellow vein virus. Commonwealth Mykological Institute and Association of Applied Biologists Description of Plant Viruses, set 4, No. 144
Whitney ED (1989) Identification, distribution, and testing for resistance to rhizomania in Beta maritima. Plant Dis 73:287–290
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1997 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bartsch, D. (1997). Ecological Impact of Transgenic Virus-Resistance in Crop, Weed, and Wild Plant Populations (Due to Potential Alterations of Plant Invasiveness). In: Tepfer, M., Balázs, E. (eds) Virus-Resistant Transgenic Plants: Potential Ecological Impact. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03506-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03506-1_13
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-03508-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03506-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive