Nothing Wrong With Unearned Wealth? A Comment on Haslett and Bracewell-Milnes
Both David Haslett and Barry Bracewell-Milnes dare to stick their necks out and do so in an articulate, thoughtful way. I like that. Not because I love chopping heads off, but because I strongly believe that an active involvement in public policy debates is an essential part of a scholar’s role in today’s society. Moreover, I have great sympathy for Haslett’s impatience with the great inequalities in life chances that result from a massively unequal access to external assets, while at the same time coming close to embracing Bracewell-Milnes’s rejection of the “short-termist, brash, materialistic, aggressively individualistic” market rat race in favour of a “more traditional and stable way of life, more long-termist, more family-oriented, less materialistic, more attuned to spiritual and ethical values, cool or contemptuous towards competitive spending, sympathetic towards conservation and preservation” (Bracewell-Milnes, 1997, p. 199). And yet, I deeply disagree with both. Why?
KeywordsDistributive Justice Productivity Conception Unequal Access Productivity Criterion Educational Expenditure
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bracewell-Milnes, B. (1982): Land and Heritage: The Public Interest in Personal Ownership, London (Institute of Economic Affairs), Hobart Paper 93.Google Scholar
- Bracewell-Milnes, B. (1997): “The hidden costs of inheritance taxation”, this volume.Google Scholar
- Brittan, S. (1973): Capitalism and the Permissive Society,London (Macmillan).Google Scholar
- Friedman, M. (1962): Capitalism and Freedom,Chicago (University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
- Haslett, D.W. (1994): Capitalism with Morality,Oxford (Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
- Haslett, D.W. (1997): “Distributive justice and inheritance”, this volume.Google Scholar
- Van Parijs, Px. (1995): Real Freedom for All. What (if Anything) Can Justify Capitalism?,Oxford (Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
- Van Parijs, Px. (1997): “Justice as the fair distribution of freedom: Fetishism or stoicism?”, in: M. FLEURBAEY and J.F. LASLIER (Eds.): The Ethics and Economics of Liberty, London (Routledge ), forthcoming.Google Scholar