Advertisement

The CT-simulator and the Simulator-CT: Advantages, Disadvantages, and Future Developments

  • James M. Galvin
Chapter
  • 325 Downloads
Part of the Medical Radiology book series (MEDRAD)

Abstract

The idea of using a CT unit in place of a conventional gantry-mounted radiographic/fluoroscopic x-ray simulator is not new. A converted CT unit, called a CT-simulator, capable of marking treatment field outlines on a patient, has been available in the United States since 1981 (originally manufactured by Pfizer Medical Corp. and now available through Medical High Technology International, Inc., Clearwater, Fl.). (Galvin et al. 1982). A short time later similar equipment was introduced in Japan (Endo et al. 1982). There is currently renewed interest in this technique. Two additional manufacturers in the United States now offer something called a CT-simulator [CT-simulators marketed by Siemens Medical Systems, Inc., Island, N.J. and the unit manufactured by Picker Medical Systems (marketed by Varian, Palo Alto, Calif.)] and two others are showing work-in-progress for their CT-simulator projects (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wisc. and Philips Medical Systems North America, Shelton, Conn.).

Keywords

Image Intensifier Reference Mark Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning Conventional Simulator Digitally Reconstruct Radiograph 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cullip TJ, Symons JR, Rosenman JG, Chaney EL (1993) Digitally reconstructed fluoroscopy and other interactive volume visualizations in 3D treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27: 145–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Dowsett R, Galvin JM, Cheng E, et al. (1992) Contouring structures for 3-dimensional treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 22: 1083–1088PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Endo M, Kutsutani-Nakamura Y (1982) Patient beam positioning system using CT Images. Phys Med Biol 27: 301–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Farmer FT, Fowler JF, Haggith JW (1963) Megavoltage treatment planning and the use of xeroradiography. Br J Radiol 36: 426–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Galvin J, Heidtman B, Cheng E, Bloch P, Goodman R (1982) The use of a CT scanner specially designed to perform the functions of a radiation therapy treatment unit simulator. Med Phys 9: 615Google Scholar
  6. Galvin JM, Turrisi AT, Cheng E (1986) Treatment simulation using a CT unit. In: Kereiakes JG, Elson HR, Born CG (eds) Radiation oncology physics. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Monograph Series. American Institute of Physics, New York, p 462Google Scholar
  7. Galvin JM, Waxler G, Sontag M., Smith R (1987) Use of reformatted CT images for radiation therapy treatment planning. Med Phys 14: 459Google Scholar
  8. Galvin JM, Powlis W, Fowble B, Goodman RL (1993a) A new technique for positioning tangential fields. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 26: 877–881PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Galvin JM, Sims C, Dominiak, GS, Cooper JS (1993b) The use of digitally reconstructed radiographs for 3D treatment planning and CT-simulation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 27 (Suppl 1): 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goitein M, Mento D (1982) An optical scanner as an aid in simulating treatment with CT data. J Comp Tomogr 6:1201–1204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goitein M, Abrams M, Rowell D, Pollari H, Wiles J (1983) Multidimensional treatment planning. II. Beam’s eye-view back projection and projection through CT sections. Int J Radiation Oncol Biol Phys 9: 789–797CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goitein M, Laughlin J, Purdy J et al. (1991) Evaluation of high energy photon external beam treatment planning: project summary. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21: 3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harrison RM, Farmer FT (1978) The determination of anatomical cross-sections using a radiotherapy simulator. Br J Radiol 51: 488–453Google Scholar
  14. Kijewski MF, Judy PF, Svensson GK (1984) Image quality of an analog radiation therapy simulator-based tomographic scanner. Med Phys 11: 502–507PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nagata Y, Nishidai T, Abe M et al. (1990) CT simulator: a new 3-D planning and simulating system for radiotherapy. Part 2. Clinical application. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18:505–513PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nishidai T, Nagata Y, Takahashi M et al. (1990) CT simulator: a new 3-D planning and simulating system for radiotherapy. Part 1. Description of system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18: 499–504PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ragan D, He T, Liu X (1993a) Correction for distortion in a beam outline transfer device in radiotherapy CT-based simulation. Med Phys 20: 179–185PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ragan D, He T, Mesina CF, Ratanatharathorn V (1993b) CTbased simulation with laser patient marking. Med Phys 20: 379–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rosenman J, Roe C, Cromartie R, Muller K, Pizer S (1993) Portal film enhancement: technique and clinical utility. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 25: 333–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rosenthal SA, Galvin JM, Goldwein JW, Smith AR, Blitzer PH (1992) Improved methods for determination of variability in patient positioning for radiation therapy using simulation and serial portal film measurements. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 23: 621–625PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sherouse GW, Chaney EL (1991) The portable virtual simulator. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 21: 475–482PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sherouse GW, Novins K, Chaney EL (1990a) Computation of digitally reconstructed radiographs for use in radiation treatment design. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 18: 651–658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sherouse GW, Bourland DJ, Reynolds K, McMurry HL, Mitchell T, Chaney EL (1990b) Virtual simulation in the clinical setting: some practical considerations. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 19: 1059–1065PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • James M. Galvin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Radiation OncologyNew York University Medical CentreNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations