Abstract
A detailed description of the histopathological features of allergic contact dermatitis can be found in most textbooks of dermatopathology. Surprisingly, however, the histopathological signs of irritant contact dermatitis are scarcely mentioned or even omitted. The best way to fill this gap is to describe the lesions observed at the sites of positive patch test reactions (allergic or irritant). This choice has two advantages: (a) the histopathological signs reflect a practical situation, encountered daily in the patch test clinic; (b) a positive patch test reaction is a clear-cut, unmodified reaction: the direct consequence of the application of a substance on previously intact skin. This is quite different from clinical situations, in which many additional parameters can play a confounding role, such as: (a) unknown duration of the disease, (b) lesions in relation to scratching, (c) infections, and (d) lichenification. The only possible drawback to using patch test reactions is the role played by occlusion. This might be especially true for allergic reactions and is the reason for this description also based on open (unoccluded) reactions, the use of which is becoming commoner in many clinics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Kerl H, Burg G, Braun-Falco O (1974) Quantitative and qualitative dynamics of the epidermal and cellular inflammatory reaction in primary toxic and allergic dinitrochlorobenzene contact dermatitis in guinea pigs. Arch Dermatol Forsch 249: 207–226
Ackerman AB, Ragaz A (1982) A plea to expunge the term “eczema” from the lexicon of dermatology and dermatopathology. Arch Dermatol Res 272: 407–411
Braun-Falco O Wolff HH (1971) Zur Ultrastruktur der menschlichen Epidermis bei der allergischen Epicutantestreaktion. Arch Dermatol Forsch 240: 23–37
Wolff HH, Braun-Falco O (1971) Zur Ultrastruktur dermaler Veränderungen bei der allergischen Epicutantestreaktion des Menschen. Arch Dermatol Forsch 240: 219–236
Angelini G, Vena GA, Filotico R, Tursi A (1990) Mast cell participation in allergic contact sensitivity. Contact Dermatitis 23: 239
Hannuksela M, Salo H (1986) The repeated open application test ( ROAT ). Contact Dermatitis 14: 221–227
Thune P, Eeg-Larsen T (1984) Contact and photocontact allergy in persistent light reactivity. Contact Dermatitis 11: 98–107
Lachapelle JM (1973) Comparative histopathology of allergic and irritant patch test reactions in man. Current concepts and new prospects. Arch Belg Dermatol 28: 83–92
Mahmoud G, Lachapelle JM (1985) Evaluation expérimentale de l’efficacité de crèmes barrière et de gels antisolvants dans la prévention de l’irritation cutanée provoquée par des solvants organiques. Cah Med Tray 22: 163–168
Achten G, Oleffe J (1966) Tests épicutanés et dermatoses professionnelles. Etude histologique. Bull Soc Fr Dermatol 73: 49–52
Metz J (1972) Elektronenmikroskopische Untersuchungen in allergischen und toxischen Epicutantestreaktionen des Menschen. Arch Dermatol Forsch 245: 125–146
Nagao S, Stroud JD, Hamada T, Pinkus H, Birmingham DJ (1972) The effect of sodium hydroxide and hydrochloric acid on human epidermis. An electronmicroscopic study. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh.) 52: 11–23
Willis CM, Stephens CJM, Wilkinson JD (1989) Epidermal damage induced by irritants in man: a light and electron microscopic study. J Invest Dermatol 93: 695–699
Willis CM, Stephens CJM, Wilkinson JD (1989) Preliminary findings on the patterns of epidermal damage induced by irritants in man. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJ, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 42–45
Medenica M, Rostenberg A (1971) A comparative light and electron microscopic study of primary irritant contact dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. J Invest Dermatol 56: 259–271
Nater JP, Hoedemaeker PHJ (1976) Histopathological differences between irritant and allergic patch test reactions in man. Contact Dermatitis 2: 247–253
Avnstorp C, Balslev E, Thomsen HK (1989) The occurrence of different morphological parameters in allergic and irritant patch test reactions. In: Frosch PJ, Dooms-Goossens A, Lachapelle JM, Rycroft RJ, Scheper RJ (eds) Current topics in contact dermatitis. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 38–41
Ferguson J, Gibbs JH, Beck JS (1985) Lymphocyte subsets and Langerhans cells in allergic and irritant patch test reactions: histometric studies. Contact Dermatitis 13: 166–174
Christensen OB, Daniels TE, Maibach HI (1986) Expression of OKT6 antigen by Langerhans cells in patch test reactions. Contact Dermatitis 14: 26–31
Brasch J, Mielke V, Künne N, Weber-Matthiesen V, Bruhn S, Sterry W (1990) Immigration of cells and composition of cell infiltrates in patch test reactions. Contact Dermatitis 23: 238
Kanerva L, Ranki A, Lauharanta J (1984) Lymphocytes and Langerhans cells in patch tests. An immunohistochemical and electron microscopic study. Contact Dermatitis 11: 150–155
Willis CM, Young E, Brandon DR, Wilkinson JD (1986) Immunopathological and ultrastructural findings in human allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Br J Dermatol 115: 305–316
Willis CM, Wilkinson JD (1990) Changes in the morphology and density of epidermal Langerhans cells (CD1+ cells) in irritant contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 23: 239
Scheynius A, Fischer T (1986) Phenotypic difference between allergic and irritant patch test reactions in man. Contact Dermatitis 14: 297–302
Avnstorp C, Ralfkiaer E, Jorgensen J, Lange Watzin G (1987) Sequential immunophenotypic study of lymphoid infiltrate in allergic and irritant reactions. Contact Dermatitis 16: 239–245
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1995 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lachapelle, JM. (1995). Histopathological and Immunohistopathological Features of Irritant and Allergic Contact Dermatitis. In: Rycroft, R.J.G., Menné, T., Frosch, P.J. (eds) Textbook of Contact Dermatitis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03104-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03104-9_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-03106-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-03104-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive