Skip to main content

The significance of prescriptive decision theory for instructional design expert systems

  • Conference paper
Book cover Instructional Models in Computer-Based Learning Environments

Part of the book series: NATO ASI Series ((NATO ASI F,volume 104))

Abstract

Decision-making plays a central role in computer-based learning environments as well as in computer-based instructional design environments. Therefore, it is also an explicit function of expert systems which are software products aimed at modeling the reasoning and decision-making of experts by explaining and making available human expert knowledge concerning performance of the particular task of instructional planning. This chapter will report the background and scope of the “prescriptive decision theory” (PDT) for expert systems in instructional design environments aimed at providing appropriate learning environments. In comparison with descriptive or normative decision theories, PDT involves interactive procedures aimed at revealing the preference structure of the decision-maker. Interactive procedures of decision-making are characterized by an interaction between subjective phases where the decision-maker has to offer local statements about his preference structure, and objective phases of calculation where the computer investigates alternative propositions based on available data. Exemplifying this procedure, a multiple-attribute-utility-test (MAUT) will be described of choosing media in the context of instructional design. With the help of this method it is possible to evaluate alternatives by taking into account the relative importance of individual goals and outcomes for the decision-maker, whereby each phase of the evaluation process is fully explicated. The significance of PDT and MAUT also will be discussed with regard to other relevant parts in the instruction design environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson, J.R.: The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press 1983

    Google Scholar 

  2. Coombs, C.H., Dawes, R.M., and Tversky, A.: Mathematical Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1970

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dick, W., and Carey, L.: The systematic design of instruction. Tallahassee, FL: Harper Collins 1990

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dick, W., and Reiser, R.A.: Planning effective instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall 1989

    Google Scholar 

  5. Flechsig, K.H.: Einführung in CEDID. Ein Tätigkeitsunterstützendes und wissensbasiertes System für com¬puterergänztes didaktisches Design. Göttingen: CEDID GmbH 1990

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fletcher, J.D., Hawley, D.E., and Piele, P.K.: Costs, effects, and utility of microcomputer assisted instruction in the classroom. American Educational Research Journal. 27, (4), 783–806 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Houris, G.: The use of an instructional design model for increasing computer effectiveness. Educational Technology. 29, (1), 14–21 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geoffrion, AM., Dyer, J.S., and Feinberg A.: An interactive approach for multicriterion optimization, with an application to the operation of an academic department. Management Science. 19, 357–368 (1972/73)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Georgeff,: Procedural control in production systems. Artificial Intelligence. 18, 175–201 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mandl, H., Won, A., and Tergan, S.O.: Computer-based systems for open Learning. State of the art. Tübingen: DIFF 1990

    Google Scholar 

  11. Merrill, M.D.: An expert system for instructional design. IEEE Expert. 2, 25–37 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Merrill, M.D., Li, Z., and Jones, M.K.: Limitations of first generation instructional design. Educational Technology. 29, (1), 7–11 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mylopoulos, J., and Levesque, H.: An overview of knowledge representations. In: On conceptual modelling: Perspectives from artificial intelligence, databases and programming languages. (M.L. Brodie, J. Mylopoulos and J.W. Schmidt, eds.). pp. 3–17. New York: Springer Verlag 1984

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pirolli, P.L., and Greeno, J.G.: The problem space of instructional design. In: Intelligent tutoring systems: Lessons learned. (J. Psotka, L.D. Massey and S.A. Mutter, eds.). pp. 181–201. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1988

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pirolli, P., and Russell, D.M.: The instructional design environment Technology to support design problem solving. Instructional Science. 19, 121–144 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pfohl, H.C., and Braun, G.E.: Entscheidungstheorie: Normative and deskriptive Grundlagen des Entscheidens. Landsberg: Verlag Moderne Industrie 1981

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reigeluth, C.M.: Instructional design: What is it and why is it? In: Instructional design theories and models: An overview of their current status. (C.M. Reigeluth, ed.). pp. 3–36. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1983

    Google Scholar 

  18. Reiser, R.A., Dick, W.: Evaluating instructional software. Educational Technology: Research and Development. 38, (3), 43–50 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reiser, R.A., and Gagné, R.M.: Selecting media for instruction. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology 1983

    Google Scholar 

  20. Russell, D.M., Moran, T.P., and Jordan, D.S.: The instructional design environment. In: Intelligent tutoring systems: Lessons learned. (J. Psotka, L.D. Massey and S.A. Mutter, eds.). pp. 203–228. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum 1988

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simon, H.A.: The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press 1981

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stolurow, L.M.: Lernumwelten oder Gelegenheiten zum Nachdenken. In: Bedinungen des Bildungsprozesses. (W. Edelstein and D. Hopf, eds.). pp. 351–398. Stuttgart Klett 1973

    Google Scholar 

  23. Winn, W.: Instructional design and intelligent systems: Shifts in the designer’s decision-making role. Instructional Science. 16, 59–77 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zionts, S., and Wallenius, J.: An interactive programming method for solving the multiple criteria problem. Management Science. 22, 652–663 (1975/76)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seel, N.M. (1992). The significance of prescriptive decision theory for instructional design expert systems. In: Dijkstra, S., Krammer, H.P.M., van Merriënboer, J.J.G. (eds) Instructional Models in Computer-Based Learning Environments. NATO ASI Series, vol 104. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02840-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02840-7_4

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-08148-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02840-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics