Skip to main content

Supervised Classification Techniques

  • Chapter

Abstract

Supervised classification is the procedure most often used for quantitative analysis of remote sensing image data. It rests upon using suitable algorithms to label the pixels in an image as representing particular ground cover types, or classes. A variety of algorithms is available for this, ranging from those based upon probability distribution models for the classes of interest (such as outlined in Chap. 3) to those in which the multispectral space is partitioned into class-specific regions using optimally located surfaces. Irrespective of the particular method chosen, the essential practical steps are:

  1. 1.

    Decide the set of ground cover types into which the image is to be segmented. These are the information classes and could, for example, be water, urban regions, croplands, rangelands, etc.

  2. 2.

    Choose representative or prototype pixels from each of the desired set of classes. These pixels are said to form training data. Training sets for each class can be established using site visits, maps, air photographs or even photointerpretation of a colour composite product formed from the image data (either in hardcopy form or on the colour display of an image analysis system). Often the training pixels for a given class will lie in a common region enclosed in a border. That region is then often called a training field.

  3. 3.

    Use the training data to estimate the parameters of the particular classifier algorithm to be used; these parameters will be the properties of the probability model used or will be equations that define partitions in the multispectral space. The set of parameters for a given class is sometimes called the signature of that class.

  4. 4.

    Using the trained classifier, label or classify every pixel in the image into one of the desired ground cover types (information classes). Here the whole image segment of interest is typically classified. Whereas training in Step 2 may have required the user to identify perhaps 1 % of the image pixels by other means, the computer will label the rest by classification.

  5. 5.

    Produce tabular summaries or thematic (class) maps which summarise the results of the classification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References for Chapter 8

  • F. Y. Borden, D. N. Applegate, B. J. Turner, B. F. Merembeck, E. G. Crenshaw, H. M. Lachowski and D. N. Thompson, 1977: Satellite and Aircraft Multispectral Scanner Digital Data Users Manual. Technical Report ORSER-SSEL 1–77, Pennsylvania State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. O. Duda and P. E. Hart, 1973: Pattern Classification and Scene Analysis, N. Y., Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. E. Freund, 1962: Mathematical Statistics, New Jersey, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. L. Kettig & D. A. Landgrebe, 1976: Classification of Multispectral Image Data by Extraction and Classification of Homogeneous Objects. IEEE Trans. Geoscience Electronics, GE-14, 19 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Lee and J. A. Richards, 1985: A low Cost Classifier for Multitemporal Applications. Int. J. Remote Sensing, 6,1405–1417.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. J. Nilsson, 1965: Learning Machines. N. Y., McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. L. Phillips (Ed.), 1973: Larsys Version 3 Users Manual, Laboratory for Applications of Remote Sensing, Purdue University, West Lafayette.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. A. Richards, D. A. Landgrebe & P. H. Swain, 1981: Pixel Labelling by Supervised Probabilistic Relaxation Labelling. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, PAM1–3, 188–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • J.A.Richards, D.A.Landgrebe & P.H. Swain, 1982: A Means for Utilizing Anicillary Information in Multispectral Classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 12,463--477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. H. Strahtler, 1980: The Use of Prior Probabilities in Maximum Likelihood Classification of Remotely Sensed Data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 10,135–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • P. H. Swain and S. M. Davis (Eds.), 1978: Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach, N.Y., McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. H. Swain and H. Hauska, 1977: The Decision Tree Classifier: Design and Potential. IEEE Trans GGeOscience Electrnnics GF-15 147–147

    Google Scholar 

  • P. H. Swain, S. B. Varderman and J. C. Tilton, 1981: Contextual Classification of Multispectral Image Data Pattern Recognition. 13.429–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • - - J. T. Tou and R. C. Gonzalez, 1974: Pattern Recognition Principles, Mass., Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • A.G. Wacker and D. A. Landgrebe, 1972: Minimum Distance Classification in Remote Sensing. First Canadian Symp. on Remote Sensing, Ottawa.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1986 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Richards, J.A. (1986). Supervised Classification Techniques. In: Remote Sensing Digital Image Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02462-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-02462-1_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-02464-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-02462-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics