Skip to main content

Analysis of Clustered Multivariate Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies

  • Conference paper
COMPSTAT

Abstract

Society is becoming increasingly concerned about problems related to fertility and pregnancy, birth defects, and developmental abnormalities. Consequently, regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have placed an increased priority on protecting the public from drugs, chemicals and other environmental exposures that may contribute to these risks. Because human data are generally limited, data from controlled animal experiments are generally used as the basis for regulation. This work is motivated by data collected from studies with a segment II design that involve exposing pregnant animals (rats, mice or rabbits) during the period of major organogenesis and structural development. Dose levels for the Segment II design consist of a control group and 3 or 4 dose groups, each with 20 to 30 pregnant dams. The dams are sacrificed just prior to normal delivery, at which time the uterus is removed and examined for resorptions and fetal deaths. The viable fetuses are examined carefully for many different types of malformations, which are commonly classified into three broad categories: external malformations are those visible by naked eye, for instance missing limbs; skeletal malformations might include missing or malformed bones; visceral malformations affect internal organs such as the heart, the brain, the lungs etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aerts, M. & Claeskens, G. (1997a). Local Polynomial Estimation in Multiparameter Likelihood Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 1536–1545.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Aerts, M. & Claeskens, G. (1997b). Bootstrapping Pseudolikelihood Models for Clustered Binary Data, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts, M. & Claeskens, G. (1997c). Bootstrap Tests for Misspecified Clustered Binary Data Models, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aerts, M., Declerck, L. & Molenberghs, G. (1997). Likelihood Misspecification and Safe Dose Determination for Clustered Binary Data. Environmetrics, 8, 613–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, B.C. & Strauss, D. (1991). Pseudolikelihood estimation : some examples. Sankhya B, 53, 233–243.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bahadur, R.R. (1961). A representation of the joint distribution of responses to n dichotomous items. In: Studies in Item Analysis and Prediction, (ed. H. Solomon), 158–168. Stanford, California : Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyse, M., Molenberghs, G. & Geys, H. (1998). Mixed Discrete and Continuous Outcomes for the Validation of Surrogate Endpoints in Randomized Experiments, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalano, P.J. & Ryan, L.M. (1992). Bivariate latent variable models for clustered discrete and continuous outcomes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 651–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. R. (1972). The analysis of multivariate binary data. Applied Statistics, 21, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crump, K.S. & Howe, R.B. (1983). A review of methods for calculating statistical confidence limits in low dose extrapolation. In: Toxicological Risk Assessment, Volume I: Biological and Statistical Criteria, (ed. D.B. Clayson, D. Krewski & I. Munro), 187–203. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump, K.S. (1984). A New Method for Determining Allowable Daily Intakes. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 4, 854–871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Declerck, L., Aerts, M. & Molenberghs, G. (1998). Behaviour of the Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic Under A Bahadur Model For Exchangeable Binary Data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, G.M. & Laird, N.M. (1995). Regression Models for a Bivariate Discrete and Continuous Outcome With Clustering. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 845–852.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geys, H., Molenberghs, G. & Lipsitz, S.R. (1997). A note on the Comparison of Pseudo-likelihood and Generalized Estimating Equations for Marginal Odds Ratio Models, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geys, H., Molenberghs, G. & Ryan, L. (1997). Pseudo-likelihood Inference for Clustered Binary Data. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 26, 2743–2767.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Geys, H., Molenberghs, G. & Ryan, L. (1997). Pseudo-likelihood Inference for Exponential Family Models, Applied to Toxicology Data, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D.W. & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D.W., Hosmer, T., Lemeshow, S. & Le Cessie, S. (1997). A Comparison of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Logistic Regression Model. Statistics in Medicine, 16, 965–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmel, C.A. & Gaylor D.W. (1988). Issues in Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis for Developmental Toxicology. Risk Analysis, 8, 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krewski, D. & Van Ryzin, J. (1981). Dose-response models for quantal response toxicity data. In: Statistics and Related Topics, (ed. M. Csorgo, D. Dawson, J.N.K. Rao & E. Saleh), 201–231. North-Holland, New York, 201–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Cessie, S. & Van Houwelingen J.C. (1994). Logistic Regression for Correlated Binary Data. Applied Statistics, 43, 95–108.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, K.Y., Zeger, S.L. & Qagish, B. (1992). Multivariate Regression Analyses for Categorical Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 54, 3–40.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsitz, SR., Fitzmaurice, G.M. & Molenberghs, G. (1996). Goodness-offit Tests for Ordinal Response Regression Models. Applied Statistics, 45, 175–190.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Molenberghs, G., Declerck, L. & Aerts, M. (1997) Misspecifying the likelihood for clustered binary data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 26, 327–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenberghs, G. & Ryan, L.M. (1998). Likelihood inference for clustered multivariate binary data, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, B.J.T. (1992) Analysis of Quantal Response Data, Chapman and Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochi, Y. & Prentice, R.L. (1984). Likelihood Inference in a Correlated Probit Regression Model. Biometrika, 71, 531–543.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Plackett, R.L. (1965). A Class of Bivariate Distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 516–522.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Price, C. J., Kimmel, C. A., Tyl, R. W. & Marr, M. C. (1985). The developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol in rats and mice. Toxico. Appl. Pharmacol., 81, 113–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regan, M.M. & Catalano P.J. (1998). Likelihood Models for Clustered Binary and Continuous Outcomes: Application to Developmental Toxicology, Harvard School of Public Health, Technical Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skellam, J.G. (1948). A probability distribution derived from the binomial distribution by regarding the probability of a success as variable between the sets of trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 10, 257–261.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Stiratelli R., Laird, N. & Ware, J.H. (1984). Random effects models for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics, 40, 961–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsiatis, A.A. (1980). A note on a goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model. Biometrika, 67, 250–251.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Molenberghs, G., Geys, H., Declerck, L., Claeskens, G., Aerts, M. (1998). Analysis of Clustered Multivariate Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies. In: Payne, R., Green, P. (eds) COMPSTAT. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01131-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01131-7_1

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1131-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-01131-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics