Abstract
Society is becoming increasingly concerned about problems related to fertility and pregnancy, birth defects, and developmental abnormalities. Consequently, regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have placed an increased priority on protecting the public from drugs, chemicals and other environmental exposures that may contribute to these risks. Because human data are generally limited, data from controlled animal experiments are generally used as the basis for regulation. This work is motivated by data collected from studies with a segment II design that involve exposing pregnant animals (rats, mice or rabbits) during the period of major organogenesis and structural development. Dose levels for the Segment II design consist of a control group and 3 or 4 dose groups, each with 20 to 30 pregnant dams. The dams are sacrificed just prior to normal delivery, at which time the uterus is removed and examined for resorptions and fetal deaths. The viable fetuses are examined carefully for many different types of malformations, which are commonly classified into three broad categories: external malformations are those visible by naked eye, for instance missing limbs; skeletal malformations might include missing or malformed bones; visceral malformations affect internal organs such as the heart, the brain, the lungs etc.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aerts, M. & Claeskens, G. (1997a). Local Polynomial Estimation in Multiparameter Likelihood Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 92, 1536–1545.
Aerts, M. & Claeskens, G. (1997b). Bootstrapping Pseudolikelihood Models for Clustered Binary Data, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.
Aerts, M. & Claeskens, G. (1997c). Bootstrap Tests for Misspecified Clustered Binary Data Models, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.
Aerts, M., Declerck, L. & Molenberghs, G. (1997). Likelihood Misspecification and Safe Dose Determination for Clustered Binary Data. Environmetrics, 8, 613–627.
Arnold, B.C. & Strauss, D. (1991). Pseudolikelihood estimation : some examples. Sankhya B, 53, 233–243.
Bahadur, R.R. (1961). A representation of the joint distribution of responses to n dichotomous items. In: Studies in Item Analysis and Prediction, (ed. H. Solomon), 158–168. Stanford, California : Stanford University Press.
Buyse, M., Molenberghs, G. & Geys, H. (1998). Mixed Discrete and Continuous Outcomes for the Validation of Surrogate Endpoints in Randomized Experiments, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.
Catalano, P.J. & Ryan, L.M. (1992). Bivariate latent variable models for clustered discrete and continuous outcomes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87, 651–658.
Cox, D. R. (1972). The analysis of multivariate binary data. Applied Statistics, 21, 113–120.
Crump, K.S. & Howe, R.B. (1983). A review of methods for calculating statistical confidence limits in low dose extrapolation. In: Toxicological Risk Assessment, Volume I: Biological and Statistical Criteria, (ed. D.B. Clayson, D. Krewski & I. Munro), 187–203. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Crump, K.S. (1984). A New Method for Determining Allowable Daily Intakes. Fundamental and Applied Toxicology, 4, 854–871.
Declerck, L., Aerts, M. & Molenberghs, G. (1998). Behaviour of the Likelihood Ratio Test Statistic Under A Bahadur Model For Exchangeable Binary Data. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, in press.
Fitzmaurice, G.M. & Laird, N.M. (1995). Regression Models for a Bivariate Discrete and Continuous Outcome With Clustering. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 845–852.
Geys, H., Molenberghs, G. & Lipsitz, S.R. (1997). A note on the Comparison of Pseudo-likelihood and Generalized Estimating Equations for Marginal Odds Ratio Models, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.
Geys, H., Molenberghs, G. & Ryan, L. (1997). Pseudo-likelihood Inference for Clustered Binary Data. Communications in Statistics: Theory and Methods, 26, 2743–2767.
Geys, H., Molenberghs, G. & Ryan, L. (1997). Pseudo-likelihood Inference for Exponential Family Models, Applied to Toxicology Data, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.
Hosmer, D.W. & Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.
Hosmer, D.W., Hosmer, T., Lemeshow, S. & Le Cessie, S. (1997). A Comparison of Goodness-of-Fit Tests for the Logistic Regression Model. Statistics in Medicine, 16, 965–980.
Kimmel, C.A. & Gaylor D.W. (1988). Issues in Qualitative and Quantitative Risk Analysis for Developmental Toxicology. Risk Analysis, 8, 15–20.
Krewski, D. & Van Ryzin, J. (1981). Dose-response models for quantal response toxicity data. In: Statistics and Related Topics, (ed. M. Csorgo, D. Dawson, J.N.K. Rao & E. Saleh), 201–231. North-Holland, New York, 201–231.
Le Cessie, S. & Van Houwelingen J.C. (1994). Logistic Regression for Correlated Binary Data. Applied Statistics, 43, 95–108.
Liang, K.Y., Zeger, S.L. & Qagish, B. (1992). Multivariate Regression Analyses for Categorical Data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 54, 3–40.
Lipsitz, SR., Fitzmaurice, G.M. & Molenberghs, G. (1996). Goodness-offit Tests for Ordinal Response Regression Models. Applied Statistics, 45, 175–190.
Molenberghs, G., Declerck, L. & Aerts, M. (1997) Misspecifying the likelihood for clustered binary data. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 26, 327–349.
Molenberghs, G. & Ryan, L.M. (1998). Likelihood inference for clustered multivariate binary data, Limburgs Universitair Centrum, Technical Report.
Morgan, B.J.T. (1992) Analysis of Quantal Response Data, Chapman and Hall, London.
Ochi, Y. & Prentice, R.L. (1984). Likelihood Inference in a Correlated Probit Regression Model. Biometrika, 71, 531–543.
Plackett, R.L. (1965). A Class of Bivariate Distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 60, 516–522.
Price, C. J., Kimmel, C. A., Tyl, R. W. & Marr, M. C. (1985). The developmental toxicity of ethylene glycol in rats and mice. Toxico. Appl. Pharmacol., 81, 113–127.
Regan, M.M. & Catalano P.J. (1998). Likelihood Models for Clustered Binary and Continuous Outcomes: Application to Developmental Toxicology, Harvard School of Public Health, Technical Report.
Skellam, J.G. (1948). A probability distribution derived from the binomial distribution by regarding the probability of a success as variable between the sets of trials. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 10, 257–261.
Stiratelli R., Laird, N. & Ware, J.H. (1984). Random effects models for serial observations with binary response. Biometrics, 40, 961–971.
Tsiatis, A.A. (1980). A note on a goodness-of-fit test for the logistic regression model. Biometrika, 67, 250–251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Molenberghs, G., Geys, H., Declerck, L., Claeskens, G., Aerts, M. (1998). Analysis of Clustered Multivariate Data from Developmental Toxicity Studies. In: Payne, R., Green, P. (eds) COMPSTAT. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01131-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01131-7_1
Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1131-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-01131-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive