Skip to main content

Relationships Between Speech and Writing Systems in Ancient Alphabets and Syllabaries

  • Chapter

Abstract

During the 14th century b.c., in the country of Canaan (Phoenicia to the Greeks, Byblos to be precise) there appeared an alphabet that was distinct from cuneiform. Its letters would come to be used, with some modifications, by the Hellenics, the Etruscans, the Oscs, the Umbrians, the Latins, and other cultures. With respect to writing systems, Canaan was certainly a privileged area in the whole Middle Eastern region. Two relatively simple writing systems were in use there, unfortunately still undeciphered today: the “pseudo-hieroglyphic” of Byblos, which had 114 characters, and the Proto-Sinaic of Palestine which had 35 (Cohen, 1958). In addition, there were the 22 signs used in the funerary inscription of Ahiram in Byblos. These characters had a long history behind them, and gave rise to the letters of our alphabet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Cardona, G. R. (1981). Antropologia della scrittura Turin: Loescher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. (1958). La Grande invention de l’écriture et son évolution. (3 vols.). Paris: Imprimerie Nationale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Février, J. G. (1959). Histoire de l’écriture. Paris: Payot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisch, M. (1956). L’arabe classique, esquisse d’une structure linguistique. Beyrouth: Imprimerie catholique.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafont, R. (1978). Le travail et la langue. Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lafont, R., Boyer, H., Gardés-Madray, F., Marconot, J. M., & Rieusset, I. (1984). Anthropologie de l’écriture. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lecomte, G. (1968). Grammaire de l’arabe. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventris, M., & Chadwick, J. (1956). Documents in Mycenian Greek Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, W. (1889). Sanskrit grammar ( 2nd ed. ). London: Oxford University Press (Reprint).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1988 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lafont, R. (1988). Relationships Between Speech and Writing Systems in Ancient Alphabets and Syllabaries. In: de Kerckhove, D., Lumsden, C.J. (eds) The Alphabet and the Brain. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01093-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-01093-8_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-01095-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-01093-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics