Psychological Evaluation and Psychometry

  • U. Hartmann
Chapter

Abstract

Psychological diagnosis and evaluation is of major importance within the multidisciplinary examination of erectile dysfunction. In many cases, the significance of psychogenic versus organic pathogenic factors, the existence and intensity of psychopathological symptoms, and relevant relationship factors are more crucial to therapeutic considerations than the medical aspects of evaluation.

Keywords

Erectile Dysfunction Sexual Dysfunction Sexual Arousal Premature Ejaculation Psychological Evaluation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Abel GG et al. (1982) Differential diagnosis of impotence in diabetics. Neurol Urodynamics 1: 57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Althof SE et al. (1989) Why do so many people drop out from auto-injection therapy for impotence? J Sex Marital Ther 15: 121–129PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barlow DH (1986) Causes of sexual dysfunction: The role of anxiety and cognitive interference. J Consult Clin Psychol 54: 140–148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Beutler LE et al. (1975) MMPI and MIT discriminators of biogenic and psychogenic impotence. J Consult Clin Psychol 43: 899–903PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bruce Ti et al. (1989) Differences in anticipatory and situational affective responding between sexually functional and dysfunctional men. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bruce TJ et al. (1989) Differential response to distraction of sexually functional and dysfunctional men. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Advancement of Behavior Therapy, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dekker J, Everaerd W (1989) Psychological determinants of sexual arousal: A review. Behav Res Ther 27: 353–364Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Derogatis LR’et al. (1976) Discrimination of organic versus psychogenic impotence with the DSFI. J Sex Marital Ther 2: 229–240PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gellman R, Gellman Barroux C (1986) Réflexions critiques sur les impuissances d’origine vasculaire. Psychologie Médicale 18: 399–401Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hatch JP et al. (1987) Psychometric differentiation of psychogenic and organic erectile disorders. J Urol 138: 781–783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jefferson TW et al. (1989) An evaluation of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory as a discriminator of primary organic and primary psychogenic impotence in diabetic males. Arch Sex Behav 18: 117–126PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaplan HS (1974) The new sex therapy. Brunner/Mazel, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaplan HS (1979) Disorders of sexual desire. Brunner/Mazel, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kaplan HS (1983) The evaluation of sexual disorders. Brunner/Mazel, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Keuler F, Altwein JE (1989) Diagnostik der erektilen Impotenz. Urologe [A] 28: 241–247Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kockott G et al. (1980) Symptomatology and psychological aspects of male sexual inadequacy: results of an experimental study. Arch Sex Behav 9: 457–475PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lemaire A et al. (1987) Les explorations psychologiques standardisées dans l’exploration de l’impuissance. Psychologie Médicale 19: 819–821Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Levenson H et al. (1986) MMPI evaluation of erectile dysfunction: failure of organic vs. psychogenic decision rules. J Clin Psychol 42: 752–754PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marshall P (1980) Differentiation of organic and psychogenic impotence on the basis of MMPI decision rules. J Consult Clin Psychol 48: 407–408PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martin LM et al. (1983) Psychometric differentiation of biogenic and psychogenic impotence. Arch Sex Behav 12: 475–485PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Masters WH, Johnson V (1970) Human sexual inadequacy. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sakheim DK et al. (1987) Distinguishing between organogenic and psychogenic erectile dysfunction. Behav Res Ther 25: 379–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Segraves KA, Segraves RT (1986) Differentiation of biogenic and psychogenic impotence with the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and the Inventory of Sexual Attitudes. Personality and Individual Differences 7: 423–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Segraves KA et al. (1987) Use of sexual history to differentiate organic from psychogenic impotence. Arch Sex Behav 16: 125–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Segraves RT et al. (1981) Discrimination of organic versus psychological impotence with the DSFI: A failure to replicate. J Sex Marital Ther 7: 230–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Smith AD (1988) Psychologic factors in the multidisciplinary evaluation and treatment of erectile dysfunction. Urol Clin North Am 15: 41–51PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Staples RB et al. (1980) A reevaluation of MMPI discriminators of biogenic and psychogenic impotence. J Consult Clin Psychol 48: 543–545PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turner LA et al. (1989) Self-injection of papaverine and phentolamine in the treatment of psychogenic impotence. J Sex Marital Ther 15: 163–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zilbergeld B (1978) Male sexuality. Little, Brown, BostonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • U. Hartmann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations