Abstract
Unlike contact metamorphism, regional metamorphism is not a localized phenomenon. It takes place at deeper regions of the crust and is, as the name suggests, of regional extent. The different types of regional dynamothermal metamorphism are confined to areas of mountain building, so that metamorphism as well as orogenesis ought to be regarded as due to “one and the same process.” 1 The factor bringing about both of them can be viewed only in an additional supply of thermal energy at specific regions of the earth, the causes of which may be presumed at great depths; namely, within the mantle. Based on his detailed investigations of plagioclases as index minerals of metamorphism in the central Alps, E. WENK (1962) pictures the presence of “thermal domes” during the metamorphism within the belt of orogenesis. “We cannot regard these thermal highs as independent phenomena, they are genetically connected to orogenesis.” It is therefore “the thermal energy surging from the depths that imparts to the rock masses their special character,” i.e, brings about rock metamorphism. In principle, however, regional metamorphism is not very different from contact metamorphism, both of them requiring a supply of thermal energy. In the case of contact metamorphism, the original source of heat is small and now exposed as a plutonic mass, whereas with regional metamorphism, it is essentially larger, more deep-seated and not visible.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
HEARTH: Schweiz. Min. Petr. Mitt. 42, 127–137 (1962).
E. WENK: Schweiz. Min. Petr. Mitt. 42, 139–152 (1962).
U. GRUBENMANN: Die kristallinen Schiefer, Berlin 1904; 2. Ed. 1910.
U. GRUBENMANN and P. NIGGLI: Die Gesteinsmetamorphose I., Berlin 1924.
G. BARROW: Quart. J. Geol. Soc. 49, 330–358 (1893)./Proc. Geol. Assoc. 23, 268284 (1912).
C. E. TILLEY: Quart. J. Geol. Soc. 81, 100–110 (1925).
A. HARKER: Metamorphism. London 1932 and 1939.
W. Q. KENNEDY: Geol. Mag. 85, 229–234 (1948).
W. Q. KENNEDY: Geol. Mag. 86, 43–56 (1949).
H. L. JAMES:Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer. 66, 1455–1488 (1955).
H. J. ZWART: Geol. Rundschau 52, 38–65 (1962).
A. MIYASHIRO: J. Petrology 2, 277–311 (1961).
A. HARKER: Metamorphism. London 1932, 1939.
E. NIGGLI: Intern. Geol. Congr. Norden, Part 13, 132–138 (1960); Eclogae Geol. Helvetiae, 58, 335–368 (1965).
G. HOSCHEK: Contr. Mineral. Petrol., 14, 123–162 (1967).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1967 Springer-Verlag New York Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Winkler, H.G.F. (1967). Regional Dynamothermal Metamorphism. In: Petrogenesis of Metamorphic Rocks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00866-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-00866-9_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-04023-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-00866-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive