Attribution and Social Power

  • H.-D. Schneider
Conference paper


Social power is often defined as the ability to influence cognitive and behavioral aspects of other persons. Power relations then embrace almost the whole sphere of social behavior because in every interaction we are attempting to influence the other in his thinking, willing and acting, or the other way about, we succumb to the influence of the other.


Power Relation Power Relationship Phenomenal Quality Social Power Winning Coalition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blood, R.O., and D.M. Wolfe: Husbands and wives. Glencoe, Ill., 1960.Google Scholar
  2. Cole, S.G.: An examination of the power-inversion effect in three-person mixed-motive games. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 11, 1969, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dahl, R.A.: The concept of power. Behavioral Science 2, 1957, 202–215.Google Scholar
  4. Dahlström, E.: Exchange, influence and power. Acta Sociologica 9, 1966, 237–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Etzioni, A.: The active society. London—New York 1968.Google Scholar
  6. French, J.R.P., and B. Raven: The bases of social power. Studies in social power. Ed. by D. Cartwright. Ann Arbor 1959, 150–167.Google Scholar
  7. Gamson, W.A.: A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review 26, 1961, 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gamson, W.A.: Power and discontent. Homewood, Ill., 1968.Google Scholar
  9. Harvey, J.H., W.J. Ickes, and R.F. Kidd (Eds.): New directions in attribution research. Hillsdale, N.J., 1976.Google Scholar
  10. Jones, E.E., and K.E. Davis: From acts to dispositions. The attribution process in person perception. Advances in experimental social psychology. Volume 2. Ed. by L. Berkowitz. New York 1965, 219–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones, E.E., and R.E. Nisbett: The actor and the observer: divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. Attribution: perceiving the causes of behavior. Ed. by E.E. Jones et al. Morristown, N.J., 1972, 79–94.Google Scholar
  12. Kaplowitz, S.A.: Toward a systematic theory of power attribution. Social Psychology 41, 1978, 131–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Köhler, W.: Gestalt psychology. New York 1959.Google Scholar
  14. Krüger, W.: Macht in der Unternehmung. Stuttgart 1976.Google Scholar
  15. Michener, H.A., E.J. Lawler, and S. Bacharach: Perceptions of power in conflict situations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28, 1973, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Olsen, M.E. (Ed.): Power in societies. London 1970.Google Scholar
  17. Riker, W.H.: The theory of political coalitions. New Haven 1962.Google Scholar
  18. Schneider, H.-D.: Sozialpsychologie der Machtbeziehungen. Stuttgart 1977.Google Scholar
  19. Schneider, H.-D.: Was determiniert Koalitionstendenzen in der Kleingruppe: Ressourcen oder Ähnlichkeit? Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie 25, 1978, 153–168.Google Scholar
  20. Schopler, J., and B. Layton: Determinants of the self-attribution of having influenced another person. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 22, 1972, 326–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schopler, J.: Attributions of interpersonal power. Perspectives on social power. Ed. by J.T. Tedeschi. Chicago 1974, 34–60.Google Scholar
  22. Weiner, B. et al.: Perceiving the causes of success and failure. Attribution: perceiving the causes of behavior. Ed. by E.E. Jones et al. Morristown, N.J., 1972, 95–120.Google Scholar
  23. Wrong, D.H.: Some problems in defining social power. American Journal of Sociology 73, 1968, 673–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Physica-Verlag, Würzburg (Germany) 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • H.-D. Schneider
    • 1
  1. 1.ZürichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations