Skip to main content

The others: Comparisons to (Other) Collectives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Navigating Nationality
  • 28 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

A good part of self-description does not happen by means of outright identification or self-characterisation, but through comparison against other groups. Social groups and entities are only identifiable insofar as they can be cognitively and linguistically separated, and differentiated from, other entities. Two types of differentiations are made by the Zimbabwean migrants I encountered in the interviews vis-à-vis themselves and other groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While one’s home country often is idealized by migrants, it also happens that both countries, the country of origin and of destination, become the subject of idealization (Sayad, 2018).

  2. 2.

    Some theorists of stereotyping make the point that stereotypes contain at least a “kernel of truth” (Perkins, 1979). T. E. Perkins (1979) emphasizes that taking stereotypes as simply erroneous, would mean to ignore their ideological content, which has analytical value in itself. The classical differentiations between type and stereotype by Walter Lippman (1956) or social type and stereotype by Orrin E. Klapp (1962), essentially should be regarded as a matter of degree (Dyer, 2009).

  3. 3.

    I commented that often no clear differentiations can be drawn between references to the nation state and its people (e.g. Zimbabwe and Zimbabweans). To be precise, the formulation “people in South Africa” or “there are killers in South Africa” leaves it open which nationality those groups belong to. It, however, can be doubted that such differences are made in people’s colloquial speech.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Johannes Kögel .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kögel, J. (2024). The others: Comparisons to (Other) Collectives. In: Navigating Nationality. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43850-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43850-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-43849-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-43850-0

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics