Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Misinformation in der strategischen Kommunikationsforschung – ein Literaturüberblick

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategische Wahrheiten

  • 465 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Während Fehlinformationen und verwandte Konzepte u. a. in der politischen Kommunikationsforschung intensiv erforscht werden, spielt das Thema in der strategischen Kommunikationsforschung eine eher marginale Rolle. Der Beitrag hat daher zum Ziel zu untersuchen, wie Misinformation und verwandte Konzepte im Feld der strategischen Kommunikationsforschung untersucht werden. Er gibt einen Überblick über bisher publizierte Beiträge zum Thema und diskutiert diese. Dazu werden zunächst existierende Definitionen von Misinformation, Desinformation und Fake News vorgestellt und kritisch hinterfragt. Der Beitrag soll dadurch helfen, die Forschung zu Misinformation und verwandten Konzepten in der strategischen Kommunikationsforschung zu strukturieren und systematisch aufzuarbeiten. Außerdem zeigt er auf, welche Lücken bisher in der Auseinandersetzung mit dem Thema bestehen und arbeitet Potenziale für zukünftige Forschung heraus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Ali, M. (2022). Fake-News Network Model: A Conceptual Framework for Strategic Communication to Deal with Fake News. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2021.1988616

  • Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211

  • Amazeen, M. A., & Bucy, E. P. (2019). Conferring Resistance to Digital Disinformation: The Inoculating Influence of Procedural News Knowledge. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(3), 415–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2019.1653101

  • Arce-García, S., Said-Hung, E., & Mottareale, D. (2022). Astroturfing as a strategy for manipulating public opinion on Twitter during the pandemic in Spain. El Profesional de La Información, e310310. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.10

  • BBC (2016). Vinci shares plunge on publication of fake press release. https://www.bbc.com/news/business-38071474

  • Beckert, J. (2022). A threat to journalism? How journalists and advertising sales managers in news organizations perceive and cope with native advertising. Journalism (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/14648849211067584

  • Beckert, J. Koch, T., Viererbl, B., Denner, N., & Peter, C. (2020). Advertising in Disguise? How Disclosure and Content Features Influence the Effects of Native Advertising. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research, 45(3), 303–324. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0116

  • Bennett, W. L., & Livingston, S. (2018). The disinformation order: Disruptive communication and the decline of democratic institutions. European Journal of Communication, 33(2), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323118760317

  • Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and Health Care Reform: Experiments in Political Misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000186

  • Bleakley, P. (2021). Panic, pizza and mainstreaming the alt-right: A social media analysis of Pizzagate and the rise of the QAnon conspiracy. Current Sociology, 001139212110348. https://doi.org/10.1177/00113921211034896

  • Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2018). See Something, Say Something: Correction of Global Health Misinformation on Social Media. Health Communication, 33(9), 1131–1140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1331312

  • Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of Computational Science, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2010.12.007

  • Boman, C. D. (2021). Examining characteristics of prebunking strategies to overcome PR disinformation attacks. Public Relations Review, 47(5), 102105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102105

  • Boman, C. D., & Schneider, E. J. (2021). Finding an antidote: Testing the use of proactive crisis strategies to protect organizations from astroturf attacks. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 102004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.102004

  • Bordia, P., Kiazad, K., Restubog, S. L. D., DiFonzo, N., Stenson, N., & Tang, R. L. (2014). Rumor as Revenge in the Workplace. Group & Organization Management, 39(4), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601114540750

  • Brown, E. (2019). Online fake news is costing us $78 billion globally each year. ZDNet. https://www.zdnet.com/article/online-fake-news-costing-us-78-billion-globally-each-year/

  • Brunsson, N. (2003). Organized hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions in organizations. Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick, A., & Stanyer, J. (2022). Deception as a Bridging Concept in the Study of Disinformation, Misinformation, and Misperceptions: Toward a Holistic Framework. Communication Theory, 32(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtab019

  • Chee, F. Y. (2020). Combat 5G COVID-19 fake news urges Europe. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-eu-telecoms-5g/combat-5g-covid-19-fake-news-urges-europe-idUSKBN2392N8

  • Chen, Z. F., & Cheng, Y. (2019). Consumer response to fake news about brands on social media: The effects of self-efficacy, media trust, and persuasion knowledge on brand trust. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2145

  • Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508413478310

  • Damstra, A., Boomgaarden, H. G., Broda, E., Lindgren, E., Strömbäck, J., Tsfati, Y., & Vliegenthart, R. (2021). What Does Fake Look Like? A Review of the Literature on Intentional Deception in the News and on Social Media. Journalism Studies, 22(14), 1947–1963. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1979423

  • Dan, V., Paris, B., Donovan, J., Hameleers, M., Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S., & von Sikorski, C. (2021). Visual Mis- and Disinformation, Social Media, and Democracy. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 98(3), 641–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990211035395

  • Denner, N. & Koch, T. (im Druck). Misinformation und Desinformation als gesellschaftliche Herausforderung: Zur Verbreitung und Korrektur von Falschmeldungen. In: Tagungsband Staatswissenschaftliches Forum. Staatswissenschaftliches Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denner, N., Viererbl, B., & Koch, T. (2023). Effects of Repeated Corrections of Misinformation on Organizational Trust: More is Not Always Better. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 17(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2022.2135098

  • Egelhofer, J. L., & Lecheler, S. (2019). Fake news as a two-dimensional phenomenon: A framework and research agenda. Annals of the International Communication Association, 43(2), 97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782

  • Einwiller, S. A., & Johar, G. V. (2013). Countering accusations with inoculation: The moderating role of consumer-company identification. Public Relations Review, 39(3), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.03.002

  • Enders, A. M., Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C. A., Seelig, M. I., Wuchty, S., Murthi, M. N., Premaratne, K., & Funchion, J. R. (2021). Do conspiracy beliefs form a belief system? Examining the structure and organization of conspiracy beliefs. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 9(1), 255–271. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.5649

  • Fallis, D. (2015). What is Disinformation? Library Trends, 63(3), 401–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetzer, J. H. (2004). Disinformation: The Use of False Information. Minds and Machines, 14(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000021683.28604.5b

  • Filkuková, P., Ayton, P., Rand, K., & Langguth, J. (2021). What Should I Trust? Individual Differences in Attitudes to Conflicting Information and Misinformation on COVID-19. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 588478. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.588478

  • Freytag, A., Knop-Huelss, K., Meier, A., Reinecke, L., Hefner, D., Klimmt, C., & Vorderer, P. (2021). Permanently Online – Always Stressed Out? The Effects of Permanent Connectedness on Stress Experiences. Human Communication Research, 47(2), 132–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/hqaa014

  • Hollstein, H. (1991). Zeitungsenten. Kleine Geschichte der Falschmeldung. Heitere und ernste Spielarten vom Aprilscherz bis zur Desinformation. Bertelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, H., & Kim, H. J. (2020). Antecedents and Consequences of Information Overload in the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9305. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249305

  • Iacobucci, S., De Cicco, R., Michetti, F., Palumbo, R., & Pagliaro, S. (2021). Deepfakes Unmasked: The Effects of Information Priming and Bullshit Receptivity on Deepfake Recognition and Sharing Intention. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0149

  • Ireton, C., & Posetti, J. (2018). Journalism, fake news & disinformation: Handbook for journalism education and training. Unesco Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahng, M. R. (2021). Is Fake News the New Social Media Crisis? Examining the Public Evaluation of Crisis Management for Corporate Organizations Targeted in Fake News. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 15(1), 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118X.2020.1848842

  • Jahng, M. R., Lee, H., & Rochadiat, A. (2020). Public relations practitioners’ management of fake news: Exploring key elements and acts of information authentication. Public Relations Review, 46(2), 101907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101907

  • Jerit, J., & Zhao, Y. (2020). Political Misinformation. Annual Review of Political Science, 23(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050718-032814

  • Jin, Y., van der Meer, T. G. L. A., Lee, Y.-I., & Lu, X. (2020). The Effects of Corrective Communication and Employee Backup on the Effectiveness of Fighting Crisis Misinformation. Public Relations Review, 46(3), 101910. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2020.101910

  • Johann, M., & Wagner, J. (2020). Neue Debatte, altes Dilemma? Die Herausforderungen des Phänomens ‚Fake News‘ für die Unternehmenskommunikation. In R. Hohlfeld, M. Harnischmacher, E. Heinke, M. Sengl, & L. S. Lehner (Hrsg.), Fake News und Desinformation: Herausforderungen für die vernetzte Gesellschaft und die empirische Forschung (S. 99–116). Nomos. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748901334-97

  • Johnson, H. M., & Seifert, C. M. (1994). Sources of the continued influence effect: When misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(6), 1420–1436. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.6.1420

  • Kapantai, E., Christopoulou, A., Berberidis, C., & Peristeras, V. (2021). A systematic literature review on disinformation: Toward a unified taxonomical framework. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1301–1326. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820959296

  • Keeley, B. L. (1999). Of Conspiracy Theories. The Journal of Philosophy, 96(3), 109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2564659

  • Keller, F. B., Schoch, D., Stier, S., & Yang, J. (2020). Political Astroturfing on Twitter: How to Coordinate a Disinformation Campaign. Political Communication, 37(2), 256–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1661888

  • Kim, S., & Kim, S. (2020). The Crisis of Public Health and Infodemic: Analyzing Belief Structure of Fake News about COVID-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 12(23), 9904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239904

  • Koch, T., & Denner, N. (2020). Fake News als Gefahr für die öffentliche Meinung? Effekte des wiederholten Aufgreifens und erklärender Dementis auf die Glaubwürdigkeit von Falschinformationen. In N. Jackob, O. Quiring, & M. Maurer (Hrsg.), Traditionen und Transformationen des Öffentlichen (S. 73–90). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29321-5_4

  • Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social Accountability and Corporate Greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43(3), 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022962719299

  • Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., Schudson, M., Sloman, S. A., Sunstein, C. R., Thorson, E. A., Watts, D. J., & Zittrain, J. L. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998

  • Leiser, M. (2016). AstroTurfing, ‘CyberTurfing’ and other online persuasion campaigns. European Journal of Law and Technology, 7(1), 1–27. https://ejlt.org/index.php/ejlt/article/view/501

  • L’Etang, J. (2008). Public Relations, Persuasion and Propaganda: Truth, Knowledge, Spirituality and Mystique. In A. Zerfass, B. van Ruler, & K. Sriramesh (Hrgs.), Public Relations Research (S. 251–269). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-90918-9_16

  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018

  • Lock, I., & Ludolph, R. (2020). Organizational propaganda on the Internet: A systematic review. Public Relations Inquiry, 9(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/2046147X19870844

  • Lubitow, A., & Davis, M. (2011). Pastel Injustice: The Corporate Use of Pinkwashing for Profit. Environmental Justice, 4(2), 139–144. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2010.0026

  • Marschall, S. (2017). Lügen und Politik im „postfaktischen“ Zeitalter. Aus Politik Und Zeitgeschichte, 67(13), 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, A. M., Liu, B. F., Tyquin, E., & Tam, L. (2021). A process view of crisis misinformation: How public relations professionals detect, manage, and evaluate crisis misinformation. Public Relations Review, 47(2), 102040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102040

  • Messina, A. (2007). Public relations, the public interest and persuasion: An ethical approach. Journal of Communication Management, 11(1), 29–52. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540710725978

  • Messing, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2014). Selective Exposure in the Age of Social Media: Endorsements Trump Partisan Source Affiliation When Selecting News Online. Communication Research, 41(8), 1042–1063. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650212466406

  • Michelson, G., & Mouly, S. (2000). Rumour and gossip in organisations: A conceptual study. Management Decision, 38(5), 339–346. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740010340508

  • Miró-Llinares, F., & Aguerri, J. C. (2023). Misinformation about fake news: A systematic critical review of empirical studies on the phenomenon and its status as a ‘threat’. European Journal of Criminology, 20(1), 356–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370821994059

  • Molina, M. D., Sundar, S. S., Le, T., & Lee, D. (2021). “Fake News” Is Not Simply False Information: A Concept Explication and Taxonomy of Online Content. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 180–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878224

  • Müller, P., & Denner, N. (2019). Was tun gegen ‘Fake News’? Eine Analyse anhand der Entstehungsbedingungen und Wirkweisen gezielter Falschmeldungen im Internet- (Gutachten 2. vollständig aktualisierte Auflage). Friedrich-Naumann-Stiftung für die Freiheit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naderer, B., & Opree, S. J. (2021). Increasing Advertising Literacy to Unveil Disinformation in Green Advertising. Environmental Communication, 15(7), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2021.1919171

  • Neo, R. (2022). Fighting Fire With Fire? Relegitimizing Strategies for Media Institutions Faced With Unwarranted “Fake News” Accusations. Social Media + Society, 8(1), 205630512210770. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051221077014

  • Nielsen, R. K., & Graves, L. (2017). News you don’t believe: Audience perspectives on fake news [Reuters institute for the study of journalism factsheets]. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:6eff4d14-bc72-404d-b78a-4c2573459ab8

  • Oh, Y. W., & Park, C. H. (2021). Machine Cleaning of Online Opinion Spam: Developing a Machine-Learning Algorithm for Detecting Deceptive Comments. American Behavioral Scientist, 65(2), 389–403. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764219878238

  • Olasky, M. N. (1984). Retrospective: Bernays’ doctrine of public opinion. Public Relations Review, 10(3), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0363-8111(84)80088-0

  • Oliver, J. E., & Wood, T. J. (2014). Conspiracy Theories and the Paranoid Style(s) of Mass Opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 952–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12084

  • Parks, C. M., & Toth, J. P. (2006). Fluency, Familiarity, Aging, and the Illusion of Truth. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13(2), 225–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/138255890968691

  • Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011

  • Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2004). Resisting persuasion by counterarguing: An attitude strength perspective. In J. T. Jost, M. R. Banaji, & D. A. Prentice (Hrsg.), Perspectivism in social psychology: The yin and yang of scientific progress. (S. 37–51). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/10750-004

  • Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (1999). Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8(3), 338–342. https://doi.org/10.1006/ccog.1999.0386

  • Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver’s Processing Experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3

  • Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Affective Judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008

  • Schulz, A., Wirth, W., & Müller, P. (2020). We Are the People and You Are Fake News: A Social Identity Approach to Populist Citizens’ False Consensus and Hostile Media Perceptions. Communication Research, 47(2), 201–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650218794854

  • Seele, P., & Gatti, L. (2017). Greenwashing Revisited: In Search of a Typology and Accusation-Based Definition Incorporating Legitimacy Strategies: Greenwashing Revisited. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 239–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1912

  • Seifert, C. M. (2002). The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective? In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 265–292). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80009-3

  • Tandoc, E. C., Lim, Z. W., & Ling, R. (2018). Defining “Fake News”: A typology of scholarly definitions. Digital Journalism, 6(2), 137–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2017.1360143

  • Thorson, E. (2016). Belief Echoes: The Persistent Effects of Corrected Misinformation. Political Communication, 33(3), 460–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2015.1102187

  • Thummes, K. (2013). Täuschung in der strategischen Kommunikation: Eine kommunikationswissenschaftliche Analyse. Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thummes, K. (2016). Zwischen Schutz und Manipulation. Eine Befragung zur Akzeptanz von Täuschungen durch Unternehmen. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 64(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634X-2016-3-359

  • Tully, M., Bode, L., & Vraga, E. K. (2020). Mobilizing Users: Does Exposure to Misinformation and Its Correction Affect Users’ Responses to a Health Misinformation Post? Social Media + Society, 6(4), 205630512097837. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120978377

  • Unkelbach, C. (2007). Reversing the truth effect: Learning the interpretation of processing fluency in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(1), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.1.219

  • Vafeiadis, M., Bortree, D. S., Buckley, C., Diddi, P., & Xiao, A. (2020). Refuting fake news on social media: Nonprofits, crisis response strategies and issue involvement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 29(2), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-12-2018-2146

  • Vafeiadis, M., & Xiao, A. (2021). Fake news: How emotions, involvement, need for cognition and rebuttal evidence (story vs. Informational) influence consumer reactions toward a targeted organization. Public Relations Review, 47(4), 102088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2021.102088

  • Valant, J. (2015). Online consumer reviews: The case of misleading or fake reviews. European Parliamentary Research Service. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EPRS_BRI(2015)571301#:~:text=Some%20European%20consumer%20organisations%20say,market%2C%20which%20can%20reduce%20competition

  • van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Jin, Y. (2020). Seeking Formula for Misinformation Treatment in Public Health Crises: The Effects of Corrective Information Type and Source. Health Communication, 35(5), 560–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2019.1573295

  • Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559

  • Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2017). Using Expert Sources to Correct Health Misinformation in Social Media. Science Communication, 39(5), 621–645. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547017731776

  • Wardle, C. (2018). Information disorder: The essential glossary. Harvard Kennedy School Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics, and Public Policy. https://firstdraftnews.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/infoDisorder_glossary.pdf

  • Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary framework for research and policy making (Council of Europe Report DGI (2017)09). Council of Europe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittenberg, C., & Berinsky, A. (2020). Misinformation and its correction. In N. Persily & J. A. Tucker (Hrsg.), Social Media and Democracy: The State of the Field, Prospects for Reform (S. 163–198). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum (2013). Global Risks Report (No. 8). World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GlobalRisks_Report_2013.pdf

  • World Economic Forum (2018). Global Risks Report (No. 13). World Economic Forum. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GRR18_Report.pdf

  • Xiao, X., Borah, P., & Su, Y. (2021). The dangers of blind trust: Examining the interplay among social media news use, misinformation identification, and news trust on conspiracy beliefs. Public Understanding of Science, 30(8), 977–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662521998025

  • Zhou, B., & Zou, T. (2021). Competing for Recommendations: The Strategic Impact of Personalized Product Recommendations in Online Marketplaces. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3761350

  • Zimmermann, F., & Kohring, M. (2020). Mistrust, Disinforming News, and Vote Choice: A Panel Survey on the Origins and Consequences of Believing Disinformation in the 2017 German Parliamentary Election. Political Communication, 37(2), 215–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2019.1686095

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Publizistik, JGU Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland

    Nora Denner

Authors
  1. Nora Denner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nora Denner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Kommunikationswissenschaft, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Deutschland

    Olaf Hoffjann

  2. Institut für Kommunikationswissenschaft, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Deutschland

    Lucas Seeber

  3. Institut für Kommunikationswissenschaft, Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Bamberg, Deutschland

    Ina von der Wense

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Denner, N. (2024). Misinformation in der strategischen Kommunikationsforschung – ein Literaturüberblick. In: Hoffjann, O., Seeber, L., von der Wense, I. (eds) Strategische Wahrheiten. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43831-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43831-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-43830-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-43831-9

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation