Skip to main content

Human Centered Design – Ein effektives Mittel gegen „Wickedness“ und „Pilotitis“ komplexer Digitalisierungsprojekte?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Health Data Management
  • 1231 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Potenziale eines digitalisierten Gesundheitssystems sind offenkundig. Von unnötigen Doppeluntersuchungen bis hin zur mangelnden Früherkennung – in kaum einem Sektor warten so viele Problemstellungen auf eine digitale Lösung. Gleichzeitig sind die erhofften Effekte kein Selbstläufer und Berichte über gescheiterte Digitalisierungsprojekte und über negative Effekte häufen sich. Dies gilt insbesondere für komplexe Vorhaben, die aus diesem Grund auch mit dem Phänomen der „Wickedness“ und der „Pilotitis“ beschrieben werden. Es ist weithin anerkannt, dass der Erfolg solcher Projekte von einer gelungenen Abstimmung menschlicher, technischer und (inter-)organisatorischer Faktoren abhängt. Eine Erkenntnis, die inzwischen auch in zahlreichen Rahmenwerken Eingang gefunden hat (z. B. FITT, NASSS, CeHRes). Obwohl diese eine erste Orientierung bieten, sind sie oftmals zu abstrakt für einen zielführenden Einsatz. Dieser Beitrag argumentiert, dass Human Centered Design (HCD) eine Brücke zwischen Erkenntnis und Umsetzung schlagen kann und somit eine vielversprechende Unterstützung für IT-Verantwortliche darstellt. Neben Merkmalen und Methoden werden auch Herausforderungen und Perspektiven von HCD aufgezeigt.

„[Wicket Problems are a] class of social system problems which are ill-formulated, where the information is confusing, where there are many clients and decision makers with conflicting values, and where the ramifications in the whole system are thoroughly confusing“

(Rittel, 1972, zitiert nach Buchanan, 1992, S. 15).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Ali, S. B., Romero, J., Morrison, K., Hafeez, B., & Ancker, J. S. (2018). Focus section health IT usability: Applying a task-technology fit model to adapt an electronic patient portal for patient work. Applied Clinical Informatics, 9(1), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0038-1632396/ID/BR170112RA-32/BIB

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., & Mahler, C. (2006). IT-adoption and the interaction of task, technology and individuals: A fit framework and a case study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-6-3

  • Bol, N., Helberger, N., & Weert, J. C. M. (2018). Differences in mobile health app use: A source of new digital inequalities? The Information Society, 34(3), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2018.1438550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design Issues, 8(2), 5. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, M., Heckner, M., Kattenbeck, M., Schneidermeier, T., & Wolff, C. (2011). Design thinking = Human-centered design? Universitätsverlag Chemnitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayon, P., & Hoonakker, P. (2019). Human factors and usability for health information technology: Old and new challenges. Yearbook of Medical Informatics, 28(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0039-1677907/ID/JRCARAYON-33/BIB

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, E., Neta, G., & Roberts, M. C. (2021). Complementary approaches to problem solving in healthcare and public health: Implementation science and human-centered design. Translational Behavioral Medicine, 11(5), 1115–1121. https://doi.org/10.1093/TBM/IBAA079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman, C. W. (1967). Wicked problems. Management Science, 14(4), B141–B142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, N. E., Maria Sino, C. G., Heerdink, E. R., & Schuurmans, M. J. (2018). Development of eHOME, a mobile instrument for reporting, monitoring, and consulting drug-related problems in home care: Human-centered design study. JMIR Human Factors, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/HUMANFACTORS.8319

  • Dul, J., Bruder, R., Buckle, P., Carayon, P., Falzon, P., Marras, W. S., Wilson, J. R., & van der Doelen, B. (2012). A strategy for human factors/ergonomics: Developing the discipline and profession. Ergonomics, 55(4), 377–395. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.661087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egermark, M., Blasiak, A., Remus, A., Sapanel, Y., & Ho, D. (2022). Overcoming pilotitis in digital medicine at the intersection of data, clinical evidence, and adoption. Advanced Intelligent Systems, 4(9), 2200056. https://doi.org/10.1002/AISY.202200056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enticott, J., Johnson, A., & Teede, H. (2021). Learning health systems using data to drive healthcare improvement and impact: A systematic review. BMC Health Services Research, 21(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-021-06215-8/TABLES/3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikainen, S., Pickersgill, M., Cunningham-Burley, S., & Chan, S. (2019). Patienthood and participation in the digital era, 5. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207619845546

  • Esdar, M., Hübner, U., Thye, J., Babitsch, B., & Liebe, J. D. (2021). The effect of innovation capabilities of health care organizations on the quality of health information technology: Model development with cross-sectional data. JMIR Medical Informatics, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/23306

  • Fernando, G. H., & Purva, M. (2023). Role of healthcare leaders in the digitalization of health system: A review. International Journal of Health Systems Resilience. https://doi.org/10.51595/INJHSR22/018

  • Göttgens, I., & Oertelt-Prigione, S. (2021). The application of human-centered design approaches in health research and innovation: A narrative review of current practices. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 9(12). https://doi.org/10.2196/28102

  • Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., A’Court, C., Hinder, S., Fahy, N., Procter, R., & Shaw, S. (2017). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11). https://doi.org/10.2196/JMIR.8775

  • Greenhalgh, T., Maylor, H., Shaw, S., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Betton, V., Nelissen, N., Gremyr, A., Rushforth, A., Koshkouei, M., & Taylor, J. (2020). The NASSS-CAT tools for understanding, guiding, monitoring, and researching technology implementation projects in health and social care: Protocol for an evaluation study in real-world settings. JMIR Research Protocols, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.2196/16861

  • Groeneveld, B., Dekkers, T., Boon, B., & D’Olivo, P. (2018). Challenges for design researchers in healthcare. Design for health, 2(2), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1080/24735132.2018.1541699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harte, R., Glynn, L., Rodríguez-Molinero, A., Baker, P. M. A., Scharf, T., Quinlan, L. R., & ÓLaighin, G. (2017a). A human-centered design methodology to enhance the usability, human factors, and user experience of connected health systems: A three-Phase Methodology. JMIR Human Factors, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/HUMANFACTORS.5443

  • Harte, R., Quinlan, L. R., Glynn, L., Rodríguez-Molinero, A., Baker, P. M. A., Scharf, T., & Ólaighin, G. (2017b). Human-centered design study: Enhancing the usability of a mobile phone app in an integrated falls risk detection system for use by older adult users. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 5(5). https://doi.org/10.2196/MHEALTH.7046

  • Hassi, L., & Laakso, M. (2011). Design thinking in the management discourse: Defining the elements of the concept. https://research.aalto.fi/en/publications/design-thinking-in-the-management-discourse-defining-the-elements. Zugegriffen am 30.08.2023.

  • Holeman, I., & Kane, D. (2020). Human-centered design for global health equity. Information Technology for Development, 26(3), 477. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1667289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IDEO. (2011). Human-centered design toolkit: An open-source toolkit to inspire and new solutions in the developing world. https://www3.nd.edu/~mbloom/ID/Archive/IDEOHCDToolkit.pdf. Zugegriffen am 30.08.2023.

  • ISO. (2019). ISO 9241-210:2010 – Ergonomics of human-system interaction – Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. https://www.iso.org/standard/52075.html. Zugegriffen am 30.08.2023.

  • Johnson, A. M., Brimhall, A. S., Johnson, E. T., Hodgson, J., Didericksen, K., Pye, J., Harmon, G. J. C., & Sewell, K. B. (2023). A systematic review of the effectiveness of patient education through patient portals. JAMIA Open, 6(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1093/JAMIAOPEN/OOAC085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kip, H., Keizer, J., da Silva, M. C., De Jong, N. B., Köhle, N., & Kelders, S. M. (2022). Methods for human-centered eHealth development: Narrative scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.2196/31858

  • Landau, A. Y., Blanchard, A., Cato, K., Atkins, N., Salazar, S., Patton, D. U., & Topaz, M. (2022). Considerations for development of child abuse and neglect phenotype with implications for reduction of racial bias: a qualitative study. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 29(3), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1093/JAMIA/OCAB275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leary, M., Cacchione, P. Z., Demiris, G., Carthon, J. M. B., & Bauermeister, J. A. (2022). An integrative review of human-centered design and design thinking for the creation of health interventions. Nursing Forum, 57(6), 1137–1152. https://doi.org/10.1111/NUF.12805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebe, J.-D., Buddrus, U., Jahn, F., & Hübner, U. (2022a). Digitalstrategie und Digitalisierungsaktivitäten: Ansätze zur Erfolgsmessung. Digitalstrategie im Krankenhaus, 169–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36226-3_12

  • Liebe, J.-D., Jahn, F., Buddrus, U., & Hübner, U. (2022b). Können Reifegradmodelle die Umsetzung von Digitalisierungsstrategien unterstützen. Forum Der Medizin_Dokumentation und Medizin_Informatik, 2, 54–59. https://www.gmds.de/fileadmin/user_upload/AG_mwmKIS/Vergleich_Reifegradmodelle_mdi_2_2022_web.pdf. Zugegriffen am 06.12.2023.

  • Melles, M., Albayrak, A., & Goossens, R. (2021). Innovating health care: key characteristics of human-centered design. International Journal for Quality in Health Care : Journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care, 33(Supplement_1), 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1093/INTQHC/MZAA127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnick, E. R., Harry, E., Sinsky, C. A., Dyrbye, L. N., Wang, H., Trockel, M. T., West, C. P., & Shanafelt, T. (2020). Perceived electronic health record usability as a predictor of task load and burnout among US physicians: Mediation analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(12), E23382. https://doi.org/10.2196/23382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monkman, H., & Kushniruk, A. (2015). eHealth literacy issues, constructs, models, and methods for health information technology design and evaluation. Knowledge Management & E-Learning: An International Journal, 7(4), 541–549. https://doi.org/10.34105/J.KMEL.2015.07.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nohl-Deryk, P., Brinkmann, J. K., Gerlach, F. M., Schreyögg, J., & Achelrod, D. (2018). Barriers to digitalisation of healthcare in Germany: A survey of experts. Gesundheitswesen, 80(11), 939–945. https://doi.org/10.1055/S-0043-121010/ID/R2017-02-0461-0018/BIB

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przysucha, M., Peters, L., Büscher, A., Schnellhammer, M., & Hübner, U. (2022). What went wrong in eMedCare? Formative evaluation of an IT project in primary care in two rural districts. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 296, 81–89. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratna, H. (2019). The importance of effective communication in healthcare practice. HPHR Journal, 23. https://doi.org/10.54111/0001/W4

  • Sadoughi, F., Nasiri, S., & Ahmadi, H. (2018). The impact of health information exchange on healthcare quality and cost-effectiveness: A systematic literature review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 161, 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CMPB.2018.04.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikandar, H., Abbas, A. F., Khan, N., & Qureshi, M. I. (2022). Digital technologies in healthcare: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Online and Biomedical Engineering (IJOE), 18(08), 34–48. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJOE.V18I08.31961

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. D., Li, D. H., & Rafferty, M. R. (2020). The implementation research logic model: A method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects. Implementation Science : IS, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/S13012-020-01041-8

  • Thieme, A., Hanratty, M., Lyons, M., Palacios, J., Marques, R. F., Morrison, C., & Doherty, G. (2023). Designing human-centered AI for mental health: Developing clinically relevant applications for online CBT treatment. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 30(2), 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/3564752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C., Nijland, N., Van Limburg, M., Ossebaard, H. C., Kelders, S. M., Eysenbach, G., & Seydel, E. R. (2011). A holistic framework to improve the uptake and impact of eHealth technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.2196/JMIR.1672

  • Wang, T., Giunti, G., Melles, M., & Goossens, R. (2022). Design-relevant factors affecting the patient experience in digital health: Preliminary results of an umbrella systematic review. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 290, 862–866. https://doi.org/10.3233/SHTI220202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusof, M. M., Kuljis, J., Papazafeiropoulou, A., & Stergioulas, L. K. (2008). An evaluation framework for health information systems: Human, organization and technology-fit factors (HOT-fit). International Journal of Medical Informatics, 77(6), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJMEDINF.2007.08.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jan-David Liebe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liebe, JD., Esdar, M. (2024). Human Centered Design – Ein effektives Mittel gegen „Wickedness“ und „Pilotitis“ komplexer Digitalisierungsprojekte?. In: Henke, V., Hülsken, G., Schneider, H., Varghese, J. (eds) Health Data Management. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43236-2_57

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-43236-2_57

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-43235-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-43236-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics