Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mikroplastik weltweit – Die Belastung in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wasser, Energie und Umwelt

  • 819 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Mikroplastik ist ein hoch aktuelles und viel diskutiertes Thema. Aus deutscher Sicht wird das Problem gerne in andere Regionen verlagert. Diskutiert werden die nachgewiesenen Mikroplastikbelastungen in deutschen Gewässern im internationalen Vergleich.

Zuerst erschienen in Wasser und Abfall 5/2020

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  1. Waldschläger K, Lechthaler S, Stauch G et al. (2020) The way of microplastic through the environment – Application of the source-pathway-receptor model (review). Science of the Total Environment 713: 136584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. GESAMP (2015) Sources, fate and effects of microplastics in the marine environment: a global assessment. Rep. Stud. GESAMP No. 90

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lebreton LC-M, Greer SD, Borrero JC (2012) Numerical modelling of floating debris in the world’s oceans. Mar Pollut Bull 64(3): 653–661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.10.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. van Wijnen J, Ragas aMJ, Kroeze C (2019) Modelling global river export of microplastics to the marine environment: Sources and future trends. Sci Total Environ 673: 392–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wagner S, Hüffer T, Klöckner P et al. (2018) Tire wear particles in the aquatic environment - A review on generation, analysis, occurrence, fate and effects. Water Res 139: 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertling J, Hamann L, Bertling R (2018) Kunststoffe in der Umwelt. Fraunhofer UMSICHT

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moore CJ, Lattin GL, Zellers AF (2011) Quantity and type of plastic debris flowing from two urban rivers to coastal waters and beaches of Southern California. RGCI 11(1): 65–73. https://doi.org/10.5894/rgci194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mani T, Hauk A, Walter U et al. (2015) Microplastics profile along the Rhine River. Sci Rep 5: 17988. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep17988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hurley R, Woodward J, Rothwell JJ (2018) Microplastic contamination of river beds significantly reduced by catchment-wide flooding. Nature Geosci 10: 124006. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0080-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brandsma SH, Nijssen P, van Velzen MJM et al. (2013) Microplastics in river suspended particulate matter and sewage treatment plants, R14/02, Version 1

    Google Scholar 

  11. Heß M, Diehl P, Meyer J et al. (2018) Mikroplastik in Binnengewässern Süd- und Westdeutschlands: Bundesländerübergreifende Untersuchungen in Baden-Württemberg, Bayern, Hessen, Nordrhein-Westfalen und Rheinland-Pfalz Teil 1: Kunststoffpartikel in der oberflächennahen Wasserphase, Karlsruhe, Augsburg, Wiesbaden, Recklinghausen, Mainz

    Google Scholar 

  12. Su L, Xue Y, Li L et al. (2016) Microplastics in Taihu Lake, China. Environ Pollut 216: 711–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ballent A, Corcoran PL, Madden O et al. (2016) Sources and sinks of micro­plastics in Canadian Lake Ontario nearshore, tributary and beach sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 110(1): 383–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.06.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Carpenter EJ, Smith KL (1972) Plastics on the Sargasso sea surface. Science 175(4027): 1240–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Desforges J-PW, Galbraith M, Dangerfield N et al. (2014) Widespread distribution of microplastics in subsurface seawater in the NE Pacific Ocean. Mar Pollut Bull 79(1–2): 94–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.12.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Hal N, Ariel A, Angel DL (2017) Exceptionally high abundances of microplastics in the oligotrophic Israeli Mediterranean coastal waters. Mar Pollut Bull 116(1–2): 151–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.12.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liebezeit G, Dubaish F (2012) Microplastics in beaches of the East Frisian islands Spiekeroog and Kachelotplate. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 89(1): 213–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-012-0642-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang GS, Liu YF (2018) The distribution of microplastics in soil aggregate fractions in southwestern China. Sci Total Environ 642: 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Habib D, Locke DC, Cannone LJ (1996) Synthetic fibers as indicators of municipal sewage sludge, sludge products and sewage treatment plant effluents. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution(103): 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  20. Piehl S, Leibner A, Löder MGJ et al. (2018) Identification and quanti­fication of macro- and microplastics on an agricultural farmland. Sci Rep 8(1): 17950. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36172-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Klein M, Fischer EK (2019) Microplastic abundance in atmospheric deposition within the Metropolitan area of Hamburg, Germany. Sci Total Environ 685: 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Cai L, Wang J, Peng J et al. (2017) Characteristic of microplastics in the atmospheric fallout from Dongguan city, China: preliminary research and first evidence. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 24(32): 24928–24935. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0116-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dris R, Gasperi J, Saad M et al. (2016) Synthetic fibers in atmospheric fallout: A source of microplastics in the environment? Mar Pollut Bull 104(1-2): 290–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.01.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Allen S, Allen D, Phoenix VR et al. (2019) Atmospheric transport and deposition of microplastics in a remote mountain catchment. Nature Geoscience 71: 299. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-019-0335-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Essel R, Engel L, Carus M et al. (2015) Quellen für Mikroplastik mit Relevanz für den Meeresschutz in Deutschland. Im Auftrag des Umweltbundesamtes. TEXTE, vol 63. Umweltbundesamt, Dessau-Roßlau

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RWTH Aachen University, Lehrstuhl und Institut für Wasserbau und Wasserwirtschaft, Aachen, Deutschland

    Kryss Waldschläger & Simone Lechthaler

Authors
  1. Kryss Waldschläger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Simone Lechthaler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kryss Waldschläger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Umweltministerium Hessen, Wiesbaden, Deutschland

    Markus Porth

  2. Institut für Wasserbau und Wasserwirtschaft, RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Deutschland

    Holger Schüttrumpf

  3. Kreisverband der Wasser- und Bodenverbände Uelzen, Uelzen, Niedersachsen, Deutschland

    Ulrich Ostermann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Waldschläger, K., Lechthaler, S. (2023). Mikroplastik weltweit – Die Belastung in Deutschland im internationalen Vergleich. In: Porth, M., Schüttrumpf, H., Ostermann, U. (eds) Wasser, Energie und Umwelt. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42657-6_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation