Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rollenbilder und Geschlechterstereotype

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender und Leadership

Zusammenfassung

Wer an Führung denkt, denkt an bestimmte Personen und erwartet bestimmte Personen. Dieses Phänomen wird in der Forschung auf folgende Formel gebracht: „Think manager, think male“. Auf Deutsch: Wer an Führung denkt, denkt an einen Mann. Das hat auch Professorin Amanda Sinclair erfahren, die diese unangenehme Einschätzung ihres von der Norm abweichenden und scheinbar unzulänglichen weiblichen Äußeren im einleitenden Zitat beschreibt. Als ob ihre Erscheinung dann mit großen Errungenschaften und daraus resultierender Reputation kompensiert werden müsste!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Allbright (2023): 7 Gründe, wieso Elternzeit gut für Väter ist. https://www.allbright-stiftung.de/vaeter [10.1.2023]

  • Ashcraft, K. (2013): The glass slipper: ‘Incorporating’ occupational identity in management studies. In: Academy of Management Review, Vol. 38, S. 6–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, M. (2021): Misogynoir Transformed, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrantes, R. J./Eaton, A. A. (2018). Sexual orientation and leadership suitability: How being a gay man affects perceptions of fit in gender-stereotyped positions. In Sex Roles, Vol. 79, S. 549–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreto, M./Ellemers, N./Piebinga, L./Moya, M. (2010): How nice of us and how dumb of me: The effect of exposure to benevolent sexism on women’s task and relational self-descriptions. In: Sex Roles, Vol. 62, S. 532–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barr-Little, V. C. (2020). The glass cliff: A longitudinal case study of eight Fortune 500 women CEOs (Doctoral dissertation, Capella University).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barth, J./Dunlap, S./Chappetta, K. (2016): The influence of romantic partners on women in STEM majors. In: Sex Roles, Vol. 75, S. 110–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, E./ Sinclair, A. (2022): Beware the glass cliff! Disaster metaphors and the precarity of leadership. Vortrag bei: 38 EGOS (European Group for Organizational Studies) Colloquium: 2022 The Beauty of Imperfection, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien, 7.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. (1974): The measurement of psychological androgyny. In: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 42, S. 155–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, B. (2020): Leadership in Game of Thrones, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Biehl, B./Weibler, J./ Referat Chancengerechtigkeit/Gleichstellungsstelle (2022) Jenseits von Wonder Woman und Superman: Zukunftsweisende Führung in Film und Serien, Online-Tagung anlässlich des Weltfrauentags, FernUniversität in Hagen, 8.3. https://www.fernuni-hagen.de/gleichstellung/veranstaltungen/zukunftsweisende-fuehrung.shtml [10.1.2023]

  • Billing, Y./Alvesson, M. (2014): Leadership: A matter of gender? In: Kumra, S./Simpson, R./Burke, R. (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Gender in Organizations, New York, S. 200–222

    Google Scholar 

  • BMFSFJ (2017): Zweiter Gleichstellungsbericht der Bundesregierung. https://www.bmfsfj.de/resource/blob/119794/b69d114cfbe2b6c1d4e510da2d74fd8d/zweiter-gleichstellungsbericht-der-bundesregierung-bt-drucksache-data.pdf [10.1.2022]

  • Bourdieu, P. (1983): Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital. In: Kreckel, R. (Hrsg.): Soziale Ungleichheiten (Soziale Welt Sonderband, Bd. 2), Göttingen, S. 183–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewis, J. (2005): Signing my life away? Researching sex and organization. In: Organization, Vol. 12, S. 493–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmüller, S./Branscombe, N. R. (2010). The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesagentur für Arbeit (2019): MINT-Berufe. https://statistik.arbeitsagentur.de/DE/Statischer-Content/Statistiken/Themen-im-Fokus/Berufe/Generische-Publikationen/Broschuere-MINT.pdf?__blob=publicationFile [10.1.2022]

  • Carli, L./Eagly, A. (2011): Gender and Leadership. In: Bryman, A./Collinson, D./Grint, K./Jackson, B./Uhl-Bien, M. (Hrsg.): The Sage Handbook of Leadership, London, S. 103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Catalyst (2007): The double-bind dilemma for women in leadership: Damned if you do, doomed if you don't, New York. https://www.catalyst.org/wp-con-tent/uploads/2019/01/The_Double_Bind_Dilemma_for_Women_in_Leadership_Damned_if_You_Do_Doomed_if_You_Dont.pdf [10.1.2022]

  • Chrousos, G./Mentis, A. (2020): Imposter syndrome threatens diversity. In: Science, Vol. 367, S. 749–750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, A./Glass, C. M. (2013): Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO? In: Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 35, S. 1080–1089

    Google Scholar 

  • Doyle, N. (2021): We need to talk about toxic femininity at work. Forbes https://www.forbes.com/sites/drnancydoyle/2021/07/13/we-need-to-talk-about-toxic-femininity-at-work/?sh=6550e9232769 [10.1.2022]

  • Eagly, A. (1987): Sex Differences in Social Behaviour, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A./Carli, L. (2007): Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become Leaders, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A./Makhijani, M./Klonsky, B. (1992): Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 111, S. 3–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, R./Stone, P./Ammerman, C. (2014): Rethink what you “know” about high-achieving women. In: Harvard Business Review, Vol. 92, S. 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Erskine, S./Brassel, S./Robotham, K. (2023): Exposé of Women’s Workplace Experiences Challenges Antiracist Leaders to Step Up. Catalyst, https://www.catalyst.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/WorldofVoices_DigitalReport_Final.pdf [2.2.2023]

  • Fletcher, J. K. (2004): The paradox of postheroic leadership: An essay on gender, power, and transformational change. In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 15, S. 647–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fotaki, M./Harding, N. (2018): Gender and the organization. Women at work in the 21st century, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillard, J./Okonjo-Iweala, N. (2021): Women and Leadership: Real Lives, Real Lessons, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Graml, R./Hagen, T./Ziegler, Y./Khachatryan, K./Herman, A. R. (2020): Lesbische Frauen in der Arbeitswelt: The L-Word in Business. Nr. 15, Working Paper Series, Frankfurt University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Business and Law.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gündemir, S./Homan, A./De Dreu, C./Van Vugt, M. (2014): Think leader, think white? Capturing and weakening an implicit pro-white leadership bias. In: PloS one, Vol. 9, S. e83915

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, A./Ryan, M. (2008): The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. In: Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 19, S. 530–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HBR Editors (2019): The Best-Performing CEOs in the World, 2019 https://hbr.org/2019/11/the-best-performing-ceos-in-the-world-2019 [1.2.2022]

  • Heilman, M./Okimoto, T. (2007): Why are women penalized for success at male tasks? The implied communality deficit. In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 92, S. 81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hideg, I./Shen, W. (2019): Why still so few? A theoretical model of the role of benevolent sexism and career support in the continued underrepresentation of women in leadership positions. In: Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Vol. 26, S. 287–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra, H./Ely, R./Kolb, D. (2013): Women rising: The unseen barriers. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 91, S. 60–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S./Murphy, S./Zewdie, S./Reichard, R. (2008): The strong sensitive type: Effects of gender stereotypes and leadership prototypes on the evaluation of male and female leaders. In: Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 106, S. 39–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T./Norwood, K. J. (2016): Aggressive encounters and white fragility: Deconstructing the trope of the angry black woman. In: Iowa Law Review, Vol. 102, S. 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Kite, M. E./Deaux, K. (1987). Gender belief systems: Homosexuality and the implicit inversion theory. In: Psychology of Women Quarterly, Vol. 11, S. 83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A./Ritchie, J./Lieb, P./Corrigall, E. (2000): Sex differences and similarities in job attribute preferences: A meta-analysis. In: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 126, S. 593–641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W./ Arvey, R/Song, Z. (2011): The influence of general mental ability, self-esteem and family socioeconomic status on leadership role occupancy and leader advancement: The moderating role of gender. In: The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 22, S. 520–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manne, K. (2018): The Logic of Misogyny, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, M. (2013): Begabung – Motivation – Eignung – Leistung. Schlüsselbegriffe der aktuellen Hochschulregulierung aus kritisch-psychologischer Sicht. In: Forum Wissenschaft 4, S. 36–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavin S./Grandy, G. (2019): Women leaders, self-body-care and corporate moderate feminism: An (im)perfect place for feminism. Gender, Work & Organization, Vol. 26, S. 1546–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey (2017): Women Matter. Time to accelerate. Ten years of insights into gender diversity, McKinsey & Company

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey/LeanIn.org (2018): Women in the workplace 2018. https://womenintheworkplace.com/ [10.1.2022]

  • Muhr, S./Sullivan, S. (2013): ‘‘None so queer as folk’’: Gendered expectations and transgressive bodies in leadership. In: Leadership, Vol. 9, S. 416–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullangi, S./Jagsi, R. (2019): Imposter syndrome: Treat the cause, not the symptom. In: Jama, Vol. 322, S. 403–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, S. C. (2019): Cutting my dick off. In: Culture and Organization, Vol. 25, S. 272–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, S. C. (2021): If I knew then what I know now. In: Gender, Work & Organization, Vol. 29, S. 626–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Özbilgin, M. F./Erbil, C./Baykut, S./Kamasak, R. (2022): Passing as resistance through a Goffmanian approach: Normalized, defensive, strategic, and instrumental passing when LGBTQ+ individuals encounter institutions. In: Gender, Work & Organization https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12928 [10.1.2023]

  • Parsley, S. (2022): Feeling your way as an occupational minority: The gendered sensilisation of women electronic music artists. In: Management Learning, Vol. 53, S. 697–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G. (2014): Sex, gender, and leadership. In: Kumra, S./Simpson, R./Burke, R. (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Gender in Organizations, Oxford, S. 249–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G./Butterfield, D./Parent, J. (2002): Gender and managerial stereotypes: Have the times changed? In: Journal of Management, Vol. 28, S. 177–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, A./ Vachhani, S. (2021): Feminist ethics and women leaders: From difference to intercorporeality. In: Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 173, S. 233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randsley de Moura, G./Leicht, C./Leite, A. C./Crisp, R. J./Gocłowska, M. A. (2018): Leadership diversity: Effects of counterstereotypical thinking on the support for women leaders under uncertainty. In: Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 74, S. 165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosette, A./Tost, L. (2010): Agentic women and communal leadership: How role prescriptions confer advantage to top women leaders. In: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 95, S. 221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumens, N. (2014): Masculinity and sexuality at work: Incorporating gay and bisexual men’s perspectives. In: Kumra, S./Simpson, R./Burke, R. (Hrsg.): The Oxford Handbook of Gender in Organizations, Oxford, S. 460–479

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M./Haslam, S./Morgenroth, T./Rink, F./Stoker, J./Peters, K. (2016): Getting on top of the glass cliff: Reviewing a decade of evidence, explanations, and impact. In: The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 27, S. 446–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahin, R. aka Dr Bitch Ray (2019): Yalla, Feminismus! Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, S. (2019): The HBR Interview. An Interview with Sheryl Sandberg by Adia Ignatuius. In: HBR’s 10 Must Reads. On Women and Leadership, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, V. (2001): A global look at psychological barriers to women’s progress in management. In: Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 57, S. 675–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (1995): Sexuality in leadership. In: International Review of Women and Leadership, Vol. 1, S. 25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A./Ladkin, D. (2020): Leading with embodied care. In L. Tompkins (Hg.) Paradox and Power in Caring Leadership: Critical and Philosophical Reflections. Abingdon, 63–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, A. (2004): Journey Around Leadership. In: Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, Vol. 25 S. 7–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Statista (2021): Frauen und Männer in Deutschland nach höchstem Schulabschluss. https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/290386/umfrage/umfrage-in-deutschland-zu-frauen-und-maennern-nach-bildungsabschluss/ [10.1.2022]

  • Troche, S./Rammsayer, T. (2011): Eine Revision des deutschsprachigen Bem Sex-Role Inventory. In: Klinische Diagnostik und Evaluation, Vol. 4, S. 262–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinkenburg, C./Van Engen, M./Eagly, A./Johannesen-Schmidt, M. (2011): An exploration of stereotypical beliefs about leadership styles: Is transformational leadership a route to women's promotion? In: The Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 22, S. 10–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Weibler, J. (2013): Entzauberung der Führungsmythen, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Wippermann, C. (2015): Transparenz für mehr Entgeltgleichheit: Einflüsse auf den Gender Pay Gap (Berufswahl, Arbeitsmarkt, Partnerschaft, Rollenstereotype) und Perspektiven der Bevölkerung für Lohngerechtigkeit zwischen Frauen und Männern. BFSFJ. https://www.bmfsfj.de/resource/blob/95400/82d8c89547a7c9e83dff8d26410c6348/transparenz-fuer-mehr-entgeltgleichheit-data.pdf [10.1.2022]

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. SRH Berlin University of Applied Sciences, Berlin, Deutschland

    Brigitte Biehl

Authors
  1. Brigitte Biehl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brigitte Biehl .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Biehl, B. (2023). Rollenbilder und Geschlechterstereotype. In: Gender und Leadership. SDG - Forschung, Konzepte, Lösungsansätze zur Nachhaltigkeit. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42540-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-42540-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-42539-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-42540-1

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation