Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Digital vernetzte Arbeit und ihre Beanspruchungsfolgen – Ein systematischer Review

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital vernetzte Arbeit

  • 1155 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der folgende Beitrag stellt die Ergebnisse eines systematischen Reviews (Englischer Volltext des Reviews unter https://occup-med.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12995-021-00333-z.) vor, der zum Ziel hatte, (Cluster von) Arbeitsbedingungen zu identifizieren, die mit digital vernetzter Arbeit verbunden sind, und ihre Beziehungen zu Gesundheit und Wohlbefinden zu analysieren. Es wurden 14 Studien identifiziert. Trotz des Suchbegriffs, der die neuesten Technologien enthält, fanden sich hauptsächlich Studien aus den 1980er/90er Jahren. Eine Kategorisierung von Arbeitsfaktoren in kognitive Anforderungen, soziale Faktoren, organisatorische Faktoren und Umweltfaktoren sowie der Gesundheitsfaktoren in Motivation/Zufriedenheit, vermindertes Wohlbefinden/affektive Symptome, physiologische Parameter/somatische Beschwerden zeigte, dass die am häufigsten identifizierten Arbeitsfaktoren zur Kategorie der kognitiven Anforderungen gehörten. Bei den Gesundheitsfaktoren wurde Motivation/Zufriedenheit am häufigsten genannt. Neuere Studien untersuchten häufig individualisierte Gesundheitsfaktoren wie z. B. Lebenszufriedenheit, während physiologische Messdaten und objektive Erhebungsmethoden wie Arbeitsplatzanalysen nicht verwendet wurden. Der letztgenannte Ansatz findet sich überwiegend in den älteren Studien. Um ein umfassendes Bild zu erhalten, lohnt es sich jedoch, für künftige Studien in diesem Bereich eine Kombination aus diesen subjektiven und objektiven Ansätzen zu verwenden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Allen, T.D.; Johnson, R.C.; Kiburz, K.M.; Shockley, K.M. (2013): Work–family conflict and flexible work arrangements: deconstructing flexibility. Pers. Psychol. (66), S. 345‒376. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12012.

  • Andries, F.; Bijleveld, C.J.H.; Pot, F.D. (1991): Working conditions and mental strain of automation personnel. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 3(4), S. 363‒373. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447319109526021.

  • Arntz, M.; Gregory, T.; Zierahn, U. (2016): The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers Nr. 189. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axtell, C.M.; Fleck, S.J.; Turner, N. (2004): Virtual teams: collaborating across distance. Int. Rev. Indus. and Organ. Psychol. (19), S. 205‒248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayyagari, R.; Grover, V.; Purvis, R. (2011): Technostress: technological antecedents and implications. MIS Quarterly. 35(4), S. 831‒858. https://doi.org/10.2307/41409963.

  • Baethge, A.; Rigotti, T. (2013): Interruptions to workflow: Their relationship with irritation and satisfaction with performance, and the mediating roles of time pressure and mental demands, Work & Stress. 27(1), S. 43‒63. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2013.761783.

  • Barber, L.K.; Santuzzi, A.M. (2015): Please respond ASAP: workplace telepressure and employee recovery. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 20(2), S. 172‒189. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038278.

  • Berg-Beckhoff, G.; Nielsen, G.; Ladekjær, L. E. (2017): Use of information communication technology and stress, burnout, and mental health in older, middle-aged, and younger workers – results from a systematic review. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health. 23(2), S. 160‒171. https://doi.org/10.1080/10773525.2018.1436015.

  • Brenner, S.O.; Östberg, O. (1995): Working conditions and environment after a participative automation project. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. (15), S. 379–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00084-G.

  • Brod, C. (1982): Managing technostress: optimizing the use of computer technology. Pers. J. 61(10), S. 753–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brougham, D.; Haar, J. (2018): Smart Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Algorithms (STARA): Employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. J. Manag. Organ. 24(2), S. 239‒257. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.55.

  • Brown, R.; Duck, J.; Jimmieson, N. (2014): E-mail in the workplace: The role of stress appraisals and normative response pressure in the relationship between e-mail stressors and employee strain. Int. J. Stress Manag. 21(4), S. 325‒347. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037464.

  • Brynjolfsson, E.; McAfee, D. (2014): The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carayon, P.; Smith, M.J. (2000): Work organization and ergonomics. Appl. Ergon. (31), S. 649‒662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(00)00040-5.

  • Carayon, P. (2007): Healthy and efficient work with computers and information and communications technology—are there limits? Scand. J. Work Environ. Health. (Suppl 3), S. 10–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascio, W.F.; Montealegre, R. (2016): How technology is changing work and organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psych. Organ. Behav. (3), S. 349–375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352.

  • Chesley, N. (2014): Information and communication technology use, work intensification and employee strain and distress. Work Employ. Soc. 28(4), S. 589‒610. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017013500112.

  • Christensen, C.M. (1997): The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claussner, C.; Müller, W. (1989): Arbeitsgestaltung und Arbeitserleben in der flexiblen automatisierten Fertigung – Analyse eines Beispiels aus dem VEB Kombinat Carl Zeiss JENA. Z. Hyg. 35(8), S. 464‒467.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, J.M. (1987): A psychological study of advanced manufacturing technology: the concept of coupling. Behav. Inform. Tech. 6(4), S. 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/01449298708901855.

  • Dainoff, M.J.; Happ, A.; Crane, P. (1981a): Visual Fatigue in VDT Operators. Hum. Factors. 23(4), S. 421‒437. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872088102300405.

  • Dainoff, M.J.; Hurrell, J.J.; Happ, A. (1981b): A taxonomic framework for the description and evaluation of paced work. In Machine pacing occupational stress edited by Salvendy G, Smith MJ. London. S. 185‒190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T.H.; Kirby, J. (2016): Just how smart are smart machines? MIT Sloan Manag. Review. (57), S. 21‒25. http://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/just-how-smart-are-smart-machines.

  • Day, A.; Paquet, S.; Scott, N.; Hambley, L. (2012): Perceived information and communication technology (ICT) demands on employee outcomes: The moderating effect of organizational ICT support. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 17(4), S. 473‒491. https://psycnet.apa.org https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029837.

  • Derks, D.; Bakker, A.B. (2014): Smartphone use, work-home interference, and burnout: A diary study on the role of recovery. Appl. Psychol.: An Intern. Review. (63), S. 411‒440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebig, M.; Müller, A.; Angerer, P. (2018): Psychische Belastungen in der Industrie 4.0. Eine selektive Literaturübersicht zu (neuartigen) Belastungsbereichen. ASU Arbeitsmed Sozialmed Umweltmed. (52), S. 832‒839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duradoni, M.; Innocenti, F.; Guazzini, A. (2020): Well-Being and Social Media: A Systematic Review of Bergen Addiction Scales. Future Internet. 12(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/fi12020024.

  • Dragano, N.; Lunau, T. (2020): Technostress at work and mental health: concepts and research results. Curr. Opin. Psychiatry. 33(4), S. 407‒413. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000613

  • European Commission (1996): Guidance on risk assessment at work. Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eyrolle, H.; Cellier, J.M. (2000): The effects of interruptions in work activity: field and laboratory results. Appl. Ergon. 31(5), S. 537‒543. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-6870(00)00019-3.

  • Fischer, T.; Riedl, R. (2017): Technostress Research: A Nurturing Ground for Measurement Pluralism? Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 40(17), S. 375‒401. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04017.

  • Franke, F. (2015): Is work intensification extra stress? J. Pers. Psych. 14(1), S. 17–27. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000120

  • Ghislieri, C.; Molino, M.; Cortese, C.G. (2018): Work and Organizational Psychology Looks at the Fourth Industrial Revolution: How to Support Workers and Organizations? Front. Psychol. (9), S. 2365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02365.

  • Graf, B.; Antoni, C.H. (2021): The relationship between information characteristics and information overload at the workplace – A meta-analysis. Europ. J. Work Organ. Psychol. (30), S. 143‒158. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2020.1813111

  • Grundke, R.; Jamet, S.; Kalamova, M.; Keslair, F.; Squicciarini, M. (2017): Skills and global value chains: A characterization. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, W.; Schönfelder, E. (1985): Analyse und Bewertung der Arbeitsteilung und -kombination sowie der Mensch-Rechner-Funktionsteilung bei Arbeitstätigkeiten mit Bildschirmtechnik. Wiss. Z. Techn. Univ. Dresden. 34(5/6), S. 79‒84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, K.; Marett, K.; Harris, R. (2011): Technology‐Related Pressure and Work–Family Conflict: Main Effects and an Examination of Moderating Variables. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 41(9), S. 2077‒2103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2011.00805.x.

  • Jackisch, D.; Richter, P.G. (1989): Psychophysiologische Beanspruchungsuntersuchungen bei Bildschirmarbeit – zum Zusammenhang zwischen aktuellen und langfristigen Beanspruchungsfolgen, deren Ursache-Wirkungsbeziehung und Prozeßcharakter. Wissen. Z Tech. Univ. Dresden. (38), S. 33‒38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Körner, U.; Müller‐Thur, K.; Lunau, T.; Dragano, N.; Angerer, P.; Buchner, A. (2019): Perceived stress in human–machine interaction in modern manufacturing environments—results of a qualitative interview study. Stress Health. 35(2), S. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2853.

  • Kopetz, H. (2019): Simplicity is Complex: Foundations of Cyber-Physical System Design. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Torre, G.; Esposito, A.; Sciarra, I.; Chiapetta, M. (2018): Definition, symptoms and risk of technostress: a systematic review. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. (92), S. 13‒35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-018-1352-1.

  • Lohani, M.; Payne, B.R.; Strayer, D.L. (2019): A Review of Psychophysiological Measures to Assess Cognitive States in Real-World Driving. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 13(57). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00057.

  • Martin, L.; Omrani, N. (2015): An assessment of trends in technology use, innovative work practices and employees’ attitudes in Europe. Appl. Econom. 47(6), S. 623‒638. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.978072.

  • Marsland, A.L; Walsh, C.; Lockwood, K.; John-Henderson, N.A. (2017): The effects of acute psychological stress on circulating and stimulated inflammatory markers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Brain Behav. Immun. (64), S. 208‒219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2017.01.011.

  • Mattioli, S.; Zanardi, F.; Baldasseroni, A. (2010): Search strings for the study of putative occupational determinants of disease. Occup. Environ. Med. (67), S. 436‒443. https://dx.doi.org/10.1136/oem.2008.044727.

  • Merten, F.; Gloor, P. (2010): Too much e-mail decreases job satisfaction. Procedia – Soc. Behav. Sci. (2), S. 6457‒6465. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.04.055.

  • Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G.; PRISMA Group. (2010): Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 8(5), S. 336‒341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007.

  • Moldaschl, M.; Voß, G. (2003): Subjektivierung von Arbeit. München.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montealegre, R.; Cascio, W. (2017): Technologydriven changes in work and employment. Commun. ACM. 60(12), S. 60–67. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152422.

  • OECD. (2017): OECD Employment Outlook. OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2017-en.

  • Oborski, P. (2004): Man‐machine interactions in advanced manufacturing systems. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 23(3‒4), S. 227‒232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1574-5.

  • Oztemel, E.; Gursev, S. (2020): Literature review of Industry 4.0 and related technologies. J. Intell. Manuf. (31), S. 127‒182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10845-018-1433-8.

  • Palm, E.; Glaser, J.; Heiden, B.; Herbig, B.; Kolb, S.; Nowak, D.; Herr, C. (2016): Zusammenspiel von organisationalen Normen, individuellen Präferenzen und arbeitsbezogenem Entgrenzungsverhalten mit Konflikten zwischen Arbeits- und Privatleben. Wirtschaftspsychologie. 18(2), S. 44‒54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulsson, K.; Sundin, L. (2000): Learning at work – a combination of experience based learning and theoretical education. Behav. Info. Technol. 19(3), S. 181‒188. https://doi.org/10.1080/014492900406173.

  • Peake, J.M.; Kerr, G.; Sullivan, J.P. (2018): A critical review of consumer wearables, mobile applications, and equipment for providing biofeedback, monitoring stress, and sleep in physically active populations. Front. Physiol. 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.00743.

  • Petropoulos, G. (2018): The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Employment. In The Fourth Industrial Revolution: Opportunities and Threats Work and Welfare edited by O'Reilly J, Neufeind M, Ranft F. London. S. 119‒132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragu-Nathan, T.S.; Tarafdar, M.; Ragu-Nathan, B.S.; Tu, Q. (2008): The consequences of technostress for end users in organizations: conceptual development and empirical validation. Inf. Sys. Research. 19(4), S. 417‒433. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1070.0165.

  • Rau, R. (1996): Einzelfallanalysen zur Bewertung von Handlungssicherheit in komplexen, automatisierten Systemen. Z. Arbeits- und Organisationspsychol. (40), S. 75‒86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rau, R. (2006): Learning opportunities at work as predictor for recovery and health. Europ. J. Work Orga. Psychol. 15(2), S. 158‒180 https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320500513905.

  • Redden, E.S.; Elliott, L.R.; Barnes, M.J. (2014): Robots: the new teammates. In The Psychology of Workplace Technology edited by Coovert MD, Thompson LF. New York. S. 185‒208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, M.; Levin, S.; Fink, T.; Levina, A. (2020): Taming complexity. Harv. Bus. Rev. January-February, S. 113–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remes, J.; Mischke, J.; Krishnan, M. (2018): Solving the Productivity Puzzle: The Role of Demand and the Promise of Digitization. International Productivity Monitor, Centre for the Study of Living Standards. (34), S. 28‒51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutenfranz, J.; Kylian, H.; Schmidt, K.H.; Klimmer, F.; Bubser, R.; Brandenburg, U. (1989): Belastungs- und Beanspruchungsanalysen bei Überwachungstätigkeiten in einer vollautomatisierten Fertigung. Z. Hyg. 35(8), S. 457‒464.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar-Concha, C.; Ficapal-Cusi, P.; Boada-Grau, J.; Camacho, L. (2021): Analyzing the evolution of technostress: a science mapping approach. Heliyon. 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06726.

  • Seibt, A.; Friedrichsen, G.; Geist, H.W.; Schurig, H.U.; Roehner, J. (1988): Untersuchungen zur Beanspruchung durch Schichtarbeit unter den Bedingungen automatisierter Fertigung. Z. Hyg. 34(7), S. 409‒412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stellman, J.M.; Klitzman, S.; Gordon, G.C.; Snow, B.R. (1987): Work environment and the well‐being of clerical and VDT workers. J. Organ. Behav. 8(2), S. 95‒114. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3000364.

  • Tarafdar, M.; Tu, Q.; Ragu-Nathan, B.S.; Ragu-Nathan, T.S. (2007): The Impact of Technostress on Role Stress and Productivity. J. Manag. Inf. Sys. 24(1), S. 301‒328. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240109.

  • Tarafdar, M.; Cooper, C.; Stich, J.F. (2019): The technostress trifecta - techno eustress, techno distress and design: theoretical directions and an agenda for research. Information Systems Journal. 29(1), S. 6–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12169.

  • Umans, T.; Kockum, M.; Nilsson, E.; Lindberg, S. (2018): Digitalisation in the banking industry and workers subjective well-being: Contingency perspective. Int. J. Workplace Health Manag. 11(6), S. 411‒423. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-05-2018-0069.

  • Van Ruysseveldt, J.; Verboon, P.; Smulders, P. (2011): Job resources and emotional exhaustion. The mediating role of learning opportunities. Work & Stress. 25(3), S. 205‒223. https://psycnet.apa.org/ https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2011.613223.

  • Zammuto, R.F.; Griffith; T.L.; Majchrzak, A.; Dougherty, D.J.; Faraj, S. (2007): Information technology and the changing fabric of organization. Organ. Sci. 18(5), S. 749‒762. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1070.0307.

  • Zuboff, S. (1988): In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power. New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut und Poliklinik für Arbeits-, Sozial- und Umweltmedizin, LMU Klinikum, München, Deutschland

    Sabrina Zolg, Barbara Heiden & Britta Herbig

Authors
  1. Sabrina Zolg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Barbara Heiden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Britta Herbig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Britta Herbig .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung e.V. - ISF München, München, Deutschland

    Michael Heinlein

  2. Institut für Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung e.V. - ISF München, München, Deutschland

    Judith Neumer

  3. Institut für Sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung e.V. - ISF München, München, Deutschland

    Tobias Ritter

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zolg, S., Heiden, B., Herbig, B. (2023). Digital vernetzte Arbeit und ihre Beanspruchungsfolgen – Ein systematischer Review. In: Heinlein, M., Neumer, J., Ritter, T. (eds) Digital vernetzte Arbeit. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40615-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-40615-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-40614-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-40615-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation