Skip to main content

Metropolregionale Akteure

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Politik USA
  • 106 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Abgesänge auf den Nationalstaat gingen nach Ende des Kalten Krieges oft einher mit dem Verweis auf erstarkende globale Städte und subnationale Regionen. Die Globalisierung schien Regionalismen ökonomisch und politisch zu begünstigen. Dieses Kapitel befasst sich historisch einordnend mit der Frage, inwiefern globale Metropolregionen in den USA tatsächlich eine eigenständige Regionalpolitik und eigene politische Institutionen entwickelt haben, um den neuen Realitäten globaler Märkte im 21. Jahrhundert zu begegnen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Abu-Lughod, Janet L. 1999. New York, Chicago, Los Angeles. America’s global cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, Neil. 2002. Decoding the newest „Metropolitan Regionalism“ in the USA: A critical overview. Cities 19(1): 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Is there a politics of ‚urban‘ development? Reflections on the US case. In The city in American development, Hrsg. Richardson Dilworth, 122–140. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Census Reporter. 2021. Census Reporter. https://censusreporter.org.

  • Cullingworth, Barry. 1997. Planning in the USA. Policies, issues and processes. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Mike. 1990. City of Quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dear, Michael J. 2000. The postmodern urban condition. Oxford/Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., Hrsg. 2002. From Chicago to L.A. Making sense of urban theory. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethington, Philip J., und David P. Levitus. 2009. Placing American political development. Cities, regions, and regimes, 1789–2008. In The city in American development, Hrsg. Richardson Dilworth, 154–176. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishman, Robert. 2000a. The American planning tradition. An introduction and interpretation. In The American planning tradition, Hrsg. Robert Fishman, 1–29. Washington/DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000b. The metropolitan tradition in American planning. In The American planning tradition, Hrsg. Robert Fishman, 65–85. Washington/DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, Richard, und Andrew Jonas. 1991. US Urban policy: The postwar state and capitalist regulation. Antipode 23(4): 349–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, John. 1986. The world city hypothesis. Development and Change 17:69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, John, und Goetz Wolff. 1982. World city formation: An agenda for research and action. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 3:309–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garreau, Joel. 1991. Edge city: Life on the new frontier. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, Edward Ludwig. 2011. Triumph of the city. How our greatest invention makes us richer, smarter, greener, healthier, and happier. New York: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, Stephen, und Simon Marvin. 2001. Splintering urbanism. Networked infrastructures, Technological mobilities and the Urban condition. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Aelred J., und David A. Johnson. 2005. The TVA regional planning and development program. Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, Miriam. 2008. Branding New York. How a city in crisis was sold to the world. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackworth, Jason. 2007. The Neoliberal city. Governance, ideology, and development in American urbanism. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, Carol. 2012. Revisiting the ungovernability debate: Regional governance and sprawl in the USA and UK. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36(4): 817–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter. 2001. Global city-regions in the twenty-first century. In Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy, Hrsg. Allen J. Scott, 59–77. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter, und Mark Tewdwr-Jones. 2011. Urban and regional panning, 5. Aufl. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Tim, und Phil Hubbard, Hrsg. 1998. The entrepreneurial city. Geographies of politics, regime, and representation. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, David K. 1999. Governing metropolitan areas: Response to growth and change. New York/London: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, David. 1989. From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in Urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography 71(1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Kenneth T. 1985. Crabgrass frontier: The suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Michael. 2011. Staatenlose Nationen oder Regionalstaaten? Territorialität und Macht im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. In Québec: Staat und Gesellschaft, Hrsg. Alain-G. Gagnon, Ingo Kolboom, und Boris Vormann, 381–400. Heidelberg: Synchron.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kronon, William. 1991. Nature’s metropolis. Chicago and the great west. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammert, Christian, und Boris Vormann. 2022. Das Versprechen der Gleichheit. Legitimation und die Grenzen der Demokratie. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, Robert C. 2009. The city and exceptionalism in American political development. In The city in American development, Hrsg. Richardson Dilworth, 17–42. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcuse, Peter. 2006. The partitioned city in history. In Of states and cities. The partitioning of urban space, Hrsg. Peter Marcuse und Ronald van Kempen, 11–35. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, David G., Keith Bartholomew, Reid Ewing, und Harvey J. Miller. 2019. Accessibility planning in American metropolitan areas: Are we there yet? Urban Studies 56(1): 167–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Bernard H., und Myron A. Levine, Hrsg. 2006. Urban politics. Power in metropolitan America, 7. Aufl. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, Saskia. 1990. Economic restructuring and the American city. Annual Review of Sociology 16:465–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1991. The global city. New York, London, Tokio. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönig, Barbara. 2011. Pragmatische Visionäre: Stadtregionale Planung und zivilgesellschaftliches Engagement in den USA. Frankfurt a. M./New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Allen John, John Agnew, Edward W. Soja, und Michael Storper. 2001. Global city-regions. In Global city-regions: Trends, theory, policy, Hrsg. Allen J. Scott, 11–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a new American state. The expansion of national administrative capacities, 1877–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Soja, Edward. 2011. Regional urbanization and the end of the metropolis era. In The new Blackwell companion to the city, Hrsg. Gary Bridge und Sophie Watson, 679–689. Malden/Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vormann, Boris. 2015. Global port cities in North America: Urbanization and global production networks. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wachsmuth, David. 2017. Infrastructure alliances: Supply-chain expansion and multi-city growth coalitions. Economic Geography 93(1): 44–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, Robert F. 1980. New York city waterfront: Changing land use and prospects for redevelopment. In Urban waterfront lands, Hrsg. Committee on Urban Waterfront Lands, 78–99. Washington/DC: Committee on Urban Waterfront Lands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, William H. 1989. The city beautiful movement. Baltimore/London/Cambridge: The John Hopkins University Press/Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yaro, Robert D., Ming Zhang, und Frederick R. Steiner. 2022. Megaregions and America’s future. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Boris Vormann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vormann, B. (2024). Metropolregionale Akteure. In: Lammert, C., Siewert, M.B., Vormann, B. (eds) Handbuch Politik USA. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39686-2_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39686-2_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39685-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39686-2

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics