Skip to main content

Global Governance of Human Rights: Dilemmas, Divergences and the Way Out

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Human Rights in a Changing World

Abstract

As a form of governance, global governance is also necessarily conducted under the guidance of values, and governance values must be realized through various institutional designs and behaviors as well. The values of global governance must be based on universalism and emphasize the values shared globally, i.e. global values. Advocates of global governance call for global-scale compliance with the core cultural values of global governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jian Chang, The Community of Common Destiny for All Mankind and New Pattern of Global Governance, Frontiers, No. 12, 2017, pp. 35–41.

  2. 2.

    C. Chinkin, International Law and Human Rights, in T. Evans (ed.) Human Rights Fifty Years On: A Reappraisal, Manchester University Press, 1998, p. 115.

  3. 3.

    John H. Knox, Horizontal Human Rights Law, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 102, No. 1, 2008, pp. 1–47. See also H.W.R. Wade, Horizons of Horizontality, Law Quarterly Review, Vol. 116, No. 2, 2000, pp. 217–224. B. Markesinis, Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Horizontal Effect of the Human Rights Bill: Lessons from Germany, Law Quarterly Review, Vol. 115, 1999, pp. 45–88. M. Hunt, The Horizontal Effect of the Human Rights Act, Public Law, 1998, pp. 423–443.

  4. 4.

    Andrew Clapham, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors (Chinese Version), translated by Chen Huiping et al., Beijing, Law Press China, 2013, p. 74.

  5. 5.

    OEIGWG, Legally Binding Instrument to Regulate, in International Human Rights Law, the Activities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises, Second Revised Draft, 2020. https://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/HRC/WGTransCorp/Pages/IGWGOnTNC.aspx, access on 25 July, 2021.

  6. 6.

    Gráinne de Búrca, Human Rights Experimentalism, The American Journal of International Law, Vol. 111, No. 2, 2017, pp. 277–316. Mark P. Lagon., and Ryan Kaminski, Bolstering the UN Human Rights Council’s Effectiveness, Council on Foreign Relations, 2017. Edward McMahon, and Marta Ascherio, A Step Ahead in Promoting Human Rights? The Universal Periodic Review of the UN Human Rights Council, Global Governance, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2012, pp. 231–248. Rahmani-Ocora, Ladan, Giving the Emperor Real Clothes: The UN Human Rights Council, Global Governance, Vol. 12, No. 1, 2006, pp. 15–20.

  7. 7.

    Jacob Dolinger, The Failure of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, The University of Miami Inter-American Law Review, Vol. 47, No. 2, 2016, pp. 164–199.

  8. 8.

    Hakimeh Saghaye-Biria, Decolonizing the “Universal” Human Rights Regime: Questioning American Exceptionalism and Orientalism, ReOrient, Vol. 4, No. 1, 2018, pp. 59–77. T. Jeremy Gunn. Do Human Rights Have a Secular, Individualistic & Anti-Islamic Bias?, Daedalus, Vol. 149, No. 3, 2020, pp. 148–169.

  9. 9.

    Andrew Hurrell, On Global Order:Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society(Chinese Version), translated by Xi Lin, Beijing, China Renmin University Press, 2018, p. 1.

  10. 10.

    Jie Liu, The International Order and Its Governance in an Era of Globalization, Journal of Social Science, No. 4, 2003, pp. 27–33.

  11. 11.

    David P. Forsythe, Human Rights in International Relations, Cambridge University Press, 2000, p. 141.

  12. 12.

    Peter R. Baehr, Monique C. Castermans-Holleman and Fred Grünfeld, Human Rights in the Foreign Policy of the Netherlands, Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2002, pp. 992–1010.

  13. 13.

    Hilary Charlesworth, Emma Larking, Introduction: the Regulatory Power of the Universal Periodic Review, in Human Rights and the Universal Periodic Review: Rituals and Ritualism, edited by Hilary Charlesworth, Emma Larking, Cambridge University Press, 2014, p. 10.

  14. 14.

    Allehone Mulugeta Abebe, Of Shaming and Bargaining: African States and the Universal Periodic Review of the United Nations Human Rights Council, Human Rights Law Review, Vol. 9, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1–35.

  15. 15.

    See Rosa Freedman, New Mechanisms of the UN Human Rights Council, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2011, pp. 289–323.

  16. 16.

    Mingguo Wang, New Situation of Global Governance Architecture and Its Impact on International Order, Teaching and Research, No. 5, 2014, pp. 32–40.

  17. 17.

    Hui Sun and Yu Yu, International Governmental Organization and Global Governance, Journal of Tongji University(Social Science Section), Vol. 15, No. 5, 2004, pp. 48–53.

  18. 18.

    Xiaoyun Yang, The Challenges to State Sovereignty from Globalization, Neo-Interventionism and Self-Determination, Contemporary International Relations, No. 12, 1999, pp. 18–21.

  19. 19.

    Jie Liu, The International Order and Its Governance in an Era of Globalization, Journal of Social Science, No. 4, 2003, pp. 27–33.

  20. 20.

    Yong Liu and Huaixin Wang, Community of Human Destiny: China’s Plan for the Change of International Speech Power in Global Governance, Probe, No. 2, 2019, pp. 32–40.

  21. 21.

    Yong Jiang, The Impact of the Financial Crisis and China, World Economics and Politics, No. 12, 2008, pp. 11–14.

  22. 22.

    Research Group of the Center for the Study of Human Rights of Nankai University and Jian Chang, The Practical Basis and Theoretical Innovation of Human Rights in Contemporary China —— Theory of Human Rights Structure Moving towards Developmentalism, Human Rights, No. 1, 2021, pp. 22–48. Jian Chang, Human Rights Implications of Bringing the Building of a Moderately Prosperous Society in All Aspects to a Successful Completion —— From the Prospective of the Developmentalism of Human Rights, Human Rights, No. 2, 2020, pp. 18–34.

  23. 23.

    See A/HRC/47/L.24 (47th Regular Session of the Human Rights Council), A/HRC/41/L.17/Rev.1 (41st Regular Session of the Human Rights Council), A/HRC/35/L.33/Rev.1 (35th Regular Session of the Human Rights Council).

  24. 24.

    Changhe Su, International System in Global Governance Transformation, Contemporary World, No. 11, 2015, pp. 34–37.

  25. 25.

    Bangkok Declaration, Human Rights, No. 5, 2006, p. 25.

  26. 26.

    Full text of Beijing Declaration adopted by the First South-South Human Rights Forum, http://www.scio.gov.cn/ztk/dtzt/36048/37445/37451/Document/1613070/1613070.htm, visited on September 20, 2021.

  27. 27.

    Jianjun Yu, American Hegemony’s Multilateralism Behaviors and Motives, Teaching and Research, No. 7, 2009, pp. 64–69.

  28. 28.

    Jiechi Yang, Working for a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind by Promoting International Cooperation and Multilateralism, China International Studies, No. 2, 2019, pp. 1–5.

  29. 29.

    The Position Paper of the People’s Republic of China on the United Nations Reforms, People’s Daily, 8 June 2005.

  30. 30.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2019/07/11/asia/xinjiang-uyghur-un-letter-intl-hnk/index.html; https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jul/11/more-than-20-ambassadors-condemn-chinas-treatment-of-uighurs-in-xinjiang, visited on Dec, 12th, 2021.

  31. 31.

    http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2019-07/11/c_138218748.htm, visited on Dec, 12th, 2021.

  32. 32.

    See Robert Spano, The European Court of Human Rights and National Courts: A Constructive Conversation or a Dialogue of Disrespect? Nordic Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2015, pp. 1–10. See Effie Foka, Directions in Religious Pluralism in Europe: Mobilizations in the Shadow of European Court of Human Rights Religious Freedom Jurisprudence, Oxford Journal of Law and Religion, Vol. 4, Issue 1, 2015, pp. 57–74.

  33. 33.

    Case of S.A.S. v. France, ECHR, (Application no. 43835/11), Judgment of July 1st, 2014.

  34. 34.

    UN Human Rights Committee Communication No. 1928/2010, CCPR/C/108/D/1928/2010.

  35. 35.

    Junxiang Mao, China’s Approach to International Governance of Human Rights, Guangming Daily, 25 October 2019.

  36. 36.

    Sixteenth Session of the General Assembly, 2005 World Summit Outcome, A/RES/60/1, paragraph 14.

  37. 37.

    Jing Lu, Institutional Predicament and Reform of Global Governance, Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2014, pp. 107–121.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junxiang Mao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mao, J. (2023). Global Governance of Human Rights: Dilemmas, Divergences and the Way Out. In: Okyayuz, M., Mao, J., Mpedi, L.G., Herrmann, P. (eds) Human Rights in a Changing World. Prekarisierung und soziale Entkopplung – transdisziplinäre Studien. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39533-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39533-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39532-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39533-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics