Abstract
This article respecifies trans-sequential analysis and its object-centred methodology. It distinguishes ways of relating events and processes: occassionally, organisationally, procedurally. The varieties of trans-sequential, accumulative work are put under immense pressure in times of existential problems, such as the global heating, poverty, or war.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
I am thankful for helpful comments by Ronja Trischler, Martina Kolanoski and Robert Schmidt. The discussions in the Working Group on Political Ethnography at the HU Berlin and at the Goethe University Frankfurt provided crucial encouragement and inspiration.
- 2.
Ethnomethodological studies of institutional settings name such reference problems or tasks as follows: ‘to delimit a therapeutically relevant problem’ (Roca-Cuberes, 2014, p. 314) for psychiatric admission interviews, or ‘to probe politicians’ answers’ (ibid.) for interviews with politicians, or even the elimination of threats in military ‘counter-insurgency’ (cf. Elsey et al., 2018).
- 3.
By reference to the object and its practical implications, trans-sequential analysis gains distance from methodological individualism. The latter is not rejected, but empirically relativised. This means that the practical relevance of motives and intentions for action, but also of agency, is not generally decided in advance, but empirically questionable (cf. Schmidt, 2012).
- 4.
Trans-sequentiality differs from ‘inter-situativity’ (Hirschauer, 2014) by centring on the object. The concatenation does not remain ‘flat’ between situations but becomes available at the object. It is not chains of situations but ‘object careers’ (Scheffer, 2012). The object is promoted in its status.
- 5.
See, for instance, the popular, quick and dirty interjections of the forty-fifth US President Donald Trump. Here, the risk of immature contributions is reduced by lowering expectations of his public speech. Something should then no longer be taken literally, be binding, meet higher consistency requirements, etc. All in all, a hyperactive loquaciousness institutionalises itself here, which undermines the relevance of state representation and the binding force of democratic publicity.
- 6.
Thus, strictly speaking, it is not social situations but episodes that are linked. The episodes have to be wrested from social situations, as it were. Certain social events, such as committee meetings, sometimes transport different objects one after the other into a new status, for example from ‘1st version’ to ‘draft’ (Scheffer et al., 2010a, b, trans. TS).
- 7.
The practical need for objectivisation is greater where episodes are spread over different social situations and the memory functions of co-presence are not available. At the same time, objectification is also found where a situation is assumed to be conflictual or the perspectives involved are assumed to be antagonistic. Here, the members seek to document intermediate states in order to secure progress in negotiations, for example.
- 8.
Other object formations come into play where the work—of the psychologist, for example—refers to the unlocking, dismantling, opening of already pre-consolidated objects. Here too, however, the work on the object leads to a limited ability to retrieve changes once they have been made. Once a loosening or opening has taken place, it cannot be reversed.
- 9.
On ‘gossip’, for example, see Bergmann (1993).
- 10.
An interesting case here would be the ‘incidental’ production of symbols. In this case, for example, ‘inference-richness’ (Sacks, 1992) can be understood as a process of successive accumulation of information: a term or name (‘Kunduz’) with further permitted, obvious conclusions (‘many civil victims’).
- 11.
Here it is mainly workplace studies that focus on specific objects in organised settings. Cf. for example Rawls (2002) and Schatzki (2006). Such studies can be seen as a countermovement to Organisational Studies and their reduction of complex work processes and their practical demands to mere rule-governed decisions.
- 12.
- 13.
With the distinction between ‘strong and weak procedures’ (Scheffer et al., 2010), we have also referred to the variance of more or less self-referential and separate procedural systems.
- 14.
In law today, aspects such as customary rights, individual rights, the reconciliation of interests, the weighing up of norms, etc. serve as levelling factors. Problems are thus (initially) placed in the series of cases. As an effect, they are normalised and relativized without regard to the existential distress.
- 15.
Here there are parallels to Habermas’ (1981) ‘idealising’ conception of the ‘lifeworld’ and its discursive openness to all claims to validity, which in turn is achieved by the broad formation of problem views for delegation to politics and law. By means of routine, ritual, script or method, however, a thematisation of or a reference to an object can become disputed and unlikely. A life-world context would then actually be averse to certain problems.
- 16.
Certain problems are emerging and becoming much noticed, where recurring events that can be named, described and explained—such as hurricanes, heat waves and floods as manifestations of climate change—interrupt, disrupt or destabilise the usual hustle and bustle, including the shared assumptions of normality (cf. Hoppe & Lemke, 2015). The same applies, in relation to other existential questions, to the performance of outbreaks of violence, epidemics or famine. Some ‘urgent’ problems become almost undeniable in their discursivity.
- 17.
The examples show how concertation in response to existential threats is somehow paradoxical: society as such is called into question and restored. Some narratives would argue that it is only here when society comes into existence at all—in the moments of concertation of an otherwise disintegrated differentiation or even fragmentation.
- 18.
In critical terms, this is understood as the construction of an ‘ideological apparatus’ in Althusser’s sense (1977). Studies critical of power interpret problem-solving regimes as presumptions of power. Accordingly, their reference problems are regarded as illusory problems or ideological creations (cf. Latour, 2004).
- 19.
In this sense, the Green demand for Veggie Day in German canteens was both a ‘doing’ and an ‘undoing of an existential problem’. It recalled a far-reaching, general problem of the relationship between meat consumption and climate change and biodiversity on the one hand; it negated the drastic nature of the situation by greatly mitigating the necessary action on the other hand. Thus the ‘seriousness of the situation’ was simultaneously denied by the request.
- 20.
The concept of the ‘zero option’ (Offe, 1986), i.e. the forward-looking prevention of organised developments such as nuclear energy or genetic engineering, was an expression of a stated overstretch. In contrast, even for existential questions the mere announcement of a problem solution dominates. This indicates the conditionality of current capacities and the need to find a solution.
References
Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception. University of Chicago Press.
Alkemeyer, T., & Michaeler, M. (2013). Die Ausformung mitspielfähiger ‘Vollzugskörper’. Praxistheoretisch-empirische Überlegungen am Beispiel des Volleyballspiels. Sport und Gesellschaft – Sport and Society, 10(3), 213–239.
Althusser, L. (1977). Ideologie und ideologische Staatsapparate. Aufsätze zur marxistischen Theorie. VSA.
Ayaß, R., & Meyer, C. (Eds.). (2012). Sozialität in Slow Motion: Theoretische und empirische Perspektiven. Springer VS.
Bergmann, J. (1993). Discrete indiscretions: The social organization of gossip. Aldine De Gruyter.
Brichzin, J. (2016). Politische Arbeit in Parlamenten. Eine ethnografische Studie zur kulturellen Produktion im politischen Feld. Nomos.
Cambrosio, A., Limoges, C., & Pronovost, D. (1990). Representing biotechnology: An ethnography of quebec science policy. Social Studies of Science, 20(3), 195–227.
Conley, J. M., & O’Barr, W. M. (1990). Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1952). The public and its problems. Swallow Press.
Elsey, C., Kolanoski, M., & Mair, M. (2018). Violence as work: Ethnomethodological insights into military combat operations. Psychology of Violence, 8(3), 316–328.
Folkers, A. (2018). Das Sicherheitsdispositiv der Resilienz. Katastrophische Risiken und die Biopolitik vitaler Systeme. Campus.
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.
Garfinkel, H. (Ed.). (1986). Ethnomethodological studies of work. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Goffman, E. (1983). The interaction order. American Sociological Review, 48, 1–17.
Habermas, J. (1981). Die Theorie des Kommunikativen Handelns. Suhrkamp.
Habermas, J. (1992). Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats. Suhrkamp.
Hirschauer, S. (2014). Intersituativität. Teleinteraktionen und Koaktivitäten jenseits von Mikro und Makro. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Special Issue ‘Interaktion – Organisation – Gesellschaft Revisited. Anwendungen, Erweiterungen, Alternativen’: 109–133.
Holly, W. (1981). Der doppelte Boden in Verhören. Sprachliche Strategien von Verhörenden. In W. Frier (Ed.), Pragmatik. Theorie und Praxis (pp. 275–319). Rodopi.
Holzinger, M. (2014). Niklas Luhmanns Systemtheorie und Kriege. Zeitschrift Für Soziologie, 43(6), 458–475.
Hoppe, K. (2017). Politik der Antwort. Zum Verhältnis von Ethik und Politik in Neuen Materialismen. Behemoth—A Journal on Civilisation, 10(1), 10–28.
Hoppe, K., & Lemke, T. (2015). Die Macht der Materie. Grundlagen und Grenzen des agentiellen Realismus von Karen Barad. Soziale Welt, 66(3), 261–280.
Kalthoff, H. (1997). Wohlerzogenheit. Eine Ethnographie deutscher Internatsschulen. Campus.
Knorr, K. (1986). Die Fabrikation von Erkenntnis. Zur Anthropologie der Naturwissenschaft. Suhrkamp.
Kolanoski, M. (2017). Undoing the legal capacities of a military object: A case-study on the (in)visibility of civilians. Law & Social Inquiry, 42(2), 377–397.
Latour, B. (1999). Pandoras hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Harvard University Press.
Latour, B. (2002). La Fabrique du droit. Une ethnographie du Conseil d’État. La Découverte.
Latour, B. (2004). Why has critique run out of steam?—From matters of fact to matters of concern. Critical Inquiry, 30(2), 225–248.
Laube, S., Schank, J., Scheffer, T. (2016a). Medien als Status-Marker in der politischen Positionenfertigung. In von Friedrich Krotz/Cathrin Despotovic/Merle Kruse (Hrsg.), Mediatisierung als Metaprozess. Transformationen, Entwicklungen und die Generierung von Neuem. VS Verlag.
Laube, S., Schank, J., & Scheffer, T. (2016b). Work-in-progress. Medien als Status-Marker in der Fertigung politischer Positionen. In F. Krotz, C. Despotovic, & M. Kruse (Eds.), Mediatisierung als eta-prozess. Transformationen, Entwicklungen und die Generierung von Neuem (pp. 113–135). Springer VS.
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1966). The savage mind. University of Chicago Press.
Luhmann, N. (1989). Legitimation durch Verfahren. Suhrkamp.
Luhmann, N. (1997). Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp.
Mair, M., Elsey, C., Watson, P. G., & Smith, P. V. (2013). Interpretive asymmetry, retrospective inquiry and the explication of action in an incident of friendly fire. Symbolic Interaction, 36(4), 398–416.
Mair, M., Watson, P. G., Elsey, C., & Smith, P. V. (2012). War-making and sense-making: Some technical reflections on an instance of ‘friendly fire.’ British Journal for Sociology, 63(1), 75–96.
Malm, A. (2020). Klima|x. Matthes & Seitz.
Marcus, G. E. (1995). Ethnography in/out the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology, 24, 85–117.
Matoesian, G. M. (1993). Reproducing rape: Domination through talk in the courtroom. University of Chicago Press.
Offe, C. (1986). Die Utopie der Null-Option. Modernität und Modernisierung als politische Gütekriterien. In by P. Koslowski, R. Löw, & R. Spaemann (Eds.), Moderne oder Postmoderne? Zur Signatur des gegenwärtigen Zeitalters (pp. 143–172). VCH.
Porsché, Y. (2018). Public representations of immigrants in museums: Exhibition and exposure in France and Germany. Palgrave Macmillan.
Preiser, C. (2016). Conducting open participant observations of bouncers: Negotiating (in)visibility in fieldwork. British Journal of Community Justice, 14(2), 61–74.
Rawls, A. W. (2002). Introduction. In H. Garfinkel (Ed.), Ethnomethodology’s program: Working out Durkheim’s Aphorism (pp. 65–76). Rowman & Littlefield.
Roca-Cuberes, C. (2014). Conversation analysis and the study of social institutions: Methodological social-cultural and epistemic considerations. Athenea Digital, 30(1), 303–331.
Sacks, H. (1992). The baby cries, the mommy picks it up. In H. Sacks (Ed.), Lectures on conversation (pp. 236–267). Blackwell Publishers.
Schatzki, T. (2006). On organizations as they happen. Organization Studies, 27(12), 1863–1873.
Scheffer, T. (2001). Asylgewährung. Eine Ethnographie des Deutschen Asylverfahrens. Lucius.
Scheffer, T. (2007). Event and process: An exercise in analytical ethnography. Human Studies, 30(3), 167–197.
Scheffer, T. (2008). Zug um Zug und Schritt für Schritt. Annäherungen an eine transsequentielle Analytik. In H. Kalthoff, S. Hirschauer, & G. Lindemann (Eds.), Theoretische Empirie. Zur Relevanz qualitativer Forschung (pp. 368–398). Suhrkamp.
Scheffer, T. (2010). Adversarial case-making: An ethnography of the English crown court. Brill.
Scheffer, T. (2012). Trans-sequentielle Analyse – und ihre formativen Objekte. In R. Hörster, S. Köngeter, & B. Müller (Eds.), Grenzobjekte. Soziale Welten und ihre Übergänge (pp. 87–114). Springer VS.
Scheffer, T. (2014). Die Arbeit an den Positionen – Zur Mikrofundierung von Politik in Abgeordnetenbüros des Deutschen Bundestages. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, Special Issue ‘Interaktion – Organisation – Gesellschaft Revisited. Anwendungen, Erweiterungen, Alternativen’, 369–389.
Scheffer, T. (2021). Existentielle Probleme, soziologisch. Zeitschrift für theoretische Soziologie (ZTS) (1).
Scheffer, T., Howe, C., Kiefer, E., Negnal, D., & Porsché, Y. (2017). Polizeilicher Kommunitarismus. Eine Praxisforschung urbaner Kriminalprävention. Campus.
Scheffer, T., Hannken-Illjes, K., & Kozin, A. (2010a). Criminal defence and procedure: Comparative ethnographies in the United Kingdom, Germany, and the United States. Palgrave Macmillan.
Scheffer, T., Michaeler, M., & Schenk, J. (2010b). Starke und Schwache Verfahren. Ein explorativer Vergleich von englischer ‘Hutton Inquiry’ und ‘CIA-Ausschuss’ der EU. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, 37(5), 423–444.
Schmidt, R. (2012). Soziologie der Praktiken. Konzeptionelle Studien und empirische Analysen. Suhrkamp.
Stoll, M. (2018). Beschleunigungsstrategien der Strafjustiz. Eine empirische Studie zum Strafbefehlsverfahren in der Schweiz. Budrich.
Streeck, W. (2017). Self-making man: A day of action, life, and language. Cambridge University Press.
Travers, M. (1997). The reality of law: Work and talk in a firm of criminal lawyers. Dartmouth.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scheffer, T. (2023). Varieties of Trans-Sequentiality: Diagnostics of Contemporary Capacities for Problem-Work, Developed from Ethnographies of the State. In: Gießmann, S., Röhl, T., Trischler, R., Zillinger, M. (eds) Materiality of Cooperation. Medien der Kooperation – Media of Cooperation. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39468-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39468-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39467-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39468-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)