Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Construction 4.0—Key Factors for the Digital Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Accents of added value in construction 4.0

  • 302 Accesses

Abstract

(Extracts published in: Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). Corporate digital responsibility (CDR) in construction engineering—Ethical guidelines for the application of digital transformation and artificial intelligence (AI) in user practice. Springer Nature SN Applied Sciences. Vol. 3, 801, Iss. 10, 2021.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    see https://www.bauindustrie.de/zahlen-fakten/bedeutung-der-bauwirtschaft/anteil-am-bip.

  2. 2.

    see https://de.statista.com/themen/2774/green-building/#dossierKeyfigures.

  3. 3.

    see https://www.bauindustrie.de/zahlen-fakten/bedeutung-der-bauwirtschaft/anteil-an-der-wertschoepfung.

  4. 4.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. and Vasiliu-Feltus, I. (2022). Empowering Digital Innovation by Diverse Leadership in—A Roadmap to a better value system in computer algorithms. In: Humanistic Management Journal. Vol.7, Iss. 1 (2022). p. 117–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-022-00123-7.

  5. 5.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). Gender Innovation in Construction in Digital Era. Conference Presentation on 14oct2021 at 31st Reser Conference 14-15oct2021 Heilbronn, The Disruptive Role of Data, AI and Ecosystems in Services. Conference Proceedings. Bernd Bienzeisler, Katrin Peters, Alexander Schletz (eds.). p. 29 et sqq. URN: urn:nbn:de:0011-n-6429286 http://publica.fraunhofer.de/dokumente/N-642928.html.

  6. 6.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2022). Impact of education and training for diversity, inclusion and sustainable digital innovations. In: Impact of Women Empowerment on SDGs in the Digital Era. Special Edition by Ingrid Vasilliu-Feltes, IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3637-0, ISBN13: 9781668436370.

  7. 7.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2022). Perspective Chapter: The sovereign way: How Diversity in Construction is Key of Success in the Digital Age. Book Chapter. In: Digital Transformation by Antonella Petrillo, Fabio De Felice, Monica Violeta Achim and Nawazish Mirza. 2022. Publishing IntechOpen Book Series. https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/80845. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.102662.

  8. 8.

    McKinsey Global Institute (2017). 10 imperatives for Europe in the age of AI and automation. October 2017 Report. McKinsey Verlagsdruck.

  9. 9.

    see COM(2018) 237 as of 25 April 2018: AI for Europe.

  10. 10.

    see COM(2018) 795 as of 7 December 2018: Coordinated Plan for AI.

  11. 11.

    BMWi (2019). AI Application in German Companies 2019, Study with Statistics.

  12. 12.

    Deloitte (2020). Study State of AI in the Enterprise, 3rd Edition, 2020, by Deloitte.

  13. 13.

    Lupp, D. (2020). Ethics, Digitization and AI in Construction. In an Interview with the Author as of 02 March 2020 in Munich.

  14. 14.

    Schäfer, M. (2020). Ethics, Digitization and AI in Construction. In an Interview with the Author as of 12 August 2020 in Leonberg.

  15. 15.

    Kirn, S. and Müller-Hengstenberg, C. D. (2014). Technische und rechtliche Betrachtungen zur Autonomie kooperativ-intelligenter Softwareagenten. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13218-014-0334-z.

  16. 16.

    Deloitte (2020). Studie zu Mittelstand Axia Best Managed Companies Award 2020 by Deloitte.

  17. 17.

    Hohmann-Dennhardt, C. (2012). Arena “Werte und Wirtschaft". Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. In: Presentation at a Podium discussion, Wertekongress, 30 October 2012 in Berlin. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqSR7DWlztM.

  18. 18.

    Bryson JJ, Theodorou A (2019). How Society Can Maintain Human-Centric Artificial Intelligence. In: Toivonen M., Saari E. (eds) Human-Centered Digitalization and Services. Translational Systems Sciences. Vol 19, S. 305–323. Springer, Singapur. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7725-9_16.

  19. 19.

    Baker-Brunnbauer, J. (2020). Management perspective of ethics in artificial intelligence. Journal of AI and Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-020-00022-3.

  20. 20.

    Deloitte (2021). 2021 Engineering and Construction Industry Outlook in the US, In: Study by Deloitte Research Center for Energy & Industrials 2021, page 2, by Deloitte Printing.

  21. 21.

    Kiron D et al. (2013). The benefits of sustainability-driven innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119204084.ch15.

  22. 22.

    Schumacher EG et al. (2013). Institutionalizing ethical innovation in organizations. An integrated causal model of moral innovation decision processes. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1277-7.

  23. 23.

    See Live-Stream as of 15 March 2022, https://zukunft-bauen.region-stuttgart.de/digital/event/event.php.

  24. 24.

    Gabriel, M. (2021). Keynote Speech of the EU-Commissary for Innovation, Research and Culture, Education and Youth. 4th European AI Forum as of 16 December 2021, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsjDYwnA5lY.

  25. 25.

    Ressler, K. (2021). Keynote Speech as Member of the European Parliament / Deputy of the Association for AI 4th European AI Forum as of 16 December 2021, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsjDYwnA5lY.

  26. 26.

    Fisher, E. (2020). Reinventing responsible innovation, Science Technology and Society Studies, Journal of Responsible Innovation, Vol. 7:1, S.1–5, https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1712537.

  27. 27.

    Pillai V. S. and Matus K. J. M. (2020). Towards a responsible integration of artificial intelligence technology in the construction sector, Journal of Science and Public Policy, Vol. 47, Iss. 5, Oktober 2020, S. 689–704, https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa073.

  28. 28.

    An entrepreneurial ecosystem is understood as the combination of social, political, economic, and cultural elements of a region that promote entrepreneurial processes. The "ecosystem" is therefore a metaphor—a positive image for the interaction of various factors that promote innovation, creativity, and start-up dynamics. Such an image creates a language ability between scientific disciplines and practice.

  29. 29.

    Bavarian Research Institute for Digital Transformation (2020). Umfrage zum Einsatz von KI in deutschen Unternehmen: Viele Stellen im Bereich KI bleiben unbesetzt. https://www.bidt.digital/umfrage-zum-einsatz-von-ki-in-deutschen-unternehmen-viele-stellen-im-bereich-ki-bleiben-unbesetzt/

  30. 30.

    Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (2020). Lagebild der Künstlichen Intelligenz. https://www.de.digital/DIGITAL/Navigation/DE/Lagebild/Kuenstliche-Intelligenz/kuenstliche-intelligenz.html.

  31. 31.

    Platform Learning Systems—The platform for artificial intelligence (2021). KI in die Anwendung bringen. White Paper. https://www.plattform-lernende-systeme.de/files/Downloads/Publikationen/AG1_WP_KI_in_Anwendung_bringen.pdf.

  32. 32.

    Platform Learning Systems—The platform for artificial intelligence (2021). KI in die Anwendung bringen. White Paper. https://www.plattform-lernende-systeme.de/files/Downloads/Publikationen/AG1_WP_KI_in_Anwendung_bringen.pdf.

  33. 33.

    Federal Ministry of Education and Research (2019). Digitale Zukunft: Lernen. Forschen. Wissen—Die Digitalstrategie. https://www.bildung-forschung.digital/digitalezukunft/de/unsere-ueberzeugungen/digitalstrategie-des-bmbf/die-digitalstrategie-des-bmbf/die-digitalstrategie-des-bmbf.html.

  34. 34.

    European Commission (2021). Aktionsplan für digitale Bildung (2021–2027). https://ec.europa.eu/education/education-in-the-eu/digital-education-action-plan_de.

  35. 35.

    European Commission(2021). Europäische Kompetenzagenda. https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1223&langId=en.

  36. 36.

    European Commission(2021). Aktionsplans zur europäischen Säule sozialer Rechte. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/economy-works-people/jobs-growth-and-investment/european-pillar-social-rights/european-pillar-social-rights-action-plan_en.

  37. 37.

    European Commission(2021). Digitalen Kompasses 2030: der europäische Weg in die digitale Dekade. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/priorities-2019-2024/europe-fit-digital-age/europes-digital-decade-digital-targets-2030_en.

  38. 38.

    Merkel, A. et al. (2021). Europe must see its digital sovereignty. Letter to the head of the EU

    Commission. https://www.handelsblatt.com/meinung/gastbeitraege/digitalisierung-appell-von-vier-regierungschefinnen-an-die-eu-europa-muss-seine-digitale-souveraenitaet-staerken/26962398.html?share=mail&ticket=ST-12911066-YRfg5bjTdBqhfCVlySXD-ap6.

  39. 39.

    AllBright Foundation (2021). Introduction of board members. https://www.allbright-stiftung.de/English.

  40. 40.

    T20-B20 Joint Statement (2021). B20 & T20 Statement on Digital Transformation in view of the G20 Digital Ministers’ Meeting Trieste as of 5 August 2021. The G20 has a crucial role in making digitalisation an opportunity for all. https://www.t20italy.org/2021/08/04/the-g20-has-a-crucial-role-in-making-digitalisation-an-opportunity-for-all.

  41. 41.

    T20 Task Force 4 (2021). Preliminary Policy Recommendations. Preliminary findings and proposals by Task Force 4 on Digital Transformation. https://www.t20italy.org/2021/07/08/task-force-4-preliminary-policy-recommendations.

  42. 42.

    Görlich, D. (2021). How does the digital transformation change global value chains? Commentary on T20 Task Force 4 activities in August 2021. https://www.t20italy.org/2021/03/26/how-does-the-digital-transformation-change-global-value-chains.

  43. 43.

    Grunwald, A. (2017). Nachhaltigkeit ist mehr als ein Management-Problem! Zur normativen und hermeneutischen Dimension nachhaltiger Entwicklung [Sustainability is more than a management problem]. Presentation as of 17 November 2017, University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt. https://publikationen.bibliothek.kit.edu/1000078113.

  44. 44.

    Burnett, M. (2020). Doing Inclusive Design: From GenderMag to InclusiveMag. In: Human-Computer Interaction Institute Seminar Series Paper [Paper presentation]. Pittsburgh, PA:Carnegie Mellon University. https://scs.hosted.panopto.com/Panopto/Pages/Viewer.aspx?id=1fa67161-215d-45e8-b228-ab3e00f844ce

  45. 45.

    AI Ethics Lab (2020). A Guide to the Dynamics of AI Principles: Our Toolbox for Understanding &

    Using AI Principles. https://aiethicslab.com/big-picture.

  46. 46.

    World Economic Forum (2020). These are the top 10 job skills of tomorrow—and how long it

    takes to learn them. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/10/top-10-work-skills-of-tomorrow-how-long-it-takes-to-learn-them.

  47. 47.

    UNESCO (2020). New UNESCO report on Artificial Intelligence and Gender Equality. Report 2020. https://en.unesco.org/AI-and-GE-2020.

  48. 48.

    Hightech Agenda Bayern (2020). https://www.forschung-und-lehre.de/politik/bayern-will-neue-professuren-frueher-besetzen-3101.

  49. 49.

    See https://www.plattform-lernende-systeme.de/files/Downloads/Diverses/Studie_KI_in_Studium_und_Lehre.pdf.

  50. 50.

    Siegele, L. (2018). Eine Frage der Zeit—Künstliche Intelligenz wird die Weltpolitik durcheinanderwirbeln. https://zeitschrift-ip.dgap.org/de/ip-die-zeitschrift/archiv/jahrgang-2018/juli-august-2018/eine-frage-der-zeit (IP Journal)

  51. 51.

    Amorelli, M.-F. and García‐Sánchez, I.-M. (2021). Trends in the dynamic evolution of board gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. In: Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), p. 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2079.

  52. 52.

    Bulfin, S. (2009). Cyber-savvy students and industrial-era schools? Disassembling and recasting the new home-school mismatch hypothesis. In Australian Association for Teaching English/Australian Literacy Educator's Association National Conference (AATE/ALEA).

  53. 53.

    Buchanan et al. (2015). Social learning and technological evolution during the Clovis colonization of the New World, In: Journal of Human Evolution, Vol. 80, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2015.01.002.

  54. 54.

    From 2019 to 2021, the author identified keywords that were particularly frequently used in job advertisements: Artificial Intelligence, BIM/Building Information Modelling, Digital Twin, Smart Environments, Smart Cities, Intelligent Building, Networked Building Technology, Building Automation, VR/Virtual Reality, Assistance Systems, Automated Systems, big data, data science, deep learning, data protection/data security, intelligent/smart, artificial intelligence, cognitive modelling, machine learning/machine learning, human-machine interaction/human-computer interaction, robotics, and interdisciplinary cooperation.

  55. 55.

    Dede, C. (2005). Commentary: The growing utilization of design-based research. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 5(3), 345–348.

  56. 56.

    De Freitas and Oliver (2005). Walker, Voce, and Jenkins (2016). The rhetoric and reality of technology-

    enhanced learning developments in UK higher education: reflections on recent UCISA research findings (2012–2016). In: Journal if Interactive Learning Environments. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1419497

  57. 57.

    HM Government (2003). Department for Education and Skills. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/4886/7/DfES5Yearstrategy_Redacted.pdf.

  58. 58.

    Bond, M., Zawacki-Richter, O. and Nichols, M. (2019). Revisiting five decades of educational technology research: A content and authorship analysis of the British Journal of Educational Technology. In: British Journal of Educational Technology 50(1):12–63, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12730.

  59. 59.

    Junhong X. (2021). Digitale Transformation in der Hochschulbildung: Kritik an den Fünfjahresentwicklungsplänen (2016–2020) von 75 chinesischen Universitäten. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01587919.2019 .1680272?casa_token = ICU-6nLC43YAAAAA%3AJFrvOZ0AsAplZeZOPpN0PH5bTOAZ4D0TqxqphnpQUf7AzrtXcwP6xYKg38EY09gD_wVOlojl-OKGsQ

  60. 60.

    Teizer, K. (2020). Digitization, AI and ethics in construction. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 21 December 2020.

  61. 61.

    Kiefer, T. (2020). Digitization, AI and ethics in construction. Reference for international professional policy and technical education, VDI Association of German Engineers. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 03 December 2020

  62. 62.

    see https://www.vdi.de/ueber-uns/presse/publikationen/details/vdi-studie-ingenieurausbildung-fuer-die-digitale-transformation.

  63. 63.

    see https://4ing.net/.

  64. 64.

    FEANI = “Federation of European National Engineering Associations”. https://www.feani.org/

  65. 65.

    Gerbig, S. (2020). Digitization, AI and ethics in construction. Head of the project office “Digitization in the construction industry”, igbau, industrial union building-agricultural-environment, Franconian region. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 18 November 2020

  66. 66.

    Gebhardt, T. (2020). Digitization, AI and ethics in construction—handling at the HWK Stuttgart. Representative for innovation and technology transfer (BIT), focus on digitization, at the HWK Chamber of Crafts Stuttgart. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 16 December 2020

  67. 67.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2022). Education and Training in the Digital Era—A Compass for “Building Forward Better”, Book Chapter. In: Digital Transformation by Petrillo A., De Felice F., Violeta Achim M., and Mirza N (2022). IntechOpen Book Series Publishing. ISBN 978-1-80355-763-2

  68. 68.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). KI in Lehre und Ausbildung, In: BIM und KI in Wissenschaft und Unternehmenspraxis, buildingSMART Deutschland Verlag (bSD), Issue July 2021. www.buildingsmart.de/buildingsmart/aktuelles/jetzt-neu-bim-und-ki-wissenschaft-unternehmenspraxis

  69. 69.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). Baukultur 4.0: Digitale Transformation in der Anwenderpraxis. Journal ALLGEMEINE BAUZEITUNG ABZ, Issue No. 15 as of 16 April 2021, p.12

  70. 70.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). Die unternehmerisch verantwortungsvolle Digitalisierung im Bauwesen, Journal Der Bauingenieur Vol. 96 (2021), Issue 01-02, p. 19–25. https://doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2021-01-02-45.

  71. 71.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). Corporate Digital Responsibility in Construction Engineering–Construction 4.0; Ethical Guidelines for Digitization and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Konferenzpräsentation und–papier zur ICACE 2021 Artificial Consciousness and Ethics Conference in Rome, Italy, 18–19 October 2021. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (WASET). In: International Journal of Cognitive and Language Sciences. Vol.15, No.10, 2021. https://publications.waset.org/abstracts/138222/corporate-digital-responsibility-in-construction-engineering-construction-40-ethical-guidelines-for-digitization-and-artificial-intelligence. International Scholarly and Scientific Research & Innovation 15(10) 2021. ISNI:0000000091950263

  72. 72.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). Fachkräftemangel? Mehr Frau am Bau!— Frauen am Bau, KI, Ethik, Weibliche Führung im digitalen Zeitalter. The Author interviewed by journalist Matilda Jordanova-Duda for the Deutsche Welle as of 25 October 2021. Published: www.dw.com/de/fachkräftemangel-mehr-frau-am-bau/a-59577196 und www.pressreader.com/germany/deutsche-welle-spanish-edition/20211102/281655373295705

  73. 73.

    Giannakidis, A., Weber-Lewerenz, B. and Stolze D. (2021). AI in Construction in Germany. Study with Fraunhofer Institute Stuttgart IAO. http://publica.fraunhofer.de/eprints/urn_nbn_de_0011-n-6306697.pdf.

  74. 74.

    see “The Engineer of Tomorrow–The Engineering Profile in 21st Century”. Study by Bianca Weber-Lewerenz, ongoing since August 2020

  75. 75.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). Mehr Erfolg durch mehr Diversität in der Bauwirtschaft. Key note speech as of 27 October 2021 Berlin for the 25th anniversary of buildingSMART Deutschland (see YouTube).

  76. 76.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). AI in the context of Ethics, social values and principles. Key Note Speech with discussion at the buildingSMART Theme day “BIM and AIˮ as of 28 September 2021

  77. 77.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B.a (2021). Gender Innovation in Construction in Digital Era. Conference Presentation on 14 October 2021 at 31st Reser Conference 14–15 October 2021 Heilbronn, The Disruptive Role of Data, AI and Ecosystems in Services. Conference Proceedings of the 31st RESER conference. Bernd Bienzeisler, Katrin Peters, Alexander Schletz (eds.). p. 29 et sqq. URN: urn:nbn:de:0011-n-6429286 http://publica.fraunhofer.de/dokumente/N-642928.html.

  78. 78.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2021). Ethical Aspects in AI in Construction. Conference Presentation on 14oct2021 at 31st Reser Conference 14–15 October 2021 Heilbronn, The Disruptive Role of Data, AI and Ecosystems in Services. Conference Proceedings of the 31st RESER conference. Bernd Bienzeisler, Katrin Peters, Alexander Schletz (eds.). p. 247 et sqq. URN: urn:nbn:de:0011-n-6429286 http://publica.fraunhofer.de/dokumente/N-642928.html.

  79. 79.

    see https://www.produktion.de/technik/diese-6-trends-bestimmen-das-ingenieurwesen-von-morgen-114.html.

  80. 80.

    Anger, C. et al. (2021). MINT-Frühjahrsreport 2021. MINT-Engpässe und Corona-Pandemie: von den konjunkturellen zu den strukturellen Herausforderungen, Gutachten für BDA, BDI, MINT Zukunft schaffen und Gesamtmetall, Köln

  81. 81.

    World Economic Forum (2018). Global Gender Gap Report 2018—Focus on gender gaps

    related to AI. In: Global Gender Gap Report 2018. World Economic Forum Printing.

  82. 82.

    Lautwein, M. and Fox, J. (2020). Digitization, AI and related ethics in construction. Handling in the department for digitization in construction at the Federal Institute for Building, Urban and Spatial Research (BBSR), in the Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR).

  83. 83.

    Lee, J. D., and Seppelt, B. (2009). Human factors in automation design, In Shimon Y. Nof (edt.), Handbook of Automation, (p. 417–436). Springer Gabler Publishing, Wiebaden.

  84. 84.

    von Gerkan, M. (1982). Die Verantwortung des Architekten: Bedingungen für die gebaute Umwelt. Deutsche Verlags-Anstalt.

  85. 85.

    Friesen, H. (2019). Architektur und Ethik. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie, 66(6), p.805–830.

  86. 86.

    von Gerkan, M. (2013). Black Box BER: Vom Flughafen Berlin Brandenburg und anderen Großbaustellen. Wie Deutschland seine Zukunft verbaut. Bastei Lübbe Publishing.

  87. 87.

    Lautwein, M. and Fox, J. (2020):.Digitization, AI and related ethics in construction. Handling in the department for digitization in construction at the Federal Institute for Building, Urban and Spatial Research (BBSR), in the Federal Office for Building and Regional Planning (BBR). In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 04 December 2020

  88. 88.

    see https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/programme/zb/Auftragsforschung/3Rahmenbedingungen/2013/BIMLeitfaden/04_Veroeffentlichungen.html.

  89. 89.

    see https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/forschung/programme/zb/zukunftbau-node.html.

  90. 90.

    Lange, M. (2020). Digital transformation and AI empirical values from user practice at APLEONA. In a telephone Interview with the Author on 05 November 2020

  91. 91.

    Bauer, T. (2020). Digitization, AI and related ethics in construction. Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Bauer AG, Schrobenhausen, and President of the European Construction Industry Federation (FIEC). In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 17 March 2020

  92. 92.

    Schmid, T. (2020). Digitization, AI and related ethics in construction. General manager of the Bayerischer Bauindustrieverband e.V., Head of the “Digitalization” Steering Committee of the Hauptverband der Dt. Bauindustrie e.V. Political scientist and Master of European Studies, worked in the foreign service, among other things. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 02 March 2020

  93. 93.

    Heltsche, M. (2020). Digitization, AI and related ethics in construction. Special representative of the German Women's Council for digitization and board member of the Digital Media Women (DMW). In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 30 November 2020

  94. 94.

    see Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT). Research project “SDaC – Smart Design and Construction ˮ

  95. 95.

    Interviews by the Author (2020–2021), for example, with Prof. Dr. Lothar Schmidt, Dean Vicil Engineering HAW Munich; Dr. Daniel Krause, Head of Department Digital Construction Wayss&Freytag Ingenieurbau AG; Dr. Matthias Peissner, Head of the Human-Technology Interaction research department Fraunhofer IAO Institute

  96. 96.

    Teizer, K. (2020). BIM und Lean Management in der Praxis. S.64. buildingSMART Buchreihe. bsD Publishing Berlin.

  97. 97.

    Freundemann, T. (2020). Digitization, AI and related ethics in construction. Co-CEO & Co-Founder of EDI GmbH-Engineering Data Intelligence. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 08 February 2020

  98. 98.

    Capgemini Consulting (2017). Turning AI into concrete value. The successful implementers’ toolkit. https://www.capgemini.com/gb-en/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2017/09/dti-ai-report_final1-1.pdf, https://panda.technology/de/ai_surveys.

  99. 99.

    Deloitte (2019). State of AI in the Enterprise.Ergebnisse der Befragung von 100 AI- Experten in deutschen Unternehmen. https://www2.deloitte.com/de/de/pages/presse/contents/AI-in-the-Enterprise.html.

  100. 100.

    Buxmann, P. and Schmidt, H. (2019). Künstliche Intelligenz. Mit Algorithmen zum wirtschaftlichen Erfolg. Springer Gabler Publishing Belin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57568-0.

  101. 101.

    Initiative Neue Qualität der Arbeit & Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales (2016). Führungskultur im Wandel–Kulturstudie mit 400 Tiefeninterviews. Berlin

  102. 102.

    Hirsch-Kreinsen, H. (2015). Digitalisierung industrieller Arbeit: die Vision Industrie 4.0 und ihre sozialen Herausforderungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

  103. 103.

    Geschäftsmodelle in der digitalen Welt. Ausgestaltung der Arbeitswelt 4.0 im mittelständischen Bauunternehmen. Wolfgang Becker, Thomas Kuchejda, Eva Reitelshöfer (2018). Springer Link Publishing.

  104. 104.

    Zukunft der Arbeit in Industrie 4.0. Botthof, A., & Hartmann, E. A. (2015). Springer Vieweg Publishing.

  105. 105.

    BMWi (2020). Einsatz von KI in der Deutschen Wirtschaft, Stand der KI-Nutzung im Jahr 2019, p. 20. Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft

    und Energie (BMWi). https://www.bmwi.de/Redaktion/DE/Publikationen/Wirtschaft/einsatz-von-ki-deutsche-wirtschaft.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=8.

  106. 106.

    see https://nachrichten.idw-online.de/2020/07/22/kuenstliche-intelligenz-im-bauwesen/.

  107. 107.

    see http://www.inab.rwth-aachen.de/en/new-welcom-to-inab/

  108. 108.

    see https://www.ibp.rwth-aachen.de/go/id/rgdcy.

  109. 109.

    see https://biminstitut.uni-wuppertal.de/

  110. 110.

    Meins-Becker, A. (2021). The BIM Institute of BU Wuppertal. In an Interview with the Author as of 03 December 2021.

  111. 111.

    see https://www.tu-darmstadt.de/cogsci/ccs/index.en.jsp.

  112. 112.

    see https://www.hochtief.de/aktuelles-medien/pressemitteilungen/pressemitteilung/innovations-plattform-nexplore-schliesst-forschungskooperation-mit-tu-darmstadt.

  113. 113.

    see https://www.architektur.tu-darmstadt.de/fachbereich/aktuelles_arch/architektur_news_details_121088.de.jsp.

  114. 114.

    see https://www.tu-darmstadt.de/universitaet/aktuelles_meldungen/archiv_2/2020/2020quartal2/news_archiv_de_256192.de.jsp.

  115. 115.

    see www.wirtschaft-digital-bw.de/ki-made-in-bw/innovationspark-kuenstliche-intelligenz-baden-wuerttemberg.

  116. 116.

    see https://www.heilbronn.de/wirtschaft/innovationspark-kuenstliche-intelligenz-ki-baden-wuerttemberg-in-heilbronn.html.

  117. 117.

    see https://uni-freiburg.de/universitaet/organisation-und-verwaltung/rektorat/geschaeftsbereich-wissenschaftskommunikation-und-strategie/.

  118. 118.

    see https://www.kmk.org/themen/hochschulen/qualitaetssicherung-und-qualitaetsentwicklung.html.

  119. 119.

    Royakkers, L., Timmer, J., Kool, L. et al. (2018). Societal and ethical issues of digitization. Journal of Ethics and Information Technology. Vol. 20, p. 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9452-x.

  120. 120.

    Among others, the UN WOMEN, World Economic Forum, the European Commission, Stanford University, the UC Berkeley Haas School of Business with Genevieve Smith, Associate Director, and Ishita Rustagi, Business strategies and operations analyst, deal with this topic at the Center for Equity, Gender and Leadership (EGAL), MIT with Catherine D’Ignazio and Lauren F. Klein (Data Feminism), Algorithmic Justice League, the policy paper “Designing a gender-equitable digital transformationˮ of the Federal Council of German Women's Organizations.

  121. 121.

    This refers to the science journals that publish peer-reviewed specialist articles, such as B., Nature, Science, Ethics and IT, Responsible Leadership, Ethics, Humanistic Management, Science Advances, SN Applied Sciences, AI Research, AI Ethics, Business Ethics, Nature Machine Learning.

  122. 122.

    Weber-Lewerenz, B. (2022). It´s a Man`s World - forever and ever? Online magazin bSD Plus. buildingSMART Germany. https://www.bsdplus.de/fachartikel/its-a-mans-world-forever-and-ever.html)

  123. 123.

    Main Association of the German Construction Industry (Hauptverband der Deutschen Bauindustrie e.V.) (2021). Statistical Analysis of the Construction as of 10 February 2021

  124. 124.

    SDG, Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations

  125. 125.

    European Commission (2020). A union of equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020–25.Brussels, 1st Edition, 2020.

  126. 126.

    McKinsey & Company (2020). How inclusion matters. In: Diversity Wins Report 2020.

    Publishing Company McKinsey & Company.

  127. 127.

    Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure BMVI (Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur BMVI) (2020): Stufenplan Digitales Planen und Bauen. BMVI Publishing, Berlin. See https://www.bmvi.de/SharedDocs/DE/Publikationen/DG/stufenplan-digitales-bauen.pdf?__blob=publicationFile.

  128. 128.

    The General Data Protection Regulation is a regulation of the European Union, with which the rules for the processing of personal data by most of those responsible, both private and public, as well as the free movement of data within the European internal market, are standardized across the EU. First presented in 2012, created and effective in 2016, applicable from 2018.

  129. 129.

    Gerbig, S.: Digitization, AI and Ethics in Construction. Insights by IG BAU. In an Interview with the Author as of 19 November 2020

  130. 130.

    Nicole Wittenbrink and Steffen Wischmann, Institute for Innovation and Technic (iit) at VDI/VDE-IT GmbH. VDI News vas of 10 May 2021: EU-Gesetzentwurf zur KI—Macht KI jetzt in Europa Pause? See https://www.vdi.de/news/detail/macht-ki-jetzt-in-europa-pause.

  131. 131.

    The AI Act is based on the European Commission’s draft law of April 21, 2021. see https://algorithmwatch.org/en/statement-scope-of-eu-ai-act/

  132. 132.

    Aitrends (2021). Executive Interview: Paul Nemitz, Principal Adviser on Justice Policy for the European Commission, Brussels, as of 20 May 2021. See https://www.aitrends.com/executive-interview/executive-interview-paul-nemitz-principal-adviser-on-justice-policy-for-the-european-commission-brussels/

  133. 133.

    Jeroen van den Hoven, Professor of Moral Philosophy at Delft University of Technology on recent experiences with responsible innovation and value-sensitive design in The Netherlands. In: Key note address at the Third International Conference on Responsible Innovation, organized by NOW on 22 May 2014.

  134. 134.

    Schmid, T.: (2020). Ethics in Construction. In an Interview with the Author as of 02 March 2020 in Munich

  135. 135.

    Hohmann-Dennhardt, C. (2020).  Arena “Werte und Wirtschaft”. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung. In: Presentation at Podium Discussion, Wertekongress as of 30 October 2012 in Berlin

  136. 136.

    Metzinger, T. (2021). Künstliche Intelligenz und “Ethics Washingˮ. Deutschlandfunk (DLF) Radio presentation as of 11 June 2021 of the Philosopher: “Wir haben keine seriösen Experten für angewandte Ethik der KIˮ. See https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/kuenstliche-intelligenz-und-ethics-washing-wir-haben-keine.680.de.html?dram:article_id=498700.

  137. 137.

    Bauer, T. (2020). Digitization, AI and ethics in construction. Member of the Supervisory Board of Bauer AG and Vice-President of the European Construction Industry Federation (FIEC). In a telephone interview with the Author as of 17 March 2020.

  138. 138.

    Hagemann-Miksits, R. (2020). Digitization and AI in construction—organization chart of the German construction industry. Head of the Main Association of the German Construction Industry e. V.; up to April 2021 Head of the Technology, Construction, Sustainability and Digitization divisions. In an interview with the Author as of 25 March 2020 in Berlin.

  139. 139.

    To deepen further: see the first Social Encyclical “Rerum novarum” (“Über die neuen Dinge”) as of 1891. The Church's Answer to the Social Question. Pope Leo XIII against the background of the industrial revolution of the nineteenth century, pleads for cooperation between employers and employees, defends private property, emphasizes its social obligation and demands fair wages and state protection for employees. Meaning: opening up to the modern world and breaking through the “fortress mentality” of the Church.

  140. 140.

    To deepen further: see Encylical “Centesimus annus” (“Über die menschliche Arbeit”) as of 1 May 1991. The reminiscence of “Rerum novarum” published by John Paul II. The balance after 25 years shows: His predictions of political and social developments were particularly impressive. Encouraged by this social encyclical, Oswald von Nell-Breuning, theologian and social philosopher, criticized the fact that the church grants its employees fewer rights of participation than is usual in business and public service.

  141. 141.

    To deepen further: see third Encyclical “Laborem exercens” (“durch Arbeit… ”) as of 1981. On the 90th anniversary of “Rerum Novarum”, Pope John Paul II advocates the dignity of work and participation in entrepreneurial success, in the sense of human dignity, the common good, and the principle of the priority of “work before capital”. Max Weber deepened the ethics of responsibility, which were taken into account to some extent, in his socio-economic considerations, including “Economy and Society” from 1921/1922 (posthumous).

  142. 142.

    Life Academy of the Vatican of Archbishop Vincenzo Paglia in Rom, Roman-Catholic Church: Rome Call for AI Ethics. Rom, 1. Edition as of 28 February 2020.

  143. 143.

    European Commission (2020). White Paper on Artificial Intelligence—a European approach to excellence and trust. Brussels, 1. Edition as of 19 February 2020.

  144. 144.

    Data Ethics Commission of the Federal Government, Federal Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Community: Opinion. Brandenburg university printing and publishing company Potsdam mbH (bud), Berlin, October 2019.

  145. 145.

    ML = Data fed into a machine by humans, so that the IT/machine, which is continuously trained through data and empirical values, carries out tasks, and processes as humanely as possible

  146. 146.

    Wißmann, H. (2019). Europäische Verfassungen 1789–1990. 2. Edition, Mohr Siebeck Printing, Tübingen

  147. 147.

    Federal Agency for Civic Education bpP (2009). Der Lissabonner Vertrag auf einen Blick. See https://www.bpb.de/themen/europaeische-union/dossier-europaeische-union/43000/der-lissabonner-vertrag-auf-einen-blick/

  148. 148.

    Von Schirach, F. (2021). Jeder Mensch. 1. Edition. Luchterhand Printing. See https://www.jeder-mensch.eu/informationen/

  149. 149.

    See VDI-Fachbereich Bautechnik: VDI Richtlinien 2552, Blatt 1: BIM Grundlagen, VDI-Gesellschaft Bauen und Gebäudetechnik (GBG), Published in July 2020 (www.vdi.de/2552).

  150. 150.

    See VDI-Fachbereich Bautechnik: VDI Richtlinien 2552, Blatt 7: BIM Prozesse, VDI-Gesellschaft Bauen und Gebäudetechnik (GBG), published in June 2020 (www.vdi.de/2552).

  151. 151.

    European Commission: White Paper on Artificial Intelligence—a European approach to excellence and trust. Brussels, 1.Edition, 19 February 2020.

  152. 152.

    see EU-Direktive 2014/95/EU: Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD)

  153. 153.

    Dörr S. (2020). Praxisleitfaden CDR: Unternehmerische Verantwortung und Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement im Digitalzeitalter. Springer Gabler Publishing, 1. Edition, April 2020.

  154. 154.

    Data Ethics Commission of the Federal Government, Federal Ministry of the Interior, for Building and Community: Opinion. Brandenburg University printing and publishing company Potsdam mbH (bud), Berlin, October 2019.

  155. 155.

    Spiekermann, S. (2019). Digitale Ethik: Ein Wertesystem für das 21. Jahrhundert. Verlag Droemer HC München, 3. Edition, 1 April 2019.

  156. 156.

    see Commission agenda on digital competition policy: Also see European digital strategy.

  157. 157.

    Giannakidis A., Weber-Lewerenz B. and Stolze D. (2021). KI in der Bauwirtschaft: Mögliche Anwendungsbereiche für Planung, Realisierung und Nutzung von Gebäuden. Fraunhofer IAO Institute Publishing. Study with Fraunhofer Institute 2021. See https://www.ki-fortschrittszentrum.de/de/studien/ki-in-der-bauwirtschaft.html.

  158. 158.

    See https://www.t20italy.org/2020/12/05/tf-4-digital-transformation/

  159. 159.

    AI is the so-called umbrella term for applications in which machines provide human-like intelligence such as learning, judgment, and problem-solving. The development, application, and maintenance of such data-driven technologies require orientation in order to be able to fulfill the associated digital responsibilities. Ethical principles help with orientation.

  160. 160.

    Weber-Lewerenz B. (2020). Corporate Digital Responsibility in Construction Engineering: Ethical Principles in Dealing With Digitization and AI. International Journal of Responsible Leadership and Ethical Decision-Making (IJRLEDM) Volume 2 Issue 1, 2020, p. 32–49. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJRLEDM.2020010103. January 2020.

  161. 161.

    See European Council Directive 2000/78 / EG.

  162. 162.

    European Commission (2020). A union of equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020-

    25. Brussels, 1st Edition, 2020.

  163. 163.

    Amorelli M.-F.. García‐Sánchez I.-M. (2021). Trends in the dynamic evolution of board.

    gender diversity and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(2), 537–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2079. 2021

  164. 164.

    Wieland J. (2014). Gelebte Ethik und Moral in Wirtschaft, Politik und Gesellschaft. In: Interview Bosch Global im März 2014. https://www.bosch.com/de/stories/josef-wieland/

  165. 165.

    SDG, Sustainable Development Goals of the UN

  166. 166.

    European Commission (2020). A union of equality: Gender Equality Strategy 2020–25.Brussels, 1st Edition, 2020.

  167. 167.

    Kirchschläger, P. G. (2015). CSR zwischen Greenwashing und ethischer Reflexion–Menschenrechte als ethischer Referenzrahmen für Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). In: zfwu Journal for Business and Corporate Ethics, Vol. 16, Iss. 3, S. 264–287

  168. 168.

    Enquête-Commission of the German Bundestag (2020). Künstliche Intelligenz–Gesellschaftliche Verantwortung und wirtschaftliche, soziale und ökologische Potenziale. Final Report of the Enquête Commission, Document No. 19/23800. 1, Edition. German Bundestag, Berlin

  169. 169.

    “BIM dimensionsˮ define all aspects and information that come into play in the digitization process of a building. The terms 2D (two-dimensional representation of the model using plans, elevations, and sections) and 3D (representation of the model in space) are often used for the graphic representation of a building. 2D and 3D are “dimensionsˮ that characterize the geometry of a model. However, there are other BIM dimensions (4D, 5D, 6D, etc.) that represent other properties of the same model. 3D—three-dimensional model of the structure; 4D—construction time analysis of structures; 5D—cost analysis; 6D—sustainability and efficiency; 7D—management of maintenance measures (facility management). Three new BIM dimensions have been added: 8D—safety in the design and construction phase of the work; 9D—lean building; 10D—industrialized building.

  170. 170.

    Heidelberger, M. (2020). Künstliche Intelligenz managt Daten in der Bauwirtschaft—KIT Karlsruhe. Journal Unternehmer Brief Bauwirtschaft 43, Journal No. 2, S. 22–23

  171. 171.

    Bundesministerium für Transport und Digitale Infrastruktur BMVI (2017): Umsetzung des Stufenplans Digitales Planen und Bauen—Erster Fortschrittsbericht. BMVI, Berlin

  172. 172.

    Sacks, R. et al. (2010). Interaction of Lean and Building Information Modelling in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000203.

  173. 173.

    Bauer, T. (2020). Digitization, AI and ethics in construction. In an Interview with the Author as of 17 March 2020

  174. 174.

    Schmid, T. (2020). Digitization, AI and ethics in construction. In an Interview with the Author as of 02 March 2020 in Munich

  175. 175.

    Smith, B. (2018). The Future Computed–Artificial Intelligence and its Role in Society. Microsoft Corporation Redmond, Washington, U.S.A.

  176. 176.

    Scheffler, M. (2019). Moralische Verantwortung von Bauingenieuren. Problemstellungen, Perspektiven, Handlungsbedarf. Springer Publishing, Wiesbaden

  177. 177.

    Porter, ME., Kramer, MR. (2012). Shared Value: Die Brücke von Corporate Social Responsibility zu Corporate Strategy. In: Schneider, A.; Schmidpeter, R.: Corporate Social Responsibility–Verantwortungsvolle Unternehmensführung in Theorie und Praxis Springer Gabler Publishing, Berlin

  178. 178.

    Koska, C., Filipović, A. (2019). Corporate Digital Responsibility muss mehr als geltendes Recht abbilden. See https://www.future-of-hr.com/2019/10/corporate-digital-responsibility-muss-mehr-als-geltendes-recht-abbilden.

  179. 179.

    Girmscheid, G. (2016). Projektabwicklung in der Bauwirtschaft—prozessorientiert—Wege zur Win–Win-Situation für Auftraggeber und Auftragnehmer. Springer Publishing, Berlin

  180. 180.

    Xu, W. (2019). Towards human-centered AI: A Perspective from Human-Computer Interaction. Interations Magazine. Vol. 26, Iss. 4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3328485.

  181. 181.

    Loh, J. (2018). Künstliche Intelligenz und Ethik: Alles gut, oder was? Podium discussion as of 05 December 2018, Telekom, Bonn. https://youtu.be/W1v46rBQ3tc.

  182. 182.

    Walsham, G. (1996). Ethical theory, codes of ethics and IS practise. Information Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2575.1996.00105.x.

  183. 183.

    Wright, D. (2011). A framework for the ethical impact assessment of information technology. Journal of Ethics and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9242-6.

  184. 184.

    Shneiderman, B. (2020). Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Reliable, Safe & Trustworthy, International Journal of Human–Computer Interactio, Vol. 36, Iss. 6, S. 495–504, https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1741118

  185. 185.

    Bughin, J., Seong, J., Manyika, J., Chui, M., Joshi, R. (2018). Notes from the frontier: Modelling impact of AI on the world economy. Study by McKinsey Global Institute (MGI)

  186. 186.

    Schäfer, M. (2020). Ethics in construction. In a telephone interview with the Author as of 10 February 2020 in Stuttgart

  187. 187.

    Wieland, J. (2014). Ethics. Interview Bosch Global in March 2014. See https://www.bosch.com/de/stories/josef-wieland.

  188. 188.

    Mendler, P. (2020). Ethics in digitization and AI in construction. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 17 December 2020

  189. 189.

    Gebhardt, T. (2020). Ethics in digitization and AI in construction. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 16 December 2020

  190. 190.

    Hagemann-Miksits, R. (2020). Digital transformation and experience with AI in construction. In an Interview with the Author as of 25 March 2020 in Berlin

  191. 191.

    Stadel, D. (2020). Digital transformation and experience with AI in construction. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 04 November 2020

  192. 192.

    What is meant here is that the most valuable capital in the company is the people, their knowledge and skills.

  193. 193.

    Krause, D. (2020). Digital transformation and experience with AI in construction. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 04 November 2020.

  194. 194.

    see https://www.bosch.com/stories/ethical-guidelines-for-artificial-intelligence/

  195. 195.

    Altmeppen, KD. and Filipović, A. (2019). Corporate Digital Responsibility. Zur Verantwortung von Medienunternehmen in digitalen Zeiten. Communicatio Socialis, Journal No. 52, Iss. 2 https://doi.org/10.5771/0010-3497-2019-2-202.

  196. 196.

    Dörr, S. (2020). Praxisleitfaden CDR: Unternehmerische Verantwortung und Nachhaltigkeitsmanagement im Digitalzeitalter. 1. Edition, Springer Gabler Publishing, Wiesbaden

  197. 197.

    Fisher, E. (2020). Reinventing responsible innovation, Science Technology and Society Studies, Journal of Responsible Innovation, 7:1, 1–5, https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1712537

  198. 198.

    Grunwald, A. (2020). Virtual AI Roadshow USA—Baden—Württemberg—Canada. Podium discussion as of 18 November 2020. https://virtual-ai-roadshow.b2match.io/

  199. 199.

    Kiefer, T. (2020). Digital transformation and experience with AI in construction. In a telephone Interview with the Author as of 03 December 2020.

  200. 200.

    Federal Association for the Digital Economy (2019). Ethik wird zum Wettbewerbsfaktor. Study on DMEXCO of German BVDW e.V. https://www.bvdw.org/der-bvdw/news/detail/artikel/bvdw-studie-zur-dmexco-ethik-wird-zum-wettbewerbsfaktor.

  201. 201.

    Hegger, J. (2020). Konstruktion, Material und Fertigung radikal umdenken. Editorial. Der Bauingenieur Vol. 96. Iss. 1, p. A3. https://doi.org/10.37544/0005-6650-2020-02

  202. 202.

    European Commission (2022). Neue Europäische Innovationsagenda. https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/13437-A-New-European-Innovation-Agenda_en

  203. 203.

    European Commission (2022). New strategic foresight 2022. https://ec.europa.eu/info/strategy/strategic-planning/strategic-foresight_en

  204. 204.

    Building Europe`s Digital Sovereignty Conference (2022): Task Force on Digital Commons (2022). https://www.euractiv.com/section/digital/news/eu-task-force-calls-for-digital-commons-foundation-launch/

  205. 205.

    Feroz, A.K. et al. (2021). Digital transformation and environmental sustainability: A Review and Research Agenda. Journal for Sustainability, Vol. 13(3), 1530. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031530

  206. 206.

    Lopes de Sousa J. et al. (2018). Industry 4.0 and the circular economy: a proposed research agenda and original roadmap for sustainable operations. Annals of Operations Research, Vol. 270, p. 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8

  207. 207.

    Shneiderman, B. (2020). Bridging the Gap between Ethics and Practice: Guidelines for reliable, safe and trustworthy human-centered AI Systems. ACM Transactions of Interactive Intelligent Systems Magazine. Beitrag No. 26, https://doi.org/10.1145/3419764.

  208. 208.

    Jordan, M. I. (2018). Artificial intelligence—The revolution hasn’t happened yet. Medium.com. https://medium.com/@mijordan3/artificial-intelligence-the-revolution-hasnt-happened-yet-5e1d5812e1e7.

  209. 209.

    Hao, K. (2019). In 2020, Let’s Stop AI Ethics-washing and Actually do Something. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/614992/ai-ethics-washing-time-to-act/

  210. 210.

    Teerlink, M. (2019). Ethics in AI: Why Values for Data Matter. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/sap/2019/12/18/ethics-in-ai/#5477c3d45af4.

  211. 211.

    Valkenburg, G. et al. (2019). Responsible Innovation as Empowering Ways of Knowing. Journal of Responsible Innovation. page 6–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1647087.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Aichtal, Germany

    Bianca Christina Weber-Lewerenz

Authors
  1. Bianca Christina Weber-Lewerenz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bianca Christina Weber-Lewerenz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Weber-Lewerenz, B.C. (2022). Construction 4.0—Key Factors for the Digital Change. In: Accents of added value in construction 4.0. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39407-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39407-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39406-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39407-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation