Skip to main content

Globalisierung und Beschäftigung

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Globalisierung
  • 2378 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Es galt in klassischen wirtschaftswissenschaftlichen Abhandlungen für ausgemacht, dass durch die Intensivierung des internationalen Handels und den technologischen Fortschritt die meisten Arbeitskräfte weltweit profitieren. Erstens durch den Import billigerer Konsumgüter, zweitens durch die Einfuhr von Vorprodukten, die im Ausland günstiger hergestellt werden können und dadurch die heimische internationale Konkurrenzfähigkeit bei der Endfertigung steigern, drittens durch die Erweiterung der Absatzmärkte bei Wegfall von Handelsbeschränkungen. Die Globalisierung hat dazu geführt, dass moderne Technologien schneller übernommen werden, wodurch sich die Produktivität in den betreffenden Betrieben/Sektoren und auch in benachbarten Bereichen gesteigert hat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Acemoglu, Daron und Pascual Restrepo (2018) Artificial Intelligence, Automation and Work, NBER Working Paper 24196, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Aghemmaleki, Hedieh et al. (2019) The China Shock, Employment Protection, and European Ait Ali, Abdelaaziz und Uri Dadush (2019) Manufacturing Employment, International Trade and Chin, Research Paper Policy Center for the New South, Rabat.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso Soto, Daniel (2020) Technology and the future of work in emerging economies: What is different, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 236, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arntz, Melanie et al. (2016) The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, David (2018) Trade and labor markets: Lessons from China’s rise, IZA World of Labor 431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor David (2019) Work of the Past, Work of the Future, NBER Working Paper 25588, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, David et al. (2015) Untangling Trade and Technology: Evidence From Local Labour Markets, The Economic Journal 125; 621–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autor, David und Anna Salomons (2018) Is automation labor-displacing? Productivity growth, employment, and the labor share, NBER Working Paper 24871, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, Richard (2019) The Globotics Upheaval. Globalization, Robotics and the Future of Work, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benmelech, Efraim und Michal Zator (2022) Robots and Firm Investment, NBER Working Paper 29676, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, Nicholas (2016) Trade-induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, The Review of Economic Studies 103,3; 208–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breemersch, Koen et al. (2017) Labour Market Polarization in Advanced Countries: Impact of Global Value Chains, Technology, Import Competition from China and Labur Market Institutions, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 197, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, Taehyoung et al. (2017) Has the Labour Share Declined? It Depends, OECD Statistics Working Papers 2017/1, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Loecker, Jan und Jan Eeckhout (2017) The Rise of Market Power and the Macroeconomic Implications, NBER Working Paper No. 23687, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, Carl Benedict und Michael A. Osborne (2013) The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation? Working Paper, Oxford Martin School.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Robotics, IFR (2021a) World Robotics 2021a. Industrial Robots, Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgieff, Alexandre und Anna milanez (2021) What happe ned to jobs at high risk of automation? OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers No. 255, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, Gary Clyder and Zhiyao Lu (2017) The Payoff to America from globalization: A Fresh Look with a Focus on Costs to Workers, Policy Brief, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Federation of Robotics (2021b) World Robotics Report 2021b.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization, ILO (2020) Global Wage Report 2020–21. Wages and minimum wages in the time of COVID-19, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Labour Organization, ILO (2021) World Employment and Social Outlook. Trends 2021, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund, IMF (2017) World Economic Outlook, April. Gaining Momentum? Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Wolfgang und Hale Utar (2016) International Trade and Job polarization: Evidence at the Worker-Level, NBER Working Paper 22315, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kletzer, Lori G. (2019) Trade and Labor Market Adjustment: The Costs of Trade-Related Job Loss in the United States and Policy Responses, In: Catao, Luis A.V. and Maurice Obstfeld (Hrsg.) Policies to Make Trade Work for All, Princeton and Oxford; 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul R. et al. (2015) Internationale Wirtschaft. Theorie und Politik der Außenwirtschaft, Hallbergmoos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, Marguerita und Anne Saint-Martin (2021) The impact of Artificial Intelligence on the labour market: What do we know so far? OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 256, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Robert Z. (2018) Five Reasons Why the Focus on Trade Deficits Is Misleading, Policy Brief, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Robert Z. (2020) Trade Surplus or Deficit? Neither Matters for Changes in Manufacturing Employment Shares, Working Paper, Peterson Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2017) Employment Outlook 2017, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2018) Employment Outlook 2018, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2019) Employment Outlook 2019. The Future of Work, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2021) Employment Outlook 2021. Navigating the COVID-19 Crisis and Recovery, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, Erica and Noel P. Johnson (2017) Occupation and the Political Economy of Trade: Offshorability, and Protectionist Sentiment, International Organization 71; 665–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pak, Mathilde et al. (2019) Labour share developments over the past two decades: The role of technological progress, globalization and “winner-take-most” dynamics, Ms.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippon, Thomas (2019) The Great Reversal. How America Gave Up on Free Markets, Cambridge, MA. und London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, Jonathan (2017) Cutting the Losses: Reassessing the Costs of Import Competition to Workers and Communities, Gallup.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwellnus, Cyrille et al. (2018) Labour share developments over the past two decades: The role of technological progress, globalization and “winner-take-most” dynamics, OECD Economic Department Working Papers, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susskind, Daniel (2021) A World Without Work. Technology, Automation and How We Should Respond, London usw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trebilcock, Michael (2019) The Fracturing of the Postwar, Free Trade Consensu: The Challenges of Constructing a New Consens, in: In: Catao, Luis A.V. and Maurice Obstfeld (eds.) Policies to Make Trade Work for All, Princeton and Oxford; 208–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyson, Laura D. (2019) Trade and Policy Adjustment to Automation Challenges, In: Catao, Luis A.V. and Maurice Obstfeld (eds.) Policies to Make Trade Work for All, Princeton and Oxford; 113–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (2019) Industrial Development Report 2020. Industrializing in the Digital Age, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Zhi et al. (2018) Re-Examining the Effects of Trading with China on Local Labor Markets: A Supply Chain Perspective, NBER Working Paper 24886, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2005) World Development Report 2006: Equity and Development, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2019) World Development Report 2019. The Changing Nature of Work, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joachim Betz .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Betz, J., Hein, W. (2022). Globalisierung und Beschäftigung. In: Globalisierung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39161-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39161-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39160-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39161-4

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics