Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Biodiversität, und die Nutzung des Waldes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Waldbewirtschaftung in der Klimakrise

Part of the book series: Studien zum Marketing natürlicher Ressourcen ((SMNR))

  • 874 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Nutzung von Wäldern nimmt eine zentrale Stellung in der Gesellschaft ein – von der Selbstversorgung (z. B. Brennholz, Nahrung) bis hin zur Holzversorgung globalisierter Wertschöpfungsketten multinationaler Unternehmen. Wälder spielen eine zentrale Rolle für das globale Klima. Darüber hinaus sind Wälder Lebensraum für unzählige Tier-, Pflanzen- und Pilzarten und tragen mit ihrer reichen Artenvielfalt ganz wesentlich zur terrestrischen Biodiversität bei. Waldökosysteme erbringen zahlreiche wertvolle Ökosystemleistungen, z. B. als Produzent nachwachsender Rohstoffe, als Ort der Erholung, zur Regulation von Wasserkreisläufen, zum Schutz des Bodens und mit zunehmender Bedeutung als einziger natürlicher terrestrischer Speicher von Kohlenstoff. Angefacht von politischen Agenden, wie z. B. der Bioökonomiestrategie auf nationaler und EU-Ebene, dem Ziel einer kohlenstoffarmen Wirtschaft, des Green Deals und den UN Zielen für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung, wird eine intensivierte Holznutzung zunehmend befürwortet und damit legitimiert. Gleichzeitig setzt der Klimawandel und damit in Zusammenhang stehende vermehrt auftretende lokale Umweltkatastrophen, wie Dürren, Schädlingsbefall oder Waldbrände, und Luftverschmutzung den Wald als funktionierendes Ökosystem und dessen Biologische Vielfalt vermehrt unter Druck. Im Laufe der Kulturgeschichte geriet der Wald immer wieder unter Druck: Die Legitimität der Nutzung der Wälder, stellt somit einen gesellschaftspolitischen Diskurs dar.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Alagador, D., Cerdeira, J. O., & Araújo, M. B. (2014). Shifting protected areas: Scheduling spatial priorities under climate change. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(3), 703–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alarcón, D., & Cavieres, L. A. (2015). In the right place at the right time: Habitat representation in protected areas of South American Nothofagus-dominated plants after a dispersal constrained climate change scenario. PLoS ONE, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119952.

  • Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D. D., Hogg, E. H. (Ted), Gonzalez, P., Fensham, R., Zhang, Z., Castro, J., Demidova, N., Lim, J. H., Allard, G., Running, S. W., Semerci, A., & Cobb, N. (2010). A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 259(4), 660–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001.

  • Almeida, I., Rösch, C., & Saha, S. (2018). Comparison of ecosystem services from mixed and monospecific forests in Southwest Germany: A survey on public perception. Forests, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/f9100627.

  • Arnberger, A., Eder, R., Allex, B., Preisel, H., Ebenberger, M., & Husslein, M. (2018). Trade-offs between wind energy, recreational, and bark-beetle impacts on visual preferences of national park visitors. Land Use Policy, 76, 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bastrup-Birk, A., Reker, J., Zal, N., Romao, C., & Cugny-Seguin, M. (2016). European forest ecosystems: State and trends. EEA Report, 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak, M. M., & Marafa, L. M. (2016). Ten years of REDD+: A critical review of the impact of REDD+ on forest-dependent communities. Sustainability, 8(7), 620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blattert, C., Lemm, R., Thees, O., Lexer, M. J., & Hanewinkel, M. (2017). Management of ecosystem services in mountain forests: Review of indicators and value functions for model based multi-criteria decision analysis. Ecological Indicators, 79, 391–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.04.025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BMK (2019): Bioökonomie-Strategie für Österreich. https://www.bmbwf.gv.at/Themen/HSUni/Hochschulgovernance/Leitthemen/Nachhaltigkeit/Bio%C3%B6konomiestrategie.html. Zugegriffen 01.11.2021.

  • Bullock, J. M., Aronson, J., Newton, A. C., Pywell, R. F., & Rey-Benayas, J. M. (2011). Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: Conflicts and opportunities. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 26(10), 541–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBD, U. (2010). Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi targets. Report of the Tenth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chazdon, R. L., Brancalion, P. H. S., Lamb, D., Laestadius, L., Calmon, M., & Kumar, C. (2017). A policy-driven knowledge agenda for global forest and landscape restoration. Conservation Letters, 10(1), 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, S., Garcia, S., & Ibanez, L. (2011). Do taste and quality perception influence consumer preferences for wood? An econometric model with latent variables. Forest Science, 57(2), 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., Fisher, B., Mulder, K., Liu, S., & Christopher, T. (2007). Biodiversity and ecosystem services: A multi-scale empirical study of the relationship between species richness and net primary production. Ecological Economics, 61(2–3), 478–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.03.021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amen, M., Bombi, P., Pearman, P. B., Schmatz, D. R., Zimmermann, N. E., & Bologna, M. A. (2011). Will climate change reduce the efficacy of protected areas for amphibian conservation in Italy? Biological Conservation, 144(3), 989–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.11.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drábková, A. (2014). Opinions and preferences of forest visitors to the Protected Landscape Area Blaník. Scientia Agriculturae Bohemica, 45(2), 110–116. https://doi.org/10.7160/sab.2014.450206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dullinger, S., Gattringer, A., Thuiller, W., Moser, D., Zimmermann, N. E., Guisan, A., Willner, W., Plutzar, C., Leitner, M., Mang, T., Caccianiga, M., Dirnböck, T., Ertl, S., Fischer, A., Lenoir, J., Svenning, J. C., Psomas, A., Schmatz, D. R., Silc, U., … Hülber, K. (2012). Extinction debt of high-mountain plants under twenty-first-century climate change. Nature Climate Change, 2(8), 619–622. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EC (2020): EU-Biodiversitätsstrategie 2030. https://environment.ec.europa.eu/strategy/biodiversity-strategy-2030_de. Zugegriffen 01.11.2021.

  • Edwards, P., Lacey, J., Wyatt, S., & Williams, K. J. H. (2016). Social licence to operate and forestry – An introduction. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 89, 473–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, L., Nordlund, A., Olsson, O., & Westin, K. (2012). Beliefs about urban fringe forests among urban residents in Sweden. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 11(3), 321–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2012.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2002). Perception of the wood-based industries – Qualitative study. Retrieved from Luxembourg: ISBN 92-894-4125-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2013). Flash Eurobarometer 379: Attitudes towards biodiversity. Luxembourg: Directorate-General for Communication. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S1103_379. Zugegriffen: 29. Mai 2020.

  • European Commission. (2020). Eurobarometer 501: Attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Luxembourg: Directorate-General for Communication. https://data.europa.eu/euodp/en/data/dataset/S2257_92_4_501_ENG. Zugegriffen: 29 Mai 2020.

  • European Environment Agency. (2012). The impacts of invasive alien species in Europe. EEA Technical report, 16(16). https://doi.org/10.2800/65864.

  • Forest Europe (1993): Resolution H1General Guidelines for the Sustainable Management of Forests in Europe. Second Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe16-17 June 1993, Helsinki/Finland accessible: https://foresteurope.org/about/ministerial-conferences/helsinki/

  • Forest Europe. (2015). State of Europe’s forests 2015. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe, 314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geburek, T., & Myking, T. (2018). Evolutionary consequences of historic anthropogenic impacts on forest trees in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 422, 23–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giergiczny, M., Czajkowski, M., Zylicz, T., & Angelstam, P. (2015). Choice experiment assessment of public preferences for forest structural attributes. Ecological Economics, 119, 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutsch, M., Larondelle, N., & Haase, D. (2019). Of bugs and men: How forest pests and their management strategies are perceived by visitors of an urban forest. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 41, 248–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halder, P., Havu-Nuutinen, S., Pietarinen, J., & Pelkonen, P. (2011). Bio-energy and youth: Analyzing the role of school, home, and media from the future policy perspectives. Applied Energy, 88(4), 1233–1240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.10.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanewinkel, M., Cullmann, D. A., Schelhaas, M.-J., Nabuurs, G.-J., & Zimmermann, N. E. (2013). Climate change may cause severe loss in the economic value of European forest land. Nature Climate Change, 3(3), 203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, L., Midgley, G., Andelman, S., Araújo, M., Hughes, G., Martinez-Meyer, E., Pearson, R., & Williams, P. (2007). Protected area needs in a changing climate. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 5(3), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2007)5[131:PANIAC]2.0.CO;2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haslett, J. R., Berry, P. M., Bela, G., Jongman, R. H. G., Pataki, G., Samways, M. J., & Zobel, M. (2010). Changing conservation strategies in Europe: A framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19(10), 2963–2977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9743-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hole, D. G., Willis, S. G., Pain, D. J., Fishpool, L. D., Butchart, S. H. M., Collingham, Y. C., Rahbek, C., & Huntley, B. (2009). Projected impacts of climate change on a continent-wide protected area network. Ecology Letters, 12(5), 420–431. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01297.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holopainen, J. M., Häyrinen, L., & Toppinen, A. (2014). Consumer value dimensions for sustainable wood products: Results from the Finnish retail sector. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29(4), 378–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.925138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howley, P., Ryan, M., & Donoghue, C. O. (2011). Forestry in Ireland: An examination of individuals’ preferences and attitudes towards the non-market benefits of forests. Irish Geography, 44(2–3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/00750778.2011.643392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC IPCC, G. (2014). Switzerland Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I. II and III To the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, RK Pachauri and LA Meyer (Hrsg.)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, P., Dunkl, A., Eibel, K., Denk, E., Grote, V., Kelz, C., & Moser, M. (2015). Evaluating psychological aspects of wood and laminate products in indoor settings with pictures. Forest Products Journal, 65(5–6), 263–271. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-14-00003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A., Ausden, M., Dodd, A. M., Bradbury, R. B., Chamberlain, D. E., Jiguet, F., Thomas, C. D., Cook, A. S. C. P., Newson, S. E., Ockendon, N., Rehfisch, M. M., Roos, S., Thaxter, C. B., Brown, A., Crick, H. Q. P., Douse, A., McCall, R. A., Pontier, H., Stroud, D. A., … Pearce-Higgins, J. W. (2013). Observed and predicted effects of climate change on species abundance in protected areas. Nature Climate Change, 3(12), 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juutinen, A., Kosenius, A. K., Ovaskainen, V., Tolvanen, A., & Tyrväinen, L. (2017). Heterogeneous preferences for recreation-oriented management in commercial forests: The role of citizens’ socioeconomic characteristics and recreational profiles. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(3), 399–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1159546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmit, D., Lindstad, B. H., Thorsen, B. J., Toppinen, A., Roos, A., & Baardsen, S. (2014). Shades of green: A social scientific view on bioeconomy in the forest sector. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29(4), 402–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.921722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krejčí, H., Stárová, M., Hrbek, I., Navrátilová, M., & Beranová, M. (2019). The perception of forests by the Czech Republic general public. Journal of Forest Science, 65(6), 226–233. https://doi.org/10.17221/138/2018-JFS.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küster, H. (2003). Geschichte des Waldes: von der Urzeit bis zur Gegenwart. CH Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzman, M. K., Motik, D., Bičanić, K., Vlosky, R. P., & Oblak, L. (2012). A comparative analysis of consumer attitudes on the use of wood products in Slovenia and Croatia. Drvna Industrija, 63(2), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.5552/drind.2012.1129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lähtinen, K., Harju, C., & Toppinen, A. (2019). Consumers’ perceptions on the properties of wood affecting their willingness to live in and prejudices against houses made of timber. Wood Material Science and Engineering, 14(5), 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/17480272.2019.1615548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. M., & Jetz, W. (2008). Future battlegrounds for conservation under global change. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275(1640), 1261–1270. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2007.1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg, S., Roos, A., Kihlstedt, A., & Lindström, M. (2013). A product semantic study of the influence of the sense of touch on the evaluation of wood-based materials. Materials and Design, 52, 300–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindner, M., Fitzgerald, J. B., Zimmermann, N. E., Reyer, C., Delzon, S., van der Maaten, E., Schelhaas, M.-J., Lasch, P., Eggers, J., van der Maaten-Theunissen, M., Suckow, F., Psomas, A., Poulter, B., & Hanewinkel, M. (2014). Climate change and European forests: What do we know, what are the uncertainties, and what are the implications for forest management? Journal of Environmental Management, 146, 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.07.030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupp, G., Förster, B., Kantelberg, V., Markmann, T., Naumann, J., Honert, C., … Pauleit, S. (2016). Assessing the recreation value of urban woodland using the ecosystem service approach in two forests in the munich metropolitan region. Sustainability, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su8111156.

  • Mace, G. M. (2004). The role of taxonomy in species conservation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 359(1444), 711–719.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, E., Marín, A. I., Malak, D. A., Trombetti, M., & Bastrup-Birk, A. (2018). Setting priorities for the management of primary forest areas: The importance of a harmonized inventory for supporting regional conservation and restoration efforts. 5th Forum Carpaticum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDowell, N. G., Allen, C. D., Anderson-Teixeira, K., Aukema, B. H., Bond-Lamberty, B., Chini, L., Clark, J. S., Dietze, M., Grossiord, C., & Hanbury-Brown, A. (2020). Pervasive shifts in forest dynamics in a changing world. Science, 368(6494).

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, M. J., Luyssaert, S., Meyfroidt, P., Kaplan, J. O., Burgi, M., Chen, Y., Erb, K., Gimmi, U., McInerney, D., & Naudts, K. (2015). Reconstructing European forest management from 1600 to 2010. Biogeosciences, 12(14), 4291–4316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Wetlands and water. World Resources Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morecroft, M. D., Duffield, S., Harley, M., Pearce-Higgins, J. W., Stevens, N., Watts, O., & Whitaker, J. (2019). Measuring the success of climate change adaptation and mitigation in terrestrial ecosystems. Science, 366(6471).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mustalahti, I. (2018). The responsive bioeconomy: The need for inclusion of citizens and environmental capability in the forest based bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 30, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, A., Schenk, T., & Westin, K. (2017). Forest beliefs in an urbanizing world: Views on and usage of forest areas among persons with and without a migration biography in Germany and Sweden. Society and Natural Resources, 30(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2016.1238988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nummelin, T., Widmark, C., Riala, M., Sténs, A., Nordström, E. M., & Nordin, A. (2017). Forest future by Swedish students–developing a mind mapping method for data collection. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 32(8), 807–817. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2017.1287303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oettel, J., & Lapin, K. (2020). Linking forest management and biodiversity indicators to strengthen sustainable forest management in Europe. Ecological Indicators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overpeck, J., Rind, D., & Goldberg, R. (1990). Climate-induced changes in forest disturbance and vegetation. Letters To Nature, 346, 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1038/346183a0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paletto, A., De Meo, I., Cantiani, M. G., & Maino, F. (2013). Social perceptions and forest management strategies in an Italian alpine community. Mountain Research and Development, 33(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-12-00115.1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paluš, H., Mat’ová, H., & Kaputa, V. (2012). Consumer preferences for joinery products and furniture in Slovakia and Poland. Acta Facultatis Xylologiae, 54(2), 123–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramage, M. H., Burridge, H., Busse-Wicher, M., Fereday, G., Reynolds, T., Shah, D. U., Wu, G., Yu, L., Fleming, P., & Densley-Tingley, D. (2017). The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 68, 333–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rametsteiner, E., Oberwimmer, R., & Gschwandtl, I. O. (2007). Europeans and wood. What do Europeans think about wood and its uses? A review of consumer and business surveys in Europe, (Vol. Warsaw (Poland)). Warsaw: Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe Warsaw Liaison Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranacher, L., & Stern, T. (2015). Are your messages being heard? Evaluation of the forest-based sector’s communication on sustainable forest management in Austria. Journal of the Austrian Society of Agricultural Economics, 25, 159–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranacher, L., Lähtinen, K., Järvinen, E., & Toppinen, A. (2017). Perceptions of the general public on forest sector responsibility: A survey related to ecosystem services and forest sector business impacts in four European countries. Forest Policy and Economics, 78, 180–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranacher, L., Höfferer, K., Lettner, M., Hesser, F., Stern, T., Rauter, R., & Schwarzbauer, P. (2018). What would potential future opinion leaders like to know? An explorative study on the perceptions of four wood-based innovations. Bodenkultur, 69(1), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2018-0005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranacher, L., Sedmik, A., & Schwarzbauer, P. (2020). Public perceptions of forestry and the forest-based bioeconomy in the European Union. European Forest Institute, S. 104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyers, B., Biggs, R., Cumming, G. S., Elmqvist, T., Hejnowicz, A. P., & Polasky, S. (2013). Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social–ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(5), 268–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberger, M., & Weigl, N. (2014). Über Nutzen und Würde von Wald und Holz: Überlegungen zur Verantwortung im Umgang mit einer zentralen Lebensgrundlage. Oekom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatini, F. M., Burrascano, S., Keeton, W. S., Levers, C., Lindner, M., Pötzschner, F., Verkerk, P. J., Bauhus, J., Buchwald, E., & Chaskovsky, O. (2018). Where are Europe’s last primary forests? Diversity and Distributions, 24(10), 1426–1439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwaiger, F., Poschenrieder, W., Biber, P., & Pretzsch, H. (2019). Ecosystem service trade-offs for adaptive forest management. Ecosystem Services, 39, 100993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, R., & Lexer, M. J. (2013). Forest management under climatic and social uncertainty: Trade-offs between reducing climate change impacts and fostering adaptive capacity. Journal of Environmental Management, 114, 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, R., Rammer, W., Jäger, D., Currie, W. S., & Lexer, M. J. (2007). Assessing trade-offs between carbon sequestration and timber production within a framework of multi-purpose forestry in Austria. Forest Ecology and Management, 248(1–2), 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seidl, R., Rammer, W., & Lexer, M. J. (2011). Adaptation options to reduce climate change vulnerability of sustainable forest management in the Austrian Alps. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41(4), 694–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šimunović, N., Hesser, F., & Stern, T. (2018). Frame analysis of ENGO conceptualization of sustainable forest management: Environmental justice and neoliberalism at the core of sustainability. Sustainability, 10, 3165. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Šimunović, N., Stern, T., & Hesser, F. (2019). Is sustainable forest management enough? Insights from a frame analysis of European environmental non-governmental organizations. Austrian Journal of Forest Science, 136, 87–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachová, J. (2018). Forests in the Czech public discourse. Journal of Landscape Ecology (Czech Republic), 11(3), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/jlecol-2018-0011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Téllez-Valdés, O., & Dávila-Aranda, P. (2003). Protected areas and climate change: A case study of the cacti in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán biosphere reserve, México. Conservation Biology, 17(3), 846–853. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01622.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom, D., Rammer, W., & Seidl, R. (2017). Disturbances catalyze the adaptation of forest ecosystems to changing climate conditions. Global Change Biology, 23(1), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toivonen, R. M. (2012). Product quality and value from consumer perspective-An application to wooden products. Journal of Forest Economics, 18(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfe.2011.12.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toppinen, A., Toivonen, R., Valkeapää, A., & Rämö, A. K. (2013). Consumer perceptions of environmental and social sustainability of wood products in the Finnish market. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 28(8), 775–783. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2013.824021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umweltbundesamt. (2021). Nachhaltige Waldwirtschaft [online]. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/daten/land-forstwirtschaft/nachhaltige-waldwirtschaft#die-vielfaltigen-funktionen-des-waldes.

  • UN. (2017). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 27 April 2017 [without reference to a Main Committee (A/71/L.63)] 71/285. United Nations strategic plan for forests 2017–2030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Upton, V., Dhubháin, Á. N., & Bullock, C. (2015). Are forest attitudes shaped by the extent andcharacteristics of forests in the local landscape? Society and Natural Resources, 28(6), 641–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2014.933925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dael, M., Lizin, S., Swinnen, G., & Van Passel, S. (2017). Young people’s acceptance of bioenergy and the influence of attitude strength on information provision. Renewable Energy, 107, 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.02.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vor, T., Spellmann, H., Bolte, A., & Ammer, C. (2015). Potenziale und Risiken eingeführter Baumarten. Göttinger Forstwissenschaften, 7, 150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zlatanov, T., Elkin, C., Irauschek, F., & Lexer, M. J. (2017). Impact of climate change on vulnerability of forests and ecosystem service supply in Western Rhodopes Mountains. Regional Environmental Change, 17(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0869-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wood K plus, Kompetenzzentrum Holz GmbH, Linz, Österreich

    Lea Ranacher & Franziska Hesser

  2. Fachinstitut Waldbiodiversität und Naturschutz, Bundesforschungszentrum für Wald, Wien, Österreich

    Katharina Lapin

Authors
  1. Lea Ranacher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katharina Lapin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Franziska Hesser
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katharina Lapin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Institut für Marketing und Innovation, Universität für Bodenkultur Wien,, Wien, Österreich

    Franziska Hesser

  2. Institut für Waldbiodiversität und Naturschutz, Bundesforschungs- und Ausbildungszentrum für Wald, Naturgefahren und Landschaft, Wien, Österreich

    Martin Braun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ranacher, L., Lapin, K., Hesser, F. (2023). Biodiversität, und die Nutzung des Waldes. In: Hesser, F., Braun, M. (eds) Waldbewirtschaftung in der Klimakrise. Studien zum Marketing natürlicher Ressourcen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39054-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-39054-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-39053-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-39054-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation