Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Führungskommunikation und virtuelle Führung – Bedeutung für die Tourismusbranche

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digital Leadership im Tourismus

  • 5629 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Kommunikationsstile als die Art und Weise, wie Menschen interagieren, beeinflussen den Erfolg im beruflichen Alltag. Fokussiert auf den Führungskontext werden daher erfolgsrelevante Kommunikationsstile herausgearbeitet und auf virtuelle Führung bezogen. Da Führung auf Distanz in der Tourismusbranche häufig den Standard darstellt, werden Besonderheiten virtueller Führung beschrieben. In einem Praxisbeispiel wird eine beispielhafte Lösung von realen Herausforderungen in der Kommunikation mit dezentralen Teams aufgezeigt und es wird herausgearbeitet, wie Künstliche Intelligenz zur Kommunikationsanalyse völlig neue Ansatzpunkte zum Verständnis und zur Verbesserung der Führungskommunikation entstehen lassen könnte.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Zur leichteren Lesbarkeit wird im weiteren Verlauf des Beitrags für die einzelnen Personenkategorien nur die männliche Form verwendet. Selbstverständlich beziehen sich die Aussagen auf weibliche, männliche und diverse Personen gleichermaßen.

Literatur

  • Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A Six-Factor Structure of Personality-Descriptive Adjectives: Solutions From Psycholexical Studies in Seven Languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 356–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker-Pieper, A., & De Vries, R. E. (2013). The incremental validity of communication styles over personality traits for leader outcomes. Human Performance, 26(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group & Organization Management, 27(1), 14–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belsom, G. A. (2019). The Impact of a virtual leader’s communication style on virtual team performance. Doctoral dissertation, Trident University International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boland, B., De Smet, A., Palter, R., & Sanghvi, A. (8. Juni 2020). Reimagining the office and work life after COVID-19. https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/organization/our-insights/reimagining-the-office-and-work-life-after-covid-19. Zugegriffen am 25.07.2021.

  • Brake, T. (2006). Leading global virtual teams. Industrial and Commercial Training, 38(3), 116–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caya, O., Mortensen, M., & Pinsonneault, A. (2013). Virtual teams demystified: An integrative framework for understanding virtual teams. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJeC), 9(2), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheshin, A., Kim, Y., Nathan, D. B., Ning, N., & Olson, J. S. (2013). Emergence of differing electronic communication norms within partially distributed teams. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(1), 7–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cogliser, C. C., Gardner, W. L., Gavin, M. B., & Broberg, J. C. (2012). Big five personality factors and leader emergence in virtual teams: Relationships with team trustworthiness, member performance contributions, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 37(6), 752–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, J. A., & Bippus, A. M. (1998). Personality and interpersonal communication: Issues and directions. In J. C. McCroskey, J. A. Daly, M. M. Martin & M. J. Beatty (Hrsg.), Communication and personality: Trait perspectives (S. 1–40). Hampton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Guinea, A. O., Webster, J., & Staples, D. S. (2012). A meta-analysis of the consequences of virtualness on team functioning. Information & Management, 49(6), 301–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. E., Bakker-Pieper, A., Siberg, R. A., van Gameren, K., & Vlug, M. (2009). The content and dimensionality of communication styles. Communication Research, 36(2), 178–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. E., Bakker-Pieper, A., & Oostenveld, W. (2010). Leadership = communication? The relations of leaders’ communication styles with leadership styles, knowledge sharing and leadership outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 367–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries et al. 2011 ist ein Fehler im Text, es müsste 2010 heißen. Habe es oben auch nochmal dazu gefügt.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, R. E., Bakker-Pieper, A., Konings, F. E., & Schouten, B. (2013). The communication styles inventory (CSI): A six-dimensional behavioural model of communication styles and its relation with personality. Communication Research, 40(4), 506–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dionne, S. D., Sayama, H., Hao, C., & Bush, B. J. (2010). The role of leadership in shared mental model convergence and team performance improvement: An agent-based computational model. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1035–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J. H., & Hoch, J. E. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eissa, G., Fox, C., Webster, B. D., & Kim, J. (2012). A framework for leader effectiveness in virtual teams. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 9(2), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, D. B. B., & Jawadi, N. (2015). Virtual R&D project teams: From e-leadership to performance. Journal of Applied Business Research (JABR), 31(5), 1693–1708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, R. C., Piccolo, R. F., & Ford, L. (2016). Strategies for building effective virtual teams: Trust is key. Business Horizons, 60(1), 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B., & Cohen, S. G. (Hrsg.). (2003). Virtual teams that work: Creating conditions for virtual team effectiveness. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilley, A., McMillan, H. S., & Gilley, J. W. (2009). Organizational change and characteristics of leadership effectiveness. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 16(1), 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, L. L., Maynard, M. T., Jones Young, N. C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual teams research: 10 years, 10 themes, and 10 opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, J. V., Johnson, M., Saunders, C., & Thayer, A. L. (2019). Trust in virtual teams: A multidisciplinary review and integration. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 23, 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, N. S., & Bartol, K. M. (2016). Empowering leadership and effective collaboration in geographically dispersed teams. Personnel Psychology, 69(1), 159–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J. E., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2014). Leading virtual teams: Hierarchical leadership, structural supports, and shared team leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791–815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joshi, A., Lazarova, M. B., & Liao, H. (2009). Getting everyone on board: The role of inspirational leadership in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 20(1), 240–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. J. (2012). The social dynamics of trust: Theoretical and empirical research, 1985–2012. Social Forces, 91(1), 25–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 648–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilian, S. C. (2014). Virtual teams: Opportunities and challenges for e-leaders. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 1251–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, C., Standing, C., & Liu, Y. C. (2008). A model to develop effective virtual teams. Decision Support Systems, 45(4), 1031–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbürger, A. (2020). Kommunikation und Führungserfolg – Entwicklung eines Instruments zur Messung von Kommunikationsstilen und Analyse des Zusammenhangs mit Führungserfolgsvariablen. Dissertation, Universität Wuppertal, Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaft/Schumpeter School of Business and Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnenbürger, A., Casper, V., & Weber, J. (2020). Analyse kommunikativer Wirkung mittels KI als Einstieg für Personal- und Organisationsentwicklung. In Digitalisierung der Management-Diagnostik (S. 351–375). Springer Gabler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2007). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge (Bd. 198). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madlock, P. E. (2008). The link between leadership style, communicator competence, and employee satisfaction. The Journal of Business Communication, 45(1), 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A., Majchrzak, A., & Rosen, B. (2007). Leading virtual teams. Academy of Management Perspectives, 21(1), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCroskey, J. C., & Beatty, M. J. (2000). The communibiological perspective: Implications for communication in instruction. Communication Education, 49(1), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesmer-Magnus, J. R., DeChurch, L. A., Jimenez-Rodriguez, M., Wildman, J., & Shuffler, M. (2011). A meta-analytic investigation of virtuality and information sharing in teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 115(2), 214–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgeson, F. P., DeRue, D. S., & Karam, E. P. (2010). Leadership in teams: A functional approach to understanding leadership structures and processes. Journal of Management, 36(1), 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, S. A., & Kassing, J. W. (1998). The relationship between perceived supervisory communication behaviors and subordinate organizational identification. Communication Research Reports, 15(1), 71–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, S. A., & Ford, R. C. (2021). Five steps to leading your team in the virtual COVID-19 workplace. Organizational Dynamics, 50(1), 100802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, R. W. (1983). Communicator style: Theory, applications, and measures. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, J. D., Jr., Goris, J. R., & Vaught, B. C. (1997). An examination of organizational communication as a moderator of the relationship between job performance and job satisfaction. The Journal of Business Communication, 34(1), 81–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinsch, N. L., Jr., & Gardner, J. A. (2014). Do communication abilities affect promotion decisions? Some data from the c-suite. Journal of Business and Technical communication, 28(1), 31–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert, L. P., Jr., & You, S. (2018). Are you satisfied yet? Shared leadership, individual trust, autonomy, and satisfaction in virtual teams. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(4), 503–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagie, A. (1996). Effects of leader’s communication style and participative goal setting on performance and attitudes. Human Performance, 9(1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, J., & Krumm, S. (2017). The „virtual team player“ A review and initial model of knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics for virtual collaboration. Organizational Psychology Review, 7(1), 66–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharbrough, W. C., Simmons, S. A., & Cantrill, D. A. (2006). Motivating language in industry: Its impact on job satisfaction and perceived supervisor effectiveness. The Journal of Business Communication (1973), 43(4), 322–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, C. (2020). Differences in trust and commitment as a linear variate across work team communication style and industry type. Doctoral dissertation, Capella University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Wart, M., Roman, A., Wang, X., & Liu, C. (2019). Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: identifying the elements of e-leadership. International review of administrative sciences, 85(1), 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wart, M. van, Roman, A., Wang, X., & Liu, C. (2019). Operationalizing the definition of e-leadership: Identifying the elements of e-leadership. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 85(1), 80–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y., Kuria, G. N., & Gu, D. X. (2020). Mediating role of trust between leader communication style and subordinate’s work outcomes in project teams. Engineering Management Journal, 32(3), 152–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Vier GmbH; Hannover, Essen, Deutschland

    Anja Linnenbürger

  2. freiberuflich als Organisationsberater, Calw, Deutschland

    Agostino Cisco

Authors
  1. Anja Linnenbürger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Agostino Cisco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anja Linnenbürger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule Kempten, Fakultät Tourismusmanagement, Kempten, Deutschland

    Marco A. Gardini

  2. Hochschule Kempten, Fakultät Tourismusmanagement, Kempten, Deutschland

    Guido Sommer

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Linnenbürger, A., Cisco, A. (2023). Führungskommunikation und virtuelle Führung – Bedeutung für die Tourismusbranche. In: Gardini, M.A., Sommer, G. (eds) Digital Leadership im Tourismus. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37545-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37545-4_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-37544-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-37545-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation