Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Der messbare Effekt Taktischer Kommunikation im Einsatz

Eine experimentelle Studie im Kontext von Versammlungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Die Rolle der Polizei bei Versammlungen

Zusammenfassung

Mit dieser quantitativen Studie wurde die deeskalierende Wirkung der Taktischen Kommunikation in Versammlungen untersucht. Hierzu wurde Filmmaterial in einem Szenario-Training einer Beweis-und-Festnahmeeinheit (BFE) erstellt, welches später polizei-externen Studienteilnehmern (N = 140) anhand einer Virtual-Reality-Brille (VR-Brille) gezeigt wurde. In dem Szenario-Training wurde eine Versammlung nachgestellt in der die Taktische Kommunikation zur Anwendung kam. Im Anschluss erfolgte mittels vollstandardisiertem Fragebogen die Einschätzung der individuellen Konfliktlösefähigkeit mit den abhängigen Variablen: Dominanz, Leugnen, Vermeidung, Nachgeben, individuelles Aggressionsmaß. Das Experiment konnte zeigen, dass die polizeiliche Taktische Einsatzkommunikation eine deeskalierende Wirkung hat. Personen in den Bedingungen mit Taktischer Einsatzkommunikation zeigten im Ergebnis niedrigere Werte in den eskalierenden Variablen (Dominanz und Eigene Aggression) und höhere Werte in den deeskalierenden Variablen wie Vermeidung und Nachgeben.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Ramiah, A., & Hewstone, M. (2013). Intergroup contact as a tool for reducing, resolving, and preventing intergroup conflict: Evidence, limitations, and potential. American Psychologist, 68(7), 527–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M. L., & Cropanzano, R. (2015). The Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace. Oxford library of psychology. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aufermann, J. (1971). Kommunikation und Modernisierung. Verlag für Dokumentation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessarabova, E., Fink, E. L., & Turner, M. (2013). Reactance, restoration, and cognitive structure: Comparative statics. Human Communication Research, 39, 339–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhave, D. P., & Glomb, T. M. (2013). The role of occupational emotional labor requirements on the surface acting-job satisfaction relationship. Journal of Management, 42(3), 722–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R., & Moag, J. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. Lewicki, B. Sheppard, & M. Bazerman (Hrsg.), Research on negotiation in organizations (S. 43–55). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R. & Mouton, J. (1983). The managerial grid. Gulf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfadelli, H., & Friemel, T. (2015). Medienwirkungsforschung. UVK Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botti, S., & Iyengar, S. (2004). The psychological pleasure and pain of choosing: When people prefer choosing at the cost of subsequent outcome satisfaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 312–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, S., & Brehm, J. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman, P., Rabinowitz, V., Karuza, J., Coates, D., Cohn, E., & Kidder, L. (1982). Models of helping and coping. American Psychologist, 37, 368–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. (1985). Language use and language users. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Ed.), Handbook on social psychology. Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. (1996). Uses of language. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H., & Carlson, T. (1982). Hearers and speech acts. Language, 58, 332–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H., & Marshall, C. (1981). Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In A. Joshi, B. Webber & I. Sag (Ed.), Elements of discourse understanding. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H., & Murphy, G. (1982). Audience design in meaning and reference. In J. F. Le Ny & W. Kintsch (Hrsg.), Language and comprehension (S. 287–299). New Holland Pub. Co.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H., & Wilkes-Gibbs, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, H. H., & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. L. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Ed.), Perspectives in socially shared cognition. American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. & Greenberg, J. (2001). Doing justice to organizational justice: Forming and applying fairness judgments. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner & D. Skarlicki (Ed.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (S. 217–242). IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J., & Cherkoff, J. (2002). Explaining injustice: The interactive effect of explanation and outcome on fairness perceptions and task motivation. Journal of Management, 28, 591–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J., Conlon, D., Wesson, M., Porter, C., & Ng, K. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. (2012). Cognitive dissonance theory. In P. A. M. Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Hrsg.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (S. 377–397). Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crano, W. D., Alvaro, E. M., Tan, C. N., & Siegel, J. T. (2017). Social mediation of persuasive media in adolescent substance prevention. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31, 479–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D´Alessio, D. & Allen, M. (2002). Selective exposure and dissonance after decisions. Psychological-Reports, 91, 527–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai, M. Y., Frank, J., & Sun, I. (2011). Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39(2), 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M. (1990). Sixty years of conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management., 3, 237–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickenberger, D., Gniech, G., & Grabitz, H. (1993). Die Theorie der psychologischen Reaktanz. In D. Frey & M. Irle (Hrsg.), Theorien der Sozialpsychologie Kognitive Theorien (Bd. I, S. 243–274). Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkin, R. A., & Leippe, M. R. (1986). Physiological arousal, dis sonance, and attitude change: Evidence for a dissonance-arousal link and a “don’t remind me” effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 55–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, A. J., & Devine, P. G. (1994). On the motivational nature of cognitive dissonance: Dissonance as psychological discomfort. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 382–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitve dissonance. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, R., Harb, C., Al-Sarraf, S., & Nashabe, O. (2008). Support for resistance among Iraqi students: An exploratory study. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 30(2), 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D., & Irle, M. (Ed.). (2002). Theorien der Sozialpsychologie: Bd. 3: Motivations-, Selbst- und Informationsverarbeitungstheorien. Huber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D., Gerkhardt, M., Fischer, P., Peus, C., & Traut-Mattausch, E. (2009). Change Management in Organisationen – Widerstände und Erfolgsfaktoren der Umsetzung. In von Rosenstiel, L., Regnet, E., & Domsch, M. E. (Ed.), Führung von Mitarbeitern. Handbuch für erfolgreiches Personalmanagement (S. 561–572). Schäffer-Poeschel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D., Kumpf, M., Ochsmann, R., Rost-Schaude, E., Sauer, C. (1977). Theorie der kognitiven Kontrolle. In W. Tack (Ed.), Bericht über den 30. Kongreß der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie in Regensburg 1976. (S. 105–107). Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, D., Rogner, O., & Havemann, D. (1983). Kognitive und psychosoziale Determinanten des Genesungsprozesses von Unfallpatienten. Universität Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fussell, S., & Krauss, R. (1989). The effects of intended audience on message production and comprehension: Reference in a common ground framework. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 203–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasl, F. (1990). Konfliktmanagement: Ein Handbuch zur Diagnose und Behandlung von Konflikten für Organisationen und ihre Berater. Verlag Freies Geistesleben.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D., & Carver, C. (1980). Helplessness and the coronary-prone personality. In J. Garber & M. Seligman (Ed.), Human helplessness: Theory and applications. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glucksberg, S., Krauss, R., & Weisberg, R. (1966). Referential communication in nursery school children: Methode and some preliminary findings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 3, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grandey, A. A., Chi, N.-W., & Diamond, J. A. (2013). Show me the Money! Do financial rewards for performance enhance or undermine the satisfaction from emotional labor? Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 569–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunig, J. (2009). Paradigms of global public relations in an age of digitalisation. PRism, 6, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., Brehm, J. W., Greenberg, J., Simon, L., & Nelson, D. E. (1996). Evidence that the production of aversive consequences is not necessary to create cognitive dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 5–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E. (1999). Toward an understanding of the motivation underlying dissonance effects: Is the production of aversive consequences necessary to cause dissonance? In E. Harmon-Jones & J. Mills (Hrsg.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (S. 71–99). American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E. (2000a). A cognitive dissonance theory perspective on the role of emotion in the maintenance and change of beliefs and attitudes. In N. H. Frijda, A. R. S. Manstead, & S. Bem (Hrsg.), Emotions and beliefs (S. 185–211). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E. (2000b). Cognitive dissonance and experienced negative affect: Evidence that dissonance increases experienced negative affect even in the absence of aversive consequences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1490–1501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2002). Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 711–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 38(1), 7–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, J., & Schulz, R. (1995). A life-span theory of control. Psychological Review, 102, 264–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (2012). Regulatory focus theory. In P. van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. T. Higgins (Hrsg.), Theories of social psychology (S. 483–504). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaacs, E., & Clark, H. (1987). References in conversation between experts and novices. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 116, 26–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2010). What is trust and confidence in the police? Policing, 4(3), 241–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Weisburd, D. (2009). Does police performance increase in importance for the public during times of security threats, and do evaluations of procedural justice decline in importance? Findings from a quasi-experimental study of antecedents of police legitimacy in Israel. Hebrew University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., Simon, L. S., & Rich, B. L. (2012). The psychic cost of doing wrong. Journal of Management, 38(3), 784–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, O., Clark, A. E., & Lyons, A. (2010). When the social becomes personal: Exploring the role of common ground in stereotype communication. Social Cognition, 28(3), 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodej, C., Voutsinas, A., Jiménez, P., & Kallus, K. W. (2005). Inventar zur Messung des Eskalationsgrades von Konflikten in der Arbeitspsychologie. Wirtschaftspsychologie., 4, 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodej, C., Wochele, C., & Kallus, W. (2011). Inventar zum individuellen Konfliktlöseverhalten am Arbeitsplatz (IKA). Journal Psychologie des Alltagshandelns, 4(2), 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, R. M., & Fussell, S. R. (1996). Social psychological models of interpersonal communication. In E. T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Hrsg.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (S. 655–701). Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreyenberg, J. (2004). Handbuch Konflikt-Management: Konfliktdiagnose, -definition und -analyse; Konfliktebenen, Konflikt- und Führungsstile; Interventions- und Lösungsstrategien, Beherrschung der Folgen. Cornelsen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Hrsg.), Advances in organizational justice (S. 56–88). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastrofski, S. D., Snipes, J. B., & Supina, A. E. (1996). Compliance on demand: The public’s response to specific police requests. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33(3), 269–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGregor, I., Zanna, M. P., Holmes, J. G., & Spencer, S. J. (2001). Compensatory conviction in the face of personal uncertainty: Going to extremes and being oneself. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 472–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz, M. E. (1993). Manual for the styles of conflict inventory. Consulting Psychologists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, C. H., Ivanov, B., Sims, J., Compton, J., Harrison, K. J., Parker, K. A., & Averbeck, J. M. (2013). Boosting the potency of resistance: Combining the motivational forces of inoculation and psychological reactance. Human Communication Research, 39, 127–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T., & Tropp, L. (2000). Does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Recent meta-analytic findings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Reducing prejudice and discrimination. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2008). How does intergroup contact reduce prejudice? Meta-analytic tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 922–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, T. (1998). Motivation. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske & G. Lindzey (Ed.), The handbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L., & Wilson, C. (1982). Communicative strategies in organizational conflict: Reliability and validity of a measurement scale. In M. Burgoon (Hrsg.), Communication Yearbook (S. 629–652). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quick, B. L. (2013). Perceived message sensation value and psychological reactance: A test of the dominant thought disruption hypothesis. Journal of Health Communication, 18, 1024–1038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A. (1983). A mearsure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 368–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A. (2015). Managing conflict in organizations (First paperback printing, fourth edition). Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T. V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and intervention. Psychological Reports, 44(3), 1323–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. A., & Magner, N. R. (1995). Confirmatory factor analyses of the styles of handling interpersonal conflict: First-order factor model and its inavriance across groups. Journal of Applied, 80(1), 122–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, A. S., & Banas, J. A. (2015). Inoculating against reactance to persuasive health messages. Health Communication, 30, 451–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, A. S., Banas, J. A., & Magid, Y. (2017). More on inoculating against reactance to persuasive health messages: The paradox of threat. Health Communication, 32, 890–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruble, T. L., & Thomas, K. W. (1976). Support for a two-dimensional model of conflict behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(1), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rüttinger, B. (1977). Konflikt & Konfliktlösen. Wilhelm Goldmann Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rüttinger, B., & Sauer, J. (2002). Konflikt und Konfliktlösen. Kritische Situationen erkennen und bewältigen. Rosenberger Fachverlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, J., Medvec, V. H., & Meloy, M. G. (1996). The distortion of information during decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 66(1), 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, R., & Brenner, G. (1977). Relocation of the aged: A review and theoretical analysis Journal of Gerontology, 32, 323–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultze, T., Pfeiffer, F., & Schulz-Hardt, S. (2012). Biased information processing in the escalation paradigm: Information search and information evaluation as potential mediators of escalating commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, G. (2014). Konfliktmanagement: Konflikte erkennen, analysieren, lösen. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, L. (2011). The effectiveness of empathy- versus fear-arousing antismoking PSAs. Health Communication, 26, 404–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipp, A. J., Furst-Holloway, S., Harris, T. B., & Rosen, B. (2014). Gone today but here tomorrow: Extending the unfolding model of turnover to consider boomerang employees. Personnel Psychology, 67(2), 421–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E. (1990). Age differences in the dimensions of perceived control during middle childhood: Implications for developmental conceptualisations and research. Child Development, 61, 1882–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, E., Chapman, M., & Baltes, P. (1988). Control, means-ends and agency beliefs: A new conceptualization and its measurement during childhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 117–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleesman, D., Conlon, D., McNamara, G., & Miles, J. (2012). Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation commitment. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 541–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steindl, C., Jonas, E., Sittenthaler, S., TrautMattausch, E., & Greenberg, J. (2015). Understanding psychological reactance: New developments and findings. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie mit Zeitschrift fur Angewandte Psychologie, 223, 205–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swart, H., Hewstone, M., Christ, O., & Voci, A. (2011). Affective mediators of intergroup contact: A three-wave longitudinal study in South Africa. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(6), 1221–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tausch, N., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J. B., Psaltis, C., Schmid, K., Popan, J. R., & Hughes, J. (2010). Secondary transfer effects of intergroup contact: Alternative accounts and underlying processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(2), 282–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., Lichtman, R., & Wood, J. (1984). Attributions, beliefs about control, and adjustment to breast cancer. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 489–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. D. Dunnette (Hrsg.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (S. 889–935). Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K. W., & Kilmann, R. H. (2002). Thomas-Kilmann conflict mode instrument. Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, K., & Thomas, G. (2004). Introduction to conflict and Teams: Enhancing Team Performance using TKI. Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S. (1981). Will it hurt less if I can control it? A complete answer to a simple question. Psychological Bulletin, 90, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (1998). The mind and heart of the negotiator. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M. (2009). Die Ursprünge der menschlichen Kommunikation. Druckhaus Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, T. R., & Wakslak, C. J. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42(2), 253–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Vliert, E., & Kabanoff, B. (1990). Toward Theory-based mearsures of conflict management. Academy of Management Journal, 33(1), 199–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos, K. (2001). Fiarness heuristic theory: Assessing the information to which people are reacting has a pivotal role in understanding organizational justice. In S. Gilliland, D. Steiner & D. Skarlicki (Ed.), Theoretical and cultural perspectives on organizational justice (S. 63–84). IAP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera, A., &. Dicks, P. (2013). Change Management und Konfliktmanagement in der Polizei Deutsches Polizeiblatt, (5), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, J. D., & Bednar, M. K. (2008). The Pacification of institutional investors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 29–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R. (1974). Freedom and reactance. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winterheld, H. A., & Simpson, J. A. (2016). Regulatory focus and the interpersonal dynamics of romantic partners’ personal goal discussions. Journal of Personality, 84(3), 277–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zemack-Rugar, Y., Moore, S. G., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2017). Just do it! Why committed consumers react negatively to assertive ads. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27, 287–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bayerisches Landeskriminalamt, München, Deutschland

    Jürgen Brandl

  2. Fortbildungsinstitut der Bayerischen Polizei, Ainring, Deutschland

    Bernd Bürger

  3. Gesellschaft für Arbeits-, Wirtschafts- und Organisationspsychologische Forschung e. V., Oldenburg, Deutschland

    Bernd Bürger

Authors
  1. Jürgen Brandl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Bernd Bürger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Bürger .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fortbildungsinstitut der Bayer. Polizei, Ainring, Deutschland

    Bernd Bürger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brandl, J., Bürger, B. (2022). Der messbare Effekt Taktischer Kommunikation im Einsatz. In: Bürger, B. (eds) Die Rolle der Polizei bei Versammlungen. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37494-5_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-37494-5_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-37493-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-37494-5

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation