Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

GG-Institutionen – Organisationen, Regime, Netzwerke

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Governance

  • 593 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Das nachfolgende Kapitel bietet aus einer institutionalistischen Perspektive eine Übersicht über die Strukturelemente globaler Governance und zeigt deren Entwicklung seit Ende des Kalten Krieges. Um Ordnung in die große Vielfalt der Forschungsaktivitäten zu Themen der globalen Governance zu bringen, werden vier Analyseperspektiven, die institutionelle und die systemische sowie die sektorale und die Mehrebenenperspektive eingeführt. Mit einem aus diesen Perspektiven (Dimensionen) gebildeten Klassifikationssystem lassen sich Themen und Schwerpunkte der GG-Forschung ermitteln. Die Klassifikation der Ansätze folgt einer institutionalistischen Logik. Internationale Organisationen, Regime und Netzwerke bilden die basalen Institutionen globaler Governance. Die drei Institutionen werden jeweils definiert. Gouvernementale, transnationale und hybride Formen werden unterschieden. Jeweils werden quantitative Angaben zu deren Wachstum sowie zu den an ihnen beteiligten GG-Akteuren gemacht. Die Daten bestätigen die These, dass nach dem Ende des Kalten Krieges eine neue Phase internationaler Beziehungen einsetzte, die mit einer Zunahme von GG-Akteuren (NSA) und neuen Formen globaler Governance verbunden ist. Am Ende des Kapitels wird der global ausgerichtete systemische Analyseansatz vorgestellt, bei dem das GG-System hinsichtlich Entstehung, Stabilität und Wandel untersucht wird. Dabei werden zwei Forschungsrichtungen betrachtet: zum einen die Erdsystemgovernance und zum anderen die Analyse von Weltordnungen, hier speziell die der liberalen internationalen Ordnung.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Siehe die Homepage des Galtung-Instituts: https://www.galtung-institut.de/de/home/johan-galtung/ (26.05.2021).

  2. 2.

    Siehe den Artikel in Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Wallerstein sowie seine ehemalige Homepage: https://iwallerstein.com/ (26.05.2021).

  3. 3.

    Siehe den Artikel zur Vita und Wirkungsgeschichte in Wikipedia: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedley_Bull (26.05.2021).

  4. 4.

    Zu anderen Versuchen, GG-Arbeiten in eine Typologie zu bringen, siehe Hofferberth, 2015, S. 608; Hoffmann & Ba, 2005; Dingwerth & Pattberg, 2006; Weiss & Wilkinson, 2019.

  5. 5.

    Siehe einführend Cutler, Haufler & Porter, 1999; Cutler & Gill, 2014; Cutler & Dietz, 2017.

  6. 6.

    Die Gründungsdokumente von IOs bedürfen in der Regel der Ratifikation durch die jeweiligen nationalen Parlamente.

  7. 7.

    Die Gründungsdokumente von Regimen bedürfen, je nach Rechtsform des Regimes und nationaler Verfassung, förmlicher Regierungsbeschlüsse.

  8. 8.

    Gouvernementale Netzwerke kommen bereits durch informelle Regierungsbeschlüsse zustande.

  9. 9.

    Nicht alle intergouvernementalen multilateralen Regelungsstrukturen können behandelt werden. Beispielsweise werden institutionalisierte Programme, wie das UN-Umweltprogramm, oder politisch-ökonomische Koordinationsinstrumente, wie die Emissionshandelssysteme des Kyoto-Protokolls, platzbedingt ausgespart.

  10. 10.

    Prof. em. für Völkerrecht und Internationale Beziehungen an der Arizona State University; zahlreiche Publikationen.

  11. 11.

    Siehe die Homepage der WMO und die Geneva Declaration (2019): https://public.wmo.int/en/media/press-release/wmo-congress-backs-new-public-private-engagement-plan (29.04.2020).

  12. 12.

    Natürlich mit der großen Ausnahme der EU!

  13. 13.

    Das Konzept der Soft Power, der weichen Machtinstrumente (Diplomatie, Vereinbarung von Standards, Monitoring) wurde von Joseph S. Nye (Nye, 2004; Nye, 2011) entwickelt und zur Analyse der amerikanischen Außenpolitik herangezogen.

  14. 14.

    Jessica F. Green untersucht die Delegation von regulativen Funktionen am Beispiel der globalen Umweltgovernance und speziell am Fall des Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) im Rahmen des Kyoto Protokolls, bei dem das ausführende Organ (Art. 12.4) als eine Körperschaft privaten Rechts vorgesehen wurde (Green, 2014, Kap. 2 und 4).

  15. 15.

    Vgl. Albert O. Hirschman (2004 (1970)).

  16. 16.

    Die G7 wurde, nach einem dreijährigen Vorlauf, 1975 etabliert. Von 1998–2014 (G8) nahm Russland an den jährlichen Treffen teil. Siehe die Plattform des G7 Information Centres: http://www.g8.utoronto.ca.

  17. 17.

    Das G20-Netzwerk (19 Staaten + EU) wurde 1999 zunächst als Treffen der Finanzminister, ab 2009 zur Governance der Finanzkrise, auf der Ebene der Regierungschefs gegründet. Siehe auch das G20 Information Centre: http://www.g20.utoronto.ca sowie das Portal des Lowy Institute: http://www.lowyinstitute.org/issues/g20.

  18. 18.

    Die jährlichen Treffen der Regierungschefs (Gipfeldiplomatie) der BRIC (Brasilien, Russland, Indien, China) wurden 2009 vereinbart und 2011 durch die Aufnahme Südafrikas zur BRICS-Gruppe (G5) erweitert.

  19. 19.

    Anne-Marie Slaughter (geb. 1958), Professorin für Politikwissenschaft an der Universität Princeton, von 2009 bis 2011 Leiterin des Planungsstabs des US-Außenministeriums; zahlreiche Publikationen, darunter der provokante Aufsatz „Why Women Still Can’t Have It All“ (Slaughter, 2012); wichtigste Veröffentlichung: Slaughter, 2009.

  20. 20.

    Siehe https://uia.org/yearbook. Das Yearbook enthält Informationen zu 72.500 Organisationen, von denen 40.300 aktiv sind, aus 300 Ländern und Territorien (Union of International Associations, seit 1907).

  21. 21.

    Siehe das Portal der UNFCCC, speziell: https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/parties-non-party-stakeholders/non-party-stakeholders/statistics-on-non-party-stakeholders#eq-1 (02.03.2020).

  22. 22.

    Hier ist darauf hinzuweisen, dass es eine breite meist historisch oder politisch-ökonomisch angeleitete Diskussion über Weltordnungen und Weltsysteme gibt. Diese Arbeiten sind jedoch nicht aus einer steuerungstheoretischen Governanceperspektive verfasst und müssen uns daher an dieser Stelle nicht weiter interessieren. Die umfangreiche Literatur zur Entstehung, zu den Funktionsbedingungen und dem Niedergang von Hegemonialstaaten oder den Stabilitätsbedingungen internationaler Ordnungen, die Schnittstellen zur Governancetheorie besitzen, ist dagegen einschlägig (s. Overbeek, 2008).

  23. 23.

    Die Formulierung ist ein viel zitiertes Erbe eines der Urväter der amerikanischen Politikwissenschaft. Zu dessen Wirken siehe Muno, 2007.

  24. 24.

    Hal Brands (1983), Henry A. Kissinger Distinguished Professor of Global Affairs at the John Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), Forschungsguppenleiter am American Enterprise Institute (AEI). 2015/1016 Special Assistent to the Secretary of Defense for Strategic Planning. Zahlreiche Publikationen.

Literatur

  • Abbott, K. W., & Faude, B. (2020). Choosing Low-Cost Institutions in Global Governance. International Theory – under review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2015). Orchestration: global governance through intermediaries. In K. W. Abbott, P. Genschel, D. Snidal & B. Zangl (Eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (1st ed., pp. 3–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, K. W., Genschel, P., Snidal, D., & Zangl, B. (2016). Two Logics of Indirect Governance: Delegation and Orchestration. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 719–729. ISSN-L: 0007-1234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, K. W., Green, J. F., & Keohane, R. O. (2016). Organizational Ecology and Institutional Change in Global Governance. International Organization, 70(2), 247–277. ISSN-L: 0020-8183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, K. W., & Kauffmann, C. (2018). The Contribution of Trans-Governmental Networks of Regulators To International Regulatory Co-operation. OECD Regulatory Policy Working Papers: Vol. 10. Paris. ISSN-L: 2414-0996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, H., Habek, P., & Cierna, H. (2016). Corporate Social Responsibility and Self-Regulation. MM Science Journal. (October), 1121–1126. Retrieved May 03, 2020, from DOI: 10.17973/MMSJ.2016_10_201681 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M., Deitelhoff, N., & Hellmann, G. (2018). Ordnung und Regieren in der Weltgesellschaft: ein Problemaufriss. In M. Albert, N. Deitelhoff & G. Hellmann (Eds.), Ordnung und Regieren in der Weltgesellschaft (pp. 1–20). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almeida, P., & Chase-Dunn, C. (2018). Globalization and Social Movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 44(1), 189–211. ISSN-L: 0360-0572 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, K. J. (2017). The Evolution of International Law and Courts. In O. Fioretos (Ed.), International Politics and Institutions in Time (pp. 251–273). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, K. J. (2019). Critical junctures and the future of international courts in a post-liberal world order. In A. Kent, N. Skoutaris & J. Trinidad (Eds.), Routledge Research in International Law. The Future of International Courts. Regional, Institutional and Procedural Challenges. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, K. J., Hafner-Burton, E. M., & Helfer, L. R. (2019). Theorizing the Judicialization of International Relations. International Studies Quarterly, 63(3), 449–463. ISSN-L: 0020-8833 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andretta, M., Della Porta, D., & Saunders, C. (2019). Globalization and Social Movements. In D. A. Snow, H. Kriesi, H. J. McCammon & S. A. Soule (Eds.), Wiley Blackwell companions to sociology. The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 602–617). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babic, M., Fichtner, J., & Heemskerk, E. M. (2017). States versus Corporations: Rethinking the Power of Business in International Politics. The International Spectator, 52(4), 20–43. ISSN-L: 0393-2729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Backhaus-Maul, H., Biedermann, C., Nährlich, S., & Polterauer, J. (Eds.) (2010). Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie: Bd. 27. Corporate Citizenship in Deutschland: Gesellschaftliches Engagement von Unternehmen. Bilanz und Perspektiven (2., aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S. (2009). Das Klimaexperiment und der IPCC: Schnittstellen zwischen Wissenschaft und Politik in den internationalen Beziehungen. Ökologie und Wirtschaftsforschung: Vol. 84. Marburg: Metropolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, S. (2016). Hybride Organisationen als Schnittstellen – Der Fall IPCC. In C. Besio & G. Romano (Eds.), Umweltsoziologie: Band 1. Zum gesellschaftlichen Umgang mit dem Klimawandel. Kooperationen und Kollisionen (1st ed., pp. 151–185). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, R., & Zürn, M. (2019). Untapped potential: How the G20 can strengthen global governance. South African Journal of International Affairs, 26(4), 549–562. ISSN-L: 1022-0461 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N. et al. (2009). Earth System Governance: People, Places, and the Planet. Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project (Earth System Governance Report No. 1). Bonn: IHDP. Retrieved May 22, 2021, from file:///C:/Users/User/AppData/Local/Temp/Earth-System-Governance_Science-Plan.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, F., & Kim, R. E. (2020). Architectures of Earth System Governance: Setting the Stage. In F. Biermann & R. E. Kim (Eds.), Earth system governance. Architectures of earth system governance. Institutional complexity and structural transformation (pp. 1–34).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bierman, F., & Siebenhüner, B. (Eds.) (2009). Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies. Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F. (2014). World politics in the anthropocene. Earth system governance. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., & Kim, R. E. (Eds.) (2020). Architectures of earth system governance: Institutional complexity and structural transformation. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (Eds.) (2012). Earth system governance: a core research project of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. Global environmental governance reconsidered. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., Zelli, F., & Pattberg, P. H. (Eds.) (2010). Global climate governance beyond 2012: Architecture, agency and adaptation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, R. (2017). The Role of International Bureaucracies. In R. Biermann & J. A. Koops (Eds.), Palgrave handbooks. Palgrave handbook of inter-organizational relations in world politics (pp. 243–270). London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloodgood, E. A. (2018). Quantifying NGOs. In A. J. Kellow & H. Murphy-Gregory (Eds.), Handbook of research on NGOs (pp. 114–129). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botzem, S. (2014a). The politics of accounting regulation: Organizing transnational standard setting in financial reporting (Paperback ed.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Botzem, S. (2014b). Transnational standard setting in accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 27(6), 933–955, from https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1301/full/pdfUR - https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2013-1301/full/html.

  • Brabandere, E. De (2011). Non-State Actors in International Dispute Settlement: Pragmatism in International Law. In J. d’Aspremont (Ed.), Routledge Research in International Law. Participants in the international legal system. Multiple perspectives on non-state actors in international law (pp. 342–359). Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracht, C., & Nguyen, H. (2017). Comparing G7/8, G20 and BRICS compliance. In J. J. Kirton & M. Larinova (Eds.), Accountability for Effectiveness in Global Governance (Kap. 9). Milton Park: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brauch, H. G., Oswald Spring, Ú., Grin, J., & Scheffran, J. (Eds.) (2016). Hexagon series on human and environmental security and peace: Vol. 10. Handbook on Sustainability Transition and Sustainable Peace: Springer Nature. ISSN-L: 1865-5793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brechin, S. R., & Ness, G. D. (2013). Looking Back at the Gap: International Organizations as Organizations Twenty-Five Years Later. International Organisations Research Journal, 4(Special Issue), 14–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeier, H. (2008). The Legitimacy of International Regimes. Global Environmental Governance. Florence: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeier, H., Young, O. R., & Zürn, M. (2006). Analyzing international environmental regimes: From case study to database. Global environmental accord. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunnengräber, A. (Ed.) (2011). Energiepolitik und Klimaschutz. Zivilisierung des Klimaregimes: NGOs und soziale Bewegungen in der nationalen, europäischen und internationalen Klimapolitik (1. Aufl.). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burch, S., Gupta, A., Inoue, C. Y.A., Kalfagianni, A., Persson, Å., Gerlak, A. K., et al. (2019). New directions in earth system governance research. Earth System Governance, 1, 100006, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589811619300059. ISSN-L: 2589-8116.

  • Bush, S., & Hadden, J. (2019). Density and Decline in the Founding of International NGOs in the United States. International Studies Quarterly, 63(4), 1133–1146. ISSN-L: 0020-8833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Büthe, T., & Mattli, W. (2013). The new global rulers: The privatization of regulation in the world economy (3. pr., 1. pbk. pr). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., & Schouenborg, L. (2018). Global international society: A new framework for analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., Post, J. E., Lipartito, K., Werhane, P. H. & Goodpaster, K. E. (2012). Corporate responsibility: The American experience. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (2012). Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Global Governance (1995). Our Global Neighbourhood. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Global Security, Justice & Governance (2015). Confronting the Crisis of Global Governance. Washington, D.C.: Stimson Center. Retrieved December 16, 2019, from https://www.stimson.org/sites/default/files/Commission-on-Global-Security-Justice-Governance-A4.pdf. (online verfügbar in englischer und russischer Sprache).

  • Cooley, A., & Nexon, D. H. (2020). Exit from hegemony: The unraveling of the American global order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, N., & Diani, M. (2019). Network and Fields. In D. A. Snow, H. Kriesi, H. J. McCammon & S. A. Soule (Eds.), Wiley Blackwell companions to sociology. The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (pp. 151–166). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. C. (2003). Private power and global authority: Transnational merchant law in the global political economy. Cambridge studies in international relations: Vol. 90. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISSN-L: 0959-6844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. C. (2007). Private international regimes and interfirm cooperation. In R. B. Hall & T. J. Biersteker (Eds.), Cambridge studies in international relations: Vol. 85. The emergence of private authority in global governance (3rd ed., pp. 23–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISSN-L: 0959-6844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. C., & Dietz, T. (Eds.) (2017). Politics of transnational law. The Politics of Private Transnational Governance by Contract. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. C., & Gill, S. (Eds.) (2014). New constitutionalism and world order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler, A. C., Haufler, V., & Porter, T. (1999). Private Authority and International Affairs. In A. C. Cutler, V. Haufler, & T. Porter (Eds.), Private Authority and International Affairs (pp. 3–27). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, X. (2015). Orchestrating monitoring: the optimal adaptation of international organizations. In K. W. Abbott, P. Genschel, D. Snidal, & B. Zangl (Eds.), International organizations as orchestrators (1st ed., pp. 139–165). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. R. (2019a). Transnational society as a mirror of international society: A reinterpretation of contemporary world order. International Theory, 11(3), 264–292. ISSN-L: 1752-9719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. R. (2017). Transnational Social Movements. In H. Ebert & T. Maurer (Eds.), Oxford bibliographies. International relations. Cyber security. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, T. R. (2019b). Routledge handbook of NGOs and international relations. London, New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLautre, G. (2019). Decent work in global supply chains: An internal research review (Working Paper No. 47). Genf: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delvenne, P., & Kreimer, P. (2017). World-System Analysis 2.0: Globalized science in centers and peripherie. In D. Tyfield, C. Thorpe, R. Lave & S. Randalls (Eds.), Routledge International Handbooks. The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science (pp. 390–404). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Was ist Global Governance? Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft, 34(3), 377–399. ISSN-L: 0340-0425 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, H. (2006). The Group of 7/8. Global Institutions. New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, J. (2009). Rethinking political structures: From ‘ordering principles’ to ‘vertical differentiation’ – and beyond. International Theory, 1(1), 49–86. ISSN-L: 1752-9719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drori, G. S. (2003). Science in the modern world polity: Institutionalization and globalization. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, B. (2019). Who Fills the Global Governance Gap? Rethinking the Roles of Business and Government in Global Governance. Organization Studies, 40(8), 1125–1145. ISSN-L: 0170-8406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eilstrup-Sangiovanni, M. (2021). What kills international organizations? When and why international organizations terminate. European Journal of International Relations, (27 (1), 281–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. ISSN-L: 0048-7333.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commissi n o(2019). Coporate Social Responsibility, Responsible Business Conduct, and Business and Human Rights: Overview of Progress (SWD(2019) 143). Brüssel. Retrieved May 02, 2020, from https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/34482. (online verfügbar).

  • Fuchs, D. (2013). Theorizing the Power of Global Companies. In J. Mikler (Ed.), Handbook of global policy series. The handbook of global companies (pp. 77–95). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Mera, L., Morin, J.-F., & van de Graaf, T. (2020). Regime Complexes. In F. Biermann & R. E. Kim (Eds.), Earth system governance. Architectures of earth system governance. Institutional complexity and structural transformation (pp. 137–157).

    Google Scholar 

  • Graz, J.-C., & Nölke, A. (2012). The Limits of Transnational Private Governance. In S. Guzzini & I. B. Neumann (Eds.), Palgrave studies in international relations. The diffusion of power in global governance. International political economy meets Foucault (pp. 118–140). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. F. (2014). Rethinking private authority: Agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, J. F., & Auld, G. (2017). Unbundling the Regime Complex: The Effects of Private Authority. Transnational Environmental Law, 6(2), 259–284. ISSN-L: 2047-1025.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. (2004). When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 569–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, P. M. (2016). Introduction: reconstructing epistemic communities. In P. M. Haas (Ed.), Epistemic communities, constructivism, and international environmental politics (pp. 1–24). London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. (2011). Internationale Standardfindung und Global Governance: Zur Legitimität des Entstehungsprozesses der Leitlinie ISO 26000. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 71(2), 121–137. ISSN-L: 0342-7064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale, T. (2016). “All Hands on Deck”: The Paris Agreement and Nonstate Climate Action. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 12–22. ISSN-L: 1526-3800.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, R. B., & Biersteker, T. J. (2007). The emergence of private authority in the international system. In R. B. Hall & T. J. Biersteker (Eds.), Cambridge studies in international relations: Vol. 85. The emergence of private authority in global governance (3rd ed., pp. 3–22). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISSN-L: 0959-6844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever, A., Mayer, P., & Rittberger, V. (2004). Theories of international regimes (6th print). Cambridge studies in international relations: Vol. 55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISSN-L: 0959-6844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, D., & Hale, T. (Eds.) (2011). Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (2004 (1970)). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofferberth, M. (2015). Mapping the Meanings of Global Governance: A Conceptual Reconstruction of a Floating Signifier. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 43(2), 598–617. ISSN-L: 0305-8298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, M. J., & Ba, A. D. (2005). Contending perspectives on global governance: dialogue and debate. In A. D. Ba & M. J. Hoffmann (Eds.), Contending Perspectives on Global Governance. Coherence, contestation and world order (pp. 249–267). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtmaat, E. A., Adolph, C., & Prakash, A. (2020). The global diffusion of environmental clubs: How pressure from importing countries supports the chemical industry’s Responsible Care® program. World Development, 127, article 104735. ISSN-L: 0305-750X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, I. (2021). International organizations: Politics, law, practice (4th ed.). Cambridge, United Kingdom, New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars (new ed.). Princeton: Princeton University. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. J. (2020). A world safe for democracy: Liberal internationalism and the crises of global order. Politics and culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff, S. (1994). The fifth branch: Science advisers as policymakers. Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karns, M. P., Mingst, K. A., & Stiles, K. W. (2015). International organizations: The politics and processes of global governance (3rd ed.). Boulder, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond Borders. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, A., Skoutaris, N., & Trinidad, J. (Eds.) (2019). Routledge Research in International Law. The Future of International Courts: Regional, Institutional and Procedural Challenges: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O. (1989). Neoliberal Institutionalism: A Perspective on World Politics. In R. O. Keohane (Ed.), International institutions and state power. Essays in international relations theory (pp. 1–20). Boulder. Colo.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2010). The Regime Complex for Climate Change (Discussion Paper No. 10-33). Harvard: The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements. Retrieved March 02, 2018, from https://www.belfercenter.org/sites/default/files/files/publication/Keohane_Victor_Final_2.pdf (online verfügbar).

  • Kim, R. E. (2020). Is Global Governance Fragmented, Polycentric, or Complex? The State of the Art of the Network Approach. International Studies Review, 22(4), 903–931, from https://academic.oup.com/isr/article/22/4/903/5571549. ISSN-L: 1468-2486 (online verfügbar).

  • Koch, M., & Stetter, S. (2013). Sociological Perspectives on International Organizations and the Construction of Global Order: An Introduction. Journal of International Organizations Studies, 4 (Special issue), 4–13. ISSN-L: 2191-2564.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler-Koch, B. (Ed.) (1989). Regime in den internationalen Beziehungen. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, S. D. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 36(2), 185–205. ISSN-L: 0020-8183 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2706520 (online verfügbar).

  • Krasner, S. D. (Ed.) (1983). International Regimes. Ithaca, London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larionova, M., & Kirton, J. J. (2018). BRICS and Global Governance. New York: Routledge, [2018] | Series: Global Governance: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, H. D. (1936). Politics: Who Gets What, When, How. New York, New York: Whittlesey House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton-Smith, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). The Triple Helix in the context of global change: Dynamics and challenges. Prometheus, 32(4), 321–336. ISSN-L: 0810-9028 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmkuhl, D. (2011). Transnational Commercial Arbitration. In D. Held & T. Hale (Eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations (pp. 138–147). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipschutz, R. D. (2005). Global civil society and global governmentality: or, the search for politics and the state amidst the capillaries of social power. In M. N. Barnett & R. Duvall (Eds.), Cambridge studies in international relations: Vol. 98. Power in global governance (pp. 229–248). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISSN-L: 0959-6844.

    Google Scholar 

  • List, M. (2007). Regimetheorie. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank, & G. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder (1st ed., pp. 226–239). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckhurst, J. (2019). The G20 Hub of Decentralizing Global Governance Authority. International Organisations Research Journal, 14(2), 7–24. ISSN-L: 1996-7845.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazarr, M. J., Priebe, M., Radin, A., & Stuth Cevallos, A. (2016). Understanding the Current International Order. Santa Monica, Calif.: RAND Corporation. Retrieved May 22, 2021, from www.rand.org/t/RR1598.

  • Mcconaughey, M., Musgrave, P., & Nexon, D. H. (2018). Beyond anarchy: Logics of political organization, hierarchy, and international structure. International Theory, 10(2), 181–218. ISSN-L: 1752-9719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. J. (1994). The False Promise of International Institutions. International Security, 19(3), 5. ISSN-L: 0162-2889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikler, J. (Ed.) (2013). Handbook of global policy series. The handbook of global companies. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, R. B., Andonova, L. B., Axelrod, M., Balsiger, J., Bernauer, T., Green, J. F., et al. (2020). What We Know (and Could Know) About International Environmental Agreements. Global Environmental Politics, 20(1), 103–121. ISSN-L: 1526-3800 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moratis, L. T., & Cochius, T. (2011). ISO 26000: The business guide to the new standard on social responsibility. Sheffield: Greenleaf Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muldoon, J. P. (2011). Multilateralism’s New Mix: Implications for Diplomacy, International Organizations, and Global Governance. In J. P. Muldoon, J. Fagot Aviel, R. Reitano, & E. Sullivan (Eds.), The new dynamics of multilateralism. Diplomacy, international organizations, and global governance (pp. 333–343). Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muldoon, J. P., JR (2018). The Architecture of Global Governance: An Introduction to the Study of International Organizations. Boulder: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muno, W. (2007). Harold D. Lasswell, Politics: Who Gets What, When, How, Cleveland/New York 1936. In S. Kailitz (Ed.), Schlüsselwerke der Politikwissenschaft (1st ed., pp. 222–225). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic, N., Rockström, J., Gaffney, O., & Zimm, C. (2016). Global Commons in the Anthropocene: World Development on a Stable and Resilient Planet (IIASA Working Paper No. WP-16-019). Laxenburg: IIASA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nölke, A. (2011). International Accounting Standards. In D. Held & T. Hale (Eds.), Handbook of Transnational Governance: Institutions and Innovations (pp. 66–70). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics (12th ed.). New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J. S. (2011). The future of power (1st ed.). New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Callaghan, T., & Vivoda, V. (2013). How Global Companies Make National Regulations? In J. Mikler (Ed.), Handbook of global policy series. The handbook of global companies (pp. 155–172). Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011). OECD-Leitsätze für multinationale Unternehmen: Neufassung 2011 (Ausg. 2011). Paris: OECD Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013). International Regulatory Co-operation: Addressing the Challenges of Globalisation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2014). International Regulatory Co-operation and International Organisations: The Cases of the OECD and the IMO (1. Aufl.). s.l.: OECD Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2016). International regulatory co-operation: The role of international organisations in fostering better rules of globalisation. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2019a). Raising the Bar: Better Politics for Better Lives. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2019b). The Contribution of International Organisations to a Rule-based International System: Key Results from the partnership of international organisations for effective rulemaking. Paris: OECD. Retrieved March 07, 2020, from https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/IO-Rule-Based%20System.pdf (online verfügbar).

  • Omilecheva, M. Y. (2009). Global Civil Society and Democratization of World Politics. International Studies Review, 11(1), 109–132. ISSN-L: 1468-2486 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, H. (2008). Rivalität und ungleiche Entwicklung: Einführung in die internationale Politik aus der Sicht der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg, P. (2012). Transnational Environmental Regimes. In F. Biermann & P. Pattberg (Eds.), Earth system governance: a core research project of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change. Global environmental governance reconsidered (pp. 97–121). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg, P., Widerberg, O., Isailovic, M., & Dias Guerra, F. (2014). Mapping and measuring fragmentation in global governance architectures: A framework for analysis (Report R-14/34). Amsterdam: IVM Institute for Environmental Stu-dies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, L. W. (2007). Global finance, political authority, and the problem of legitimation. In R. B. Hall & T. J. Biersteker (Eds.), Cambridge studies in international relations: Vol. 85. The emergence of private authority in global governance (3rd ed., pp. 76–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISSN-L: 0959-6844.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, P. (2012). Regimekomplexe: Neue Kooperationsformen zur Regulierung globaler Risiken (1. Aufl.). Staatlichkeit im Wandel: Vol. 19. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prakash, A., & Potoski, M. (2014). Global Private Regimes, Domestic Public Law: ISO 14001 and Pollution Reduction. Comparative Political Studies, 51(3), 369–394. ISSN-L: 0010-4140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, K., & Victor, D. G. (2004). The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization, 58(2), 277–309. ISSN-L: 0020-8183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitano, R. (2011). Power, the State, Multilateral Diplomacy, and Global Governance. In J. P. Muldoon, J. Fagot Aviel, R. Reitano & E. Sullivan (Eds.), The new dynamics of multilateralism. Diplomacy, international organizations, and global governance (pp. 317–332). Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, V. (Ed.) (1995). Clarendon Paperbacks. Regime Theory and International Relations. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, V., Zangl, B., Kruck, A., & Dijkstra, H. (2019). International organization (3rd ed.). London: Red Global Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittberger, V., Zangl, B., & Staisch, M. (2008). Internationale Organisationen: Politik und Geschichte (3. überarb. Aufl.). Grundwissen Politik: Vol. 10. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. ISSN-L: 2570-4397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, B. (2018). The European Union. In T. G. Weiss & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), International Organization and Global Governance (2nd ed., pp. 268–282). Milton: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2013). Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2018a). Multinationals as global institution: Power, authority and relative autonomy. Regulation & Governance, 12(3), 317–333. ISSN-L: 1748-5983 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggie, J. G. (2018b). Die soziale Konstruktion der Leitlinien für Wirtschaft und Menschenrechte der Vereinten Nationen. Leviathan. Berliner Zeitschrift für Sozialwissenschaft, 46(1), 6–36. ISSN-L: 0340-0425 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruhlman, M. A. (2017). Who Participates in Global Governance? States, bureaucracies, and Ngos in the united nations. Global institutions series. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, S. W., & List, R. (2003). Global Civil Society: An Overview. Baltimore, MD: Center for Civil Society Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking Ideas and Discourse Seriously: Explaining Change through Discursive Institutionalism as the Fourth New Institutionalism. European Political Science Review, 2(1), 1–25. ISSN-L: 1755-7739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2018a). Civil Society and NGOs. In T. G. Weiss & R. Wilkinson (Eds.), International Organization and Global Governance (2nd ed., pp. 351–364). Milton: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A. (2011). Global Governance, Accountability and Civil Society. In J. A. Scholte (Ed.), Building global democracy? Civil society and accountable global governance (pp. 8–41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholte, J. A., & Tallberg, J. (2018). Theorizing the Institutional Sources of Global Governance Legitimacy. In J. Tallberg, K. Bäckstrand & J. A. Scholte (Eds.), Legitimacy in global governance. Sources, processes, and consequences (pp. 56–74). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghaas, D., & Roth, M. (Eds.) (2006). Global Governance für Entwicklung und Frieden: Perspektiven nach einem Jahrzehnt; Sonderband zum 20-jährigen Bestehen der Stiftung Entwicklung und Frieden. Bonn: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2009). A New World Order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2012). Why Women Still Can’t Have It All. The Atlantic (July/August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M., & Hale, T. (2013). Transgovernmental Networks. In M. Bevir (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of governance (pp. 342–351). Los Angeles, Calif.: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J., Gemici, B., Plummer, S., & Hughes, M. M. (2018). Transnational Social Movement Organizations and Counter-Hegemonic Struggles Today. Journal of World-Systems Research, 24(2), 372–403. ISSN-L: 1076-156X (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D. A., Kriesi, H., McCammon, H. J., & Soule, S. A. (Eds.) (2019). Wiley Blackwell companions to sociology. The Wiley Blackwell companion to social movements (Second edition). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, W. et al. (2005). Global Change and the Earth System: A Planet Under Pressure (2nd printing). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J., Bäckstrand, K., & Scholte, J. A. (2018). Introduction: Legitimacy in Global Governance. In J. Tallberg, K. Bäckstrand & J. A. Scholte (Eds.), Legitimacy in global governance. Sources, processes, and consequences (pp. 3–19). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallberg, J., & Zürn, M. (2019). The legitimacy and legitimation of international organizations: introduction and framework. The Review of International Organizations, 14(4), 581–606. ISSN-L: 1559-7431 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Teubner, G. (2018). Quod omnes tangit: Transnationale Verfassungen ohne Demokratie? Der Staat, 57(2), 171–194. ISSN-L: 0038-884X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J. (2014). Governance Networks. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance (pp. 99–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J., Peters, G. B., Pierre, J., & Soerensen, E. (2012). Interactive governance: Advancing the paradigm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyfield, D., Thorpe, C., Lave, R., & Randalls, S. (Eds.) (2017). Routledge International Handbooks. The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science (1st ed.). London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Global Compact (2019). Progress Report 2019. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Vuuren, D. P., Riahi, K., Calvin, K., Dellink, R., Emmerling, J., Fujimori, S., et al. (2017). The Shared Socio-economic Pathways: Trajectories for human development and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 42, 148–152. ISSN-L: 0959-3780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbruggen, P., & Havinga, T. (2014). The Rise of Transnational Meta-Regulators. Osgood Legal Studies Research Paper 71, 10(16). Retrieved March 14, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitzthum, W., & Proelß, A. (Eds.) (2016). De Gruyter Studium. Völkerrecht (7th ed.). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A. (2008). The difference makers: How social and institutional entrepreneurs created the corporate responsibility movement. Sheffield, U.K.: Greenleaf Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, A., & Jansen, D. (2007). Netzwerke. In A. Benz, S. Lütz, U. Schimank, & G. Simonis (Eds.), Handbuch Governance. Theoretische Grundlagen und empirische Anwendungsfelder (1st ed., pp. 93–105). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G., & Gordenker, L. (Eds.) (1996). NGOs, the UN, and Global Governance. Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (Eds.) (2018a). International Organization and Global Governance (2nd ed.). Milton: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2018b). The Globally Governed - Everyday Global Governance. Global Governance, 24, 193–210. ISSN-L: 1075-2846.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2019). Rethinking Global Governance. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesemann, G. (2011). Norms and Diplomacy: The Diplomatic Underpinnings of Multilateralism. In J. P. Muldoon, J. Fagot Aviel, R. Reitano, & E. Sullivan (Eds.), The new dynamics of multilateralism. Diplomacy, international organizations, and global governance (pp. 5–22). Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiik, A. (2018). Amicus Curiae before international courts and tribunals. Dissertation (1st ed.). Successful dispute resolution: volume 4. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willetts, P. (2011). Non-Governmental Organizations in World Politics: The Construction of Global Governance. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willke, H. (2006). Global Governance. Einsichten. Themen der Soziologie. Bielefeld: transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wit, D. d., Lindsay Ostovar, A., Bauer, S., & Jinnah, S. (2020). International Bureaucracies. In F. Biermann & R. E. Kim (Eds.), Earth system governance. Architectures of earth system governance. Institutional complexity and structural transformation (pp. 57–74).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, K. D. (2017). Patterns of Legitimation in Hybrid Transnational Regimes: The Controversy Surrounding the Lex Sportiva. Politics and Governance, 5(1), 63. ISSN-L: 2183-2463 (online verfügbar).

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, O. R. (2010). Institutional Dynamics: Emergent Patterns in International Environmental Governance. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürn, M. (2018a). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation (First edition). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, FernUniversität in Hagen, Hagen, Deutschland

    Georg Simonis

Authors
  1. Georg Simonis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Simonis, G. (2022). GG-Institutionen – Organisationen, Regime, Netzwerke. In: Global Governance. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36462-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36462-5_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-36461-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-36462-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation