Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transformation etablierter Unternehmen im Übergang in die Elektromobilität

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transforming Mobility – What Next?

  • 4391 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Bei der langfristigen Ablösung von Basistechnologien ist die Unsicherheit, aber auch die Komplexität und Mehrdeutigkeit so hoch, dass es oft lange dauert, bis sich eine neue stabile Branchenarchitektur mit einem neuen „dominanten Design“ herausbildet. Beispiele für einen langen Übergang zu einer neuen Basistechnologie sind die Ablösung des Segelschiffs durch das Dampfschiff im 19. Jahrhundert und heute die Ablösung der Verbrennungstechnologie durch die Elektromobilität.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Ambrosini, V., Bowman, C., & Collier, N. (2009). Dynamic capabilities: An exploration of how firms renew their resource base. British Journal of Management, 20, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyres, N., Bigelow, L., & Nickerson, J. A. (2015). Dominant designs, innovation shocks, and the follower’s dilemma. Strategic Management Journal, 36(2), 216–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, A., Stolletz, R., & Stäblein, T. (2016). Strategic ramp-up planning in automotive production networks. International Journal of Production Research, 55(1), 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, N., & Lemoine, J. (2014). What a difference a word makes: Understanding threats to performance in a VUCA world. Business Horizons, 57(3), 311–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, L., Nickerson, J. A., & Park, W.-Y. (2019). When and how to shift gears: Dynamic trade-offs among adjustment, opportunity, and transaction costs in response to a innovation shock. Strategic Management Journal, 40(3), 377–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brezis, E., Krugman, P., & Tsiddon, D. (1991). Leapfrogging: A theory of cycles in national technological leadeship. Boston. (= National Bureau of Economic Research NBER Working Paper No. 3886).

    Google Scholar 

  • Caves, R. E., & Porter, M. E. (1977). From entry barriers to mobility barriers. Conjectural decision and contrived deterrence to new competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics 9(2), 241–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, C. M., Suárez, F. F., & Utterback, J. M. (1998). Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries. Management Science, 44(12), 207–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, H., Kirkland, J., & Viguerie, P. (1997). Strategy under uncertainty. Harvard Business Review, 75(6), 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Csaszar, F. A., & Eggers, J. P. (2013). Organizational decision making: An information aggregation view. Management Science, 59(10), 2257–2277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., Brady, T., & Hobday, M. (2009). Organizing for solutions – Systems seller vs. systems integrator. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(2), 183–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2020). Elektromobilität in Deutschland – Marktentwicklung bis 2030 und Handlungsempfehlungen. https://www2.deloitte.com/de/de/pages/consumer-industrial-products/articles/elektromobilitaet-in-deutschland.html. Zugegriffen: 15. Juni 2021.

  • De Rubens, G. Z., Noel, L., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020). The market case for electric mobility: Investigating electric vehicle business models for mass adoption. Energy, 194, 116841.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A. K. (1989). Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. Journal of Political Economy, 97(3), 620–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donada, C., & Attias, D. (2015). Food for thought: Which organisation and ecosystem governance to boost radical innovation in the electromobility 2.0 industry? International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 15(2), 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, D., Mc Donough, E. F., Mudambi, R., & Swift, T. (2015). Making up is hard to do: Knowledge acquisition strategies and the nature of new product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 33(4), 472–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggers, J., & Park, K. (2018). Incumbent adaptation to technological change: The past, present, and future of research on heterogeneous incumbent response. The Academy of Management Annals, 12, 357–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farias, V. F., Jagabathula, S., & Shah, D. (2013). A nonparametric approach to modeling choice with limited data. Management Decision, 59(2): 305–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, P. L., & Page, A. L. (1985). Harvesting: The misunderstood market exit strategy. The Journal of Business Strategy, 5(4), 79–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furr, N., & Kapoor, R. (2018). Capabilities, technologies, and firm exit during industry shakeout: Evidence from the global solar photovoltaic industry. Strategic Management Journal, 39(1), 33–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, J. R. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K. R., & Porter, M. E. (1983). End-game strategies for declining industries. Harvard Business Review, 61(4), July–August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G., & MacDuffie, J. P. (2013). How to drive value your way. Harvard Business Review, 91(7), 92–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, J., & Kim, S. J. (2020). Performance implications of incremental transition and discontinuous jump between exploration and exploitation. Strategic Management Journal, 41(6), 1083–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, B. H. (1977). Dynamic economics. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S. (1996). Entry, exit, growth, and innovation over the product life cycle. American Economic Review, 86(3), 562–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S. (1997). Industry life-cycles“. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 145–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, S. (2002). The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US automobile industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 645–666.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knobbe, F., & Proff, H. (2020). Dynamic Capabilities in the Automotive Industry under Digitalisation – A quantitative study in the automotive supplier industry. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 20(4) (Special Issue: Managing the new mobility), 436–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, M. B., Balasubramanian, N., & Garcia-Castro, R. (2017). Toward a dynamic notion of value creation and appropriation in firms: The concept and measurement of economic gain. Strategic Management Journal, 39(6), 1546–1572.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liesenkötter, B., & Schewe, G. (2014). E-Mobility. Zum Sailing-Ship-Effect in der Automobilindustrie. Springer Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, F. (2015). Navigieren in Zeiten des Umbruchs: Die Welt neu denken und gestalten. Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. A., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2004). Coping with decline in dynamic markets: Corporate entrepreneurship and the recombinative organizational form. Advances in Strategic Management, 21, 357–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., & Venkatraman, S. (1995). Defining and developing competence – A strategic process paradigm. Strategic Management Journal, 16(4), 251–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKinsey&Company. (2020). Electric mobility after the crisis. https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/electric-mobility-after-the-crisis-why-an-auto-slowdown-wont-hurt-ev-demand. Zugegriffen: 15. Juni 2021.

  • Nadler, D. A., & Tushman, M. L. (1989). Organizational frame bending: Principles for managing reorientation. In Academy of Management Executive, 3(3), 194–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • O. V. (2018). Special Section of VUCA. California Management Review, 61(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Rivkin, J. W. (2000). Industry transformation. Harvard Business School Background Note, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, H. E., & Levinthal, D. A. (2012). Chasing a moving target: Exploitation and exploration in dynamic environments. Management Science, 58(3), 587–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proff, H. (2002). Konsistente Gesamtunternehmensstrategien. Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Proff, H. (2019). Multinationale Automobilunternehmen in Zeiten des Umbruchs: Herausforderungen – Geschäftsmodelle – Steuerung. Springer Gabler.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Proff, H., & Fojcik T. M. (2015). Business model innovations in times of long-term discontinuous technological change. International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 15(4), 418–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch, S., & Tushman, M. L. (2016). Growing new corporate businesses: From invitation to graduation. Organization Science, 27(5), 1237–1257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, D. K., & Pearce, J. A., II (1992). Turnaround: Retrenchment and recovery. Strategic Management Journal,13(4), 287–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rong, Y., Hu, Y., Mei, A., Tan, H., Saidaminov, M. I., Seok, S. I., & Han, H. (2018). Challenges for commercializing perovskite solar cells. Science, 361, 965–993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saebi, T., Lin, B. L., & Foss, N. J. (2017). What drives business model adaptation? The impact of opportunities, threats and strategic orientation. Long Range Planning, 50(5), 567–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simsek, Z., Heavey, C., & Veiga, J. F. (2009). A typology for aligning organizational ambidexterity̓s conceptualizations, antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 46(5), 864–894.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J., (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, V. J., & Maine, E. (2019). Market entry strategies for electric vehicles start-ups in the automotive industry – Lessons from Tesla Motors. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 653–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, H. W., & Baden-Fuller, C. (1998). Strategic renewal and competence building. Four dynamic mechanisms. In Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K., & O̓Neil, D. (Hrsg.), Strategic flexibility. Managing in a turbulent world (S. 371–389). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Duisburg-Essen, Lehrstuhl für ABWL & Int. Automobilmanagement, Duisburg, Deutschland

    Heike Proff, Fabian Falk & Daniel Jaspers

Authors
  1. Heike Proff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabian Falk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Daniel Jaspers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heike Proff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. ABWL & Int. Automobilmanagement, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Deutschland

    Heike Proff

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Proff, H., Falk, F., Jaspers, D. (2022). Transformation etablierter Unternehmen im Übergang in die Elektromobilität. In: Proff, H. (eds) Transforming Mobility – What Next?. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36430-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36430-4_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-36429-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-36430-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation