Skip to main content

Tinkering with Care and Citizenship in Times of Uncertainty. Contributions by Feminist Precarity Activists

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Race and Inclusive Citizenship

Abstract

Almost twenty years ago, feminist activists based in Spain searched for a way to move beyond labour-centred critiques of precarity. In the process, they coined the term ‘caretizenship’. By centering care as the articulator of belonging, these activists proposed a way to develop intersectional politics outside the exclusionary and racialised institution of citizenship. The COVID-19 scenario has put conventional notions of country-based citizenship to the test, proving such a citizenship framework insufficient to address international emergencies. I propose to reclaim this activist concept as a way to face the uncertainty provoked by current social transformations. These precarity movements were prophetic in their longing for other institutions and forms of belonging and socio-economic organization, calling for a care-based politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The first lexicon was developed by a chainworkers activist largely inspired by Italian immaterial labour theories (Foti 2004). Then, inspired by and in reaction to this first lexicon, a feminist precarity based project collected more terms: Precarias a la Deriva (2005).

  2. 2.

    EuroMayDay was a yearly demonstration networked across different cities (initially in Italy, then other parts of Europe and finally beyond) where different kinds of flexibilised, informal and precarious subjects joined for public protests and celebrations. It was a kind of ‘coming out’ party with an emphasis on visibilisation of different precarious conditions.

  3. 3.

    Not all Marxist feminist readings agree with this premise (Davis 1983).

  4. 4.

    The Wages for Housework Campaign is surprisingly still going and even growing in visibility, calling for a Global Women’s Strike (GWS) on March 8, demanding for payment for all caring work. In 2021, Women from over 60 countries around the world participated in the protest. Since 2000, the GWS network has continued the call for a living wage for women and other caregivers, and they have led or joined campaigns focused on pay equity, violence against women and the rights of sex workers, among other issues. Wages for Housework and Global Women’s Strike are an international grassroots network campaigning for recognition and payment for all caring work, in the home and outside. They argue that mothers and other care-givers are entitled to a living wage. Their campaign is for a caring economy where human beings and all life are central, not a means to an end, but the goal of finishing power relations of sex, race, class, income, nation, immigration status, city and countryside, age, disability, occupation, gender identity, North and South, etc. On April 9, 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the climate emergency, the GWS and Women of Colour GWS networks released an open letter to governments amplifying their call for a care income. The idea of a care income expands the original demand for wages for housework to include all indispensable yet unpaid (or underpaid) work that involves caring for people and the planet, or caring for life. https://globalwomenstrike.net/ Accessed 11 October 2021.

  5. 5.

    The question of coloniality is explicitly engaged in the introduction of one of the edited volumes by Eskalera Karakola. Otras Inapropiables (hooks et al. 2004) is a collection of iconic texts by third-wave feminist authors. Coloniality is a philosophical and analytical paradigm, helpful in order to understand unspoken hierarchies born out of historical power relations (Mignolo and Escobar 2010). This book had a strong impact on several feminist initiatives in Spain, including Precarias a la Deriva.

  6. 6.

    This debate has been present in the Covid context, where politicians and society argue for economic reasons vs. health reasons. Beyond this framing, authors call for ‘politics of care’ (see Neely and Lopez 2020).

  7. 7.

    https://pumarejo.org/ Accessed 09 October 2021.

  8. 8.

    Tazzioli suggests using the historical genealogy of the “interracial motley crowd” traced by Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Rediker in The Many-Headed Hydra: Sailors, Slaves, Commoners, and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic (2000) studying its crucial role in urban and slave revolts in the eighteenth century.

References

  • Butler, Judith. 2006. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith, Zeynep Gambetti, and Leticia Sabsay, Eds. 2016. Vulnerability in Resistance. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Cortés, Maribel. 2014. A Genealogy of Precarity: A Toolbox for Rearticulating Fragmented Social Realities in and out of the Workplace. Rethinking Marxism 26(2): 206–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2014.888849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Cortés, Maribel. 2019. Caretizenship: Precarity, Social Movements, and the Deleting/Re-Writing of Citizenship. Citizenship Studies 2(1): 19–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1556248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Cortés, Maribel and Sebastian Cobarrubias. 2007. The Sevilla Meeting on Welfare-State Crisis, Precarity and New Social Rights. Meeting report. http://transform.eipcp.net/correspondence/1180176073/ Accessed: 09 October 2021.

  • Dalla Costa, Mariarosa, and Selma James. 1975. The Power of Women and the Subversion of the Community. 3rd ed. Bristol: Falling Wall Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Angela Y. 1983. Women, Race & Class. 1st Vintage Books ed. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doerr, Nicole and Mattoni, Alice. 2014. Public Spaces and Alternative Media Practices in Europe: The Case of the EuroMayDay Parade against Precarity. In Media and Revolt: Strategies and Performances from the 1960s to the Present, 386–403. Berghahn Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenreich, Barbara, and Arlie Russell Hochschild, Eds. 2003. Global Woman: Nannies, Maids, and Sex Workers in the New Economy. 1st publ. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fantone, Laura. 2007. Precarious Changes: Gender and Generational Politics in Contemporary Italy. Feminist Review 87(1): 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federici, Silvia. 1975. Wages against Housework. Bristol: Power of Women Collective and the Falling Wall Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federici, Silvia. 2010. Feminism and the Politics of the Commons in an Era of Primitive Accumulation. In Uses of a Whirlwind, Team Colors Collective, 283–93. Oakland, CA: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foti, Alex. 2004. Precarious Lexicon, Greenpepper Magazine (special issue: Precarity) n. 2 (Amsterdam, Greenpepper Project). 18–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foti, Alex. 2005. Mayday Mayday: Euro Flex Workers Time to Get a Move On. Republicart. Net Precarity (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, Nancy. 1996. Gender Equity and the Welfare State: A Postindustrial Thought Experiment. In Democracy and Difference. Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, Seyla Benhabib, Ed. 219–41. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelabert, Tomeu Sales. 2014. Ciudadanía y Cuidados; apuntes para una política feminista democrática. Daimon Revista Internacional de Filosofia, no. 63 (November): 159–74. https://doi.org/10.6018/daimon/189751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael, and Antonio Negri. 2003. Empire. 13. printing. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, Virginia. 2006. The Ethics of Care: Personal, Political, and Global. Oxford ; New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • hooks, bell, et al. 2004. Otras inapropiables: feminismos desde las fronteras. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, C.L.R. 1938. The Black Jacobins: Toussaint Louverture and the San Domingo Revolution. London: Secker and Warburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Selma. 1974. Sex, Race and Class: The Perspective of Winning: A Selection of Writings, 1952–2011. Oakland: PM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Selma. ed. 1985. Strangers & Sisters: Women, Race & Immigration: Voices from the Conference Black and Immigrant Women Speak Out and Claim Our Rights, London, England, 13 November 1982. 1st ed. Bristol: Falling Wall Press; Distributed by Element Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski, Aviv. 2005. Precarity Explained to Kids (a Medley). Journal of Aesthetics and Protest (4) 2005. http://joaap.org/4/aviv.html Accessed 06 October 2021.

  • Laboratorio Feminista. 2006. Transformaciones del trabajo desde una perspectiva feminista: producción, reproducción, deseo, consumo. Ciempozuelos (Madrid): Tierradenadie Ediciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, Maurizio. 2010. Immaterial Labour. In Paolo Virno and Michael Hardt (Eds.) Radical Thought in Italy: A Potential Politics, Theory out of Bounds 7. Minneapolis, Minn.: Univ. of Minnesota Press, 142–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linebaugh, Peter, and Marcus Rediker. 2000. The Many-Headed Hydra: Sailors, Slaves, Commoners, and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, Ruth. 1997. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. Washington Square, N.Y: New York University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lorey, Isabell. 2015. State of Insecurity: Government of the Precarious. Translated by Aileen Derieg. Futures. London ; New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorey, Isabell. 2018. Precarisation and Care-Citizenship. Griffith Law Review 27(4): 426–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2018.1595339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattoni, Alice. 2012. Media Practices and Protest Politics: How Precarious Workers Mobilise. NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignolo, Walter D., and Arturo Escobar, Eds. 2010. Globalization and the Decolonial Option. 1. publ. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitropoulos, Angela. 2005. ‘Precari-Us?’ Mute: Culture and Politics 1(29): 88–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motakef, Mona. 2019. Recognition and precarity of life arrangement. Towards an enlarged understanding of precarious working and living conditions. Distinktion. Journal of Social Theory, 20(2): 156–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, Abigail H., and Patricia J. Lopez. 2020. Care in Time of Covid in Antipodeonline. https://antipodeonline.org/2020/04/04/care-in-the-time-of-covid-19/ Accessed: 11 October 2021.

  • Neilson, Brett and Ned Rossiter. 2005. From Precarity to Precariousness and Back Again: Labour, Life and Unstable Networks. Fibreculture Journal, 2005. http://five.fibreculturejournal.org/fcj-022-from-precarity-to-precariousness-and-back-again-labour-life-and-unstable-networks/ Accessed 11 October.

  • Papadopoulos, Dimitris, and Vassilis S. Tsianos. 2013. After Citizenship: Autonomy of Migration, Organisational Ontology and Mobile Commons. Citizenship Studies 17(2): 178–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2013.780736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parreñas, Rhacel Salazar. 2001. Servants of Globalization: Migration and Domestic Work. Second edition. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Orozco, Amaia. 2006. Amenaza Tormenta: La Crisis de Los Cuidados y La Reorganizacion Del Sitema Economico. Revista de Economia Critica 5: 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Orozco, Amaia. 2014. Subversión feminista de la economía: aportes para un debate sobre el conflicto capital-vida. Madrid: Traficantes de Sueños.

    Google Scholar 

  • Precarias a la Deriva. 2004a. Una Huelga de Mucho Cuidado (Cuatro Hipotesis). Transversal: European Institute for Progressive Cultural Politics, 2004. https://transversal.at/transversal/0704/precarias-a-la-deriva-2/es Accessed 11 October 2021.

  • Precarias a la Deriva. 2004b. A La Deriva: Por Los Circuitos de La Precariedad Femenina. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.

    Google Scholar 

  • Precarias a la Deriva. 2005. A Precarious Lexicon. Available at http://web.archive.org/web/20061013073807/www.sindominio.net/karakola/precarias/lexicon.htm Accessed: 11 October 2021.

  • Querrien, Anne. 2003. Femmes, Multitude et Propriété. Multitudes, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez Ruiz, Blanca. 2005. Caring Discourse: The Care/Justice Debate Revisited. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez Ruiz, Blanca. 2010. Hacia Un Estado Post-Patriarcal: Feminismo y Cuidadania. Revista de Estudios Politicos (Nueva Epoca), 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tazzioli, Martina. 2020. The Making of Migration: The Biopolitics of Mobility at Europe’s Borders. London: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • TrabajoZero. 2001. Sobre La Feminización Del Trabajo. ContraPoder, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tronto, Joan. 2003. Care as the Work of Citizens. A Modest Proposal. In Marilyn Friedman, Ed. Women and Citizenship, 131–45. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truth, Sojourner, and Mercedes Jabardo Velasco. 2012. Feminismos negros: una antología. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega Solís, Cristina. 2009. Culturas del cuidado en transición: espacios, sujetos e imaginarios en una sociedad de migración. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. Barcelona: UOC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vega Solís, Cristina, Raquel Martínez Buján, and Myriam Paredes Chauca. 2018. Cuidado, comunidad y común: experiencias cooperativas en el sostenimiento de la vida. Madrid: Traficantes de sueños.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, Nira. 1999. What Is ‘Transversal Politics’? Soundings, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2006. Intersectionality and Feminist Politics. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, Nira, and Pnina Werbner. 2005. Women, Citizenship and Difference. New Delhi: Zubaan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maribel Casas-Cortés .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Casas-Cortés, M. (2022). Tinkering with Care and Citizenship in Times of Uncertainty. Contributions by Feminist Precarity Activists. In: Supik, L., et al. Gender, Race and Inclusive Citizenship. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36391-8_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36391-8_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-36390-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-36391-8

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics