Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Behandlungsziele im Justizvollzug

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Behandlung im Strafvollzug

  • 3702 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Behandlungsziele des Justizvollzugs haben sich im Laufe der Zeit gewandelt, orientieren sich in der Gegenwart aber grundsätzlich am Risiko-Bedürfnis-Ansprechbarkeits-Modell. Hierbei ist das dritte Prinzip, die Ansprechbarkeit der Gefangenen auf die Behandlung, am wenigsten erforscht. Die Autoren gehen davon aus, dass genau hier die größten Potentiale für eine Erhöhung der Wirksamkeit der Behandlung im Justizvollzug liegen.

Dafür ist es notwendig, die Ziele des Justizvollzugs mit den Eigenzielen der Gefangenen in Einklang zu bringen, um die Motivation zur Veränderung und die therapeutische Allianz bei diesen zu fördern. Ein Ansatz, mit dem dieses gelingen kann, das „Good Lives"-Modell (Ward 2002), wird vorgestellt und Möglichkeiten der Implementierung in Behandlungsmaßnahmen werden beschrieben.

Da Zielsetzungen in weiten Teilen der bewussten Introspektion nicht zugänglich sind, sollten auch Techniken zur Bearbeitung unbewusster Motivkonflikte und zur Erzeugung erwünschter neuer Automatismen, wie das Zürcher Ressourcen Modell, in der Behandlung eingesetzt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Agnew, R. (2012). Reflection on “A revised strain theory of delinquency”. Social Forces, 91, 33-38

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Guzzo, L., Raynor, P., Rowe, R. C., Rettinger, L. J., Brews, A. & Wormith, J. S. (2012). Are the major risk/need factors predictive of both female and male reoffending? A test with the eight domains of the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 56, 113-133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., Zinger, I., Hoge, R. D., Bonta, J., Gendreau, P. & Cullen, F. T. (1990). Does correctional treatment work? A clinically relevant and psychologically informed meta‐analysis. Criminology, 28, 369-404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. & Vohs, K. (Hrsg.), (2004). Handbook of self-regulation. Research, theory and applications. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechtel, K., Lowenkamp, C. T. & Latessa, E. (2007). Assessing the risk of re-offending for juvenile offenders using the Youth Level of Service/Case Management Inventory. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 45, 85-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., & Andrews, D. A. (2017). The psychology of criminal conduct. Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonta, J., Blais, J. & Wilson, H. A. (2014). A theoretically informed meta-analysis of the risk for general and violent recidivism for mentally disordered offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19, 278-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carl, L. C., Schmucker, M. & Lösel, F. (2020). Predicting attrition and engagement in the treatment of young offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64, 355-374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, C., Fremouw, W., Horacek, T., Cole, A. & Schwartz, R. (2011). Factors associated with treatment acceptance and compliance among incarcerated male sex offenders. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 55, 880-897.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, C., Antonowicz, D. & Andrews, D. A. (2003). The effectiveness of relapse prevention with offenders: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 47, 516-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gannon, T. A., Olver, M. E., Mallion, J. S. & James, M. (2019). Does specialized psychological treatment for offending reduce recidivism? A meta-analysis examining staff and program variables as predictors of treatment effectiveness. Clinical Psychology Review, 101752. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2019.101752.

  • Garrett, T., Oliver, C., Wilcox, D. T. & Middleton, D. (2003). Who cares? The views of sexual offenders about the group treatment they receive. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 15, 323-338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glueck, S. & Glueck, E. (1950). Unraveling juvenile justice. New York: Commonwealth Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R. & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. K. & Harris, A. J. (2000). Where should we intervene? Dynamic predictors of sexual offense recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 27, 6-35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkins, L., Flak, V. E., Beech, A. R. & Woodhams, J. (2012). Evaluation of a community-based sex offender treatment program using a good lives model approach. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 24, 519-543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H., Alge, B.J., Wesson, M. und Hollenbeck, J. (1999). Goal commitment and the goal-setting process: Conceptual clarification and empirical synthesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 885-896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liem, M., & Richardson, N. J. (2014). The role of transformation narratives in desistance among released lifers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 692-712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (1995). What do we learn from 400 research studies on the effectiveness of treatment with juvenile delinquents? In J. McGuire (Hrsg.), What works: Reducing reoffending: Guidelines from research and practice (S. 63–78). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. & Latham, G. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenkamp, C. T., Latessa, E. J., & Holsinger, A. M. (2006). The risk principle in action: What have we learned from 13,676 offenders and 97 correctional programs? Crime & Delinquency, 52, 77-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, R. E., Hanson, R. K. & Thornton, D. (2010). Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: Some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191-217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mews, A., Di Bella, L. & Purver, M. (2017). Impact evaluation of the prison-based core sex offender treatment programme. London, UK: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyers, T. B., Miller, W. R. & Hendrickson, S. M. (2005). How does motivational interviewing work? Therapist interpersonal skill predicts client involvement within motivational interviewing sessions. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 590-598.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olver, M. E., Stockdale, K. C. & Wormith, J. S. (2011). A meta-analysis of predictors of offender treatment attrition and its relationship to recidivism. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 79, 6–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parhar, K. K., Wormith, J. S., Derkzen, D. M. & Beauregard, A. M. (2008). Offender coercion in treatment: A meta-analysis of effectiveness. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 1109–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purvis, M., Ward, T. & Willis, G. M. (2015). The Good Lives Model of offender rehabilitation. In M. Carich & S. Mussack (Hrsg.), The Safer Society Handbook of Adult Sexual Offense Assessment and Treatment (S. 193-220). Brandon, VT: Safer Society Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • SothA der JVA Brandenburg an der Havel (Hrsg.). (2019). Die Behandlungsmaßnahme Zukunfts-ICH mit integriertem Zürcher Ressourcen Modell (ZRM®).

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, M. & Krause, F. (2017). Selbstmanagement – ressourcenorientiert. Grundlagen und Trainingsmanual für die Arbeit mit dem Zürcher Ressourcen Modell ZRM (6. Aufl.) Bern: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgess, D., Woodhams, J. & Tonkin, M. (2016). Treatment engagement from the perspective of the offender: Reasons for noncompletion and completion of treatment – A systematic review. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 60, 1873-1896.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suhling, S. (2005). Lebensziele junger Männer im Strafvollzug. Theoretische und empirische Argumente aus aktionaler Entwicklungsperspektive. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, P., Wright, E. M., Salisbury, E. & Bauman, A. (2010). Women’s risk factors and their contributions to existing risk/needs assessment: The current status of a gender-responsive supplement. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 37, 261-288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakeling, H. C., Webster, S. D. & Mann, R. E. (2005). Sexual offenders’ treatment experience: A qualitative and quantitative investigation. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 171-186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. (2002). Good lives and the rehabilitation of offenders: promises and problems. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7, 513-528.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., Yates, P. M. & Willis, G. M. (2012). The good lives model and the risk need responsivity model: A critical response to Andrews, Bonta, and Wormith (2011). Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 94-110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, H. A., & Gutierrez, L. (2014). Does one size fit all? A meta-analysis examining the predictive ability of the Level of Service Inventory (LSI) with Aboriginal offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41, 196-219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischka, B., Foppe, E., Griepenburg, P., Nuhn-Naber, C. & Rehder, U. (2000). Behandlungsprogramm für Sexualstraftäter (BPS). Lingen: Kriminalpädagogischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Justizministerium des Landes Brandenburg, Potsdam, Deutschland

    Steven Feelgood

  2. Brandenburg, Deutschland

    Joseas R. Helmes

Authors
  1. Steven Feelgood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Joseas R. Helmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven Feelgood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Kriminologischer Dienst des bayerischen Justizvollzugs, Erlangen, Deutschland

    Johann Endres

  2. Bildungsinstitut des niedersächsischen Justizvollzuges, Celle, Deutschland

    Stefan Suhling

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Feelgood, S., Helmes, J.R. (2023). Behandlungsziele im Justizvollzug. In: Endres, J., Suhling, S. (eds) Behandlung im Strafvollzug. Edition Forschung und Entwicklung in der Strafrechtspflege. Springer, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36046-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-36046-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-36045-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-36046-7

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation