Skip to main content

Escaping the Vicious Circle: New Coalition Forms as Alternatives to CDU-SPD Grand Coalitions in the German Länder

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie

Abstract

The German party system has experienced considerable changes in the past years. A decline of the two larger parties CDU/CSU and SPD, the rise of the smaller parties, and the entrance of new parties into parliament cause a significant increase of party system fragmentation. This trend affects well-established routines of government formation, since traditional two-party camp coalitions fail to gain majorities oftentimes. We argue that the most common reaction to such missing majorities, the formation of a so-called grand coalition between the two largest parties, is problematic as a permanent solution. To give advice how alternatives can succeed, we compare coalitions on the German state level and search for factors which favour the formation of such alternative coalition models. Our results indicate that the smaller parties are most crucial and that, besides standard office and policy factors, also questions of relative strength play a role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example Best (2015a) who analyses coalition signals and finds that most of the signals confirm this structure. Linhart (2018) shows that in most of the cases, the respective coalitions have been formed, if they held the necessary majorities.

  2. 2.

    Here and in the following, we refer to the situation as at January 2021.

  3. 3.

    See Sect. 2 for conceptual clarity about this term.

  4. 4.

    Berlin, Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Saxony, Saxony-Anhalt and Thuringia.

  5. 5.

    To avoid confusion with different party names, we refer to the PDS also as ‘The Left’, also when we write about the time before 2007.

  6. 6.

    On the Länder level, we find more than three options, for example when we include regional parties. As these are exceptional cases and we are interested in general patterns, we skip these cases in our discussion. Further, we are not interested in three-party coalitions of CDU, SPD and Greens, which have been built only in cases where CDU and SPD are not the strongest parties.

  7. 7.

    One of our Reviewers hinted to the point that it is nothing unusual that governing parties are losing votes after elections. This is absolutely right. To account for this argument, we compared average losses after grand coalitions and classical coalitions in the Länder level since 1990. Average losses indeed also occurred after classical coalitions but were considerably smaller (−1.8% points) than after grand coalitions (−2.8% points).

  8. 8.

    Further, parties aim at reducing the number of coalition parties in order to avoid bargaining costs (Leiserson 1968). As the number of parties is largely constant for our setup (two parties in grand coalitions, three parties for most of the alternatives under research), we omit a further discussion of this variable.

  9. 9.

    Table 3 does not include the government formations in Saxony 2004 and 2014, Thuringia 2014 and Hesse 2018, since in these four cases, CDU and SPD were not the strongest parties.

  10. 10.

    The larger party can be better off regarding its office (i) or policy utility (ii), it can be the strongest party in parliament (iii) and have increased its vote share (iv). Also up to two smaller parties can have higher vote shares than in the election before (v, vi), and they can be quite safe about the legal threshold (vii, viii). Finally, the camp-changing party can be stronger than the other small coalition party (ix). For single cases, the maximum can be smaller, for example for black-green coalitions in which only one smaller party is member.

References

  • Aggarwal C.C., Hinneburg A., & Keim D.A. (2001). On the Surprising Behavior of Distance Metrics in High Dimensional Space. In J. Van den Bussche, & V. Vianu (eds), Database Theory — ICDT 2001. ICDT 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (pp. 420–434). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen-Smith, D., & Banks, J. (1988). Elections, coalitions, and legislative outcomes. American Political Science Review, 82, 405–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäck, H., & Dumont, P. (2007). Combining Large-n and Small-n Strategies: The Way Forward in Coalition Research. West European Politics, 30, 467–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäck, H., Debus, M., Müller, J., & Bäck, H. (2013). Regional government formation in varying multilevel contexts: A comparison of eight European countries. Regional Studies, 47, 368–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, V. (2015a). Koalitionssignale bei Landtagswahlen. Eine empirische Analyse von 1990 bis 2012. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, V. (2015b). Komplexe Koalitionen, perplexe Wähler, perforierte Parteiprofile. Eine kritische Revision jüngerer Befunde zur deutschen Koalitionsdemokratie und ein Reformvorschlag. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 46, 82–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuninger, T., Debus, M., Müller, J., & Stecker, C. (2019). Party Competition and Government Formation in Germany: Business as Usual or New Patterns? German Politics, 28, 80–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bytzek, E. (2013). Wer profitiert von Großen Koalitionen? Öffentliche Wahrnehmung und Wirklichkeit. In F. Decker, & E. Jesse (eds.), Die deutsche Koalitionsdemokratie vor der Bundestagswahl 2013 (pp. 437–455). Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R., & Cox, G.W. (2007). The Logic of Gamson’s Law: Pre-election Coalitions and Portfolio Allocations, American Journal of Political Science, 51, 300–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub, J. (2006). Presidentialism, Electoral Identifiability, and Budget Balances in Democratic Systems. American Political Science Review, 100, 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, A. (2014). Difficult Decisions. The GAL and Schwarz-Grün in Hamburg, German Politics & Society, 32, 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Däubler, T., & Debus, M. (2009). Government formation and policy formulation in the German states. Regional & Federal Studies, 19, 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debus, M. (2008). Party Competition and Government Formation in Multilevel Settings: Evidence from Germany. Government & Opposition, 43, 505–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W. (1961). A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review, 26, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganghof, S. (2018). A New Political System Model: Semi-Parliamentary Government. European Journal of Political Research, 57, 261–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garzia, D., & Marschall, S. (2012). Voting Advice Applications Under Review: The State of Research. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 5, 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. (2018). ‘Sowing the seeds of love’? Determinants of local coalition formation and termination between the CDU and the Greens, 1994–2016. German Politics, 27, 339–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M., & Niendorf, T. (2017). Determinanten der Bildung nicht-etablierter Koalitionen in den deutschen Bundesländern, 1990–2016. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 11, 365–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hague, R., & Harrop, M. (2010). Comparative Government and Politics. An Introduction. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hough, D., & Verge, T. (2009). A sheep in wolf’s clothing or a gift from heaven? Left-left coalitions in comparative perspective. Regional & Federal Studies, 19, 37–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, D., Koß, M., & Olsen, J. (2007). The Left Party in Contemporary German Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, W. (2017). Grand coalitions and democratic dysfunction: Two warnings from Central Europe. Government & Opposition, 52, 329–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, S. (2010). The Ubiquity and Strategic Complexity of Grand Coalition in the German Federal System. German Politics, 19, 286–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leiserson, M.A. (1968). Factions and coalitions in one‐party Japan: An interpretation based on the theory of games. American Political Science Review, 62, 70–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linhart, E. (2018). Coalition building on the federal and on the Länder level in Germany. In A. Albala, & J.M. Reniu (eds.), Coalition Politics and Federalism (pp. 33–51). Cham: Springer International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhart E. (2021). Koalitionen unter veränderten Rahmenbedingungen. In K.-R. Korte, & M. Florack (eds.), Handbuch Regierungsforschung (online first). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linhart, E., Pappi, F.U., & Schmitt, R. (2008). Die proportionale Ministerienaufteilung in deutschen Koalitionsregierungen: Akzeptierte Norm oder das Ausnutzen strategischer Vorteile? Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 49, 46–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, L., & Stevenson, R. (2001). Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies. American Journal of Political Science, 45, 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, W.C., & Strøm, K. (1999). Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oppelland, T., & Träger, H. (2016). Ein neuer Koalitionstyp: Voraussetzungen für rot-rote bzw. rot-rot-grüne Koalitionen unter Führung der Linken auf Landesebene. Zeitschrift für Politik, 63, 24–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappi, F.U., Herzog, A., & Schmitt, R. (2006): Koalitionssignale und die Kombination von Erst- und Zweitstimmen bei den Bundestagswahlen 1953 bis 2005. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 37, 493–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saalfeld, T. (2000). Coalitions in Germany: Stable Parties, Chancellor Democracy and the Art of Informal Settlement. In W.C. Müller & K. Strøm (eds.), Coalition Government in Western Europe (pp. 32–85). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saalfeld, T. (2015). Coalition Formation and Coalition Governance after the Election of 2013. In G. D’Ottavio & T. Saalfeld (eds.), Germany after the 2013 Elections: Breaking the Mould of Post-Unification Politics? (pp. 203–224). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seemann, W. & Bukow, S. (2010). Große Koalitionen in Deutschland. In S. Bukow, & W. Seemann (eds.), Die Große Koalition. Regierung – Politik – Parteien 2005–2009 (pp. 9–40). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shikano, S., & Linhart, E. (2010). Coalition-formation as a result of policy and office motivations in the German federal states: An empirical estimate of the weighting parameters of both motivations. Party Politics, 16, 111–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strøm, K. (1990). Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Switek, N. (2010). Neue Regierungsbündnisse Braucht das Land! Zeitschrift für Politikberatung, 3, 177–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Switek, N. (2015). Bündnis 90/Die Grünen. Koalitionsentscheidungen in den Ländern. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick, P.V., & Druckman, J.N. (2006). The Portfolio Allocation Paradox: An Investigation into the Nature of a Very Strong But Puzzling Relationship, European Journal of Political Research, 45, 635–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Linhart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Linhart, E., Switek, N. (2022). Escaping the Vicious Circle: New Coalition Forms as Alternatives to CDU-SPD Grand Coalitions in the German Länder. In: Sauermann, J., Tepe, M., Debus, M. (eds) Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie. Jahrbuch für Handlungs- und Entscheidungstheorie. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35878-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-35878-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-35877-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-35878-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics