Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung im digitalen Zeitalter pp 71–98Cite as

Inklusion von Menschen ohne Internet in zufallsbasierte Onlinepanel-Umfragen

Part of the Schriftenreihe der ASI - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Institute book series (SASI)

Zusammenfassung

Zur Beantwortung vieler Forschungsfragen in den Sozialwissenschaften ist es unerlässlich Umfragen durchzuführen, mittels derer die Forschenden Einblicke in die Einstellungen und das Verhalten der Gesamtbevölkerung erlangen. Um zu gewährleisten, dass die aus den Umfragedaten generierten Erkenntnisse auf die Gesamtbevölkerung übertragbar sind, werden klassischerweise zufallsbasierte Stichproben gezogen, beispielsweise aus Bevölkerungsregistern. Die zufällig ausgewählten Personen oder Haushalte werden daraufhin anhand der aus dem Stichprobenrahmen verfügbaren Informationen kontaktiert und befragt.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  • Antoun, C. 2015. Who Are the Internet Users, Mobile Internet Users, and Mobile-Mostly Internet Users?: Demographic Differences across Internet-Use Subgroups in the U.S.... In: Toninelli, D, Pinter, R & de Pedraza, P (eds.) Mobile Research Methods: Opportunities and Challenges of Mobile Research Methodologies , Pp. 99–117. London: Ubiquity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blank, G., & Groselj, D. (2014). Dimensions of Internet use: amount, variety, and types. Information, Communication & Society, 17(4), 417-435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, A. G., Cornesse, C., Friedel, S., Krieger, U., Fikel, M., Rettig, T., Wenz, A., Juhl, S., Lehrer, R., Möhring, K., Naumann, E. & Reifenscheid, M. (2020). High Frequency and High Quality Survey Data Collection. Survey Research Methods 14(2), 171-178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, A. G., Herzing, J. M., Cornesse, C., Sakshaug, J. W., Krieger, U., & Bossert, D. (2017). Does the recruitment of offline households increase the sample representativeness of probability-based online panels? Evidence from the German internet panel. Social Science Computer Review 35(4), 498-520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, A. G., Bosnjak, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A. S., Das, M., Douhou, S., & Krieger, U. (2016). A comparison of four probability-based online and mixed-mode panels in Europe. Social Science Computer Review 34(1), 8-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, A. G., Gathmann, C., & Krieger, U. (2015). Setting up an online panel representative of the general population: The German Internet Panel. Field methods 27(4), 391-408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnjak, M., Dannwolf, T., Enderle, T., Schaurer, I., Struminskaya, B., Tanner, A., & Weyandt, K. W. (2018). Establishing an open probability-based mixed-mode panel of the general population in Germany: The GESIS panel. Social Science Computer Review 36(1), 103-115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosnjak, M., Haas, I., Galesic, M., Kaczmirek, L., Bandilla, W., & Couper, M. P. (2013). Sample Composition Discrepancies in Different Stages of a Probability-based Online Panel. Field Methods 25(4), 339–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium für Verkehr und digitale Infrastruktur (2020). Der Breitbandatlas. https://www.bmvi.de/DE/Themen/Digitales/Breitbandausbau/Breitbandatlas-Karte/start.html. Zugegriffen: 29. Januar 2020.

  • Callegaro, M., Baker, R., Bethlehem, J. G., Göritz, A. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2014). Online panel research. History, concepts, aapplication and a look at the future. In M. Callegaro, R. Baker, J. Bethlehem, A. S. Göritz, J. A. Krosnick, & P. J. Lavrakas (Hrsg.), Online Panel Research. A Data Quality Perspective (S. 1–22). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • CentERdata (2020). LISS Panel. https://www.lissdata.nl/. Zugegriffen: 10.06.2020.

  • Center for Asian Public Opinion Research & Collaboration Initiative (CAPORCI, 2020). KAMOS. http://www.cnukamos.com/eng/main/. Zugegriffen: 10.06.2020.

  • Cornesse, C., Blom, A. G., Dutwin, D., Krosnick, J. A., De Leeuw, E. D., Legleye, S., Pasek, J., Pennay, D., Phillips, B., Sakshaug J. W., Struminskaya, B., & Wenz, A. (2020). A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Empirical Evidence on Probability and Nonprobability Sample Survey Research. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology 8(1), 4–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornesse, C., Schaurer, I. (2021). The long-term impact of different offline population inclusion strategies in probability-based online panels: Evidence from the German Internet Panel and the GESIS Panel. Social Science Computer Review, doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320984131.

  • Destatis (2020). Durchschnittliche Nutzung des Internets durch Personen nach Altersgruppen. https://www.destatis.de/DE/Themen/Gesellschaft-Umwelt/Einkommen-Konsum-Lebensbedingungen/IT-Nutzung/Tabellen/durchschnittl-nutzung-alter-ikt.html. Zugegriffen: 28. Januar 2020.

  • DiSogra, C., & Callegaro, M. (2016). Metrics and Design Tool for Building and Evaluating Probability-Based Online Panels. Social Science Computer Review, 34(1), 26–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckman, S. (2016). Does the Inclusion of Non-Internet Households in a Web Panel Reduce Coverage Bias? Social Science Computer Review 34(1), 41–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eynon, R., & Helsper, E. (2011). Adults learning online: Digital choice and/or digital exclusion? New Media & Society, 13(4), 534–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • GALLUP (2020). Gallup Panel. https://www.gallup.com/analytics/213695/gallup-panel.aspx. Zugegriffen: 10.06.2020.

  • Heerwegh, D. (2009). Mode differences between face-to-face and web surveys: an experimental investigation of data quality and social desirability effects. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 21(1), 111-121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The emergence of a “digital underclass” in Great Britain and Sweden: Changing reasons for digital exclusion. New Media & Society, 19(8), 1253–1270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzing, J. M. E., & Blom, A. G. (2018). The Influence of a Person’s Digital Affinity on Unit Nonresponse and Attrition in an Online Panel. Social Science Computer Review, 089443931877475.

    Google Scholar 

  • Internet World Stats. Internet Usage in the European Union. https://www.internetworldstats.com/stats9.htm. Zugegriffen: 28. Januar 2020.

  • Ipsos (2020). KnowledgePanel. https://www.ipsos.com/en-us/solutions/public-affairs/knowledgepanel. Zugegriffen: 10.06.2020.

  • Jessop, Curtis. 2017. „Developing the NatCen Panel“. http://www.natcen.ac.uk/media/1484228/Developing-the-NatCen-Panel-V2.pdf. Zugegriffen 27. Mai 2019.

  • König, R., Seifert, A., & Doh, M. (2018). Internet use among older Europeans: an analysis based on SHARE data. Universal Access in the Information Society 17(3), 621–633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leenheer, J., & Scherpenzeel, A. C. (2013). Does it pay off to include non-Internet households in an Internet panel? International Journal of Internet Science 8(1), 17–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • NatCen Social Research (2020). NatCen Panel. http://www.natcen.ac.uk/taking-part/studies-in-field/natcen-panel/. Zugegriffen 10. Juni 2020.

  • NORC (2019). Technical Overview of the AmeriSpeak Panel. NORC’s Probability-Based Household Panel. https://amerispeak.norc.org/Documents/Research/AmeriSpeak%20Technical%20Overview%202019%2002%2018.pdf. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2020.

  • Pagel, L., & Schupp, J. (2019). Die Haushaltspanelstudie sozio-ökonomisches Panel (SOEP) und ihre Potenziale für Sekundäranalysen. In: M.-C. Begemann und K. Birkelbach (Hrsg.). Forschungsdaten für die Kinder- und Jugendhilfe (S.165-186). Springer VS, Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center (2019). Growing and Improving Pew Research Center’s American Trends Panel. https://www.pewresearch.org/methods/2019/02/27/growing-and-improving-pew-research-centers-american-trends-panel/. Zugegriffen: 09.06.2020.

  • Pforr, K., & Dannwolf, T. (2017). What do we lose with online-only surveys? Estimating the bias in selected political variables due to online mode restriction. Statistics, Politics and Policy 8(1), 105-120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon 9 (5): 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probit Inc. (2020). Probit Panel. https://probit.ca/. Zugegriffen: 10. Juni 2020.

  • Revilla, M., Cornilleau, A., Cousteaux, A.-S., Legleye, S., & de Pedraza, P. (2016). What Is the Gain in a Probability-Based Online Panel of Providing Internet Access to Sampling Units Who Previously Had No Access? Social Science Computer Review 34(4), 479–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rookey, B. D., Hanway, S., & Dillman, D. A. (2008). Does a Probability-Based Household Panel Benefit from Assignment to Postal Response as an Alternative to Internet-Only? Public Opinion Quarterly 72(5), 962–984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaurer, I., & Weiß, B. (2020). Investigating selection bias of online surveys on coronavirus-related behavioral outcomes. Survey Research Methods 14(2), 103-108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleife, K. (2010). What really matters: Regional versus individual determinants of the digital divide in Germany. Research Policy, 39(1), 173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.11.003. Zugegriffen: 12. Juni 2020.

  • Seifert, A., & Schelling, H. R. (2018). Seniors online: Attitudes toward the internet and coping with everyday life. Journal of Applied Gerontology 37(1), 99-109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. D., Olson, K., & Millar, M. M. (2014). Identifying predictors of survey mode preference. Social Science Research, 48, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.06.002

  • Statista (2020). Global digital population as of April 2020. https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2020.

  • Toepoel, V. (2016). The Impact of Non-Coverage in Web Surveys in a Country with High Internet Penetration: Is It (Still) Useful to Provide Equipment to Non-Internet Households in the Netherlands? International Journal of Internet Science 11(1), 33-50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toepoel, V., & Hendriks, Y. (2016). The Impact of Non-Coverage in Web Surveys in a Country with High Internet Penetration: Is It (Still) Useful to Provide Equipment to Non-Internet Households in the Netherlands? 11(1), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Laar, E., Van Deursen, A. J., Van Dijk, J. A., & De Haan, J. (2017). The relation between 21st-century skills and digital skills: A systematic literature review. Computers in human behavior 72, 577-588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Universität Mannheim (2020). German Internet Panel. https://www.uni-mannheim.de/gip/. Zugegriffen: 10. Juni 2020.

  • University of Southern California (USC; 2017). Understanding America Study. https://uasdata.usc.edu/index.php. Zugegriffen: 10. Juni 2020.

  • Vannieuwenhuyze, J. T., & Loosveldt, G. (2013). Evaluating relative mode effects in mixed-mode surveys: three methods to disentangle selection and measurement effects. Sociological Methods & Research 42(1), 82-104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasmer, M., Blohm, M., Walter, J., Jutz, R., Scholz, E. (2017). Konzeption und Durchführung der „Allgemeinen Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften (ALLBUS) 2014. GESIS Paper 2017 | 20. https://www.gesis.org/en/allbus/contents-search/methodological-reports. Zugegriffen: 09. Juni 2020.

  • Weiß, Bernd, Henning Silber, Bella Struminskaya, and Gabriele Durrant. 2019. „Mobile Befragungen.“ In Handbuch Methoden der empirischen Sozialforschung, edited by Baur Nina, and Blasius Jörg, 801-812. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universität Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland

    Carina Cornesse

  2. Mannheim, Deutschland

    Ines Schaurer

Authors
  1. Carina Cornesse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ines Schaurer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carina Cornesse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Nürnberg, Germany

    Prof. Dr. Tobias Wolbring

  2. Fachbereich Soziologie, Katholische Universität Eichstätt- Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany

    Dr. Heinz Leitgöb

  3. Institut für Soziologie, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Duisburg, Germany

    Frank Faulbaum

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cornesse, C., Schaurer, I. (2021). Inklusion von Menschen ohne Internet in zufallsbasierte Onlinepanel-Umfragen. In: Wolbring, T., Leitgöb, H., Faulbaum, F. (eds) Sozialwissenschaftliche Datenerhebung im digitalen Zeitalter. Schriftenreihe der ASI - Arbeitsgemeinschaft Sozialwissenschaftlicher Institute. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34396-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-34396-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-34395-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-34396-5

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

search

Navigation