Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Raum und internationale Politik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen

  • 304 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Dieses Kapitel leistet einen Beitrag zur Raumwende in der internationalen Politik. Die ‚Raumwende‘ bezeichnet eine Wende von einem absolutistischen Raumverständnis, in dem Räume als fixe, permanent existierende Behälter verstanden werden, hin zu einem relationalen Verständnis, das die Konstituiertheit von Raum durch soziale Interaktion in den Fokus nimmt. Räume existieren demnach nicht unabhängig von Handlung, sondern sind sowohl deren Produkt als auch der Kontext, in dem Handeln möglich ist. Vor diesen Hintergrund möchte das Kapitel das Konzept Raum für die internationale Politik fruchtbar machen und dessen Relevanz sowie Anwendbarkeit beleuchten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Im Folgenden werden die Begriffe mikro und makro analog zur Verwendung in der rezipierten Literatur gebraucht. Aus einer raumtheoretischen Perspektive können sie so abgeschlossen und beziehungslos nicht aufrechterhalten werden.

Literatur

  • Acharya, A. 2016. Advancing global IR: Challenges, contentions, and contributions. International Studies Review 18(1): 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. 1994. The territorial trap: The geographical assumptions of international relations theory. Review of International Political Economy 1(1): 53–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, M., und B. Buzan. 2017. On the subject matter of international relations. Review of International Studies 43(5): 898–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. 2003. Sovereignty without territoriality: Notes for a postnational geography. In Anthropology of space and place: Locating culture, Hrsg. S. Low und D. Lawrence-Zúñiga, 337–350. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Autesserre, S. 2014. Peaceland: Conflict resolution and the everyday politics of international intervention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M., und M. Finnemore. 2004. Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bast, J. 2017. Völker- und unionsrechtliche Anstöße zur Entterritorialisierung des Rechts. Veröffentlichungen der Vereinigung der Deutschen Staatsrechtslehrer 76:278–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berking, H. 2006. Raumtheoretische Paradoxien im Globalisierungsdiskurs. In Die Macht des Lokalen in einer Welt ohne Grenzen, Hrsg. H. Berking, 7–24. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhambra, G. K. 2010. Historical sociology, international relations and connected histories. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 23(1): 127–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilgin, P. 2008. Thinking past ,Western‘ IR? Third World Quarterly 29(1): 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Björkdahl, A., und S. Buckley-Zistel, Hrsg. 2016. Spatializing peace and conflict: Mapping the production of places, sites and scales of violence. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkdahl, A., und S. Kappler. 2017. Peacebuilding and spatial transformation: Peace, space and place. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Björkdahl, A., S. Buckley-Zistel, S. Kappler, J. Mannergren Selimovic, und T. Williams. 2017. Memory politics, cultural heritage and peace: Introducing an analytical framework to study mnemonic formations. Working Paper 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Björkdahl, A., M. Hall, und T. Svensson. 2019. Everyday international relations: Editors’ introduction. Cooperation and Conflict 54(2): 123–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. 1999. Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society 28(1): 39–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., und S. Elden. 2009. Henri Lefebvre on state, space, territory. International Political Sociology 3(4): 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, L., und M. Albert. 1995. Entgrenzung der Staatenwelt: Zur Analyse weltgesellschaftlicher Entwicklungstendenzen. Zeitschrift für internationale Beziehungen 2(2): 259–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley-Zistel, Susanne. 2021. Raum in den internationalen Beziehungen. Ein Überblick. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bueger, C. 2013. Actor-network theory, methodology, and international organization. International Political Sociology 7(3): 338–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueger, C., und F. Gadinger. 2018. International practice theory. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno Lacy, R., und H. van Houtum. 2015. Lies, Damned Lies & Maps: The EU’s cartopolitical invention of Europe. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 23(4): 477–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B., und G. Lawson. 2015. The global transformation: History, modernity and the making of international relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chojnacki, S., und B. Engels. 2016. Overcoming the material/social divide: Conflict studies from the perspective of spatial theory. In Spatializing peace and conflict: Mapping the production of places, sites and scales of violence, Hrsg. A. Björkdahl und S. Buckley-Zistel, 25–40. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choucri, N. 2012. Cyberpolitics in international relations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Christmann, Gabriela B., Hrsg. 2016. Zur kommunikativen Konstruktion von Räumen: Theoretische Konzepte und empirische Analysen. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colás, A. 2013. International civil society: Social movements in world politics. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conrad, S., und S. Randeria. 2002. Jenseits des Eurozentrismus: Postkoloniale Perspektiven in den Geschichts-und Kulturwissenschaften. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, Janet. 2008. Geographies of transnational feminisms: The politics of place and scale in the World March of Women. Social Politics 15(2): 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, D., und H. Leitner. 1997. The political construction of scale. Political Geography 16(2): 93–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, K., B. Engels, und O. Pye. 2016. Sozial-räumliche Dynamiken der Agrartreibstoffe: Transnationale Netzwerke, skalare Rekonfigurationen, umkämpfte Orte und Territorien. PROKLA. Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialwissenschaft 46(184): 423–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diez, T. 2004. Europe’s others and the return of geopolitics. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17(2): 319–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour, P., und I. Giraud. 2007. Globalization and political change in the women’s movement: The politics of scale and political empowerment in the World March of Women. Social Science Quarterly 88(5): 1152–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher Onar, N., und K. Nicolaïdis. 2013. The decentring agenda: Europe as a post-colonial power. Cooperation and Conflict 48(2): 283–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flint, C. 2006. Introduction to geopolitics. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Forde, Susan. 2019. Cartographies of transformation in Mostar and Cape Town: Mapping as a methodology in divided cities. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 13(2): 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goettlich, K. 2019. The rise of linear borders. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190846626.013.563.

  • Hafner-Burton, E. M., M. Kahler, und A. H. Montgomery. 2009. Network analysis for international relations. International Organization 63(3): 559–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heathershaw, J., und D. Lambach. 2008. Introduction: Post-conflict spaces and approaches to statebuilding. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 2(3): 269–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henrizi, A. 2016. Local Agency in ‚global‘ spaces? The engagement of Iraqi women’s NGOs with CEDAW. In Spatializing peace and conflict: Mapping the production of places, sites and scales of violence, Hrsg. A. Björkdahl und S. Buckley-Zistel, 118–137. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, S., und S. Karakayali. 2018. Migration’s lines of flight. Borders as spaces of contestation. In The Routledge handbook of transregional studies, Hrsg. M. Middell, 416–423. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, S., B. Kasparek, und M. Schwertl. 2018. Regime ist nicht Regime ist nicht Regime. Zum theoriepolitischen Einsatz der ethnografischen (Grenz-) Regimeanalyse. In Was ist ein Migrationsregime? What Is a Migration Regime? Hrsg. A. Pott, C. Rass, und F. Wolff, 257–283. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hönke, J. 2017. Neue politische Geographien von Konflikt und Widerstand: Eine Einleitung. IReflect 4(S1): 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hönke, J. 2018. Beyond the gatekeeper state: African infrastructure hubs as sites of experimentation. Third World Thematics: A TWQ Journal 3(3): 347–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E. 2016. Affective communities in world politics: Collective emotions after trauma. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchison, E., und R. Bleiker. 2014. Theorizing emotions in world politics. International Theory 6(3): 491–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappler, S. 2013. Everyday legitimacy in post-conflict spaces: The creation of social legitimacy in Bosnia-Herzegovina’s cultural arenas. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding 7(1): 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E., und K. Sikkink. 2014. Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koloma Beck, T. 2017. Räume der Sicherheit – Räume der Gewalt: Topologien des Alltags in der afghanischen Hauptstadt Kabul. Zeitschrift für Friedens-und Konfliktforschung 6(1): 6–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman, S. 2015. Social movements. In The Wiley Blackwell companion to political geography, Hrsg. J. Agnew, V. Mamadouh, A. J. Secor, und J. Sharp, 339–351. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Korf, B., und C. Schetter. 2016. Räume des Ausnahmezustands: Carl Schmitts Raumphilosophie, Frontiers und Ungoverned Territories. PERIPHERIE – Politik• Ökonomie• Kultur 32(126/127): 147–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil, F. 1986. Of systems, boundaries, and territoriality: An inquiry into the formation of the state system. World Politics 39(1): 27–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambach, D. 2020. The territorialization of cyberspace. International Studies Review 22(3): 482–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, Henri. 1991. The production of space. Übersetzt von D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löw, Martina. 2013. Raumsoziologie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löw, Martina. 2016. Kommunikation über Raum. Methodologische Überlegungen zur Analyse der Konstitution von Räumen. In Zur kommunikativen Konstruktion von Räumen: Theoretische Konzepte und empirische Analysen, Hrsg. G. B. Christmann, 79–88. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mannergren Selimovic, J. 2019. Everyday agency and transformation: Place, body and story in the divided city. Cooperation and Conflict 54(2): 131–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, G. E. 1995. Ethnography in/of the world system: The emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24(1): 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masson, D. 2010. Transnationalizing feminist and women’s movements: Toward a scalar approach. In Solidarities beyond borders: Transnationalizing women’s movements, Hrsg. P. Dufour, D. Masson, und D. Caouette, 35–55. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B. 2000. Geography and social movements: Comparing antinuclear activism in the Boston area. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, B., W. Nicholis, und J. Beaumont, Hrsg. 2016. Spaces of contention: Spatialities and social movements. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. 2012. Opening the black box of the organization: Socio-material practices of geopolitical ordering. Political Geography 31(6): 379–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pain, R. 2015. Intimate war. Political Geography 44:64–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, G. 2012. Bordering and ordering the twenty-first century: Understanding borders. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • della Porta, D., und M. Caiani. 2009. Social movements and europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J., und C. Schetter. 2016. Conditioned sovereignty: The creation and legitimation of spaces of violence in counterterrorism operations of the „war on terror“. Alternatives 41(3): 119–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raanan, Malka Greenberg, und Noam Shoval. 2014. Mental maps compared to actual spatial behavior using GPS data: A new method for investigating segregation in cities. Cities 36:28–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rau, Susanne. 2017. Räume: Konzepte, Wahrnehmungen, Nutzungen. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risse, T. 2007. Transnational actors and world politics. In Corporate ethics and corporate governance, Hrsg. W. C. Zimmerli, K. Richter und M. Holzinger, 251–286. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. 1999. Globalization and its discontents: Essays on the new mobility of people and money. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S., Hrsg. 2016. Global networks, linked cities. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink, K. 2011. The justice cascade: How human rights prosecutions are changing world politics (The norton series in world politics). New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smirl, L. 2015. Spaces of aid: How cars, compounds and hotels shape humanitarianism. London: Zed Books Ltd.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. 1992. Geography, difference and the politics of scale. In Postmodernism and the social sciences, Hrsg. J. Doherty, E. Graham und M. Malek, 57–79. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, Edward W. 1989. Postmodern geographies: The reassertion of space in critical social theory. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, Edward W. 2008. Taking space personally. In The spatial turn: Interdisciplinary perspectives, Hrsg. B. Warf und S. Arias, 11–35. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Ty, und Brent J. Steele. 2017. Micro-moves in international relations theory. European Journal of International Relations 23(2): 267–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, S., und P. Le Billon. 2016. Violence and space: An introduction to the geographies of violence. Political Geography 52:1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sylvester, C. 2013. War as experience: Contributions from international relations and feminist analysis. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. 1996. States and opportunities: The political structuring of social movements. In Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings, Hrsg. D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, und M. N. Zald, 41–61. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, Arlene B., und Ole Wæver, Hrsg. 2009. International relations scholarship around the world. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turton, H. L. 2015. International relations and American dominance: A diverse discipline. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Williams, N. 2009. Border politics: The limits of sovereign power. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Williams, N. 2016. Borders. In Critical imaginations in international relations, Hrsg. A. Ní Mhurchú und R. Shindo, 11–27. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. 1993. Inside/outside: International relations as political theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wemheuer-Vogelaar, W., N. J. Bell, M. Navarrete Morales, und M. J. Tierney. 2016. The IR of the beholder: Examining global IR using the 2014 TRIP survey. International Studies Review 18(1): 16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, A., und N. Glick Schiller. 2002. Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation – state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks 2(4): 301–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuval-Davis, Nira, Georgie Wemyss, und Kathryn Cassidy. 2019. Bordering. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Conflict Studies, Philipps University Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland

    Susanne Buckley-Zistel

Authors
  1. Susanne Buckley-Zistel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Buckley-Zistel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Frank Sauer

  2. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Luba von Hauff

  3. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Carlo Masala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Buckley-Zistel, S. (2024). Raum und internationale Politik. In: Sauer, F., von Hauff, L., Masala, C. (eds) Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_52

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33952-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33953-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation