Nichtwestliche Perspektiven in den Internationalen Beziehungen

Chu, Sinan

doi:10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_50

Sinan Chu⁴

288 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

In den letzten beiden Jahrzehnten war ein wachsendes Forschungsgebiet zu beobachten, das sich der Frage widmet, wie wir durch die Beschäftigung mit Erfahrungen und Perspektiven aus dem Nichtwesten über die Mainstream- bzw. disziplinären IB hinausgehen sollten. Der vorliegende Aufsatz untersucht die wichtigsten Forschungsprojekte der letzten beiden Jahrzehnte, die sich auf die Untersuchung „nichtwestlicher IB“ beziehen. Insbesondere werde ich mich mit den Forschungsgebieten der „nichtwestliche IB-Theorie“, des „Worlding jenseits des Westens“, den „postwestlichen IB“, den „globalen IB“ und den eher neueren „pluriversalen IB“ beschäftigen, um eine nützliche Einführung in dieses relativ junge, aber wichtige Thema zu geben. Außerdem zeigt diese Untersuchung, dass ein zunehmend globaler, multiperspektivischer Dialog in der Wissenschaftsgemeinschaft sowohl inner- als auch außerhalb der Disziplin der IB stattgefunden hat, trotz der anhaltenden und erheblichen Meinungsverschiedenheiten in konzeptionellen, theoretischen und philosophischen Fragen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Chapter: USD 29.95; Price excludes VAT (USA)

eBook: USD 189.00; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Hardcover Book: USD 199.99; Price excludes VAT (USA)

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

1.
Amitav Acharya wurde für den Zeitraum 2014–2015 zum Präsidenten der International Studies Association (ISA) gewählt.

Literatur

Acharya, Amitav. 2011. Dialogue and discovery: In search of international relations theories beyond the west. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(3): 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811406574.
Article Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2014. Global International Relations (IR) and regional worlds: A new agenda for international studies. International Studies Quarterly 58(4): 647–659.
Article Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, und Barry Buzan. 2007. Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 7(3): 287–312.
Article Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, und Barry Buzan. 2010a. Conclusion: On the possibility of a non- Western international relations theory. In Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, Hrsg. Amitav Acharya und Barry Buzan, 221–238. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, und Barry Buzan, Hrsg. 2010b. Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav, und Barry Buzan. 2010c. Why is there no non-Western international relations theory? An introduction. In Non-Western international relations theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, Hrsg. Amitav Acharya und Barry Buzan, 1–25. London: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Agathangelou, Anna M., und L. H. M. Ling. 2004. The house of IR: From family power politics to the poisies of worldism. International Studies Review 6(4): 21–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-9488.2004.00448.x.
Article Google Scholar
Alejandro, Audrey. 2017. The narrative of academic dominance: How to overcome performing the ,core-periphery‘ divide. International Studies Review 19(2): 300–309.
Google Scholar
Alejandro, Audrey. 2019. Western dominance in international relations? The internationalisation of IR in Brazil and India. Worlding beyond the west. Abingdon/New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Aydınlı, Ersel, und Gonca Biltekin. 2017. Widening the world of IR: A typology of homegrown theorizing. All Azimuth: A Journal of Foreign Policy and Peace 7(1): 45–68. https://doi.org/10.20991/allazimuth.328427.
Article Google Scholar
Aydinli, Ersel, und Gonca Biltekin, Hrsg. 2018. Widening the world of international relations: Homegrown theorizing, Worlding beyond the west 15. London/New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Google Scholar
Bilgin, Pinar. 2008. Thinking past ,Western‘ IR? Third World Quarterly 29(1): 5–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436590701726392.
Article Google Scholar
Bilgin, Pinar. 2016. ‚Contrapuntal reading‘ as a method, an ethos, and a metaphor for global IR. International Studies Review 18(1): 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv018.
Article Google Scholar
Blanchard, Eric M., und Shuang Lin. 2016. Gender and non-Western ,global‘ IR: Where are the women in Chinese international relations theory? International Studies Review 18(1): 48–61.
Article Google Scholar
Blaney, David L., und Arlene B. Tickner. 2017. Worlding, ontological politics and the possibility of a decolonial IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 45(3): 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829817702446.
Article Google Scholar
Buzan, Barry. 2016. Could IR be different? International Studies Review 18(1): 155–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv025.
Article Google Scholar
Callahan, William A. 2008. Chinese visions of world order: Post-hegemonic or a new hegemony? International Studies Review 10(4): 749–761.
Article Google Scholar
Capan, Zeynep Gulsah. 2017. Decolonising international relations? Third World Quarterly 38(1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2016.1245100.
Article Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2008. Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial thought and historical difference. Reissue, with a new preface by the author. Princeton studies in culture, power, history. Princeton: University Press.
Google Scholar
Chen, Ching-Chang. 2011. The absence of non-Western IR theory in Asia reconsidered. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11(1): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcq014.
Article Google Scholar
Cox, Robert W. 1981. Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 10(2): 126–155.
Article Google Scholar
Delgado, Ana Carolina Teixeira. 2021. Internal colonialism and international relations: Tracks of decolonization in Bolivia. Worlding beyond the west: Routledge.
Book Google Scholar
Fonseca, Melody. 2019. Global IR and Western dominance: Moving forward or Eurocentric entrapment? Millennium: Journal of International Studies 48(1): 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829819872817.
Article Google Scholar
Gelardi, Maiken. 2020. Moving global IR forward – A road map. International Studies Review 22(4): 830–852. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viz049.
Article Google Scholar
Hellmann, Gunther. 2017. Interpreting international relations. International Studies Review 19(2): 296–300.
Google Scholar
Hellmann, Gunther, und Morten Valbjørn. 2017. Problematizing global challenges: Recalibrating the ,inter‘ in IR-theory. International Studies Review 19(2): 279–282. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix009.
Article Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Stanley. 1977. An American social science: International relations. Daedalus 106(3): 41–60.
Google Scholar
Hurrell, Andrew. 2016. Beyond critique: How to study global IR? International Studies Review 18(1): 149–151. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv022.
Article Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2011. Dialogue between whom? The role of the west/ non-west distinction in promoting global dialogue in IR. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(3): 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829811401941.
Article Google Scholar
Hutchings, Kimberly. 2019. Decolonizing global ethics: Thinking with the pluriverse. Ethics & International Affairs 33(02): 115–125. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679419000169.
Article Google Scholar
Jackson, P. T. 2011. The conduct of inquiry in international relations. Philosophy of science and its impact for the study of world politics. New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Jørgensen, Knud Erik. 2017. Inter alia: On global orders, practices, and theory. International Studies Review 19(2): 283–287.
Google Scholar
Katzenstein, Peter J. 2018. The second coming? Reflections on a global theory of international relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 11(4): 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/poy012.
Article Google Scholar
Kristensen, Peter M. 2019. States of emergence, states of knowledge: A comparative sociology of international relations in China and India. European Journal of International Relations 25(3): 772–799. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119829804.
Article Google Scholar
Kristensen, Peter M. 2020. The south in ,global IR‘: Worlding beyond the ,non-west‘ in the case of Brazil. International Studies Perspectives 22(2): 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1093/isp/ekz029.
Article Google Scholar
Kristensen, Peter M., und Ras T. Nielsen. 2013. Constructing a Chinese international relations theory: A sociological approach to intellectual innovation. International Political Sociology 7(1): 19–40.
Article Google Scholar
Kurki, Milja. 2021. Relational revolution and relationality in IR: New conversations. Review of International Studies March: 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000127.
Article Google Scholar
Ling, L. H. M. 2013. The Dao of world politics: Towards a post-Westphalian, Worldist international relations, 1. Aufl. New International Relations: Routledge.
Book Google Scholar
Lu, Peng. 2014. Pre-1949 Chinese IR: An occluded history. Australian Journal of International Affairs 68(2): 133–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2013.861385.
Article Google Scholar
Lu, Peng. 2019. Chinese IR Sino-centrism tradition and its influence on the Chinese School Movement. The Pacific Review 32(2): 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2018.1461681.
Article Google Scholar
Makarychev, Andrey, und Viatcheslav Morozov. 2013. Is ,non-Western theory‘ possible? The idea of multipolarity and the trap of epistemological relativism in Russian IR. International Studies Review 15(3): 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/misr.12067.
Article Google Scholar
Milani, Carlos R. S. 2021. The foundation and development of international relations in Brazil. Review of International Studies March: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000139.
Article Google Scholar
Noesselt, Nele. 2015. Revisiting the debate on constructing a theory of international relations with Chinese characteristics. The China Quarterly 222(June): 430–448.
Article Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing. 2009. Development of international relations theory in China. International Studies 46(1–2): 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1177/002088171004600212.
Article Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing. 2016. A relational theory of world politics. International Studies Review 18(1): 33–47.
Article Google Scholar
Qin, Yaqing. 2018. A relational theory of world politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Book Google Scholar
Querejazu, Amaya. 2016. Encountering the pluriverse: Looking for alternatives in other worlds. Revista Brasileira de Política Internacional 59(2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7329201600207.
Querejazu, Amaya. 2021. Cosmopraxis: Relational methods for a pluriversal IR, 1–16. August: Review of International Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210521000450.
Book Google Scholar
Rösch, Felix. 2017. The inter as liminal spaces: Prudence, transience, and affection. International Studies Review 19(2): 287–291.
Google Scholar
Shahi, Deepshikha. 2019. Kautilya and non-Western IR theory. Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01728-6.
Book Google Scholar
Shambaugh, D. 2011. International relations studies in China: History, trends, and prospects. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 11(3): 339–372. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcr013.
Article Google Scholar
Shani, Giorgio. 2008. Toward a post-Western IR: The Umma, Khalsa Panth, and critical international relations theory. International Studies Review 10(4): 722–734.
Article Google Scholar
Shih, Chih-yu, und Yih-Jye Hwang. 2018. Re-worlding the ,west‘ in post-Western IR: The reception of Sun Zi’s the Art of War in the Anglosphere. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific 18(3): 421–448. https://doi.org/10.1093/irap/lcy009.
Article Google Scholar
Smith, Steve. 2002. The United States and the discipline of international relations: ,hegemonic country, hegemonic discipline‘. International Studies Review 4(2): 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/1521-9488.00255.
Article Google Scholar
Song, Xinning. 2001. Building international relations theory with Chinese characteristics. Journal of Contemporary China 10(26): 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670560125339.
Article Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene. 2003. Seeing IR differently: Notes from the third world. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 32(2): 295–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298030320020301.
Article Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene B., und David L. Blaney. 2012. Thinking international relations differently. Worlding beyond the west: Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Thinking-International-Relations-Differently/Tickner-Blaney/p/book/9780415781312.
Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene B., und David L. Blaney, Hrsg. 2013. Claiming the international, Worlding beyond west. Milton Park/Abingdon/Oxon: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene B., und Ole Wæver. 2009a. Conclusion: Worlding where the west once was. In International relations scholarship around the world. Worlding beyond the west, Hrsg. Arlene B. Tickner und Ole Wæver, 328–341. Oxford/New York: Routledge.
Chapter Google Scholar
Tickner, Arlene B., und Ole Wæver, Hrsg. 2009b. International relations scholarship around the world, Worlding beyond the west 1. Oxford/New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Tickner, Judith Ann. 2016. Knowledge is power: Challenging IR’s Eurocentric narrative. International Studies Review 18(1): 157–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viv026.
Article Google Scholar
Tsygankov, Andrei P., und Pavel A. Tsygankov. 2007. A sociology of dependence in international relations theory: A case of Russian Liberal IR. International Political Sociology 1(4): 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-5687.2007.00023.x.
Article Google Scholar
Valbjørn, Morten. 2017. Dialoguing about dialogues: On the purpose, procedure and product of dialogues in inter-National Relations Theory. International Studies Review 19(2): 291–296.
Google Scholar
Vasilaki, Rosa. 2012. Provincialising IR? Deadlocks and prospects in post-Western IR theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 41(1): 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305829812451720.
Article Google Scholar
Visoka, Gëzim, und Vjosa Musliu, Hrsg. 2019. Unravelling liberal interventionism: Local critiques of statebuilding in Kosovo. Worlding beyond the West: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole. 1998. The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations. International Organization 52(4): 687–727. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081898550725.
Article Google Scholar
Wæver, Ole, und Arlene B. Tickner. 2009. Introduction: Geocultural epistemologies. In International relations scholarship around the world, Hrsg. Arlene B. Tickner und Ole Wæver, 1–31. Oxford/New York: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Yan, Xuetong. 2008. Xun Zi’s thoughts on international politics and their implications. The Chinese Journal of International Politics 2(1): 135–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjip/pon005.
Article Google Scholar
Yan, Xuetong. 2011. The Princeton-China Series. In Ancient Chinese thought, modern Chinese power, Hrsg. Daniel A. Bell und Zhe Sun . Princeton: Princeton University Press.Translated by Edmund Ryden.
Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang. 2006. Rethinking empire from a Chinese concept ,all-under-heaven‘ (Tian-Xia, 天下). Social Identities 12(1): 29–41.
Article Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang. 2009. A political world philosophy in terms of all-under-heaven (Tian-xia). Diogenes 56(1): 5–18.
Article Google Scholar
Zhao, Tingyang. 2019. Redefining a philosophy for world governance. Translated by Liqing Tao. Key concepts in Chinese thought and culture. Singapore: Palgrave Pivot. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5971-2.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

German Institute for Global and Area Studies, Hamburg, Deutschland
Sinan Chu

Authors

Sinan Chu
View author publications
You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sinan Chu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland
Frank Sauer
Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland
Luba von Hauff
Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland
Carlo Masala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chu, S. (2024). Nichtwestliche Perspektiven in den Internationalen Beziehungen. In: Sauer, F., von Hauff, L., Masala, C. (eds) Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_50

Download citation

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_50
Published: 16 May 2024
Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33952-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33953-1
eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics