Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Religion und internationale Politik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen

  • 286 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Rückkehr der Religion in den öffentlichen, politischen Raum seit den späten 1970er-Jahren hat auch in der politikwissenschaftlichen Disziplin der Internationalen Beziehungen zu einer intensiveren Beschäftigung mit Religion und religiösen Akteuren geführt. Der Beitrag zeichnet die theoretischen Entwicklungen in diesem Feld nach, beleuchtet insbesondere die neuen postsäkularen Ansätze, und gibt dann Einblick in zwei empirische Felder der aktuellen Forschung: den Zusammenhang von Religion, Gewalt und Frieden sowie die Rolle von religiösen Akteuren im Humanitarismus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Die wohl umfassendste Analyse des Fundamentalismus lieferte das „Fundamentalism Project“ der American Academy of Arts and Sciences, dessen Ergebnisse in fünf Bänden publiziert wurden: Marty und Appleby (1991, 1993, 1993, 1994, 1995).

Literatur

  • Adamson, F. 2005. Global liberalism versus political Islam: Competing ideological frameworks in international politics. International Studies Review 7(4): 547–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, Emanuel. 2002. Constructivism and international relations. In Handbook of international relations, Hrsg.Walter Carlsnaes, Thomas Risse, und Beth A. Simmons, 95–118. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, John. 2004. Does God matter, and if so whose God? Religion and democratization. Democratization 11(4): 192–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, R. S. 2000. The ambivalence of the sacred. Religion, violence, and reconciliation. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleby, R. S. 2008. Building sustainable peace: The roles of local and transnational religious actors. In Religious pluralism, globalization, and world politics, Hrsg. Thomas Banchoff, 125–154. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bacevich, Andrew J., und Elizabeth H. Prodromou. 2004. God is not neutral: Religion and U.S. foreign policy after 9/11. Orbis 48(1): 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banchoff, Thomas. 2008. Introduction. In Religious pluralism, globalization, and world politics, Hrsg. Thomas Banchoff, 3–38. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Barbato, Mariano P. 2011. Conceptions of the self for post-secular emancipation: Towards a pilgrim’s guide to global justice. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 39(2): 547–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbato, Mariano, und Friedrich Kratochwil. 2009. Towards a post-secular political order? European Political Science Review 1(3): 317–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbato, Mariano. 2013. Pilgrimage, politics, and international relations. Religious semantics for world politics. Culture and Religion in International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael, und Shibley Telhami, Hrsg. 2002. Identity and foreign policy in the Middle East. Ithaka: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, Michael N., und Janice G. Stein. 2012. The secularization and sanctification of humanitarianism. In Sacred aid. Faith and humanitarianism, Hrsg. Michael N. Barnett und Janice G. Stein, 3–36. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basedau, Matthias, Georg Strüver, Johannes Vüllers, und Tim Wegenast. 2011. Do religious factors impact armed conflict? Empirical evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa. Terrorism and Political Violence 23(5): 752–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgart-Ochse, Claudia. 2008. Demokratie und Gewalt im Heiligen Land. Politisierte Religion in Israel und das Scheitern des Osloer Friedensprozesses. Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellin, Eva. 2008. Faith in politics. New trends in the study of religion and politics. World Politics 60: 315–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belloni, Roberto. 2007. The trouble with humanitarianism. Review of International Studies 33(3): 451–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, Jacob, und S.A. Kadayifci-Orellana. 2009. Religion and mediation: The role of faith-based actors in international conflict resolution. International Negotiation 14: 175–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter L. 1999. The desecularization of the world: A global overview. In The desecularization of the world. Resurgent religion and world politics, Hrsg. Peter L. Berger, 1–18. Grand Rapids: W. B. Eerdmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielefeldt, Heiner. 2001. Säkularisierung – ein schwieriger Begriff: Versuch einer praktischen Orientierung. In Säkularisierung und Resakralisierung in westlichen Gesellschaften. Ideengeschichtliche und theoretische Perspektiven, Hrsg. Mathias Hildebrandt, Manfred Brocker, und Hartmut Behr, 29–42. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boehle, Josef. 2010. Religious NGOs at the UN and the millennium development goals: An introduction. Global Change, Peace & Security 22(3): 275–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, Joshua. 2007. Bono made Jesse Helms cry. Jubilee 2000, debt relief, and moral action in international politics. International Studies Quarterly 51(2): 247–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, Barry, und Richard Little. 2000. International systems in world history: Remaking the study of international relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, Craig, Mark Juergensmeyer, und Jonathan VanAntwerpen. Hrsg. 2011. Rethinking secularism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannell, Fenella. 2010. The anthropology of secularism. Annual Review of Anthropology 39: 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casanova, José. 1994. Public religions in the modern world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanaugh, William T. 2009. The myth of religious violence. Secular ideology and the roots of modern conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Gerard. 2006. Faith matters: Faith-based organisations, civil society and international development. Journal of International Development 18(6): 835–848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft, Stuart. 2007. ‚Thy will be done‘: The new foreign policy of America’s Christian right. International Politics 44(6): 692–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallmayr, Fred. 2012. Post-secularity and (global) politics: A need for radical redefinition. Review of International Studies 38(5): 963–973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingsen, Tanja. 2005. Toward a revival of religion and religious clashes? Terrorism and Political Violence 17(3): 305–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito, John L., und John O. Voll. 2003. Islam and the west: Muslim voices of dialogue. In Religion in international relations. The return from exile, Hrsg. Pavlos Hatzopoulos und Fabio Petito, 237–269. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, James D., und David D. Laitin. 2003. Ethnicity, insurgency, and civil war. American Political Science Review 97(1): 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finnemore, Martha, und Kathryn Sikkink. 2001. Taking stock: The constructivist research program in international relations and comparative politics. Annual Reviews of Political Science 4(1):391–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Fiona. 2001. New humanitarianism: Does it provide a moral banner for the 21st century. Disasters 25(4): 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Jonathan. 2004. Religion, civilization, and civil war. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, Jonathan, und Shmuel Sandler. 2004. Bringing religion into international relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gartzke, Erik, und Kristian S. Gleditsch. 2006. Identity and conflict: Ties that bind and differences that divide. European Journal of International Relations 12(1): 53–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2006. Religion in the public sphere. European Journal of Philosophy 14(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2008. Die Dialektik der Säkularisierung. Blätter für deutsche und internationale Politik 4: 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1988. Nachmetaphysisches Denken. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 2005. Zwischen Naturalismus und Religion. Philosophische Aufsätze. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever, Andreas, und Alexander de Juan. 2007. Grasping the impact of religious traditions on political conflicts: Empirical findings and theoretical perspectives. Die Friedens-Warte 82(2-3): 19–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever, Andreas, und Volker Rittberger. 2003. Does religion make a difference? Theoretical approaches to the impact of faith on political conflict. In Religion in international relations. The return from exile, Hrsg. Pavlos Hatzopoulos und Fabio Petito, 107–146. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hatzopoulos, Pavlos, und Fabio Petito, Hrsg. 2003. Religion in international relations. The return from exile. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Jeffrey. 2012. Religious transnational actors and soft power. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Jeffrey. 2009. Religion and foreign policy. In The Routledge handbook of religion and politics, Hrsg. Jeffrey Haynes, 293–307. Milton Park, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Jeffrey. 2014. Faith-based organisations at the United Nations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, Jeffrey, Hrsg. 2011. Religion and democratizations. Milton Park, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hehir, J. B. 1990. Papal foreign policy. Foreign Policy 78: 26–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, Errol A. 2004. Mistaken identity. Testing the clash of civilizations thesis in light of democratic peace claims. British Journal of Political Science 34(3): 539–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopgood, Stephen, und Leslie Vinjamuri. 2012. Faith in markets. In Sacred Aid. Faith and Humanitarianism, Hrsg. Michael Barnett und Janice Gross Stein. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. 1998. Kampf der Kulturen. Die Neugestaltung der Weltpolitik im 21. Jahrhundert. München: Siedler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurd, Elizabeth S. 2008. The politics of secularism in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, Douglas, und Cynthia Sampson, Hrsg. 1995. Religion, the missing dimension of statecraft. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, Ben, und Marie J. Petersen. 2011. Instrumental, narrow, normative? Reviewing recent work on religion and development. Third World Quarterly 32(7): 1291–1306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juan, Alexander de. 2010. Innerstaatliche Gewaltkonflikte unter dem Banner der Religion: Die Rolle politischer und religiöser Eliten. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juan, Alexander de, und Andreas Hasenclever. 2009. Das Framing religiöser Konflikte – die Rolle von Eliten in religiös konnotierten Bürgerkriegen, In Identität, Institutionen und Ökonomie. Ursachen innenpolitischer Gewalt, Sonderheft Politische Vierteljahrsschrift (PVS), Hrsg. Margit Bussmann, Andreas Hasenclever und Gerald Schneider, 178–205. Wiesbaden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, Mark. 1993. The new cold ear? Religious nationalism confronts the secular state. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Juergensmeyer, Mark. 2000. Terror in the mind of God. The global rise of religious violence. San Francisco Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallscheuer, Otto. 1996. Zusammenprall der Zivilisationen oder Polytheismus der Werte? Religiöse Identität und europäische Politik. In Das Europa der Religionen, Hrsg. Otto Kallscheuer, 17–38. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karam, Azza. 2010. The United Nations Population Fund’s (UNFPA’s) legacy of engaging faith-based organizations as cultural agents of change. Cross Currents 60(3): 432–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O. 2002. The globalization of informal violence, theories of world politics, and the „liberalism of fear“. Dialogue IO 1(1): 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepel, Gilles. 1994. The revenge of God: The resurgence of Islam, Christianity and Judaism in the modern world. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettell, Steven. 2012. Has political science ignored religion? PS: Political Science & Politics 45(1): 93–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kippenberg, Hans G., und Tilman Seidensticker, Hrsg. 2004. Terror im Dienste Gottes. Die „Geistliche Anleitung“ der Attentäter des 11. September 2001. Frankfurt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, Audie, und Cecelia Lynch. 2007. Strategies for research in constructivist international relations, International Relations in a Constructed World. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. 1995/96. Compromising Westphalia. International Security 20(3): 115–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubálková, Vendulka. 2003. Toward an international political theology. In Religion in international relations. The return from exile, Hrsg. Pavlos Hatzopoulos und Fabio Petito, 79–105. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kubálková, Vendulka. 2006. International political theology. Brown Journal of World Affairs 12(2): 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kubálková, Vendulka. 2009. A ‘turn to religion’ in international relations? Perspectives 17(2): 13–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küenzlen, Gottfried. 2003. Die Wiederkehr der Religion. Lage und Schicksal in der säkularen Moderne. München: Olzog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Künkler, Mirjam, und Julia Leininger. 2009. The multi-faceted role of religious actors in democratization processes: Empirical evidence from five young democracies. Democratization 16(6): 1058–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laustsen, Carsten B., und Ole Waever. 2003. Defense of religion: Sacred referent objects for securitization. In Religion in international relations. The return from exile, Hrsg. Pavlos Hatzopoulos und Fabio Petito, 147–180. New York: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Karsten. 2010. Interdependenzen zwischen Religionsgemeinschaften und internationaler Politik. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 17(1): 75–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leininger, Julia, Hrsg. 2013. Religiöse Akteure in Demokratisierungsprozessen: Konstruktiv, destruktiv und obstruktiv. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Bruce. 2003. Holy terrors. Thinking about religion after September 11. Chicago: University Chicago of Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, Cecelia. 2011. Religion, identity, and the ‘war on terror’: Insights from religious humanitarianism. In Religion, identity, and global governance. Ideas, evidence and practice, Hrsg. Patrick James, 108–127. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandaville, Peter G. 2004. Transnational Muslim politics. Reimagining the Umma. Transnationalism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Katherine. 2008. Religion and global development: Intersecting paths. In Religious pluralism, globalization, and world politics, Hrsg. Thomas Banchoff, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Katherine. 2013. Global institutions of religion. Ancient movers, modern shakers. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E., und R. S. Appleby, Hrsg. 1991. Fundamentalism observed (the fundamentalism project). Chicago: University Chicago of Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E., und R. S. Appleby. Hrsg. 1993. Fundamentalisms and the state: Remaking polities, militance, and economies (the fundamentalism project). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E., und R. S. Appleby, Hrsg. 1994. Accounting for fundamentalisms: The dynamic character of movements (the fundamentalism project). Chicago: University Chicago of Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E., und R. S. Appleby, Hrsg. 1995. Fundamentalisms comprehended (the fundamentalism project). Chicago: University Chicago of Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E. und R. S. Appleby. 1996. Herausforderung Fundamentalismus. Radikale Christen, Moslems und Juden im Kampf gegen die Moderne. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty, Martin E., und R. S. Appleby, Hrsg. 1993. Fundamentalisms and society. Reclaiming the sciences, the family, and education. The Fundamentalism Project, Bd. 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavelli, Luca, und Fabio Petito, Hrsg. 2012a. The postsecular in international relations, Sonderheft, Review of International Studies, 38(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavelli, Luca, und Fabio Petito. 2012b. The postsecular in international relations: An overview. Review of International Studies 38(5): 931–942.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, Peter. 2003. Die Epistemologie der Internationalen Beziehungen: Anmerkungen zum Stand der 'Dritten Debatte'. In Die neuen Internationalen Beziehungen. Forschungsstand und Perspektiven in Deutschland, Hrsg. Gunther Hellmann, Klaus D. Wolf, und Michael Zürn, 47–98. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, Gregor. 2010. The postsecular turn. Theory, Culture & Society 27(3): 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C.W. 1959. The sociological imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirbaghari, Farid. 2004. Shi’ism and Iran’s foreign policy. The Muslim World 94(4): 555–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, Assaf. 2008. The globalization of martyrdom: Al Quaeda, Salafi Jihad, and the diffusion of suicide attacks. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montalvo, José G., und Marta Reynal-Querol. 2005. Ethnic polarization, potential conflict, and civil war. American Economic Review 95(3): 796–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, Harald. 1998. Das Zusammenleben der Kulturen. Ein Gegenentwurf zu Huntington. Frankfurt: S. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberg, Steven L., Carolyn M. Warner, Stephen A. Mistler, Anna Berlin, Eric D. Hill, Jordan D. Johnson, Gabrielle Filip-Crawford, Roger E. Millsap, George Thomas, Michael Winkelman, Benjamin Broome, Thomas J. Taylor, und Juliane Schober. 2013. Religion and intergroup conflict: Findings from the global group relations project. Psychological Science 25(1): 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, Pippa, und Ronald Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and secular. Religion and politics worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Osiander, Andreas. 2001. Sovereignty, international relations, and the westphalian myth. International Organization 55(2): 251–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pape, Robert A. 2005. Dying to win. The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedahzur, Ami. 2005. Suicide terrorism. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petito, Fabio, und Pavlos Hatzopoulos, Hrsg. 2000. Religion and international relations. Millennium Journal of International Relations, Sonderausgabe 29(3). London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. 2000. The religious roots of modern international relations. World Politics 52(2): 206–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. 2001. Revolutions in sovereignty. How ideas shaped modern international relations, Princeton Studies in International History and Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. 2002. The challenge of September 11 to secularism in international relations. World Politics 55(1): 66–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. 2007. Explaining the political ambivalence of religion. American Political Science Review 101(3): 505–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott, Daniel. 2009. Has the study of global politics found religion? Annual Review of Political Science 12:183–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollack, Detlef. 2003. Säkularisierung – ein moderner Mythos? Studien zum religiösen Wandel in Deutschland. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, David C. 1984. Fear and trembling: Terrorism in three religious traditions. American Political Science Review 78(3): 658–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riesebrodt, Martin. 2001. Die Rückkehr der Religionen. Fundamentalismus und der ‚Kampf der Kulturen‘. München: C.H. Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, Susanne H., und James P. Piscatori, Hrsg. 1997. Transnational religion and fading states. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandal, Nukhet A., und Jonathan Fox. 2013. Religion in international relations theory. Interactions and possibilities, Routledge Studies in Religion and Politics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sandal, Nukhet A., und Patrick James. 2011. Religion and international relations theory: Towards a mutual understanding. European Journal of International Relations 17(1): 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sedgwick, Mark. 2004. Al-Qaeda and the nature of religious terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 16(4): 795–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senghaas, Dieter. 1998. Zivilisierung wider Willen. der Konflikt der Kulturen mit sich selbst, Bd. 2081. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seul, Jeffrey R. 1999. ‘Ours is the way of God’: Religion, identity, and intergroup conflict. Journal of Peace Research 36(5): 553–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, Jack. 2011. Religion and international relations theory. In Religion and international relations theory, Hrsg. Jack Snyder, 1–23. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Rodney. 1999. Secularization R.I.P. Sociology of Religion 60(3): 249–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Jessica. 2003. Terror in the name of God. Why religious militants kill. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, Isak. 2007. Fighting with faith. Religion and conflict resolution in civil wars. Journal of Conflict Resolution 51(6): 930–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Scott M. 2001. Faith, history and Martin Wight: The role of religion in the historical sociology of the English school of international relations. International Affairs 77(1): 905–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Scott M. 2005. The global resurgence of religion and the transformation of international relations. The struggle for the soul of the twenty-first century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibi, Bassam. 1995. Krieg der Zivilisationen. Politik und Religion zwischen Vernunft und Fundamentalismus. Hamburg: Hoffman und Campe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tipson, Frederick S. 1997. Culture clash-ification: A verse to Huntington’s curse. Foreign Affairs 76: 166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toft, Monica D. 2007. Getting religion? The puzzling case of Islam and civil war. International Security 31(4): 97–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toft, Monica D., Daniel Philpott, und Timothy S. Shah. 2011. God’s century. Resurgent religion and global politics. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tusicisny, Andrej. 2004. Civilizational conflicts: More frequent, longer, and bloodier? Journal of Peace Research 41(3): 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vüllers, Johannes. 2013. Religiöses Friedensengagement in innerstaatlichen Gewaltkonflikten. Das Verhalten der Religionsgemeinschaften. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waardenburg, Jacques. 1986. Religionen und Religion. Systematische Einführung in die Religionswissenschaft. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wald, Kenneth D., und Clyde Wilcox. 2006. Getting religion: Has political science rediscovered the faith factor? American Political Science Review 100(4): 523–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis, Roy, und Steve Bruce. 1992. Secularization: The orthodox model. In Religion and modernization, Hrsg. Steve Bruce, 8–30. London: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Carolyn M., und Stephen G. Walker. 2011. Thinking about the role of religion in foreign policy: A framework for analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis 7(1): 113–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weingardt, Markus A. 2007. Religion Macht Frieden. Das Friedenspotential von Religionen in politischen Gewaltkonflikten. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems, Ulrich 2001. Säkularisierung des Politischen oder politikwissenschaftlicher Säkularismus? Anmerkungen zum disziplinären Perzeptionsmuster des Verhältnisses von Religion und Politik in gegenwärtigen Gesellschaften. In Säkularisierung und Resakralisierung in westlichen Gesellschaften. Ideengeschichtliche und theoretische Perspektiven, Hrsg. Mathias Hildebrandt, Manfred Brocker und Hartmut Behr, 215–240. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Erin K. 2010. Beyond dualism: Expanded understandings of religion and global justice. International Studies Quarterly 54(3): 733–754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Erin K. 2012. After secularism. Rethinking religion in global politics. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Erin K., und Manfred B. Steger. 2013. Religious globalisms in the post-secular age. Globalizations 10(3): 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Erin, Faiz Sheikh, Samantha May, und Claudia Baumgart-Ochse, Hrsg. 2014. The religious as political and the political as religious: The blurring of sacred and secular in contemporary international relations, Sonderausgabe, Politics, Religion & Ideology, 15(3).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

    Claudia Baumgart-Ochse

Authors
  1. Claudia Baumgart-Ochse
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Baumgart-Ochse .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Frank Sauer

  2. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Luba von Hauff

  3. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Carlo Masala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Baumgart-Ochse, C. (2024). Religion und internationale Politik. In: Sauer, F., von Hauff, L., Masala, C. (eds) Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_47

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33952-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33953-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation