Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Umwelt und internationale Politik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen

  • 305 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der Beitrag behandelt globale Umweltpolitik aus drei Perspektiven. In einem ersten Überblick wird die Genese des Politikfelds beschrieben, der zweite Abschnitt diskutiert aktuelle umweltpolitische Herausforderungen und erläutert wie diese politikwissenschaftlich bearbeitet und interpretiert werden. Der letzte Teil debattiert wie globale Umweltpolitikforschung die breitere Diskussion der Internationalen Beziehungen beeinflusst.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Spannende Details und einen sehr guten Überblick bietet die folgende Webseite: https://www.stockholmresilience.org/research/planetary-boundaries.html.

  2. 2.

    Der britische Sozialphilosoph Thomas R. Malthus postulierte 1798, dass das Auseinanderklaffen eines linearen Zuwachses an Nahrungsmittelproduktion und eines exponentiellen Bevölkerungswachstum zu einem abrupten Ende des letzteren führen müsste.

Literatur

  • Aklin, Michael. 2018. Renewables. The politics of a global energy transition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alter, Karen J., und Kai Raustiala. 2018. The rise of international regime complexity. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 14(1): 329–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, Regina S., und Stacy D. VanDeveer, Hrsg. 2020. The global environment. institutions, law, and policy, 5. Aufl. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, Steffen. 2013. Strengthening the United Nations. In The handbook of global climate and environment policy, Hrsg. Robert Falkner, 320–338. Hoboken: Wiley. CrossRef.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Behringer, Wolfgang. 1995. Weather, hunger and fear: Origins of the European witch-hunts in climate, society and mentality. German History 13(1): 1–27. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behringer, Wolfgang. 2007. Kulturgeschichte des Klimas. Von der Eiszeit bis zur globalen Erwärmung, 2. Aufl. München: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, Frank, und Kim E. Rakhyun, Hrsg. 2020. Architectures of earth system governance. Institutional complexity and structural transformation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brand, Ulrich, und Markus Wissen. 2017. Imperiale Lebensweise. Zur Ausbeutung von Mensch und Natur in Zeiten globalen Kapitalismus. München: Oekom.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Breitmeier, Helmut, Arild Underdal, und Oran R. Young. 2011. The effectiveness of international environmental regimes: Comparing and contrasting findings from quantitative research. International Studies Review 13:579–605. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruckmeier, Karl. 2019. Global environmental governance. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cashore, Benjamin. 2002. Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance: How Non-State Market Driven (NSMD) governance systems gain rule-making authority. Governance 15:502–529. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chasek, Pamela S., und David L. Downie. 2021. Global environmental politics, 8. Aufl. Boulder: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, Johanna, Simon Bager, Patrick Meyfroidt, Jens Newig, und Und Edward Challies. 2021. Environmental governance of China’s belt and road initiative. Environmental Policy and Governance 31(1): 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conca, Ken. 2006. Governing water. Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen, Paul J. 2002. Geology of mankind: The anthropocene. Nature 415:23. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingwerth, Klaus, und Philipp Pattberg. 2007. Wirkungen transnationaler Umweltregime. Politische Vierteljahresschrift Sonderheft. Politik und Umwelt 39:133–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Death, Carl. 2019. Can we save the planet? In Global politics. A new introduction, Hrsg. Jenny Edkins und Maya Zehfuss, 57–78. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deitelhoff, Nicole, und Michael Zürn. 2016. Lehrbuch der Internationalen Beziehungen. Per Anhalter durch die IB-Galaxis. München: C.H. Beck.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, Jared. 2005. Collapse. How societies choose to fail or suceed. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrov, Radoslav S. 2020. Empty institutions in global environmental politics. International Studies Review 22(3): 626–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton, David. 1965. A framework for political analysis. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkner, Robert. 2016. The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs 92(5): 1107–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Doris. 2007. Business power in global governance. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, Doris, Marlyne Sahakian, Tobias Gumbert, Antonietta Di Giulio, Michael Maniates, Sylvia Lorek, und Antonia Graf, Hrsg. 2021. Consumption corridors. Living a good life within sustainable limits. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, Rüdiger. 2008. Klimageschichte Mitteleuropas. 1000 Jahre Wetter, Klima, Katastrophen, 2. Aufl. Darmstadt: WBG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gleditsch, Nils P. 2020. This time is different! Or is it? NeoMalthusians and environmental optimists in the age of climate change. Journal of Peace Research 58(1): 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goudie, Andrew S. 2013. The human impact on the natural environment: Past, present, and future, 7. Aufl. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guarín, Alejandro, Furness Mark, Scholz Imme, und Weinlich Silke. 2014. Wirtschaftliche, politische und soziale Auswirkungen des Aufstiegs neuer Mittelschichten. In Wirtschaftliche, politische und soziale Auswirkungen des Aufstiegs neuer Mittelschichten, Hrsg. Andreas Nölke, May Christian, und Claar Simone, 21–42. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haas, Peter M. 1992. Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46(1): 1–35. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Thomas. 2020a. Transnational actors and transnational governance in global environmental politics. Annual Review of Political Science 23(1): 203–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Thomas. 2020b. Catalytic cooperation. Global Environmental Politics 20(4): 73–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, Thomas, David Held, und Kevin Young. 2013. Gridlock. Why global cooperation is failing when we need it most. Cambrdige: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallmann, Caspar A., Martin Sorg, Eelke Jongejans, Henk Siepel, Nick Hofland, Heinz Schwan, Werner Stenmans, Andreas Müller, Hubert Sumser, Thomas Hörren, Dave Goulson, und Hans de Kroon. 2017. More than 75 percent decline over 27 years in total flying insect biomass in protected areas. PLOS ONE 12(10): e0185809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Garrett. 1968. Tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859): 1243–1248. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Judith N., und Jürgen Scheffran. 2019. Environmental peacebuilding and climate change: Peace and conflict studies at the edge of transformation. Policy brief no. 68. Tokyo: Toda Peace Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Paul G., Hrsg. 2022. Routledge handbook of global environmental politics, 2. Aufl. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenclever, Andreas, Peter Mayer, und Volker Rittberger. 1997. Theories of international regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbard, Kathy A., Paul J. Crutzen, Eric F. Lambin, Diana Liverman, Nathan J. Mantua, John R. McNeill, Bruno Messerli, und Will Steffen. 2006. Decadal interactions of humans and the environment. In Decadal interactions of humans and the environment, Hrsg. Costanza Robert, Graumlich Lissa, und Steffen Will, 341–375. Boston: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickmann, Thomas. 2014. Science–policy interaction in international environmental politics: An analysis of the ozone regime and the climate regime. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies 16(1): 21–44. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickmann, Thomas, Oscar Widerberg, Philipp Pattberg, und Markus Lederer. 2021. The UNFCCC secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policy-making. International Review of Administrative Sciences 87(1): 23–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Matthew J. 2011. Climate governance at the crossroads. Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press. CrossRef.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Homer-Dixon, Thomas F. 1999. Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2021. Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of Woring Group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climte change, Hrsg. V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, et al. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, Helmut. 1994. Einführung in die Umweltgeschichte. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jetschke, Anja. 2017. Internationale Beziehungen. Eine Einführung. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, Andrew J., David Huitema, Mikael Hilden, Harro van Asselt, Tim J. Rayner, Jonas J. Schoenefeld, Jale Tosun, Johanna Forster, L. Elin, und Boasson. 2015. Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change 5(11): 977–982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jörgens, Helge, Nina Kolleck, Barbara Saerbeck, und Mareike Well. 2017. Orchestrating (bio-) diversity: The secretariat of the convention of biological diversity as an attention-seeking bureaucracy. In International bureaucracy: Challenges and lessons for public administration research, Hrsg. Michaal W. Bauer, Christopher Knill, und Steffen Eckhard, 73–95. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kallis, Giogos, Susan Paulson, Giacomo D’Alisa, und Federico Demaria. 2020. The case for degrowth. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, Robert O., und David G. Victor. 2010. The regime complex for climate change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbert, Elizabeth. 2015. The sixth extinction. An unnatural history. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D., Hrsg. 1983. International regimes. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kütting, Gabriela, und Kyle Herman, Hrsg. 2018. Global envrionmental politics. Concepts, theories and case studies, 2. Aufl. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebreton, Laurent, Boyan Slat, Francesco Ferrari, J. Bruno Sainte-Rose, R. Marthouse Aitken, Sara Hajbane, Serena Cunsolo, A. Anna Schwarz, Kimberly Noble Levivier, H. Pavla Debeljak, Rosanna Schoeneich-Argent Maral, Roberto Brambini, und Julia Reisser. 2018. Evidence that the Great Pacific Garbage Patch is rapidly accumulating plastic. Scientific Reports 8(1): 4666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, Markus. 2015. Global governance and climate change. In Research handbook on climate governance, Hrsg. Karin Bäckstrand und Eva Lövbrand, 3–13. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, Markus. 2019. Laudato Si’ und der Kapitalismus – kann und soll die Bestie gebändigt werden? In Die Enzyklika Laudato Sí. Ein interdisziplinärer Nachhaltigkeitsansatz? Hrsg. Sabine Schlacke und Marinanne Heimbach-Steins, 77–97. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lederer, Markus, und Judith Kreuter. 2018. Organising the unthinkable in times of crises: Will climate engineering become the weapon of last resort in the Anthropocene? Organization 25(4): 472–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, Christiane. 2018. Internationale Beziehungen. Grundkonzepte, Theorien und Problemfelder. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, Jens. 2020. Fridays for future’s disruptive potential: An inconvenient youth between moderate and radical ideas. Frontiers in Communication 5(48): 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLeman, Robert, und Francois Gemenne, Hrsg. 2018. Routledge handbook of environmental displacement and migration. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, James. 2005. From welfare state to ecostate. In The state and global ecological crisis, Hrsg. John Barry und Robin Eckersley, 3–24. London: MIT Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, Donella H., Dennis L. Meadows, Randers Jorgen, und William W. Behrens III. 1972. The limits to growth. New York: Universe Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, Ronald B., Lilliana B. Andonova, Mark Axelrod, Jörg Balsiger, Thomas Bernauer, Jessica F. Green, James Hollway, Rakhyun E. Kim, und Jean-Fréderic Morin. 2020. What we know (and could know) about international environmental agreements. Global Environmental Politics 20(1): 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Jean-Frédéric, und Amandine Orsini. 2013. Insights from global environmental governance. International Studies Review 15:562–565. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, Jean-Frédéric, Amandine Orsini, und Sikina Jinnah. 2020. Global environmental politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, William. 2020. The climate club. Foreign Affairs 99(3): 10–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Kate. 2017. The environment and international relations, 2. Aufl. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oltmer, Jochen. 2012. Globale migration. Geschichte und Gegenwart. München: C.H. Beck. CrossRef.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. New York: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 2014. A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. Annals of Economics and Finance 15(1): 71–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parson, Edward A. 1993. Protecting the ozone layer. In Protecting the ozone layer, Hrsg. Peter M. Haas, Robert O. Keohane, und Marc A. Levy, 27–73. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partzsch, Lena. 2015. The power of celebrities in global politics. Celebrity Studies 6(2): 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg, Philipp. 2005. What role for private rule-making in global environmental governance? Analysing the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC). International Environmental Agreements 5:175–189. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattberg, Philipp, und Fariboz Zelli, Hrsg. 2015. Encyclopedia of global environmental governance and politics. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfister, Christian. 2007. Climatic extremes, recurrent crises and witch hunts: Strategies of European societies in coping with exogenous shocks in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. The Medieval History Journal 10(1–2): 33–73. CrossRef.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raustiala, Kal, und David G. Victor. 2004. The regime complex for plant genetic resources. International Organization 55:277–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Lankao, Patricia, Harriet Bulkeley, Mark Pelling, Sarah Burch, David J. Gordon, Joyeeta Gupta, Craig Johnson, Priya Kurian, Emma Lecavalier, David Simon, Laura Tozer, Gina Ziervogel, und Debashish Munshi. 2018. Urban transformative potential in a changing climate. Nature Climate Change 8(9): 754–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaguchi, Kendra, Anil Varughese, und Graeme Auld. 2017. Climate wars? A systematic review of empirical analyses on the links between climate change and violent conflict. International Studies Review 19(4): 622–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffran, Jürgen, Michael Brzoska, Jasmin Kominek, Michael P. Link und Janpeter Schilling. 2012. „Disentangling the Climate-conflict Nexus: Empirical and Theoretical Assessment of Vulnerabilities and Pathways.“ Review of European Studies 4(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sil, Rudra, und Peter J. Katzenstein. 2010. Analytic eclecticism in the study of world politics: Reconfiguring problems and mechanisms across research traditions. Perspectives on Politics 8:411–131. CrossRef.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, Will, Katherine Richardson, Johan Rockström, Sarah E. Cornell, Ingo Fetzer, Elena M. Bennett, Reinette Biggs, Stephan R. Carpenter, Wim de Vries, Cynthia A. de Wit, Carl Folke, Dieter Gerten, Jens Heinke, Georgina M. Mace, Linn M. Persson, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, Belinda Reyers, und Sverker Sörlin. 2015. Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 6223 1259855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Nicholas. 2007. The economics of climate change. The stern review. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Nicholas. 2015. Why are we waiting? The logic, urgency, and promise of tackling climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, Hayley. 2018. Global environmental politics. Problems, policy and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • TEEB. 2010. Die Ökonomie von Ökosystemen und Biodiversität: Die ökonomische Bedeutung der Natur in Entscheidungsprozesse integrieren. Schlussfolgerungen und Empfehlungen von TEEB – eine Synthese. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. 1994. Human development report: Annual report. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, John. 2019. Environmental issues. In The globalization of world politics, Hrsg. John Baylis, Steve Smith und Patricia Owens, 8. Aufl., 387–403. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wapner, Paul. 2020. Is wildness over? Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wapner, Paul, und Anne J. Kantel. 2017. In Global civil society. Environmental governance reconsidered. challenges, choices, and opportunities, Hrsg. Robert F. Durant, Daniel J. Fiorino, und Rosemary O’Leary, 175–204. Cambridge, MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, Jeroen, und Ingrid Boas. 2019. Securitization of climate change: How invoking global dangers for instrumental ends can backfire. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 37(8): 1471–1488.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU. 2014. Sondergutachten – Klimaschutz als Weltbürgerbewegung. Berlin: WBGU.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU. 2020. Landwende im Anthropozän: Von der Konkurrenz zur Integration. Berlin: WBGU.

    Google Scholar 

  • WCED. 1987. Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, Oran R. 1989. International cooperation: Building regimes for natural ressources and the environment. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, TU Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Deutschland

    Markus Lederer

Authors
  1. Markus Lederer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Lederer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Frank Sauer

  2. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Luba von Hauff

  3. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Carlo Masala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lederer, M. (2024). Umwelt und internationale Politik. In: Sauer, F., von Hauff, L., Masala, C. (eds) Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33952-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33953-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation