Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Terrorismus(bekämpfung) und internationale Politik

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen

  • 290 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Terrorismus gilt als eine der größten sicherheitspolitischen Herausforderungen des 21. Jahrhunderts. Zugleich zählen Terrorismus und seine Bekämpfung zu den am heftigsten umstrittenen (politischen) Phänomenen unserer Zeit. Der Beitrag gibt einen Überblick über den Forschungsstand und diskutiert Begriffe, Ursachen und Gegenstrategien sowie aktuelle Entwicklungen von Terrorismus. Traditionellen Ansätzen werden hierbei Konzepte der kritischen Terrorismusforschung gegenübergestellt, um prinzipielle Probleme des Forschungsgegenstandes und deren Überwindung zu illustrieren.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Siehe Incident and Trafficking Database, http://www-ns.iaea.org/security/itdb.asp. Zugegriffen am 21.06.2021.

  2. 2.

    Siehe https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/ctc/. Zugegriffen am 14.06.2021.

Literatur

  • Acton, James M., M. Brooke Rogers, und Peter D. Zimmerman. 2007. Beyond the dirty bomb: Rethinking radiological terror. Survival 49(3): 151–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albright, David, und Corey Hinderstein. 2005. Unraveling the A.Q. Khan and future proliferation networks. The Washington Quarterly 28(2): 109–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, Richard J. 2004. Transatlantic intelligence and security cooperation. International Affairs 80(4): 731–753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arce, M., G. Daniel, und Todd Sandler. 2005. Counterterrorism: A game – theoretic analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49(2): 183–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnaby, Wendy. 2002. Biowaffen – Die unsichtbare Gefahr. München: Goldmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basile, Mark. 2004. Going to the source: Why Al Qaeda’s financial network is likely to withstand the current war on terrorist financing. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(3): 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassiouni, M. Cherif. 2001. International Terrorism: Multinational Conventions (1937–2001). Ardsley: Transitional publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensahel, Nora. 2006. A coalition of coalitions: International cooperation against terrorism. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 29(1): 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Betts, Richard K. 1998. The new threat of mass destruction. Foreign Affairs 77(1): 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biersteker, Thomas J. 2002. Targeting terrorist finances: The new challenges of financial market globalization. In Worlds in collision: Terror and the future of global order, Hrsg. K. Booth und T. Dunne, 74–84. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeley, Ruth. 2007. Bringing the state back into terrorism studies. European Political Science 6(3): 228–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, Wyn Q. 2004. Deterrence and asymmetry: Non-state actors and mass casualty terrorism. Contemporary Security Policy 25(1): 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowyer Bell, J. 1978. A time of terror. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, Michael J. 2018. The military approach to counterterrorism. In Routledge handbook of terrorism and counterterrorism, Hrsg. Andrew Silke, 384–394. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breen Smyth, Marie. 2007. A critical research agenda for the study of political terror. European Political Science 6(3): 260–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brophy-Baermann, Bryan, und John A. C. Conybeare. 1994. Retaliating against terrorism: Rational expectations and the optimality of rules versus discretion. American Journal of Political Science 38(1): 196–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, Ethan. 2007. Politics and the suboptimal provision of counterterror. International Organization 61(1): 9–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium des Inneren. 1981–1984. Analysen zum Terrorismus. Darmstadt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunn, Matthew. 2010. Yes: The threat is very real. In Debating terrorism and counterterrorism, Hrsg. Stuart Gottlieb, 168–180. Washington: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Gavin. 2004. Weapons of mass destruction terrorism research: Past and future. In Research on terrorism-trends, achievement and failures, Hrsg. Andrew Silke, 72–90. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Celeb. 1996. Terrorism as warfare: The lessons of military history. World Policy Journal 13(4): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Paul, und James Windle. 2018. Cyber as an enabler of terrorism financing, now and in the future. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism 13(3): 285–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Brittnee, und Erik M. Fay. 2019. Responding to terror: An empirical analysis of US military activity, public opinion, and transnational terrorism. Journal of Applied Security Research 14(2): 140–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cataldo Neuberger, Luisella de, und Tiziana Valentini. 1996. Women and terrorism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalk, Peter. 1995. Liberal democratic response to terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 7(4): 10–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chalk, Peter. 1996. West European terrorism and counter-terrorism: The evolving dynamic. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, Hai-Cheng, Der-Jiunn Deng, Han-Chieh Chao, und Yueh-Min Huang. 2009. Next generation of terrorism: Ubiquitous cyber terrorism with the accumulation of all intangible fear. Journal of Universal Computer Science 15(12): 2372–2386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Wesley K. 2001. Waging the new war – What’s next for the U.S. Armed Forces? In How did this happen? Terrorism and the new war, Hrsg. James F. Hoge und Gideon Rose, 241–253. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clausewitz, Carl van. 1990. Vom Kriege, 19. Aufl. Bonn: Dümmlers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Stephan. 2004. Dissuading state support of terrorism – Strikes or sanctions? (An analysis of dissuasion measures employed against Libya). Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 27(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Copeland, Thomas. 2001. Is the new terrorism really new? An analysis of the new paradigm for terrorism. Journal of Conflict Studies 21(2): 91–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crelinsten, Ronald. 1989. Terrorism, counter-terrorism and democracy: The assessment of national security threats. Terrorism and Political Violence 1(2): 242–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crelinsten, Ronald. 2000. Terrorism and counter-terrorism in a multi-centric world: Challenges and opportunities. In The future of terrorism, Hrsg. M. Taylor und J. Horgan, 170–196. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crelinsten, Ronald, und Alex Schmid. 1992. Western responses to terrorism: A twenty-five year balance sheet. Terrorism and Political Violence 4(4): 307–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Martha. 1983. Terrorism, legitimacy, and power: The consequences of political violence. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Martha. 1990. The logic of terrorism: Terrorist behavior as a product of strategic choice. In Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind, Hrsg. Walter Reich, 7–24. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Martha. 2001. Counterterrorism policy and the political process. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 24(5): 329–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Martha. 2003. Coercive diplomacy and the response to terrorism. In The United States and coercive diplomacy, Hrsg. Robert J. Art und Patrick M. Cronin, 305–357. Washington, DC: United States Institution of Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw, Martha. 2019. Terrorism and international cooperation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daase, Christopher. 2001. Terrorismus – Begriffe. Theorien und Gegenstrategien, Friedens-Warte 76(1): 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daase, Christopher. 2005. Terrorgruppen und Massenvernichtungswaffen. Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte (APuZ) 48:31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daase, Christopher. 2006. Die RAF und der internationale Terrorismus. Zur transnationalen Kooperation klandestiner Organisationen. In Die RAF und der linke Terrorismus, Bd. 2, Hrsg. Wolfgang Kraushaar, 905–929. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, James W. 2005. Terms of inquiry: On the theory and practice of political science. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, Donatella. 1995. Left-wing terrorism in Italy. In Terrorism in context, Hrsg. Martha Crenshaw, 105–159. New York: Pennsylvania State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denning, Dorothy E. 2000. Cyberterrorism, testimony before the special oversight panel on terrorism committee on Armed Services U.S. House of Representatives. http://www.cs.georgetown.edu/~denning/infosec/cyberterror.html. Zugegriffen am 27.02.2014.

  • Der Derian, James. 1992. Antidiplomacy: Spies, terror, speed and war. Cambridge: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanapala, Jayantha. 2005. The United Nations’ response to 9/11. Terrorism and Political Violence 17(1/2): 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn Cavelty, Myriam. 2008. Cyber-terror – Looming threat or phantom menace? The framing of the US cyber-threat debate. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 4(1): 19–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duyvesteyn, Isabelle. 2004. How new is the new terrorism? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27(5): 439–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrenfeld, Rachel. 2003. Funding evil: How terrorism is financed and how to stop it. Chicago: Bonus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eland, Ivan. 1998. Does U.S. Intervention overseas breed terrorism? The historical record. Foreign Policy Briefing Paper 50. Washington, DC: CATO Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Qorchi, Mohammed. 2002. Hawala. Finance and Development 39(4): 31–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enders, Walter, Todd Sandler, und Jon Cauley. 1990. UN Conventions, technology and retaliation in the fight against terrorism: An econometric evaluation. Terrorism and Political Violence 2(1): 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faria, Joao Ricardo. 2006. Terrorist innovation and anti-terrorist policies. Terrorism and Political Violence 18(1): 47–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, Charles D., und William C. Potter. 2005. The four faces of nuclear terrorism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Thomas. 2007. Die Tupamaros in Uruguay. In Die RAF und der linke Terrorismus, Bd. 1, Hrsg. Wolfgang Kraushaar, 736–750. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, Alexander. 1991. The discipline of terrorology. In Western state terrorism, Hrsg. Alexander George, 76–101. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacomello, Giampiero. 2004. Bangs for the buck: A cost-benefit analysis of cyberterrorism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 27(5): 387–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, Seymour E., Jessica C. Kirk, und Megan H. Kirk. 2007. Cyberspace as medium for terrorists. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 74:193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Joshua. 2002. The myth of cyberterrorism. Washington Monthly. http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2001/0211.green.html. Zugegriffen am 27.02.2014.

  • Gunaratna, Rohan. 2002. Inside Al Qaeda: Global network of terror. New York: Berkley Pub Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, Jeroen. 2007a. A case for critical terrorism studies. Government and Opposition 43(3): 363–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunning, Jeroen. 2007b. Babies and bathwaters: Reflecting on the pitfalls of critical terrorism studies. European Political Science 6(3): 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Nadine, und Benjamin Cole. 2000. The new face of terrorism: Threats from weapons of mass destruction. London: I.B.Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Ted Robert. 1970. Why men rebel. Princeton: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurr, Ted Robert. 1988. Empirical research on political terrorism: The state of the art and how it might be improved. In Current perspectives on international terrorism, Hrsg. Robert O. Slater und Michael Stohl, 115–154. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helms, Ronald, S. E. Constanza, und Nicholas Johnson. 2012. Crouching tiger or phantom dragon? Examining the discourse on global cyber-terror. Security Journal 25:57–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman, Edward S., und Gerry O’Sullivan. 1989. The „Terrorism“ industry. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, Philip B. 2000. Terrorism and America. A commonsense strategy for a democratic society. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann, Philip B. 2001. Dealing with terrorism: An overview. International Security 26(3): 24–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hippel, Karinvon. 2002. The roots of terrorism: Probing the myths. The Political Quarterly 73(1): 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Bruce. 1995. Holy terror’: The implications of terrorism motivated by a religious imperative. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 18(4): 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Bruce. 1998. Inside terrorism. London: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Bruce. 1999. Terrorism, trends and prospects. In Countering the new terrorism, Hrsg. Ian O. Lesser, Bruce Hoffman, John Arquila, David Ronfeldt, und Michele Zanini, 7–38. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, Bruce. 2004. Foreword. In Research on terrorism: Trends achievements and failures, Hrsg. Andrew Silke, 17–19. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, John. 1997. Issues in terrorism research. The Police Journal 70(3): 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, John. 2004. The case for firsthand research. In Research on terrorism – Trends achievements and failures, Hrsg. Andrew Silke, 30–56. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hülsse, Rainer, und Alexander Spencer. 2008. The metaphor of terror: Terrorism studies and the constructivist turn. Security Dialogue 39(6): 571–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel. 2001. The age of Muslim wars. Newsweek, 17.12.2001, 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Richard. 2007. The core commitments of critical terrorism studies. European Political Science 6(3): 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Richard, Hrsg. 2016. Routledge handbook of critical terrorism studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Richard, Harmonie Torors, Lee Jarvis, und Charlotte Heath-Kelly. Hrsg. 2020. Critical terrorism studies at ten: Contributions, cases and future challenges. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, Alison. 1990. Identity and morality in the Italian red brigades. Terrorism and Political Violence 2(4): 508–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, Lee, Stuart Macdonald, und Lella Nouri. 2014. The cyberterrorism threat: Findings from a survey of researchers. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 37(1): 68–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josua, Maria. 2021. What drives diffusion? Anti-terrorism legislation in the Arab Middle East and North Africa. Journal of Global Security Studies 6:3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsrud, John. 2017. Towards UN counter-terrorism operations? Third World Quarterly 38(6): 1215–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosnik, Mark E. 2017. The military response to terrorism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraushaar, Wolfgang. 2007. Rudi Dutschke und der bewaffnete Kampf. In Die RAF und der linke Terrorismus, Bd. 1, Hrsg. Wolfgang Kraushaar, 218–247.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, Alan B., und Jitka Maleckova. 2002. Education, poverty, political violence and terrorism. Is there a causal connection? NBER Working Paper No. 9074. Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurth Cronin, Audrey. 2002/2003. Behind the curve: Globalization and international terrorism. International Security 27(3): 30–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamberg, Robert F. 1972. Die Guerilla in Lateinamerika. Theorie und Praxis eines revolutionären Modells. München: DTV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Walter. 1977. Terrorism. London: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Walter. 1987. The age of terrorism. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Walter. 1996. Postmodern terrorism. Foreign Affairs 75(5): 24–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Walter. 1998. Dawn of Armageddon. New York: Oxford Universtiy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laqueur, Walter. 1999. The new terrorism: Fanaticism and the arms of mass destruction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larue, Patrick F. 2017. Judicial responses to counter-terrorism law after September 11. Democracy and Security 13(1): 71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, Sean. 2013. Beyond cyber-doom: Assessing the limits of hypothetical scenarios in the framing of cyber-threats. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 10(1): 86–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Matthew. 2002. The political economy of Middle East terrorism. Middle East Review of International Affairs 6(4): 49–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, Matthew. 2003. Stemming the flow of terrorist financing: Practical and conceptual challenges. Fletcher Forum of World Affairs 27(1): 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, Margot. 2002. The response to 9/11 and the lessons of history. International Relations 16(2): 275–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lübbe, Hermann. 1987. Politischer Moralismus. Der Triumph der Gesinnung über die Urteilskraft. Berlin: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchak, Patricia. 1999. God’s assassins: State terrorism in Argentina in the 1970s. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marighella, Carlos. 1972. Das Minihandbuch der Stadtguerilleros. Hamburg: Trikontinental.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Susan B. 2010. No: The threat is overblown. In Debating terrorism and counterterrorism, Hrsg. Stuart Gottlieb, 180–200. Washington: CQ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martini, Alice. 2020. Rethinking terrorism and countering terrorism from a critical perspective. CTS and normativity. Critical Studies on Terrorism 13(1): 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matusitz, Jonathan, und Elizabeth Minei. 2009. Cyberterrorism: Its effects on health-related infrastructures. Journal of Digital Forensic Practice 2(4): 161–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merari, Ariel. 1991. Academic research and government policy on terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 3(1): 88–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Münkler, Herfried. 1992. Gewalt und Ordnung. Das Bild des Krieges im politischen Denken. Frankfurt a. M: FISCHER Taschenbuch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münkler, Herfried. 2004. Ältere und Jüngere Formen des Terrorismus. Strategien und Organisationsstrukturen. In Herausforderung Terrorismus. Die Zukunft der Sicherheit, Hrsg. Werner Weidenfeld, 29–43. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoleoni, Loretta. 2004. Terror Inc.: Tracing the money behind global terrorism. UK London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navias, Martin S. 2002. Finance warfare as a response to international terrorism. In Superterrorism: Policy responses, Hrsg. L. Freedman, 57–79. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, Brendan, und Andrew Silke. 2007. Understanding and ending persistent conflict: Bridging research and policy. In Terror, insurgency and the state: Ending protracted conflicts, Hrsg. Marianne Heiberg, Brendan O’Leary, und John Tirman. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheim, Felix E. 1981. Political concepts: A reconstruction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pape, Robert A. 2005. Dying to win: The strategic logic of suicide terrorism. New York: Random House Trade Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parachini, John. 2003. Putting WMD terrorism into perspective. The Washington Quarterly 26(4): 37–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearlstein, Richard M. 1991. The mind of the political terrorist. Wilmington: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, Anthony W. 2005. Political (In)Justice, authoritarianism and the rule of law in Brazil, Chile and Argentina. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pillar, Paul R. 2001. Terrorism and U.S. Foreign Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posen, Barry R. 2001/2002. The struggle against terrorism: Grand strategy, strategy and tactics. International Security 26(3): 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, Jerrold M. 1990. Terrorist psycho-logic: Terrorist behavior as a product of psycological forces. In Origins of terrorism: Psychologies, ideologies, theologies, states of mind, Hrsg. Walter Reich, 25–40. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press with Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, Robert. 2007. Defending against terrorist attacks with limited resources. American Political Science Review 101(3): 527–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prunckun, Henry W., und Philip B. Mohr. 1996. Military deterrence of international terrorism: An evaluation of operation El Dorado Canyon. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 20(3): 267–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranstorp, Magnus, Hrsg. 2007. Mapping terrorism research: State of the art, gaps and future direction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphaeli, Nimrod. 2003. Financing of terrorism: Sources, methods and channels. Terrorism and Political Violence 15(4): 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, David. 1984. Fear and trembling: Terrorism in three religious traditions. American Political Science Review 78(3): 658–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapoport, David. 2003. The four waves of rebel terror and September 11. In The new global terrorism, Hrsg. C. W. Kegley, 36–51. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, Edna. 1993. Terrorism research and the diffusion of ideas. Knowledge and Policy 6(1): 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Louise. 2006. What terrorists want, understanding the terrorist threat. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Jeffrey Ian. 2006. Political terrorism: An interdisciplinary approach. New York: Peter Lang Inc./International Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberger, Liane, Joachim Krause, Jannis Jost, und Kira Frankenthal, Hrsg. 2022. Terrorismusforschung – Interdisziplinäres Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein, R. E. 1987. Alchemists of revolution: Terrorism in the modern world. New York: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salami, Iwa. 2018. Terrorism financing with virtual currencies: Can regulatory technology solutions combat this? Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 41(12): 968–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, Todd. 2003. Collective action and transnational terrorism. The World Economy 26(6): 779–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, Frank. 2007. Nuklearterrorismus: Akute Bedrohung oder politisches Schreckgespenst, HSFK-Report 2/2007, Hessische Stiftung Friedens- und Konfliktforschung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Alex. 1999. Terrorism and the use of weapons of mass destruction: From where the risk? Terrorism and Political Violence 11(4): 106–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, Alex, und Albert Jongman. 1988. Political terrorism: A new guide to actors, authors, concepts, data bases, theories and literature. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneckener, Ulrich. 2004. Transnationale Terroristen als Profiteure fragiler Staatlichkeit (Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, SWP-Studie 2004/S 18, Mai 2004), Berlin. http://www.swp-berlin.org/de/common/get_document.php?asset_id=1288. Zugegriffen am 16.12.2008.

  • Schneckener, Ulrich. 2006. Transnationaler terrorismus. Frankfurt a. M: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulze, Frederick. 2004. Breaking the cycle: Empirical research and postgraduate studies on terrorism. In Research on terrorism: Trends achievements and failures, Hrsg. Andrew Silke, 161–185. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sederberg, Peter. 1989. Terrorist myths: Illusion, rhetoric, and reality. Englewood Cliffs: Pearson College Div.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shultz, Richard H., und Andreas Vogt. 2003. The real intelligence failure on 9/11 and the case for a doctrine of striking first. In Terrorism and counterterrorism: Understanding the new security environment, Hrsg. Russell D. Howard und Reid L. Sawyer, 367–390. Guildford: McGraw Hill Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silke, Andrew. 1998. Cheshire-cat logic: The recurring theme of terrorist abnormality in psychological research. Psychology, Crime & Law 4(1): 51–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silke, Andrew. 2001. The devil you know: Continuing problems with research on terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 13(4): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silke, Andrew, Hrsg. 2004a. Research on terrorism: Trends achievements and failures. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silke, Andrew. 2004b. The road less travelled: Recent trends in terrorism research. In Research on terrorism: Trends achievements and failures, Hrsg. Andrew Silke, 186–213. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Alexander. 2006. Questioning the concept of new terrorism. Peace Conflict & Development 8:1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Alexander. 2011. Bild Dir Deine Meinung. Die metaphorische Konstruktion von Terrorismus in den Medien. Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 18(1): 47–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Alexander, und Josephine Winkler. 2022. Themen, Daten und Perspektiven: Entwicklungen in der Traditionellen und Kritischen Terrorismusforschung. In Terrorismusforschung – Interdisziplinäres Handbuch für Wissenschaft und Praxis, Hrsg. Liane Rothenberger, Joachim Krause, Jannis Jost, und Kira Frankenthal. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Alexander, Alexander Kocks, und Kai Harbrich, Hrsg. 2011. Terrorismusforschung in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinhausler, Friedrich. 2003. What it takes to become a nuclear terrorists. American Behavioral Scientist 46(6): 782–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stempolowski, Ryszard, Hrsg. 2002. Transnational terrorism in the world system perspective. Warsaw: Polski Instytut Spraw Miedzynarodowych.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steven, Graeme C. S., und Rohan Gunaratna. 2004. Counterterrorism: A reference handbook. Santa. Barbara: Bloomsbury 3PL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, Michael. 1988. The politics of terrorism. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stohl, Michael. 2006. Cyber terrorism: A clear and present danger, the sum of all fears, breaking point or patriot games? Crime, Law and Social Change 46(4–5): 223–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichmann, Fabian Maximilian. 2019. Recent trends in money laundering and terrorism financing. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 27(1): 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari, Ayushi, und Parimal Kashyap. 2020. Countering terrorism through multilateralism: Reviewing the role of the United Nations. Groningen Journal of International Law 8(1): 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townshend, Charles. 2002. Terrorism: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulfstein, Geir. 2003. Terrorism and the use of force. Security Dialogue 34(2): 153–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unal, Mustafa Cosar, und Petra Cafnik Uludağ. 2020. Eradicating terrorism in asymmetric conflict: The role and essence of military deterrence. Terrorism and Political Violence. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2020.1742113.

  • Waldmann, Peter. 1998. Terrorismus. Provokation der Macht. München: Gerling Akademie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmann, Peter. 2001. Revenge without rules: On the renaissance of an archaic motive of violence. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 24(6): 435–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walther, Rudolf. 2007. Terror und Terrorismus. Eine begriffs- und sozialgeschichtliche Skizze. In Die RAF und der linke Terrorismus, Bd. 1, Hrsg. Wolfgang Kraushaar, 64–77. Hamburg: Hamburger Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, William F. 2001. Strangling the hydra: Targeting Al Qaeda’s finances. In How Did This Happen? Terrorism and the New War, Hrsg. James F. Hoge und Gideon Rose, 129–143. New York: PublicAffairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, Gabriel. 2005. Cyberterrorism: The sum of all fears? Studies in Conflict and Terrorism 28(2): 129–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Leonard, Ami Pedahzur, und Sivan Hirsch-Hoefler. 2004. The challenges of conceptualizing terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 16(4): 777–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weintraub, Sidney. 2002. Disrupting the financing of terrorism. The Washington Quarterly 25(1): 53–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, Christopher. 2019. Cryptoterrorism: Assessing the utility of blockchain technologies for terrorist enterprise. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism. https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610X.2018.1531565.

  • Wilkinson, Paul. 2000. Terrorism versus democracy: The liberal state response. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilner, Alex. 2018. The dark side of extended deterrence: Thinking through the state sponsorship of terrorism. Journal of Strategic Studies 41(3): 410–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winer, Jonathan M., und Trifin J. Roule. 2002. Fighting terrorist finance. Survival 44(2): 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wintrobe, Ronald. 2006. Rational extremists: The political economy of radicalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Thomas. 2007. State terrorism in Latin America: Chile, Argentina and international human rights. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagare, Frank C. 2006. Deterrence is dead: Long live deterrence. Conflict Management and Peace Science 23(2): 115–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Politikwissenschaft, Goethe-Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland

    Christopher Daase

  2. Institut für Gesellschaftswissenschaften, Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland

    Alexander Spencer

Authors
  1. Christopher Daase
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alexander Spencer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Christopher Daase or Alexander Spencer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Frank Sauer

  2. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Luba von Hauff

  3. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Carlo Masala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Daase, C., Spencer, A. (2024). Terrorismus(bekämpfung) und internationale Politik. In: Sauer, F., von Hauff, L., Masala, C. (eds) Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_39

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33952-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33953-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation