Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Internationale Politische Ökonomie in den Internationalen Beziehungen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen

  • 306 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Zentrales Thema der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie (IPÖ) sind Verhältnis und Interaktion politischer (i.e.L. staatlicher) und wirtschaftlicher (staatlicher wie privater) Akteure, Institutionen und Strukturen. Die IPÖ steht also an der Schnittstelle politik- und wirtschaftswissenschaftlicher Blickwinkel der internationalen Beziehungen. Der vorliegende Beitrag erläutert die wissenschaftshistorische Entwicklung, die prägenden theoretischen Hauptströmungen und wesentliche Nachbardisziplinen der IPÖ sowie ihre Stellung innerhalb des Feldes des Internationalen Beziehungen. Ihre spezifische Perspektive wird anhand des strukturellen Machtbegriffs und der Frage nach der Hegemonie im internationalen System verdeutlicht. Aktuelle Forschungsfragen und Diskussionen in der IPÖ beziehen sich beispielsweise auf Aspekte der Globalisierung und global governance in internationalen Wirtschafts- und Finanzsystem, insbesondere angesichts des Aufstiegs Chinas, der europäischen Integration, der „Wiederentdeckung“ Afrikas in der IPÖ, des Liberalen Friedens und der economic und financial warfare.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • A’Zami, Darius. 2014. ‚China in Africa‘: From under-researched to under-theorised? Millennium: Journal of International Studies 43(2): 724–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abbott, Jason P., und Owen Worth. 2002. Critical perspectives on international political economy. New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Albert, Hans. 1974. Die ökonomische Tradition im soziologischen Denken. In Zwei Ansätze der Politischen Ökonomie. Marxismus und ökonomische Theorie der Politik, Hrsg. Bruno S. Frey und Werner Meißner, 48–66. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer Athenäum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, Samir. 1992. A world in chaos. In Approaches to the study of international political economy, Hrsg. Helena Linholm, 61–79. Göteborg: Peace and Development Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, Samir. 1996. The challenge of globalization. Review of International Political Economy 3(2): 216–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angell, Norman. 1910. The great illusion. A study of the relation of military power to national advantage. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asante, Richard. 2018. China and Africa: Model of south-south cooperation? China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 4(2): 259–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailin, Alison. 2001. From traditional to institutionalized hegemony. University of Toronto G8 Information Centre. http://www.g7.utoronto.ca/g7/scholar/bailin/bailin2000.pdf. Zugegriffen am 10.05.2021.

  • Becker, Gary S. 1993. Der ökonomische Ansatz zur Erklärung menschlichen Verhaltens, 2. Aufl. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergmann, Julian, und Arne Niemann. 2015. Theories of European integration. In The SAGE handbook of foreign policy, Hrsg. Knud Erik Jorgensen et al., Bd. 1, 166–182. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieling, Hans-Jürgen. 2003. Internationale Politische Ökonomie. In Theorien der Internationalen Beziehungen, Hrsg. Siegfried Schieder und Manuela Spindler, 363–390. Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bieling, Hans-Jürgen. 2011. Internationale Politische Ökonomie. Eine Einführung, 2. Aufl. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bieling, Hans-Jürgen, Tobias Haas, und Julia Lux. 2013. Entwicklung und Perspektiven der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie (IPÖ) nach der Weltfinanzkrise. Zeitschrift für Außen- und Sicherheitspolitik 6(1): 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanchard, Jean-Marc F. 2021. Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) blues: Powering BRI research back on track to avoid choppy seas. Journal of Chinese Political Science 26: 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, Kenneth E. 1962. Conflict and defense. A general theory. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradlow, Daniel D. 2018. Assessing the potential for global economic governance reform. International Organisations Research Journal 13(4):213–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brautigam, Deborah. 2020. A critical look at Chinese „debt-trap diplomacy“: the rise of a meme. Area Development and Policy 5(1): 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, und David Lalman. 1992. War and reason. Domestic and international imperatives. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bush, Ray. 2018. Africa: A political economy of continued crisis. Africa focus 31(2): 23–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busumtwi-Sam, James, und Laurent Dobuzinskis. 2003. Turbulences and new directions in global political economy. New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Steve. 1997. In search of the democratic peace: Problems and promise. Mershon International Studies Review 41(1): 59–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. K. 2016. China in Africa: A threat to African countries? Strategic Review for Southern Africa 38(2): 100–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Ian. 2011. China and the United States: A succession of hegemonies? International Affairs 87(1): 13–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cling, Jean-Pierre. 2014. The future of global trade and the WTO. Foresight 16(2): 109–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, Paul. 2008. International political economy: Some African applications. Journal of African Economies 17(Suppl 1): 110–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collison, Sarah. 1999. ‚Issue-systems‘, ‚multi-level games‘ and the analysis of the EU’s external commercial and associated policies: A research agenda. Journal of European Public Policy 6(2): 206–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, Robert W. 1998. Weltordnung und Hegemonie: Grundlagen der „Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie“. Philipps-Universität Marburg: Forschungsgruppe Europäische Gemeinschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, Christopher, John Sender, und Arkebe Oqubay. 2020. African economic development. evidence, theory, policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • CRS (Congressional Research Service). 2020. International economic policy coordination at the G-7 and the G-20. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czech, Slawomir, und Monika Krakowiak-Drzewiecka. 2019. The rationale of Brexit and the theories of European integration. Oeconomia Copernicana 10(4): 589–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deciancio, Melisa, und Cintia Quiliconi. 2020a. IPW beyond Western paradigms: China, Africa, and Latin America in comparative perspektive. In The Routledge handbook to global political economy. Conversations and inquiries, Hrsg. Ernesto Vivares, 457–471. New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deciancio, Melisa, und Cintia Quiliconi. 2020b. Widening the „global conversation“: Highlighting the voices of IPE in the Global South. All Azimuth. https://doi.org/10.2099/allazimuth.726271.

  • Dieter, Herbert. 2021. Der erste Gipfel der Anti-China-Koalition (SWP-Aktuell 43/Juni 2021). Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drezner, Daniel W. 2014. The system worked: Global economic governance during the Great Recession. World Politics 66(1): 123–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecclestone, Richard, Aynsley Kellow, und Peter Carroll. 2013. G20 endorsement in post crisis global governance: More than a toothless talking shop? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 17(2): 298–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehizuelen, M. M. O. 2017. More African countries on the route: The positive and negative impacts of the belt and road initiative. Transnational Corporations Review 9(4): 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etim, Akpan Nse, und Onya Reason. 2018. China and Africa: Strategic partnership or crypto-imperialism? Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences 9(3): 141–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forland, Tor Egil. 1993. The history of economic warfare: International law, effectiveness, strategies. Journal of Peace Research 30(2): 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, Johan. 1971. A structural theory of imperialism. Journal of Peace Research 8(1): 81–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garlick, Jeremy. 2020. The regional impacts of China’s belt and road initiative. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs 49(1): 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giering, Claus. 1997. Europa zwischen Zweckverband und Superstaat. Die Entwicklung der politikwissenschaftlichen Integrationstheorie im Prozess der europäischen Integration. Bonn: Europa Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, Robert. 2001. Global political economy. Understanding the international economic order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, Antonio. 1971. Selections from the prison notebooks. Genf: International Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, Björn. 1992. What is international political economy? In Approaches to the study of international political economy, Hrsg. Helena Linholm, 1–35. Göteborg: Peace and Development Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, Jennifer, und David Sachs. 2021. China’s Belt and Road: Implications for the United States. New York: Council on Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollman, Jennifer, und David Sacks. 2021. China’s belt and road. Implications for the United States. New York: Council of Foreign Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Shale, und Uk Heo, Hrsg. 2001. The political economy of international financial crisis. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, et al. 2007. Economic sanctions reconsidered, 3. Aufl. Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1993. The clash of civilizations. Foreign Affairs 72(3): 22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, Samuel P. 1997. Der Kampf der Kulturen – The Clash of Civilizations. Die Neugestaltung der Weltpolitik im 21. Jahrhundert, 7. Aufl. München/Wien: Siedler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurt, Stephen R. 2020. African agency and EU-ACP relations beyond the Cotonou Agreement. Journal of Contemporary European Research 16(2): 139–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. John. 2014. From hegemony to the balance of power: The rise of China and American grand strategy in East Asia. International Journal of Korean Unification Studies 23(2): 41–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF (International Monetary Fund). 2020. World economic outlook October 2020: A long and difficult ascent. Washington, DC: IMF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishaque, Waseem, Aman Ullah, und Safia. 2018. China’s Debt Diplomacy and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC): Implications for Pakistan. Global Political Review 3(1): 120–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain, Romi. 2019. The South China sea issue. Indian Journal of Asian Affairs 32(1/2): 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzenstein, Peter. 1985. Small states in world markets. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, Raza Ali, Muhammad Asim, und Fatima Maham. 2019. The role and impact of China’s trade internationaliszation: A paradigm shift in the world economy. Journal of Independent Studies and Research – Management, Social Sciences and Economics (Karachi u. a.) 17(2): 121–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khisa, Moses. 2019. Whose Africa is rising? Review of African Political Economy 46(160): 304–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, Jonathan. 1995. Currency and coercion. The political economy of international monetary power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Korsch, Karl. 1974. Die Entwicklung der Politischen Ökonomie. In Zwei Ansätze der Politischen Ökonomie. Marxismus und ökonomische Theorie der Politik, Hrsg. Bruno S. Frey und Werner Meißner, 11–22. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer Athenäum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 2020. Arguing with Zombies: Economics, Politics, and the Fight for a Better Future. New York: Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul, Maurice Obstfeld, und Marc Melitz. 2019. Internationale Wirtschaft: Theorie und Politik der Außenwirtschaft, 11. Aufl. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, Nicholas A. 2012. Planning Armageddon. British economic warfare and the First World War. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, Thomas C., James N. Rosenau, und Amy C. Verdun, Hrsg. 2000. Strange power. Shaping the parameters of international relations and international political economy. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin, Wladimir Iljitsch. 1987. Der Imperialismus als höchstes Stadium des Kapitalismus. In Ausgewählte Werke, Hrsg. W. I. Lenin, 164–257. Moskau: Progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi-Faur, David. 1997. Economic nationalism: From Friedrich List to Robert Reich. Review of International Studies 23(3): 359–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy, David L. 2021. COVID-19 and global governance. Journal of Management Studies. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12654.

  • Liberman, Peter. 1996. Does conquest pay? The exploitation of occupied industrial societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Political Science Review 53:69–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • List, Friedrich. 1950. Das nationale System der Oekonomie, 6. Aufl. Jena: G. Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ly, Bora. 2020. China and global governance: Leadership through BRI. Cogent Social Sciences 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2020.1801371.

  • Marx, Karl, und Friedrich Engels. 1989. Ausgewählte Werke in sechs Bänden, Bd. I, 15. Aufl. Ostberlin: Dietz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maswood, Javed. 2008. International political economy and globalization, 2. Aufl. Singapur: World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mazrui, Ali A. 1990. Cultural forces in world politics. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, Susan M. 1997. Interdependence and conflict. Mershon International Studies Review 41(1): 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mhandara, Lawrence, Charity Manyeruke, und Eve Nyemba. 2013. Debating China’s new role in Africa’s political economy. African East-Asian Affairs 2:79–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, John Stuart. 1909. Principles of Political economy. London: Longman, Green & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Edward S. 2007. Bankrupting the enemy. The U.S. financial siege of Japan before Pearl Harbor. Annapolis: U.S. Naval Institute Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modebadze, Valeri. 2020. US-China rivalry for global hegemony. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs 6(2): 167–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, Hans. 1963. Macht und Frieden. Grundlegung einer Theorie der internationalen Politik. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, Layna, und Davida Singer. 2009. The Global Financial Crisis: Lessons and Opportunities for International Political Economy. International Interactions 35(4): 420–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R. Thomas. 2008. Patriots and profiteers. Economic warfare, embargo busting, and state-sponsored crime, 2. Aufl. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ngwakwe, Collins C. 2015. Is EPA an obscure coercion? A critical reflection from the literature and agenda for research. Journal of Governance and Regulation 4(4): 747–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph. 1990a. Bound to lead. The changing nature of American power. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph. 1990b. Soft power. Foreign Policy 80(3): 153–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nye, Joseph. 2008. The powers to lead: Soft, hard, and smart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brian, Robert, und Marc Williams. 2010. Global political economy. Evolution and dynamics, 3. Aufl. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oatley, Thomas. 2018. International political economy, 6. Aufl. New York: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Öberg, Maria, Kristina Nilsson, und Charlotta Johansson. 2016. Governance of major transport corridors involving stakeholders. Transportation Research Procedia 14:860–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohiorhenuan, John F. E., und Zoe Keeler. 2008. International political economy and african economic development: A survey of issues and research agenda. Journal of African Economies 17(Suppl 1): 140–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okolo, A. L., und J. O. Akwu. 2016. China’s foreign direct investment in Africa’s land: Hallmarks of neo-colonialism or south-south cooperation? Africa Review 8(1): 44–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oneal, John R., und Bruce M. Russett. 1997. The classical liberals were right: Democracy, interdependence, and conflict, 1950–1985. International Studies Quarterly 41(2): 267–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opratko, Benjamnin, und Oliver Prausmüller, Hrsg. 2011. Gramsci global: Neogramscianische Perspektiven in der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie. Hamburg: Argument Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osaretin, Idahosa, Mary Ehiosuomwan, und Edith Ukpebor. 2013. Africa and the international political economy: Meeting the challenges of the global economic meltdown. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 2(2): 243–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahre, Robert. 1998. Leading questions. How hegemony affects the international political economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palan, Ronen, Hrsg. 2013. Global political economy. Contemporary theories, 2. Aufl. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radnitzky, Gerard, und Peter Bernholz, Hrsg. 1987. Economic imperialism. The economic approach applied outside the field of economics. New York: Pwpa Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, Zia Ur. 2020. A comprehensive overview of China’s belt and road initiative and its implication for the region and beyond. Journal of Public Affairs 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.2298.

  • Ramphal, Shridath. 1998. Die Notwendigkeit einer Weltordnungspolitik. Internationale Politik 53(11): 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, Jeffrey. 2018. Imperialism and the Middle Kingdom: The Xi Jinping administration’s peripheral diplomacy with developing states. Third World Quarterly 39(5): 976–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, Dani. 2020. Putting global governance in its place. The World Bank Research Observer 35:1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosamond, Ben. 2000. Theories of European integration. Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Klaus, und Karlhans Sauernheimer. 2006. Theorie der Außenwirtschaft, 14. Aufl. München: Vahlen.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosecrance, Richard. 1987. Der neue Handelsstaat. Herausforderungen für Politik und Wirtschaft. Frankfurt a. M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotte, Ralph. 1994. Ökonomische Theorieansätze in der Internationalen Politik: Ein einführender Überblick. München: Universität der Bundeswehr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotte, Ralph. 1998. International commitment and domestic politics: A note on the maastricht case. European Journal of International Relations 4(1): 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotte, Ralph. 2002a. Vom „Zwiespalt der Kulturen“ zum „Clash of Civilizations“: Das exemplarische Scheitern des Liberalen Friedens 1914 und seine Lehren für die internationale Politik der Gegenwart. Neuried: ars et unitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotte, Ralph. 2002b. Der Liberale Frieden als „neues Paradigma“ der Internationalen Politik? Theoretische und empirische Probleme. Zeitschrift für Politik 49(4): 380–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotte, Ralph. 2003. G7/G8 und Global Governance in der Wirtschafts- und Finanzpolitik. Perspektiven aus Sicht der Internationalen Politischen Ökonomie. In Globalisierung und Perspektiven internationaler Verantwortung. Problemstellungen, Analysen, Lösungsstrategien: Eine systematische Bestandsaufnahme, Hrsg. Reinhard Meier-Walser und Peter Stein, 499–532. München: De Gruyter Saur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotte, Ralph. 2004. The political economy of EMU and the EU stability pact. In Fiscal federalism and European economic integration, Hrsg. Mark Baimbridge und Phillip Whyman, 48–66. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotte, Ralph. 2005. Zur Didaktik politikwissenschaftlicher Theorien der europäischen Integration: Ein praxisorientierter Überblick. Zeitschrift für Hochschuldidaktik 5:54–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotte, Ralph. 2017. Krieg und Wirtschaft. Beiträge zur Politischen Ökonomie von Kriegführung und Kriegswirkung. Berlin: epubli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotte, Ralph. 2019. Das Phänomen Krieg. Eine sozialwissenschaftliche Bestandsaufnahme. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saltnes, Johanne Døhlie, et al. 2020. EU aid for trade: Mitigating global trade injustices? Third World Quarterly 41(12): 1992–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, Sabine. 2013. Theoretical apporaches to European integration. Basingstoke: Red Globe Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirm, Stefan A. 2019. Internationale Politische Ökonomie. Eine Einführung, 4. Aufl. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Florian, Hrsg. 2021. Global perspectives on china’s belt and road initiative. Asserting agency through regional connectivity. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholl, Bernd, Ana Peric, und Mathias Niedermaier, Hrsg. 2019. Spatial and transport infrastructure development in Europe: Example of the orient/east-med corridor. Hannover: Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz, Benjamin. 1996. Why America thinks it has to run the world. Atlantic Monthly 277(6): 92–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silberner, Edmund. 1946. The problem of war in nineteenth century economic thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Ajit. 2020. The myth of „debt-trap diplomacy“ and realities of Chinese development finance. Third World Quarterly 42(2): 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SIPRI (Stockholm International Peace Reseach Institute). 2021. Trends in world military expenditure, 2020, SIPRI fact sheet, April 2021. Stockholm: SIPRI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephen, Matthew. 2017. Emerging powers and emerging trends in global governance. Global Governance 23(3): 483–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevis, Dimitris, und Valerie J. Assetto, Hrsg. 2001. The international political economy of the environment, critical perspectives. Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph. 2010. Im freien Fall – Vom Versagen der Märkte zur Neuordnung der Weltwirtschaft, 2. Aufl. München: Siedler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1984. What about international relations? In Paths to international political economy, Hrsg. Susan Strange, 183–197. London: George Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1987. The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization 41:551–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1989. Toward a theory of transnational empire. In Global changes and theoretical challenges. Approaches to world politics for the 1990s, Hrsg. Ernst-Otto und James N. Rosenau, 161–176. Lexington/Toronto: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1994a. States and markets, 2. Aufl. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1994b. Wake up, Krasner! The world has changed. Review of International Political Economy 1(2): 209–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1996. The retreat of the state. The diffusion of power in the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1998. Mad money. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Strange, Susan. 1999. The westfailure system. Review of International Studies 25(3): 345–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, Arockiasamy. 2014. International responses to the financial and economic crisis. Asian Journal of Research in Business Economics and Management 4(1): 70–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanchum, Michael. 2021. Europe-Africa connecticity outlook 2021: Post-Covid-19 challenges and strategic opportunities, Istituto Affari Internazionali Papers 20. Rom: Istituto Affari Internazionali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Ian, und Tim Zajontz. 2020. In a fix: Africa’s place in the Belt and Road Initiative and the reproduction of dependency. South African Journal of International Affairs 27(3): 277–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooze, Roger, und Christopher May, Hrsg. 2002. Authority and markets. Susan Strange’s writings on international political economy. New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underhill, Geoffrey R. D. 2000. State, market, and global political economy: Genealogy of an (inter-?) discipline. International Affairs 76(4): 805–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volgy, Thomas J., und Lawrence E. Imwalle. 2000. Two faces of hegemonic strength: Structural versus relational capabilities. International Interactions 26(3): 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The capitalist world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2018. Welt-System-Analyse. Eine Einführung. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, Kenneth. 1979. Theory of international politics. Reading: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weede, Erich. 1995. Economic policy and international security: Rent-seeking, free trade and democratic peace. European Journal of International Relations 1(4): 519–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Liang. 2021. China’s institutional statecraft under Xi Jinping: Has the AIIB served China’s interest? Journal of Contemporary China 30(128): 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wessels, Wolfgang. 1992. Staat und (west-) europäische Integration. Die Fusionsthese. Politische Vierteljahresschrift 33(Sonderheft 23): 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, Antje, Tanja A. Börzel, und Thomas Dietz. 2009. European integration theory, 2. Aufl. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Chien-Huei. 2018. Global economic governance in the wake of the Asian infrastructure investment bank: Is China remaking Bretton Woods? Journal of World Investment & Trade 19(3): 542–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing, Yuqing. 2016. The Asian infrastructure investment bank and China’s role in regional economic governance. East Asian Policy 8(2): 25–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarate, Juan C. 2015. Treasury’s war. The unleashing of a new era of financial warfare. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, Suisheng. 2016. China as a rising power versus the US-led world order. Rising Powers Quarterly 1(1): 13–21.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Deutschland

    Ralph Rotte

Authors
  1. Ralph Rotte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ralph Rotte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Frank Sauer

  2. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Luba von Hauff

  3. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Deutschland

    Carlo Masala

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert an Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rotte, R. (2024). Internationale Politische Ökonomie in den Internationalen Beziehungen. In: Sauer, F., von Hauff, L., Masala, C. (eds) Handbuch Internationale Beziehungen. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33953-1_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33952-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33953-1

  • eBook Packages: Social Science and Law (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation