Skip to main content

Organisieren ohne Organisationen?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Organisation über Grenzen

Part of the book series: Organisation und Pädagogik ((ORGAPÄD,volume 29))

  • 1683 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Der vorliegende Beitrag vereint zwei Textteile in sich, die Impulse für den organisationspädagogischen Diskurs bereithalten. Der erste Teil plädiert für die verstärkte Fokussierung der Organisationsforschung auf einen immer noch vernachlässigten Untersuchungsgegenstand: das Organisieren. Er rekapituliert dabei zentrale Motive meiner Theorie des Organisierens angesichts der gegenwärtigen Debatten um Technologisierung und Digitalisierung. Im zweiten Teil lote ich das Potential einer theoretischen Perspektive für die Erforschung des Organisierens aus: des Konstruktivismus, insbesondere in seiner sozialkonstruktivistischen Spielart.

Übersetzt aus dem Englischen von Silvia und Andreas Schröer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Im englischen Original stammen die Beiträge aus der zweiten Auflage meines Buches „A Theory of Organizing“ von 2014.

  2. 2.

    Stichworte: Organisieren, Organisation. Mehr zu diesem Thema in Czarniawska (2010a).

  3. 3.

    “Officialization is the process whereby the group (or those who dominate it) teaches itself and masks from itself its own truth, binds itself by a public profession which sanctions and imposes what it utters, tacitly defining the Iimits of the thinkable and unthinkable and so contributing to the maintenance of the social order from which it derives its power. It follows that the intrinsic difficulty of any explicit statement of the logic of practice is intensified by the obstacle of the whole set of authorized representations in which the group is willing to recognize itself.” (Bourdieu 1990, S. 108; italics mine).

Literatur

  • Ahrne, G., & Brunsson, N. (2011). Organization outside organizations: The significance of partial organization. Organization, 18 (1), (S. 83–104).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aronson, E. (1972). The social animal. New York, NY: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann, Z. (2003). Razent osobno [Together, Apart], Krakow: Wydawnictwo Literackie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P, & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. New York, NY: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). Logic of practice. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2001). Is it possible to be a constructivist consultant? Management learning, 32 (2), (S. 253–272).

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2002). A tale of three cities, or the clocalization of city management. Oxford: oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2003). "Social constructionism-and organization studies", in Robert Westwood und Stewart Clegg (Hrsg.), Debating Organization. Punkt Kontrapunkt in den Organisationsforschung, Oxford: Blackwell, S. 128–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2010a). Going back to go forward: On Studying organizing in action nets. In T. Hernes & S. Meitlis (Eds.), Prozess, sensemaking and organizing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2010b). Translation impossible? Accounting for a city project. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23 (3), (S. 420–437).

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B. (2014). A Theory of Organizing. Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B, & Sevón, G. (1996). Introduction. In Dies. (Eds.), Translating Organizational Change (S. 1–12). Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska, B., & Sevón, G. ( 2005). Global ideas. How ideas, objects and practices travel in the global economy. Malmö/Copenhagen: Liber/CBS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, N. (2012). Vanished Kingdoms. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePamphilis, D. (2008). Mergers, Acquisitions, and Other Restructuring Activities. New York, NY: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1994). Realities and Relationships. Soundings in Social Construction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grass, G. (2002). Im Krebsgang. Eine Novelle. Göttingen: Steidl Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grass, G. (2003). Grabwalk. Orlando, FL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakansson, H., & Johansson, J. (Eds.) (2001). Business Networking Learning. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (Ed.) (1986). The Social Construction of Emotions. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzner, B. (1968). Reality Construction in Society. Cambridge, MA: Schenkman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, B. (1994). On Evil Organizations and Illusory Reforms. In B. Czarniawska & P. Guillet de Monthoux (Eds.), Good Novels, Better Management. Reading Organizational Realities in Fiction (S. 65–92). Reading: Harwoord Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knorr-Cetina, K. (1994). Primitive Klassifikation und Postmoderne: Auf dem Weg zum soziologischen Begriff der Fiktion.Theorie, Kultur und Gesellschaft, 11(3), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamoreoux, N. R. (2004). Partnerships, Corporations, and the Limits on Contractual Freedom in U. S. History: An Essay in economic, law and culture. In K. Lipartito & D. B. Sicilia (Eds.), Constructing Corporate America: History, Politics, Culture (S. 29–65). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, Action and Belief (S. 261–277). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1998). Artefaktens återkomst. Stockholm: Nerenius and Santérus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s Hope. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social. An Introduction to Actor-Network Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megens, H., & Martin, B. (2003). Cybermethod: An Assessment. First Monday, 8 (2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Michels, R. ([1911] 1915). Political Parties. A Sociological Study of the Oligarchical Tendencies of modern Democracy. New York, NY: Heart’s International Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molière, J.-B. P. (1670). Le Bourgeois gentilhomme. Paris: Le Roy & Ballard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, M (1998). Judgment Day: Cyborganization, humanism and postmodern ethics. Organization, 5 (4), (S. 503–518).

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1986). Complex Organizations. A Critical Essay. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of Pragmatism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarry, E. (1985). The Body in Pain: The Making and Unmaking of the World. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The Power of Organizing without Organizations. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sismondo, S. (1993). Some Social Constructions. Social Studies of Science, 23, (S. 515–553).

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith Ring, P, & Van de Ven, A. (1992). Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 13 (7), (S. 483–498).

    Google Scholar 

  • Strindberg, A. ([1879] 1913). The Red Room. New York, NY: G. B. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1996). Drop your tools: An allegory for organization studies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (2), (S. 301–313).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Czarniawska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Czarniawska, B. (2021). Organisieren ohne Organisationen?. In: Schröer, A., Köngeter, S., Manhart, S., Schröder, C., Wendt, T. (eds) Organisation über Grenzen . Organisation und Pädagogik, vol 29. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33379-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33379-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33378-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33379-9

  • eBook Packages: Education and Social Work (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics