Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flexibilisierung von Arbeitswelten in der digitalen Transformation – Ansatzpunkte für die erfolgreiche Gestaltung von Homeoffice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Digitale Arbeitswelt

  • 16k Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Technologische, sozioökonomische und kulturelle Entwicklungen der letzten Jahrzehnte sowie zuletzt die Covid-19-Pandemie führten zu einer erhöhten Nachfrage nach flexiblen Arbeitsformen wie Homeoffice. In der Forschung wird danach gefragt, welche Faktoren die Umsetzung von flexiblen Arbeitsmodellen in Unternehmen beeinflussen und wie die Faktoren miteinander zusammenhängen. Bisher bietet die Forschung allerdings zu wenige Ansatzpunkte, um relevante Handlungsempfehlungen für eine erfolgreiche Umsetzung von Homeoffice für die Praxis abzuleiten. In dieser Fallstudie können auf organisationaler Ebene technologische, formelle und informelle Rahmenbedingungen, auf interaktionaler Ebene das Team und die Kommunikation sowie auf individueller Ebene Präferenzen, Kompetenzen und personenbezogene Rahmenbedingungen der Beschäftigten als relevante Einflussfaktoren identifiziert werden. Die Themenfelder sind eng miteinander verbunden, wobei sich vor allem stark vernetzte und einflussreiche Faktoren, wie formelle und technologische Rahmenbedingungen sowie Kommunikation, als Ansatzpunkte für die Gestaltung von Homeoffice eignen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Aguilera, A., Lethiais, V., Rallet, A., & Proulhac, L. (2016). Home-based telework in France: Characteristics, barriers and perspectives. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 92, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, T., Golden, T., & Shockley, K. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(2), 40–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, A., Kaplan, S., & Vega, R. (2015). The impact of telework on emotional experience: When, and for whom, does telework improve daily affective well-being? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 882–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold, D., Kampkötter, P., & Steffes, S. (2016). Homeoffice als Herausforderung für die Mitarbeiterführung. PERSONALquarterly, 3, 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, C., Wrzesniewski, A., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2012). Knowing where you stand: Physical isolation, perceived respect, and organizational identification among virtual employees. Organization science, 23(3), 743–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, K., & Beauregard, T. (2016). Strategies for successful telework: How effective employees manage work/home boundaries. Strategic HR Review, 15(3), 106–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathini, D., & Kandathil, G. (2019). An orchestrated negotiated exchange: Trading home-based telework for intensified work. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayrak, T. (2012). IT support services for telecommuting workforce. Telematics and Informatics, 29(3), 286–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belle, S., Burley, D., & Long, S. (2015). Where do I belong? High-intensity teleworkers’ experience of organizational belonging. Human Resource Development International, 18(1), 76–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentley, T., Teo, S., McLeod, L., Tan, F., Bosua, R., & Gloet, M. (2016). The role of organisational support in teleworker wellbeing: A socio-technical systems approach. Applied ergonomics, 52, 207–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boell, S., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., & Campbell, J. (2016). Telework paradoxes and practices: The importance of the nature of work. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 114–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Hislop, D., & Cartwright, S. (2016). Social support in the workplace between teleworkers, office-based colleagues and supervisors. New Technology, Work and Employment, 31(2), 161–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, G., Chowhan, J., & Cooper, T. (2014). Dialing it in: A missed opportunity regarding the strategic use of telework? Industrielle Beziehungen, 69(3), 550–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom, T. (2013). Telecommuting and Leadership Style. Public Personnel Management, 42(3), 438–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMenezes, L., & Kelliher, C. (2017). Flexible working, individual performance, and employee attitudes: Comparing formal and informal arrangements. Human Resource Management, 56(6), 1051–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducki, A., Gerstenberg, S., & Nguyen, H. (2017). Mobiles Arbeiten: Konsequenzen für die strategische Personalarbeit. PERSONALquarterly, 69(2), 28–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewinger, D., Ternès, J., Koerbel, J., & Towers, I. (2016). Arbeitswelt im Zeitalter der Individualisierung. Trends: Multigrafie und Multi-Option in der Generation Y. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. (2007). A set-theoretic approach to organizational configurations. Academy of management review, 32(4), 1180–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonner, K., & Stache, L. (2012). All in a days work, at home: Teleworkers management of micro role transitions and the work-home boundary. New Technology, Work and Employment, 27(3), 242–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gajendran, R., Harrison, D., & Delaney-Klinger, K. (2015). Are telecommuters remotely good citizens? Unpacking telecommuting’s effects on performance via I-deals and job resources. Personnel Psychology, 68(2), 353–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärtner, M., Garten, T., & Huesmann, M. (2016). Flexible Arbeitsmodelle für Führungskräfte. Zum Stand der Forschung. Zeitschrift für Arbeitswissenschaft, 70(4), 220–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golden, T., Veiga, J., & Dino, R. (2008). The impact of professional isolation on teleworker job performance and turnover intentions: Does time spent teleworking, interacting face-to-face, or having access to communication-enhancing technology matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1412–1421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden, T., Veiga, J., & Simsek, Z. (2006). Telecommuting's differential impact on work-family conflict. Is there no place like home? Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1340–1350.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grunau, P., Ruf, K., Steffes, S., & Wolter, S. (2019). Homeoffice bietet Vorteile, hat aber auch Tücken. IAB-Kurzbericht – Aktuelle Analysen aus dem Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, (11), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harker Martin, B., & MacDonnell, R. (2012). Is telework effective for organizations? A meta-analysis of empirical research on perceptions of telework and organizational outcomes. Management Research Review, 35(7), 602–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huesmann, M., Garten, T., & Gärtner, M. (2017). Flexibles Arbeiten in Führung. Wie beurteilen Führungskräfte selber Barrieren und Effekte von flexiblen Arbeitsmodellen. Zeitschrift Führung und Organisation, 86(4), 231–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaakson, K., & Kallaste, E. (2010). Beyond flexibility: Reallocation of responsibilities in the case of telework. New Technology, Work and Employment, 25(3), 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, S., & Kozica, A. (2014). Über Grenzverschiebungen in der neuen, vernetzten Arbeitswelt. In A. Richter (Hrsg.), Vernetzte Organisation (S. 7–15). München: Oldenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, S., Kozica, A., & Wittmann, P. (2017). Führung und Arbeit in einer digitalisierten und datengetriebenen Welt: Ein konfigurationstheoretischer Zugang. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung (zfbf), 72(Sonderheft), 65–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., Engelsted, L., Lei, X., & Lockwood, K. (2017). Unpackaging Manager Mistrust in Allowing Telework. Comparing and Integrating Theoretical Perspectives. Journal of Business and Psychology, (5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffeld, S., Handke, L., & Straube, J. (2016). Verteilt und doch verbunden. Virtuelle Teamarbeit. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Organisationspsychologie, 47(1), 43–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E., Lautsch, B., & Eaton, S. (2009). „Good Teleworking“: Under what conditions does teleworking enhance employees’ well-being? In Y. Amichai-Hamburger (Hrsg.), Technology and Psychological Well-Being (S. 148–173). Cambridge: University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, M., & Janneck, M. (2013). Kommunikation und Kooperation in Virtuellen Teams. Gruppendynamik und Organisationsberatung, 44(4), 361–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lautsch, B., Kossek, E., & Eaton, S. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62(6), 795–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, A., Tsui, A., & Hinings, C. (1993). Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analyses. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1175–1195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Offstein, E., Morwick, J., & Koskinen, L. (2010). Making telework work: Leading people and leveraging technology for competitive advantage. Strategic HR Review, 9(2), 32–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peretz, H., Fried, Y., & Levi, A. (2017). Flexible work arrangements, national culture, organisational characteristics, and organisational outcomes. A study across 21 countries. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(1), 182–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P., & Batenburg, R. (2015). Telework adoption and formalisation in organisations from a knowlegde transfer perspective. International Journal of Work Innovation, 3(1), 251–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, P., Ligthart, P., Bardoel, A., & Poutsma, E. (2016). ‘Fit’ for telework’? Cross-cultural variance and task-control explanations in organizations’ formal telework practices. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27(21), 2582–2603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spreitzer, G., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative Work Arrangements: Two Images of the New World of Work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troup, C., & Rose, J. (2012). Working from home: do formal or informal telework arrangements provide better work–family outcomes? Community, Work and Family, 15(4), 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Ven, A., Ganco, M., & Hinings, C. (2013). Returning to the frontier of contingency theory of organizational and institutional designs. The Academy of Management Annals, 7(1), 393–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vega, R., Anderson, A., & Kaplan, S. (2015). A within-person examination of the effects of telework. Journal of Business and Psychology, 30(2), 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2014). Case study research. Design and methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hochschule Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Deutschland

    Madlen Müller

Authors
  1. Madlen Müller
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Madlen Müller .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Universität der Bundeswehr München, Neubiberg, Germany

    Stephan Kaiser

  2. Hochschule Reutlingen, Reutlingen, Germany

    Arjan Kozica

  3. AOK Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart, Germany

    Frank Böhringer

  4. RKW Bayern e.V., Taufkirchen b. München, Germany

    Josef Wissinger

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Müller, M. (2021). Flexibilisierung von Arbeitswelten in der digitalen Transformation – Ansatzpunkte für die erfolgreiche Gestaltung von Homeoffice. In: Kaiser, S., Kozica, A., Böhringer, F., Wissinger, J. (eds) Digitale Arbeitswelt. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33224-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-33224-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-33223-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-33224-2

  • eBook Packages: Business and Economics (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation