Skip to main content

Research Gaps and Research Questions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Strategic Equity Partnerships in Professional Football

Part of the book series: Event- und Impaktforschung ((EIF))

  • 492 Accesses

Abstract

Strategic partnerships in the sport context are discussed from different theoretical views, most notably from a marketing/brand management, strategic management, strategic alliance, or financial perspective. Accordingly, different terminologies are used ranging from “co-branding partnerships” (e.g., Kahuni et al., 2009; Motion et al., 2003; Simonin & Ruth, 1998), “strategic partnerships” (e.g., Adam & Hovemann, 2018; Urriolagoitia & Planellas, 2007; Groscuth, 2005), “strategic relationships” (Farrelly, 2010), “strategic alliances” (e.g., Morgan et al., 2014; Hecox, 2007; Farrelly & Quester, 2005a), and “(strategic) investors” (e.g., Welling & Westhoff, 2018; Leister, 2017; Rentz, 2015). However, these terms are mostly used synonymously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Brand equity is defined as “a set of assets and liabilities linked to a brand's name and symbols that adds to or subtracts from the value provided by a product or service to a firm and/or that firm's customers. The major asset categories are: brand name awareness, brand loyalty, perceived quality, and brand associations” (Aaker, 1996; 78).

  2. 2.

    Degenerative episode is defined as “an episode having a negative effect on a relationship's state by decreasing cooperation, trust, mutual understanding and joint benefits” (Schurr, 2007; 165).

  3. 3.

    A soft loan is an interest-free loan provided by a sugar daddy for his club (Franck & Lang, 2014).

  4. 4.

    Critical success factors are “those characteristics, conditions, or variables that, when properly sustained, maintained, or managed, can have a significant impact on the success of a firm competing in a particular industry” (Leidecker & Bruno, 1984; 24). In this study, critical success factors include those characteristics/aspects which attract corporations to enter into an equity partnership. These are referred to as ‘attracting factors’ comprise those conditions which need to be in place to enter into an equity partnership. These are referred to as ‘basic requirements’.

  5. 5.

    Strategic intent is classified as the long-term (future) business direction of the company (Johnston et al., 2011; Todeva & Knoke, 2005).

  6. 6.

    This question (fan survey) focuses on four types of equity partners identified in literature and qualitative data, namely: a sponsor, a financial investor, a Maecenas, and an oligarch.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Duffner .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Duffner, T. (2020). Research Gaps and Research Questions. In: Strategic Equity Partnerships in Professional Football. Event- und Impaktforschung. Springer Gabler, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-31301-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics