Advertisement

How to Design Trust on Market Platforms?

Chapter
Part of the ZfbF-Sonderheft book series (ZFBFS, volume 75/20)

Abstract

Reputation systems are core components of online platform markets, incentivizing trust and trustworthiness. Small market design details may have large implications on the extent of trade and platform revenues. We selectively review our own and others’ research on the design of reputation mechanisms for platforms highlighting particular issues in the design of feedback systems which may affect feedback behavior and thus the informativeness and effectiveness of feedback information. We also discuss new research on conflict resolution mechanisms for platforms and the arguments for allowing reputation mobility. Finally, we conclude with implications for platform management and users.

Literature

  1. Bajari, P., & Hortaçsu, A. (2004). Economic insights from internet auctions. Journal of Economic Literature, 42(2), 457–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bolton, G., Breuer, K., Greiner, B., & Ockenfels, A., (2019). The design of feedback revision rules – An experimental study. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  3. Bolton, G., Greiner, B., & Ockenfels, A. (2013). Engineering trust: Reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Management Science, 59(2), 265–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolton, G., Greiner, B., & Ockenfels, A., (2018). Dispute resolution or escalation? The strategic gaming of feedback withdrawal options in online markets. Management Science, 64(9), 4009–4031.Google Scholar
  5. Bolton, G., Greiner, B., & Ockenfels, A. (in progress). One-sided feedback with two-sided moral hazard – An empirical study.Google Scholar
  6. Bolton, G., Katok, E., & Ockenfels, A. (2004). How effective are online reputation mechanisms? An experimental study. Management Science, 50(11), 1587–1602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cabral, L., & Hortaçsu, A. (2010). The dynamics of seller reputation: Evidence from eBay. Journal of Industrial Economics, 58, 54–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dann, D., Teubner, T., & Weinhardt, C. (2019). Poster child and guinea pig—Insights from a structured literature review on Airbnb. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(1), 427–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dellarocas, C. (2004). Building trust on-line: The design of robust reputation mechanisms for online trading communities. In G. Doukidis, N. Mylonopoulos, & N. Pouloudi (Eds.) Social and economic transformation in the digital era (pp. 95–113). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
  10. Dellarocas, C., Dini, F., & Spagnolo, G. (2009). Designing reputation mechanisms, Handbook of Procurement (pp. 446–482).Google Scholar
  11. Easley, D., & Kleinberg, J. (2010). Network effects. In Networks, crowds, and markets: Reasoning about a highly connected world (pp. 509–542). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Eaton, D. H. (2007). The impact of reputation timing and source on auction outcomes. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 7(1), Article 33.Google Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2017). Exploratory study of consumer issues in online peer-to-peer platform markets. http://ec.europa.eu/newsroom/just/item-detail.cfm?&item_id=77704.
  14. European Union. (2018). REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data (General Data Protection Regulation).Google Scholar
  15. Forbes. (2018). As a rare profitable unicorn, Airbnb appears to be worth at least $38 Billion. https://www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2018/05/11/as-a-rare-profitable-unicorn-airbnb-appears-to-be-worth-at-least-38-billion/#3d77a6022741. Accessed 12. Febr. 2019.
  16. Fradkin, A., Grewal, E., & Holtz, D., (2017). The determinants of online review informativeness: Evidence from field experiments on Airbnb, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  17. Greiner, B., & Ockenfels, A. (in progress). One-sided and two-sided feedback systems in markets with one-sided and two-sided moral hazard – An experiment.Google Scholar
  18. Greiner, B., Teubner, T., & Weinhardt, C. (2018). Grundfragen der Plattformökonomie – Wie man Vertrauen designt. In U. Blaurock, M. Schmidt-Kessel, & K. Erler (Eds.), Plattformen – Geschäftsmodell und Verträge (Schriften der Ernst von Caemmerer Stiftung Vol. 10). Nomos.Google Scholar
  19. Houser, D., & Wooders, J. (2005). Reputation in auctions: Theory and evidence from eBay. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 15(2), 353–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hui, X., Saeedi, M., & Neel Sundaresan, N. (2017). Adverse selection or moral hazard: An empirical study. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  21. Jin, G. Z., & Kato, A. (2006). Price, quality and reputation: Evidence from an online field experiment. RAND Journal of Economics, 37(4), 983–1005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein, T. J., Lambertz, C., & Stahl, K. (2016). Market transparency, adverse selection, and moral hazard. Journal of Political Economy, 124(6), 1677–1713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Krämer, J. (2018). Datenschutz 2.0 – Ökonomische Auswirkungen von Datenportabilität im Zeitalter des Datenkapitalismus. In T. Kretschmer et al. (Eds.), Datenkapitalismus – Eine ökonomische Betrachtung (Vol. 98, pp. 459–480).Google Scholar
  24. Livingston, J. A. (2005). How valuable is a good reputation? A Sample Selection Model of Internet Auctions, Review of Economics and Statistics, 87(3), 453–465.Google Scholar
  25. Lucking-Reiley, D., Bryan, D., Prasad, N., & Reeves, D. (2007). Pennies from eBay: The determinants of price in online auctions. Journal of Industrial Economics, 55(2), 223–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Otto, L., Angerer, P., & Zimmermann, S. (2018). Incorporating external trust signals on service sharing platforms. In ECIS 2018 Proceedings, Portsmouth, UK.Google Scholar
  27. Puschmann, T., & Alt, R. (2016). Sharing economy. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 58(1), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., & Kuwabara, K. (2000). Reputation systems. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 45–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R ., Swanson, J., Lockwood, K. (2006). The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment, Experimental Economics 9, 79–101.Google Scholar
  30. Tadelis, S. (2016). Reputation and feedback systems in online platform markets. Annual Review of Economics, 8, 321–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teubner, T., & Dann, D. (2018). How platforms build trust. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  32. Teubner, T., & Hawlitschek, F. (2018). The economics of P2P online sharing. In P. A. Albinsson & B. Y. Perera (Eds.), The sharing economy: Possibilities, challenges, and the way forward (pp. 129–156). Praeger Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Teubner, T., Adam, M. T. P., & Hawlitschek, F. (2020). Unlocking online reputation: On the effectiveness of cross-platform signaling in the sharing economy. Business & Information Systems Engineering 62(6), pp. 501–513.Google Scholar
  34. Teubner, T., Hawlitschek, F., & Adam, M. T. P. (2019). Reputation transfer. Business & Information Systems Engineering 61(2), pp. 229–235.Google Scholar
  35. Teubner, T., Hawlitschek, F., & Dann, D. (2017). Price determinants on Airbnb: How reputation pays off in the sharing economy. Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 5(4), 53–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wessel, M., Thies, F., & Benlian, A. (2017). Competitive positioning of complementors on digital platforms: Evidence from the sharing economy, In ICIS 2017 Proceedings.Google Scholar
  37. Zervas, G., Proserpio, D., & Byers, J., (2015). A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average, Working Paper.Google Scholar
  38. Zloteanu, M., Harvey, N., Tuckett, D., & Livan, G. (2018). Digital identity: The effect of trust and reputation information on user judgement in the sharing economy. PLOS ONE, 13(12), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Der/die Herausgeber bzw. der/die Autor(en), exklusiv lizenziert durch Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2021

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wirtschaftsuniversität WienWienÖsterreich
  2. 2.Technische Universität BerlinBerlinDeutschland
  3. 3.Einstein Center Digital FutureBerlinDeutschland
  4. 4.Karlsruher Institut für TechnologieKarlsruheDeutschland

Personalised recommendations