Advertisement

Virtual validation of autonomous vehicle safety through simulation-based testing

  • Mustafa Saraoğlu
  • Qihang Shi
  • Andrey Morozov
  • Klaus Janschek
Conference paper
  • 252 Downloads
Part of the Proceedings book series (PROCEE)

Zusammenfassung

Full validation of the safety of an autonomous vehicle requires excessive amounts of testing and driving hours, which is impossible to achieve without virtual simulations. Therefore, companies seek efficient and smart testing strategies to virtually validate the safety of autonomous vehicle functions aiming to achieve lower costs and less time to market. Simulation-based testing for autonomous and connected vehicles is essential for the future generation of transportation systems.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. 1.
    SAMSUNG Business, “The Connected Vehicle Comes of Age”, Featuring research from Gartner, 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bernard J. Arseneau, Santanu Roy, Joshua Salazar, Joey Yang, “Autonomous and Connected Vehicles Preparing for the Future of Surface Transportation”, HDR, 2015.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    John Bradburn, David Williams, Rob Piechocki, Kat Hermans, “Connected & Autonomous Vehicles Introducing the Future of Mobility”, Atkins and Intelligent Mobility, 2015.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Juez, G., Amparan, E., Lattarulo, R., Rastelli, J.P., Ruiz, A., and Espinoza, H. (2017). Safety assessment of automated vehicle functions by simulation-based fault injection. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES), 214-219, doi:10:1109/ICVES:2017:7991928.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Silveira, A.M., Arajo, R.E., and de Castro, R. (2012). Fieev: A co-simulation framework for fault injection in electrical vehicles. In 2012 IEEE International Conference on Vehicular Electronics and Safety (ICVES 2012), 357-362. doi: 10:1109/ICVES:2012:6294254.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Krajzewicz, D., Erdmann, J., Behrisch, M., and Bieker, L. (2012). Recent development and applications of SUMO - Simulation of Urban MObility. International Journal On Advances in Systems and Measurements, 5(3&4), 128-138.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Backfrieder, C., Mecklenbruker, C.F., and Ostermayer, G. (2013). TraffSim : a traffic simulator for investigating benefits ensuing from intelligent traffic management. In 2013 European Modelling Symposium, 451-456. doi: 10:1109/EMS:2013:76.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Treiber, M. and Kesting, A. (2010). An open-source microscopic traffic simulator. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 2(3), 6-13. doi: 10:1109/MITS:2010:939208.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Saraoglu, Mustafa, Andrey Morozov, and Klaus Janschek. “MOBATSim: MOdel-Based Autonomous Traffic Simulation Framework for Fault-Error-Failure Chain Analysis.” IFAC-PapersOnLine 52.8 (2019): 239-244.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Minnerup, P. M. (2017). An Efficient Method for Testing Autonomous Driving Software against Nondeterministic Influences (Doctoral dissertation, Technische Universität München).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saraoğlu, Mustafa, et al. “ErrorSim: A tool for error propagation analysis of simulink models.” International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. Springer, Cham, 2017.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    ISO 26262-2:2018(en) Road vehicles — Functional safety. International Standardization Organization.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    D. N. Lee. A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time to collision. Perception, 1976.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kristofer D. Kusano and Hampton C. Gabler. Safety benefits of forward collision warning, brake assist, and autonomous braking systems in rearend collisions. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 13(4):1546–1555, 2012.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Praprut Songchitruksa and Andrew P. Tarko. The extreme value theory approach to safety estimation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 38(4):811– 822, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Michiel M. Minderhoud and Piet H.L. Bovy. Extended time-to-collision measures for road traffic safety assessment. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 33(1):89–97, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Qiang Meng and Jinxian Weng. Evaluation of rear-end crash risk at work zone using work zone traffic data. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 43(4):1291–1300, 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Saraoğlu
    • 1
  • Qihang Shi
    • 1
  • Andrey Morozov
    • 1
  • Klaus Janschek
    • 1
  1. 1.IfATU DresdenDresdenDeutschland

Personalised recommendations