Skip to main content

Comparative methods in practice: Using an iterative approach to explore aviation apprenticeships in England and Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Comparative Vocational Education Research

Part of the book series: Internationale Berufsbildungsforschung ((INBER))

Abstract

In international comparative vocational education and training (VET) research, the discourse concerning the interlinking of theory and empirical practice often runs in one direction and asks: to what extent the theoretical concepts shape the empirical research design. The empirical limitations and challenges of field-based research rarely find their way into the theoretical debate. This is despite the particularly important challenges that need to be faced during field research in comparative VET to prevent misinterpretation and ethnocentrism. This chapter expands the discourse and outlines an iterative, reflective approach to interlink theoretical frameworks and empirical work through an explorative study of aviation apprenticeships in England and Germany. This study set out to examine the impact of international technical standardisation and regulation on the design, organisation and delivery of apprenticeships in the aeronautical and aerospace sectors in England and Germany. We identify the challenges we met during the empirical stage of the research and discuss the ways in which our responses influenced our theoretical elaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aarkrog, V., & Jørgensen, C. H. (Eds.). (2008). Divergence and convergence in education and work. Bern: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amos, S. K., & Parreira do Amaral, M. (Eds.). (2015). Internationale und Vergleichende Erziehungswissenschaft. Geschichte, Theorie, Methode und Forschungsfelder. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anckar, C. (2008). On the applicability of most similar systems design and the most different systems design in comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(5), pp. 389–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckett, D., & Hager, P. (2002). Life, work and learning: Practice in postmodernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bereday, G. (1964). Comparative method in education. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billett, S. (2002). Workplace pedagogic practices: Co-participation and learning. British Journal of Educational Studies, 50(4), pp. 457–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Busemeyer, M. R., & Trampusch, C. (2012). The comparative political economic of collective skill formation. In M. R. Busemeyer & C. Trampusch (Eds.), The political economy of collective skill formation (pp. 3–38). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • EASA (European Union Aviation Safety Agency). (2019). The agency. https://www.easa.europa.eu/the-agency/the-agency. Accessed: 12 September 2019.

  • Epstein, E. H. (2008). Setting the normative boundaries: Crucial epistemological benchmarks in comparative education. Comparative Education, 44(4), pp. 373–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, E. H. (1992). The problematic meaning of ‘comparison’ in comparative education. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Theories and Methods in Comparative Education (pp. 3–24). Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felstead, A., Fuller, A., Jewson, N., & Unwin, L. (2009). Improving Working as Learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, T., & Nerland, M. (Eds.). (2014). Reconceptualising professional learning. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, A., Unwin, L., Felstead, A., Jewson, N., & Kakavelakis, K. (2007). Creating and using knowledge: An analysis of the differentiated nature of workplace learning environments. British Educational Research Journal, 33(5), pp. 743–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georg, W. (2005). Vergleichende Berufsbildungsforschung. In F. Rauner (Ed.), Handbuch der Berufsbildungsforschung (pp. 186–193). Bielefeld: Bertelsmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, A. (1999). Education and globalization in Europe and East Asia. Convergent and divergent trends. Journal of Education Policy, 14(1), pp. 55–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, B. (1965) Problems in education: A comparative approach. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keep, E. (2006). State control of the English education and training system – playing with the biggest train set in the world. Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 58(1), pp. 47–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahiff, A., Li, J., Unwin, L., Zenner, L., & Pilz, M. (2019). Industrial standardisation as a driver for cross-national convergence in training processes: Aviation apprenticeships in England and Germany. European Journal of Education and Training, 43(7/8), pp. 752–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauterbach, U. 2003. Vergleichende Berufsbildungsforschung. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauterbach, U., & Mitter, W. (1998). Theory and methodology of international comparisons. In Cedefop (Ed.), Vocational education and training – the European research field background reportVolume 11. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthes, J. (1992). The operation called “Vergleichen”. In J. Matthes (Ed.), Zwischen den Kulturen? Die Sozialwissenschaften vor dem Problem des Kulturvergleichs (pp.75–99). Göttingen: Schwartz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2000). The world institutionalization of education. In J. Schriewer (Ed.): Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 111–132). Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noah, H. J., & Eckstein, M. A. (1969). Toward a science of comparative education. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, D., & Schweisfurth, M. (2008). Comparative and international education: An introduction to theory, method and practice. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilz, M. (2009). Initial vocational training from a company perspective. A comparison of British and German in-house training cultures. Vocations and Learning, 2(1), pp. 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilz, M. (2012). International comparative research into vocational training: methods and approaches. In M. Pilz (Ed.), The future of vocational education and training in a changing world (pp. 561–588). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilz, M. (2013). Review of the book The political economy of collective skill formation, by M. Busemeyer & C. Trampusch. Retrieved from @ bwp Berufs- und Wirstchaftspädagogik – online website: http://www.bwpat.de/rezensionen/rezension_5-2013_busemeyer_trampusch.pdf. Accessed: 12 September 2019.

  • Pilz, M. (2016). Typologies in comparative vocational education. Existing models and a new approach. Vocations and Learning, 9(3), pp. 295–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, P. (2012). Review of the book The political economy of collective skill formation, by M. Busemeyer & C. Trampusch. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 64(3), pp. 381–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, P., & Unwin, L. (2001). Apprenticeship in the British ‘training market’. National Institute Economic Review, 178(1), pp. 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schriewer, J. (1992). The method of comparison and the need for externalization: Methodical criteria and sociological concepts. In J. Schriewer (Ed.), Theories and methods in comparative education (pp. 25–83). Frankfurt a. M.: Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junmin Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Li, J., Lahiff, A., Unwin, L., Pilz, M. (2020). Comparative methods in practice: Using an iterative approach to explore aviation apprenticeships in England and Germany. In: Pilz, M., Li, J. (eds) Comparative Vocational Education Research. Internationale Berufsbildungsforschung. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29924-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-29924-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer VS, Wiesbaden

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-658-29923-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-658-29924-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics